American Dissident VoicesAudioKevin Alfred StromRadio

Enemy Media

American Dissident Voices broadcast of July 7, 2018

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

THE JEWS and their collaborators are getting more and more blatant in their censorship of those who would expose their crimes and their anti-White agenda. And they’re also becoming more desperate and stupid. I was recently “suspended” from the social media platform Twitter, allegedly because of this tweet I made many weeks ago, which Twitter in true Orwellian fashion serves up to me every time I try to access the site, with a single choice given to me — a big red button that says “delete” tweet. No “retain tweet” button, oh no. Retaining the tweet, no matter who didn’t like it, would also be retaining one’s integrity, and we can’t have that! We can’t even offer it as a choice. Just “delete.” It reminds me of being five years old and someone trying to suggest to me that “heads I win, tails you lose” was an honest wager.

The initial “notice”
All I can see on Twitter now

Here’s what they claimed about my tweet: “You may not engage in the targeted harassment of someone, or incite other people to do so. We consider abusive behavior an attempt to harass, intimidate, or silence someone else’s voice. . . . if you think we’ve made a mistake, contact our support team.” That next-to-last section — “silence someone’s voice” — is really rich coming from censor-happy Twitter. (Did I “contact [their] support team”? Indeed I did, with a detailed explanation of how absurd their “abuse” claim was. That was weeks ago now. Not a peep or a tweet has been heard from them since, and I am still being given the red button treatment.)

Now what did I say in my tweet that so enraged the censors?

I was talking about the artist John William Godward, the pre-Raphaelite painter of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. He was an artist who created many images of beauty, often using Classical settings. Godward committed suicide in 1922, literally putting his head into a gas oven, and leaving a note behind which read “the world is not big enough for myself and a Picasso.” You see, by 1922, the “art critic” establishment, already heavily dominated by Jews, and unfortunately very influential over the empty-headed wealthy who could afford to purchase original art, had rejected beauty and was promoting the ugliness of so-called “modern art.” So I said in my tweet no more and no less than this: “Godward, who gave us so much beauty, put his head in a gas oven after the newly Jewish art critic establishment had, by 1920 or so, made real art unsaleable.” That’s it. I’m banned.

Now do you really think that someone at Twitter truly finds that factual observation of mine “abusive”? Do you honestly believe that I, who advocate openly for racial-nationalism and racial separation, and the removal of the Jewish power structure from any power over us, and have advocated for all of those things on Twitter (in a totally non-abusive and gentlemanly way, of course), really “stepped over the line” when discussing Godward, a painter in oils who lived and worked a century ago, and the art critics of his era? Hardly.

What happened, obviously, is something close to this: I was placed on a “watch list” at Twitter, probably back in December when the platform told Jews it was cracking down on “hate.” Perhaps the Jewish ADL or SPLC even provided the list of “problematic” people. This is similar to what the Jews train our police to do: People with views that Jews don’t like are given special scrutiny that other people don’t get, so that they will be more likely to be prosecuted for every technical — or imagined — infraction of the ever-morphing rules, laws, and regulations that grace this land.

But, even then — even when provided with “watch lists” of the evil White people who are so depraved they actually want their race to survive — they still apparently don’t have a large enough staff of actual human beings to censor the growing number of White racial advocates on their platform. They rely on algorithms. And rather stupid ones at that. Once I thought about it, the answer was obvious: I was banned because I published a tweet that had the words “Jewish” and “gas ovens” in it — though I was not at all talking about Jews being in said ovens, nor even faintly implying or thinking of such a thing. Their algorithm just assumes the worst if you’re on their “watch list” and you use those words, and you are instantly placed — well, maybe not instantly, it took them weeks — but you are eventually placed in Twitter purgatory.

Another Jewish-dominated Internet firm is Google, which provides the most popular search engine in the world, and which also owns YouTube, by far the most popular video site on the ’Net. Google also famously tracks, and keeps records of, almost all of your activities online to which they manage to gain access.

