“Wokeness” is a Jew Construct
HERE’S ANOTHER professional Jew claiming responsibility, connecting the dots between BLM, liberalism, and the Enlightenment. Recounting the “song of Jew history” (the Jew version of history, the eternal screech), he Jewsplains how Jews with a particularist “Jew lives matter” idea always foremost in their own minds “practically invented” the toxic universalist ideas which have repeatedly killed their hosts.
Throughout history Jews have tried the “all lives matter” argument. We brought the idea of ethical monotheism to the world — under the foundational beliefs that all humans are created in the image of God. In a world dominated by social hierarchies, the early Israelites and prophets railed against this unjust caste system, starting a long process of moral progression. We practically invented the idea of “all lives matter.”
According to Jewish tradition, we then tried teaching this to the Egyptians, Babylonians, Greeks and Romans – yet their hostility towards others, specifically us, went unstopped. We engaged in medieval debates with the Christain hegemony, making the argument that all humans are inherently valuable and godly. Yet the libels, pogroms and scapegoating never ceased.
Finally, we thought after the Enlightenment that anti-Semitism would soon be over. Finally the world recognized that all lives matter — that people have fundamental and unalienable rights that need not depend on color or creeds. Yet we all know how that worked out.
. . .
The “all lives matter” song of Jewish history slowly stopped and was replaced by “Jewish lives matter.” A state for the Jews, in our historic and indigenous homeland, where we can govern and protect ourselves, cultivate our tradition and keep it alive, and be a refuge for any Jew in trouble. Yes — Zionis mis the ultimate claim that Jewish lives matter.
Jews have come to the difficult but important realization that we need to occasionally thrust aside universalism in favor of particularism. We understand that while we need to be constantly dedicated to global and universal issues, Jewish-specific education and protection is paramount to our well-being. We have no issue proudly advocating for the fact that “Jewish lives matter.”
Because of this, we don’t just have a moral imperative to support Black Lives Matter. We have a personal one. The same history and values that inspire me to be an outspoken Zionist underpin my support for Black Lives Matter.
Our prophets teach that in Messianic times the entire world will come together in a monolithic utopia where there is no more strife or war. Until then, we need to be on the frontlines of racial justice and yes, that means rejecting broken and ineffective claims such as “All Lives Matter.”
“Messianism” is Jewing. The term refers specifically to the shameless Jew-serving moralizing with which they have repeatedly turned their host societies inside out and upside down. The current moral panic, “wokeness”, is just the most recent example.
Many Jewsmedia pundits have noticed this moralizing. Most critique its religious character, and its war-like character, while ignoring its Jewy character. We’re In A Cultural Civil War. It’s Time For Conservatives To Fight Back is a typical “classical liberal” take:
In some sense this is entirely psychological. A relatively small group of radical left-wing activists is using classic cult psychology to wage psychological war against the rest of us. They are the vanguard of what can only be described as a religious movement in America.
Indeed, Black Lives Matter and its attendant ideology contain all the elements of a religion: it promulgates doctrines that are explicitly normative, it has a cosmology and a morality, its claims are not subject to or consistent with scientific proofs. James Lindsay has gone further and described it as a cult, with recognizable and well-established features of a cult such as initiation, indoctrination, and cult reprogramming.
But this is a religious movement unlike any we’ve seen before, because unlike established religions it’s formally secular enough to be allowed into purely secular institutions of public life. This is why the Black Lives Matter agenda and The New York Times’ 1619 Project are being taught openly in our public schools.
We certainly have seen this kind of “formally secular” religion before. Consider the “nazi death camp” and “six million” shibboleths. These Big Lies have been openly taught in public schools for decades. What’s more, Jews organized openly as Jews stage an annual public spectacle whereby their most useful servants make a pilgrimage to worship Jews and recite their cultish beliefs about Jewland.
Anything critics say about “the BLM agenda” applies even more so to Jewing. No doubt that’s why many of the pundits who might say something critical of Blacks decide not to. They’re not afraid of the Blacks. They’re afraid of the Jews who see “Black lives matter” as a proxy for “Jew lives matter”. Whites who have already accepted some form of Jew worship will find it easier to accept Black worship. They need only imagine Blacks as their “new Jews”. They might feel some cognitive dissonance when Jews screech about Black “anti-Semitism”, but the Jewsmedia will surely help them work that out.
