A Tale of Three Roberts, part 1: Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

by John Massaro

THE FIRST NEWS ABOUT a novel coronavirus that struck Wuhan, China — the virus, real or imagined, that would come to be known as Covid-19 — was reported in the US on or about December 31, 2019. Thus, the Age of Covid was ushered in at the very beginning of 2020, though it wasn’t until March 13, after more than two months of steadily mounting fear propaganda cranked out by the media, that Donald Trump, then squatting in the White House, declared a state of emergency.

Since then, and especially since the Covid-19 injection campaign began on December 14, 2020, scores of self-styled spokesmen and authorities, most of them dissenting doctors previously unknown to the public, have popped up out of nowhere and made a name for themselves. I’ve read or listened to the opinions and presentations of at least thirty of these new achievers, and while they represent a wide range of character and credibility, most of them are fighting the good fight. Hardly any, however, have come right out and said that this is the end, it’s time to scrap the whole idea of vaccination because it’s an endless saga of fraud and evil. (This latest and deadliest concoction technically is not a vaccine at all, of course, but the same old gangsters are promoting it.) In fact, I know of two prominent doctors — Scott Atlas and Jay Bhattacharya, both affiliated with Stanford University — who decried the fact that many children were missing out on their shots during the disruptive 2020 lockdowns. In my opinion, this was the only good thing that happened in 2020. A few other renowned doctors continued to support the idea of injecting seniors with the Covid vax poison, even after the widespread harm this shot was causing became clear.

Unsurprisingly, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. weighed in on the issue. He was one of the very few, among the field of rookies, who had been a longtime outspoken critic of the vaccine industry, having taken up the cause around 2005. He already had picked up millions of supporters, mostly parents of vaccine-damaged children — easy to do when you’re handsome and your last name is Kennedy. I will concede that he has done good work in spreading awareness of vaccine dangers, and the fetid corruption of the big-name vaccine pushers and profiteers — speaking truth to power, as they say. But I never really liked this guy. He wrote the foreword to Kevin Barry’s Vaccine Whistleblower: Exposing Autism Research Fraud at the CDC, published in 2015. This book is a transcript of four telephone calls, secretly but legally recorded between Dr. Brian Hooker, an activist father of an autistic child, and a conscience-stricken CDC scientist named William Thompson. This is how Kennedy begins his foreword: “I have always been fiercely pro-vaccine. I had all six of my children vaccinated. I believe that vaccines have saved millions of lives and that broad vaccine coverage is desirable. To achieve those goals, we need safe vaccines, transparent and reliable science, and an independent regulatory agency….” Now how can anyone write so scathingly, and brilliantly, about the dangers of vaccines and the evil people surrounding them, then turn around and claim to be not only pro-vaccine, but fiercely so? He tells us he had all his children shot up, but doesn’t tell us what vaccines they got and how many doses. He repeats the old mantra that vaccines have saved millions of lives, but like everyone else who praises them, never goes into detail. Broad coverage is desirable, he says, but what exactly does that mean, and why does he use such a vague term? RFK arrived in this cockamamie world two months after I did, which means that he couldn’t have gotten more than the six doses I got as a child, and our generation did just fine — so why now does he favor “broad coverage,” which implies a Hell of a lot more than six doses for kids? And since there has never been a vaccine batch guaranteed to be safe, and by definition there never can be, how does he propose to change that? For the remainder of his six-page foreword, however, he makes a lot of sense. In fact, most of what he writes on the subject makes sense.

Nevertheless, I’m not aware that this man has ever retracted his claim to be fiercely pro-vaccine. Furthermore, despite his repeated denunciations of vaccine overload that children endure today — which contradicts his desire for “broad coverage” — he has never recommended dropping any vaccine from the CDC schedule. Recently, I read something on the Internet — I wish I had jotted down the source — about someone asking him which childhood vaccines should be eliminated. He gave an evasive answer, something like “That’s for the experts to decide, not me.” I can’t keep track of everything Kennedy writes, so if he’s changed his outlook on anything I’ve discussed, I’ll correct myself.

I did read his book The Real Anthony Fauci, which was published in November 2021, the same month my own book was published. It quickly sold more than a million copies. I’ve sold about 100 copies so far, in addition to two or three hundred sold by organizations I support. As I said, with a name like Kennedy you can’t go wrong. Strangely, his book landed on the prestigious New York Times bestseller list, which impresses boobs, but from what I understand, not only was it never reviewed in this newspaper but the editors refused a full-page ad submitted by Skyhorse, the New York publisher which has brought out several books critical of vaccines. (On June 15, 2022 I sent a letter and a copy of my own book to Tony Lyons, the founder and president of Skyhorse Publishing, asking if we could work something out, as I could use the publicity, but he never replied.) I have mixed feelings about The Real Anthony Fauci, but mostly positive ones. It’s definitely worth reading. It focuses not only on Fauci, but on Bill Gates and a nest of other scoundrels and psychopaths who flop around in the overflowing cesspool of Big Pharma and public health. I’ve long been familiar with the big picture this book illustrates, but not with many small, sordid details, none of which surprised me. My main criticism is that RFK takes the Covid scamdemic seriously, and in too many places he injects his insufferable liberalism. The man really is a confused puppy on a lot of issues. It has never failed to amaze me how nominally intelligent people can think very clearly in some ways, yet in other ways are retards.

Back on April 6, 2018, I wrote Bobby Kennedy a courteous letter, telling him about my own extensive vaccine research and the book I was writing. I mentioned in a critical but polite way his statement about being fiercely pro-vaccine. He had written somewhere that there never had been a long-term study comparing vaccinated with unvaccinated children, and I offered to collaborate with him on such a study — one of many impractical efforts that has added color to my life story. I mailed the letter to his Manhattan residence, which I found on the Internet. I realized it was a longshot, but as they say in the New York state lottery commercials, “Hey, you never know.” I never heard from him.