Google has enthusiastically embraced censorship of sites which are critical of the Jewish power structure’s agenda. An example of this can be seen in those Web sites which discuss the Leo Frank case, which I’ve talked about quite a bit on this program. National Vanguard, in the course of our own research and publishing, made contact with a group of people who created several well-researched Web sites on the Leo Frank case, working hard on these sites over the course of about ten years. They include but aren’t limited to The American Mercury and the Leo Frank Case Research Library. As of 16 months ago, all of these truth-telling sites, including ours, consistently got first or second-page Google rankings for searches for “Leo Frank” or “Leo Frank case” or other simple, obvious search queries relating to the case. Those were the rankings they deserved, according to Google’s then-objective standards of what constitutes a relevant, reliable, and highly-cited Web page. But then the controlled media, like the Washington Post, and Jewish groups like the ADL, became very upset about our success. Suddenly, shortly after that, Google de-ranked all these pages of ours and those of other truth-tellers, and a mere two of them can now be found there, buried deep in the Google results, many pages in — and many of the others have simply disappeared from Google! This coincided with Google’s promises to censor speech which the Jewish groups didn’t like. This is blatant censorship, and really a kind of fraud on the public. How can you put yourself forward as a “search engine,” the purpose of which is to help people find the facts about subjects in which they’re interested in the most transparent and unbiased way possible, while suppressing points of view that the wealthiest ethnic group on planet Earth doesn’t like?

And it’s not just the Leo Frank case truth-tellers who have been de-ranked on Google. National Vanguard has lost its top or near-top ranking for many search terms where we used to dominate. It happened suddenly, and without any major pieces on the same subjects being published by controlled media sites. Just one day, we were on the first page of Google results on a given subject — and the next day we were nowhere to be found, or buried pages and pages deep in the results, behind Indonesian scraper sites.

The first page of Yandex.com’s results for a search about the Leo Frank case: Not all search engines are censoring truth-tellers.

Interestingly, our readership has been going up here at National Vanguard. We’ve reached 200,000 readers per month now, and for several months we’ve served up over a million pages per month to those readers. So there’s no technical reason for Google to de-rank us. And these statistics also show that the de-ranking hasn’t been able to stop our growth. Another thing to note is that not all search engines are censoring us. A check of the search engines Yandex.com and several others show National Vanguard and other truth-telling sites still ranking as high as ever.

This comparison was made a little over a month ago — our readership has gone up a bit since then.

 

This censorship isn’t all bad news, by the way. It’s a sign of the growing popularity of our ideas. Their overuse of flawed algorithms is a sign that we’re too big now for their staff to cherry-pick our posts and delete them. There are too many goyim who know for that to work anymore. And forcing them to admit openly that they “need” to suppress pro-White speech is a good thing. It adds clarity. They can’t pretend the main issue isn’t race any more. They can’t pretend to be supporters of free speech any more. They can’t pretend to be supporters of self-determination any more.

We need your support to keep winning this fight. You can join or donate by writing to the postal address I’ll mention in a moment, or you can also donate by sending funds via

natall.com/donate

We can have a clean, orderly, progressive, safe, and incomparably richer and more beautiful nation if it becomes a proud White nation again.

To do that we must begin by restoring White community and White racial consciousness among our people. We at the National Alliance are doing that by building new media for Whites and by getting out on the street and meeting our neighbors and showing them what we’re all about. We’re going to help our people. We’re going to educate our people. We’re going to come up with creative ways to awaken our people. We’re going to create outreach that will be like nothing ever seen before in this world. We’re going to do what it takes.

Be a part of what we’re doing. Join the National Alliance today. For further information write to Box 172, Laurel Bloomery TN 37680 USA — or visit natall.com/join and read about our program for victory and progress. We appreciate your support.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the National Alliance. The National Alliance is working to educate White men and women around the world as to the nature of the reality we must face — and organizing our people to ensure our survival and advancement. We need your help to continue. Please send the largest contribution you can afford to National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. You can also help us by visiting natall.com/donate. Make your life count.  Once again, our postal address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to keep on thinking free.