Lindsay’s The Cult Dynamics of Wokeness, linked in the Federalist article quoted above, equates the “wokeness” behind BLM to anti-“racism” (another Jew construct) and notes its similarity to Christianity (yet another Jew construct):
“Christ died for your sins, so you can be forgiven” is a Christian example, and “Be an antiracist. Help us dismantle the system and build a better world” is an “antiracist” example.
Lindsay elaborates upon the emotional and psychological manipulation of “the mark” by “the cult”, but also connects it to Marxism, another “formally secular” bit of Jewing:
I know this part gets a little heady, but it’s important. Critical consciousness is, formally, the cult mentality of Karl Marx’s conflict theory. Conflict theory, in briefest explanation, is the idea that society is broken into different groups or classes (for Marx, they were economic classes, and for the Woke, they are social group-identity classes) that are oppressive on one side, oppressed on the other, and in conflict over this. That is, conflict theory is the belief that different social groups in society are always in conflict with one another for power and dominance, and that rather than working together in complex, dynamical ways that can be mutually beneficial, they are at war. A critical consciousness means realizing this and that you are somehow personally complicit in creating the material conditions for that war and need to “do better,” either by renouncing your dominance (if dominant) or by agitating for a full-on revolution (if oppressed).
Critical consciousness is therefore a very cartoonish, us-versus-them reading of the world. This mentality, of course, tweaks various psychological and social impulses in people as described in social identity theory, for example, and dramatically increases what’s called “parochial altrusim.” This means strongly favoring the in-group (here, the cult) and forgiving it for every excess and abuse while becoming overtly hostile to the out-group (here, everyone else in society and society itself) and reading everything it does in the worst light possible. This is obviously core to the present sociological dynamic! It also dramatically increases cult commitment, adding an overtly warlike tenor to the us-against-them mentality, which in critical cults like Wokeness is us-against-the-world.
. . .
To summarize, then, Wokeness is a cult. It might even be, in its broadest functions, a proper religion at this point with a describable and fanatic cult element within it and protected by the relative reasonability of the broader faith. Antiracism, in particular, under its auspices is explicitly framed religiously and with clear patterns of cult initiation written all over it. This is what we’re up against.
This cult mentality Lindsay describes as manifesting in Christianity and Marxism springs from the more ancient and potent “critical consciousness” of Jews. They translate their cabalist term “tikkun olam” as “social justice”. It means: “help us dismantle the (non-Jew) system and build a better world (for Jews)”.
The Jews have always had an us-against-the-world mentality, a Jews-versus-goyim “reading of the world”. Just a few months ago, amidst the hysteria around coronavirus, before BLM and “wokeness” went viral, Jews were shamelessly screeching that “anti-Semitism” is the real pandemic everyone should worry about. In that screeching it was clear that they see non-Jews as diseased and ever more Jewing as the cure.
The Tribe refers to themselves, among themselves, as “The Tribe”. They see themselves as morally and culturally distinct from and superior to non-Jews. They see themselves at perpetual war with non-Jews. Their primary weapons are emotional and psychological manipulation, using their long-standing dominance of the mass media and academia to constantly accuse non-Jews, especially Whites, of oppressing them. The oppression narrative at the very center of “wokeness” isn’t a non-White construct, it’s a Jew construct. In the “wokeness” narrative Whites remain the oppressors, the epitome of evil, and the Jew role, by definition good, has simply been generalized to include all non-Whites. As Jews sometimes put it, the non-Whites are the “new Jews”.
“Supercession” is the religious term for this kind of Jew-sanctioned, Jew-serving extension of Jew mentality. There’s a cargo cult quality to other non-Whites trying to ape the Jews. This is especially the case with “wokeness”, where the Jew role isn’t explicit, making it more likely some goy will lose the plot and either conflate or distinguish Whites and Jews in a way that displeases the “fellow oppressed”.
Early in his article Lindsay notes:
The concept of “white fragility” in the antiracist Woke cult is exactly this sort of emotional shakedown. White fragility separates white people and their “adjacencies” into exactly two types: racists (who admit it) and racists (who are too emotionally fragile to admit it).
The concept of “anti-Semitism” is where the concept of “racism” and this newer, more precisely-targeted buzzterm “White fragility” come from. “Anti-Semitism” is the original “original sin”. The Jews separate non-Jews into exactly two types of “anti-Semite”: those who know, and those who don’t know yet.
