Essays

Individualism and Collectivism

collectivism

by Igor Alexander

MANY ON THE RIGHT try to reduce politics to being a conflict between “collectivists” and “individualists.” This is a concept that’s been heavily promoted over the years by the John Birch Society (a Jewish false front, sometimes humorously referred to as the B’nai Birch), especially ex-JBS member G. Edward Griffin (of Creature from Jekyll Island fame). (ILLUSTRATION: “Collectivism” is a bad thing, according to Cuckservatives. But in reality, collective action and organization are absolutely necessary for a people’s survival.)

I’m wary of people who try to divide the world between “collectivists” and “individualists” for the following reasons:

1. Because it is impossible to live in a society — any society — without giving up at least some of one’s individual freedom, and without society, one cannot survive. That’s why societies exist in the first place — to ensure our survival. If anyone wants to dispute that, then try this — get yourself airdropped naked in the middle of a wild terrain, and see how long you last. Not even Unabomber Ted Kaczynski was able to live in the wild by himself without occasionally going into town to pick up supplies.

Most people find giving up some of their individual liberties in exchange for roads, clean tap water, cheap electricity, national security, public decency, etc., to be an acceptable trade-off. So it’s not really a question of “collectivism” versus “individualism”; it’s more a matter of what degree of “collectivism” you’re willing to accept in exchange for the perceived benefits.

2. Because the collectivist/individualist paradigm is constantly used to attack white nationalism. The people who embrace this dichotomy view any sort of white racial consciousness as a form of “collectivism” (which it is). If you view people strictly as individuals, then it is not possible to view them as members of racial or ethnic groups. Case in point — I had a white lady, a lesbian, who fanatically believed in all this JBS “collectivist vs individualist” baloney, stubbornly refuse to accept that blacks commit more violent crimes than whites, or that society even has a right to look at whether or not they do. After all, we’re only supposed to judge people as individuals, not according to which race they belong to, right? I’m sorry, but any world-view that requires its adherents to deny reality cannot be good. The “collectivist vs individualist” paradigm almost seems like a secular version of Christianity’s universalism — that every human has a soul and that every individual should only be judged by whether or not he is a good Christian.

Going back to point #1, I maintain that racial collectivism is necessary for our survival, and that anyone who attacks it while promoting “individualism” is either consciously or unconsciously a tool of the New World Order, whose primary goal is the creation of a global plantation filled with rootless, uniformly brown people (ironically, the people who are pushing for this New World Order say they are in favor of “diversity,” when what they are actually trying to do is destroy it).

What those who are concerned about personal freedom (including many so-called “fascists” and “nazis”) ought to oppose is tyranny and despotism, not “collectivism” per se. Collectivism is unavoidable and necessary, and fighting against it is as futile as fighting against the air we breathe.

* * *

Source: Igor Alexander’s Weblog

For Further Reading

Previous post

Columbus Day Out, “Indigenous Peoples” Day In

Next post

Syria: Iran Deploys Troops, Sends in Senior Commander in Support of Russia, Assad

2 Comments

  1. Walt Hampton
    October 14, 2015 at 8:45 pm — Reply

    The Jewess Alisa Zinovievna
    Rosenbaum (Ayn Rand) was and
    is largely responsible for a
    great deal of this disinformation.
    For an inside look at the inner
    workings of a Randian cult,
    see the link below:

    http://whitebiocentrism.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1120&p=3510&hilit=ayn+rand#p2512

  2. Thomas Plaster
    September 10, 2017 at 4:52 pm — Reply

    As long as society is all of one race, then there can be individualism as imagined as by the political Right. All Christian societies of more than one race and significant fractions of each, will have the problems seen in America today. All White societies regardless of which spiritual belief, seem to do OK.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.