Let’s Not Accept Partial Truths
by David Sims
THE FOLLOWING EXTRACT is from Red Ice TV’s interview with a Jewish lawyer who goes by the online alias of “Frame Game,” who seems to be an honest and perceptive fellow. Here’s an out-take of the conversation from 12:22 to 15:20 on the recording:
Host: “So if Jews or other ethnic groups wield disproportionate amounts of power and influence in the West, are they to blame, or is it the fault of White people for allowing their institutions to be subverted?”
Jewish guest: “I would say that there’s certainly an element of both. I try to stay away from the blame game. But that’s not really my job as I see it. Mine is to provide facts and compelling stories, and other people sort of weave what they will with it. But I would say that, as a proud Jewish person, I don’t think that it’s Jewish people per se that should be demonized.
“I see it as the organizational capacity. Organized Jewish influence started in America in about 1838. That was with the first B’nai B’rith lodge. And there are four waves of Jewish influence. There was the 1830s which was B’nai B’rith, and Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society. And the 1890s there was Zionism and the flexing of the political teeth of B’nai B’rith. And then in the 1920s there was an absolute in Jewish identity groups. This is everything from the ADL to the American Zionist Council to the Jewish Agency to the American Jewish President’s Conference, the Board of Governors, the… I mean the list goes on and on. We were at the point where there were literally thousands of Jewish identity organizations.
“But they took on what you might call the element of corruption beginning in the 1920s. And I’m not so sure that it started out with the level of corruption. It may have started out with very benign intentions, and then I think what likely ended up happening is the major players in those organizations sort of thought they were doing something by functional necessity, and then realized as time went on that they had a mega-powerful weapon in their hands and refused to let it go. So I think that the best way to describe this is to say that — there’s that great quote: ‘Every great cause starts as a movement, becomes a business, and degenerates into a racket.’ I think that the Jewish identity movement, which really started in the 1920s in full, became a business by the 1940s and 50s, and by the 1960s, and certainly as of right now, is in its degenerated into a racket stage. It is a full-fledged mafia organization. I mean there’s simply no other way to describe it if you’re being honest.”
As much as I admire the candor of this particular Jew, I think he’s wrong to assert the initial good intentions of the Jews involved in creating the institutional drive for Jewish power in America. And he’s wildly wrong about the timing. That drive has its inception in Europe, and it can be traced back to antiquity, to the Roman Empire. It might have arisen when Rome insisted that Judea be a part of the Empire and that the Jews pay their taxes, just like everybody else did. The Jews resisted the Empire and got conquered at Jerusalem and at Masada in AD 70-74. That’s probably when the Jews first embarked on their multi-generational pogrom against the White race, mostly on the sneak, with deception and usury as their primary strategies.
Much later, in the late 18th century, a Jew named Amschel Meyer Rothschild (a.k.a. Anslem Mayer Rothschild) was angry about having to pay his taxes, just like everybody else. Whereas Jews getting economic revenge on Gentiles through usury had already been a thing for seventeen centuries, Rothschild decided to intensify it and bring under the control of the Jews all of the countries of Europe, and, perhaps, eventually the entire world. Besides enlisting his sons into his world-banking scams, he had political help from well-connected Jews in other countries, such as “Baron” Moses Montefiore in England and Adolphe Cremieux in France.
So the hostile intentions of the Jews did not begin in the 1920s, as this Jewish lawyer thinks, but rather began much farther back.
* * *