Another mainstream “classical liberal” has written pointedly about this Jewing-by-other-means without identifying it as such. Andrew Sullivan coyly asks, Is There Still Room for Debate?
The orthodoxy goes further than suppressing contrary arguments and shaming any human being who makes them. It insists, in fact, that anything counter to this view is itself a form of violence against the oppressed. The reason some New York Times staffers defenestrated op-ed page editor James Bennet was that he was, they claimed, endangering the lives of black staffers by running a piece by Senator Tom Cotton, who called for federal troops to end looting, violence, and chaos, if the local authorities could not. This framing equated words on a page with a threat to physical life — the precise argument many students at elite colleges have been using to protect themselves from views that might upset them. But, as I noted two years ago, we all live on campus now.
In this manic, Manichean world you’re not even given the space to say nothing. “White Silence = Violence” is a slogan chanted and displayed in every one of these marches. It’s very reminiscent of totalitarian states where you have to compete to broadcast your fealty to the cause. In these past two weeks, if you didn’t put up on Instagram or Facebook some kind of slogan or symbol displaying your wokeness, you were instantly suspect. The cultishness of this can be seen in the way people are actually cutting off contact with their own families if they don’t awaken and see the truth and repeat its formulae. Ibram X. Kendi insists that there is no room in our society for neutrality or reticence. If you are not doing “antiracist work” you are ipso facto a racist. By “antiracist work” he means fully accepting his version of human society and American history, integrating it into your own life, confessing your own racism, and publicly voicing your continued support.
This suppression orthodoxy is visible in its purest form when Jews swarm and screech about “anti-Semitism” and “anti-Semites”. It’s chilling effect is visible in these Jewsmedia pundits describing “wokeness” as if it has no connection to Jewing.
Whites “liberals” who display their “wokeness” by saying “Black lives matter” are doing the same thing as White “conservatives” waving a Jew-state flag and proclaiming that they “stand with Israel”. It is not an act of self-abnegation. Quite the opposite. They are trying to protect and even elevate themselves. Whites who have accepted and internalized the Jew lie that race is a social construct may even imagine they can change teams, or “convert”, as if they were Jews. Even those who don’t believe the lies understand they can get ahead by mouthing those lies more quickly or convincingly than others.
Job #1 of the Jews’ anti-“racist” “work” has been painting Whites as public enemy #1. “Wokeness” is a recent extension of that project, an add-on to “political correctness”, which itself is more aptly described as Semitical correctness. The Jewing that begat “wokeness” isn’t shrinking or being displaced. It’s adapting and growing.
To be woke is to wake up to the truth — the blinding truth that liberal society doesn’t exist, that everything is a form of oppression or resistance, and that there is no third option. You are either with us or you are to be cast into darkness.
The truth is that liberalism and the Enlightenment belong to an earlier, now obsolete phase of Jewing. It was characterized by Jews dissimulating as “fellow Whites”. This newer phase, the Enrichment, is characterized by Jews dropping their “White” mask. In this phase Jews are openly screeching as Jews, Jewsplaining how their Jewness sets them apart, how their oppression status outranks any other and thus entitles them to tell non-Jews what to think about anything.
The truth is that even the “wokest” non-White goy who somehow vexes Jews gets piled on almost as viciously as any uppity White goy. Swarming screeching Jews overrule any truth, trump any chimpout. However “nuanced” the pilpul gets when Jews try to Jewsplain what everyone else should think about “wokeness”, their premise is always the same. They either support it or oppose it because that’s what they think is best for their tribe. That’s the essence of Semitical correctness.
The BBC has reportedly ordered its television presenters not to wear Black Lives Matter (BLM) badges on air after Campaign Against Antisemitism exposed worrying antisemitism in the movement and its other extreme views emerged.
. . .
A spokesperson for Campaign Against Antisemitism said: “We are not surprised that the antisemitic outbursts and revelations of other extremist views from within the BLM movement are causing those who had lent their support to distance themselves. All decent people oppose racism, which is why seeing anti-Jewish racism emerging from within the movement against anti-black racism has been an ugly sight. Prejudice cannot be beaten with more prejudice.”
Here the anti-White teacher is correcting their student.
* * *
Source: Age of Treason