Dr. Seuss Was a “Racist,” Oh My!

by Chris Rossetti

HE GAVE AID and comfort to the enemies of White people, and, according to the rich and the powerful, that was fine, even laudable.

He betrayed his nation and his people to Jews and Communism, and savagely attacked any who tried to save America. For that he was lionized and praised.

He fought to get America involved in World War 2 as an ally of the Soviet Union, and ruined the reputations of those who tried to keep us out of that slaughter — and, as a result, millions of people died. And that, too, was regarded as “good” and “moral.”

His name was Theodor Geisel, known to millions of readers as “Dr. Seuss,” the author of children’s books in the 1930s to 1970s that are still popular today. But he was also a vicious, anti-White leftist. A betrayer of his own people. He was such a fanatical supporter of the Jewish agenda to mongrelize and Communize the United States that some people assumed he was a Jew (and honestly, considering what he did, he might as well have been one) — and years later the mayor of Jerusalem actually made him an “honorary Jew” to reward his “fine work.” He evidently wasn’t a Jew, though. But he was the most enthusiastic anti-White, anti-nationalist piece of scum that you could ever have the misfortune to meet.

But in today’s hyper-accelerated anti-White social paradigm, Geisel was a “White racist,” some of whose books must be — and are being — suppressed. Why? As William White Williams recently wrote on White Biocentrism: “In one of Geisel’s banned books he represented Asians with horizontal lines as eyes and holding chop sticks! He represented Africans in another banned book as barefooted and with grass skirts! Horrors!”

Bare feet, grass clothing, and narrow eyes. Enough to get you banned forever these days.

But visceral hatred and gutter-level smears of anyone who would defend White racial integrity, which “Seuss” engaged in for years, gets a pass (those works of his aren’t banned, or suggested to be) — in fact, they got a pass for almost a century now. More than a pass, really — they were praised to the skies.

Apparently Geisel, early in his career, made some cartoons for college and humor magazines that used racial stereotypes. That has put him on the censors’ radar in recent years. Then some of the anti-White academics that your children’s tuition and your tax money pay for got hold of Geisel’s children’s books, and started to “see” all sorts of “White supremacist symbolism” that, needless to say, isn’t really there. But in the Evil Insane Asylum that America has become, such imagined “sins” are enough to get anyone — even dedicated “anti-racist” and slavish servant of Jewish power Geisel — crucified. It couldn’t happen to a more appropriate guy.

My theory is that Geisel was what Dr. Pierce would have called a “trendy.” When it was common in the “young set” of the 1920s and 30s to make fun of non-Whites in a gently stereotypical way, that’s what Geisel did. When so many of his generation got propagandized by Jews into hating “racism,” loving Communism, and attacking Hitler, Geisel got into the groove faster and stronger than anyone, much to the benefit of his career.

Here are some of the maunderings taken from the 51-page ( ! ) “study” in “Research on Diversity in Youth Literature” that the SPLC used to get Geisel’s works (formerly recommended by the SPLC, by the way) banned from a recent event. Hold your nose!

In the sequel The Cat in the Hat Comes Back, the story is centered around the black Cat expelling ink from his body and getting it all over a White family’s home. This reflects an anti-Black reference from the early twentieth century that Black people get their skin color from drinking ink. For example, a 1916 magazine advertisement by Morris and Bendien shows a Black baby drinking ink, with the caption: “N*gger milk” (Pilgrim). The connotations are that Black people are not human, their Blackness is unnatural, and Blackness is dirty.

…The Cat’s mouth is also depicted as open wide on fifteen of the nineteen pages he is present. Nel cites Sianne Ngai’s research that explains, ‘the mouth functions as a symbolically overdetermined feature in racist constructions of Blackness.’

Theodore Geisel is proof of what Sam Dickson said some years ago: The White racial traitor will never be remembered as the “great hero” that he imagines he will be as he commits his treason. His own people will either not survive to remember him — or, if they do, they will execrate him for his betrayal. And the non-Whites he helped to power will, at best, prefer to shunt his memory off to the side and give maximum credit to their own kind in their hour of imagined triumph, rather than to some doddering old cracker who helped them way back when. In fact, given a tenth of a chance, they’ll spit on said cracker’s grave and call him a “racist” who was never really on the side of the angels, anyway, since he was a hated White man — no matter what the depth of his treason. And that’s exactly what’s happening to Geisel.

Writing on White Biocentrism, National Alliance Chairman William White Williams offered a selection of Geisel’s anti-White editorial cartoons from over the years, reprinted below.

* * *

I SUPPOSE Tucker Carlson and those other script readers at Fox News have never seen the book that I own, Dr. Seuss Goes to War. Before “Dr. Seuss” did Horton Hears a Who and other children’s books he drew extremely racist anti-German and anti-Jap cartoons to encourage American intervention in the war against Germany, then against Japan.

Here’s one of his anti-German cartoons that is also anti-Charles Lindbergh, the American hero who was the foremost spokesman for the patriotic America First Committee that tried to keep America out of the unnecessary European war that was to be fought for the Jews and against the interests of Whites:

Here’s another, with Uncle Samuel claiming Lindbergh, born of exceptional Aryan parents, wasn’t related by blood to Germans:

Here, Uncle Samuel tells the “White racist” war industry that it must hire Blacks:

This example shows us that Geisel hated White preservationist Governor Talmadge of Georgia:

And in this work we can see that Geisel had special hatred in his heart for the White preservationist hero, Senator Bilbo:

Yes, “Dr. Seuss” was a racist: He hated Whites.

* * *

Source: Will Williams via White Biocentrism