Andrew HamiltonNews

Google: Race-Based Censorship Through Search Engine Manipulation?

by Andrew Hamilton

FOR A LONG TIME it has been difficult to find National Vanguard articles through Google searches that should instantly turn them up.

For example, some of my own articles originally appeared on the Web site Counter-Currents and were subsequently reprinted here by National Vanguard’s editor. When I want to quickly find one of these using Google, the Counter-Currents version always appears at the top of the results, as it should, for in these instances I use very specific search strings consisting of author’s name and exact title. But National Vanguard’s reprint, which is actually more recent, is always difficult to locate, or may be impossible to find at all. This has been the case for several years now.

Today I searched for an article by National Alliance founder William Pierce that originally appeared in the National Alliance Bulletin in 1978 and was reprinted here, where it still resides, on February 2, 2015. Its title is “The Cobbler and the Professor.”

Using the exact title of the article, which is both precise and unusual, Google did not return any National Vanguard results for this essay. It is essentially impossible for this to happen given Google’s frightful efficiency and vast reach. Therefore it is presumably due to blacklisting. Google is a multibillion dollar Jewish media company that works closely with powerful Jewish hate groups such as the ADL and SPLC to censor the speech of the populace on a worldwide scale — a crime at which Jews are very efficient.

[Here are the search results. I’ve gone twenty pages deep and still no NV result. It is possible to force Google to deliver the NV link (so we know it’s in their database!), but only by using a degree of specificity that should not be necessary and would be unlikely to be used by the average seeker. For the moment at least, Microsoft’s Bing seems not to have gotten the censorship memo, and neither has European search engine Unbubble. Google’s extreme demotion of National Vanguard and American Mercury articles on the topic of the Leo Frank case — articles that Jews don’t approve of, and which used to rank on the first page of Google results for searches on the case, but which are now difficult or impossible to find — has been documented here. — Ed.]

The only possible alternative explanation is that persons running National Vanguard’s Web site somehow routinely but inadvertently foil the operation of the search engine — which is not in their interest. The whole point of sites like National Vanguard is to reach new people, not create content that only malevolent, well-paid Jewish and government spies and censors will see and archive in their vast databases.

Probabilities therefore point to concealed censorship by Jewry, censorship that has existed since the advent of the Internet but expanded greatly over the past few years. Needless to say, what is being done to National Vanguard is probably also done to other sites, some quite large and influential. You do not develop and unilaterally possess a superweapon like this and then use it only against one target, particularly NV.

We have reached the point where virtually all global “news,” information, and public discussion is now restricted to Left-wing extremists, with everybody else excluded.

Besides destroying democracy, permitting Jews to monopolize speech in societies everywhere has resulted in countless wars, crimes, murders, torture, and discrimination. History demonstrates that such warped repression will claim millions more lives, exactly as it has in the past.

* * *

Source: Author

For Further Reading

Previous post

The Tomb of Pan

Next post

Martha Stewart: Why Is She Hated?

4 Comments

  1. Franklin Ryckaert
    November 10, 2018 at 12:16 pm — Reply

    The Jews used their control of the old media in their age long war against Whites. With their (still partial) control of the new media, they simply continue.

    For example if you search “David Duke” in Google you only find (negative) information about him, but not his own website. For that you’ll have to search specifically “davidduke.com”, a formula a newbie does not know.

    I think numerous other examples can be found.

    Far worse than ordinary Google is Google Images.
    I suggest to search in Google Images following subjects :

    happy american people
    happy american children
    happy american marriages
    great american inventors

    You will find images of only Black or Mulatto people.
    If you specifically add “white” to “american” it is the same : only Blacks and Mulattos.

    With European subjects it is not better.
    Try “European history” and you will find the cover of a book called “Making Europe” with this image : https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51DFyRm9-eL._SX423_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg

    Thanks Jews !

  2. Sethmoto101
    November 10, 2018 at 2:32 pm — Reply

    To Franklin Ryckaert: My Google Image results of your first four subjects had a smattering of whites. Probably one out of every 8 for the first, one out of every 20 for the second, and for happy marriages, only one white couple out of about 30 couples. Google is right though, whites have a reason to be unhappy. For inventors, I got about one white out of every 40, with Henry Ford and Thomas Edison repeated several times.

  3. 21st Century WN
    November 11, 2018 at 9:17 am — Reply

    I also performed some sample searches, and there does seem to be something going on. As a test, I put in the title of an article I wrote for another WN site from sixteen years ago. And there it was, listed as number two in the search results. And that was from sixteen years ago.

    On the other hand…

    Here’s an NV article entitled, Racist Computer Algorithms Predict Negroes are More Likely to Commit Crime, and it popped up in Google right at the top, indicating that National Vanguard is not blacklisted, at least in some cases. I also searched “William Pierce National Vanguard” and brought up many hits on Google as well.

    What to make of the inconsistencies? I’ll leave that to others.

  4. Bruce Arney
    November 11, 2018 at 11:13 pm — Reply

    It is likely that some of the most enlightening and informative writings have been deleted simply because they truly are enlightening and informative, which is the antithesis of Kosher ideas. Being anti-Kosher is grounds for being sent into the memory hole with no possibility of redemption.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.