Upon writing the previous paragraph, I took a little break. I remembered seeing yet another book that RFK had in the works, so I did a quick search. The title is Vaxed-Unvaxxed: Let the Science Speak, co-authored with the aforementioned Brian Hooker. It’s about to be published as I write. I also logged on to Kennedy’s Web site, childrenshealthdefense.com, and found something about his vaccine safety project, with a detailed six-step overview to accomplish this goal. I was not impressed. Except for a brief passage in step six, which mentioned individual rights to refuse a vaccination, it was all toothless half-measures sure to be laughed at and thrown in the waste basket by any bureaucrat. None of them address the core problem of children getting far too many vaccines, nor, needless to say, do any of them question the need for vaccines in the first place. Robert Kennedy was beginning to smell.

Out of curiosity, I then went to a January 3, 2023 healthimpactnews.com article I had copied, but not completely read, entitled “Has Wall Street hijacked the vaccine resistance movement by funding pro-vaccine spokespeople to speak against Covid vaccines?” Bobby K was featured, along with other recently-emerged stars like Peter McCullough, who have done some good but who nevertheless retained their ties to the medical and pharmaceutical establishment, and are still pro-vaccine. There was a 26-second YouTube clip which began with Kennedy again emphasizing — his word — that he was fiercely pro-vaccine, had all his children vaccinated, and this time he added that “We should have policies that encourage full vaccination for all Americans.” What?? The article showed a photo of Kennedy with the caption “$497,013 salary.” There was a link to Children’s Health Defense (CHD) 2021 tax return, IRS form 990, “Return of Organization Exempt from Income Tax,” and sure enough, not only did this dirtbag earn half a million dollars as head of this 501c3 “non-profit” organization, but CHD took in $15,695,358 in contributions and grants that year. An inquiry made by the Web site editor Brian Shilhavy as to where all this money came from went unanswered. Parenthetically, I had no idea that people who worked for non-profit organizations can legally draw a salary. The tax return showed that there are eight employees on the CHD payroll, with RFK listed as chairman and chief legal counsel. He was by far the highest paid. (President and director Mary S. Holland, number two on the list, earned a measly $180,000.) In addition to his exorbitant salary, the approximate net worth of this Janus-faced jerk-off is $60 million, according to wealthypersons.com. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was born into wealth and privilege and that’s all he knows. The millions who think he’s a “man of the people” in his battle against the vaccine criminals are badly fooled. Like quite a few men in the Kennedy clan, including his father and two uncles, John the president and Ted the senator, RFK Jr. has some grave character defects. Much of his personal life is a shambles. In fact, I think his father — who along with his Uncle John had an affair with Marilyn Monroe while they were in office — murdered this sad, exploited woman, on the night of August 4, 1962 by spiking her drink with poison. She felt used by the Kennedys and had threatened to go public with details of her bedroom fun with both of them. You can investigate that juicy story online and decide for yourself if the 1982 tearful confession made to a detective by the actor Peter Lawford, the Kennedys’ brother-in-law, who said he was there that night and witnessed the murder after a furious Kennedy assaulted her, is true. It sounds true to me. Nor is that the only grievous crime attributed to RFK Sr., but I don’t want to make this a four-Robert essay. Not to forget Mary Jo Kopechne and her last ride with Uncle Ted on the night of July 18, 1969. Possibly drunk, Kennedy drove his Oldsmobile 88 off a bridge into a pond, leaving the young woman to drown in the submerged car while he swam to shore. He didn’t report the accident until the next morning. One hell of a bloodline, I must say. I grew up with the Kennedys, so to speak. JFK was assassinated just before my tenth birthday, and RFK Sr. when I was a freshman in high school. It was something to live through those times, and something more to learn the ugly facts about this messed-up family over the years, which are totally at odds with their public image and the wholesome Camelot myth I remember from childhood. But I digress.

Bobby Sox Junior, who may be our next president, spent much of his career as a big shot lawyer going after various huge corporations throughout the Western hemisphere whose operations were poisoning the environment. I’ve never looked into this litigation so I’m not going to comment on it. If Robert accomplished anything worthwhile then fine, more power to him, because I’m all for protecting the natural world from toxic waste, and bringing major polluters to justice, by which I mean long prison sentences at the very least. But I suspect it was mostly legal showboating. Kennedy strikes me as a born publicity hound, a man who is addicted to media attention as earnestly as he was once addicted to heroin. I don’t see much difference between him and Al Sharpton.

Putting aside his Bible thumping, I think very highly of Brian Shilhavy. He’s a fair and honest man who’s on top of his subject. He has some old friends at CHD, and on his own site has reposted an abridged video of Dr. Judy Mikovits that first appeared on the CHD site — “proving that they do put out some very fine work,” in his words. And as much as I dislike RFK Jr., things are not always black and white. As I said, The Real Anthony Fauci is a superb read, and it’s incongruous that he posted an interview with the somewhat ornery Judy Mikovits on his site. Shilhavy, Mikovits, and Jon Rappoport are the only advocates I’ve come across who are total and unequivocal anti-vaxxers. There may be others, but they’re the only prominent ones I know of who have come right out and said that all vaccines are unnecessary, and all of them are potentially dangerous. Even Dr. Suzanne Humphries, for whom I have the greatest respect, has held back from making this open declaration, though it’s implicit in her excellent book, co-authored with Roman Bystrianyk, Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and the Forgotten History. But let me move on to the next Robert.

To be continued. Next subject: Robert Gallo

* * *

Source: Author