Listen to the broadcast

For Further Reading

Previous post

Kali Yuga and the Age of Iron in Different Traditions

Next post

What Makes Madeleine Run

13 Comments

  1. Michael R
    July 7, 2018 at 8:37 am — Reply

    Searching for “Leo Frank Guilty” still produced a good result at the top on Google. Unfortunately, I wonder how many will search his name followed by the word “guilty”…

  2. Bridger
    July 7, 2018 at 10:05 am — Reply

    I, too, had my Twitter account temporarily locked when I called the Pakistani Muslims who’ve been raping white English girls for decades “savages”. I was going to challenge Twitter monitors and demand they explain how a politically incorrect opinion on a subject constitutes the harassment or silencing of people but figured (rightly) that I’d get the same response (no response) as Kevin received or leftist babble justifying their action.

    The de facto speech codes we’re seeing on major internet platforms is a direct result of Jewish power and influence and not just “libruls” run amok as the kosher conservatives tell us.

  3. Arvin N. Prebost
    July 7, 2018 at 10:33 am — Reply

    Congratulations on being banned, Kevin. It is an honor that has been accorded you.

    And I think it is pathetic that this very talented painter let them get to him like that. His very living would have been a rebuke to them; his death was a surrender.

    But the Left is not the only ones who censor people. I myself have been banned from Jared Taylor’s website. It has a rather clinical and lifeless feel to it anyway. They never miss a chance to celebrate the supposed superior intelligence of the “Ashkenazi” and they do not like any kind of original thought which deviates from their line, especially if it is expressed in a creative way instead of their wooden-headed borespeak. It was my phrasing as much as it was my tweeking them that got me banned.

    I wish them well—as a kind of anti-Left nursery-school—but the number of websites that I contribute to, some are being selected out, and will get no more of my $upport!

    • July 7, 2018 at 1:02 pm — Reply

      I’ve always felt and would put money on the fact that Jared Taylor and AmRen (not their guest speakers) is controlled opposition. Taylor will NEVER name the jew. I’ve seen him fiercely resist it in a couple videos. That says everything about who he’s working for and why you got banned from the site. It’s nothing but a front to distract Whites with endless discourse about immigration, no borders, Antifa, affirmative action, etc. etc. while never cutting to the chase and mentioning the source of all those things. Keep the Whites running in one hundred different directions with their attention and strength dissipated.

      • Arvin N. Prebost
        July 7, 2018 at 4:54 pm — Reply

        I agree completely, DC3. I always disputed their enthralled reverence for the fabled superiority of Ashkenazi intelligence, every time it was presented.

        Now AmRen has a feature called, “Our Favorite Comments.”

        People must contribute comments that the moderators like, then they are rewarded by having their comment included in “Our Favorite Comments.’ Commenters are actually jubilant when they make “Our Favorite Comments.”

        Good grief, this is high school all over again. It is shameful. But it shows the level of the people they attract.

        But, to be fair, I think the (controlled) moderators submit a great many of the (controlled) comments, which they make under various assumed names. In this way, they try to set the parameters of what can, and cannot be, discussed.

        Who needs them?

    • Travon MartinVanGogh
      July 14, 2018 at 11:24 am — Reply

      Modern art (“Modernism”), is evident as a scam when the artwork must be “explained” as to what the artist intended. There are exceptions, such as event-representations (e.g. 9/11 memorials made from Twin-Tower steel girders), or architecture such as the Sundial bridge in Redding, CA (until it collapses). But typically, any splat can be highly appraised now if the right people say so: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3002712/Pranksters-cheap-IKEA-print-art-gallery-ask-experts-value-saying-worth-nearly-2million.html . You can see how a talented and sensitive artist like Godward could be crushed by what was a new phenomenon. Was Kevin incorrect about broad-brush jewish influence in moving modern art to prominence, and twitter right? Two hints:
      https://www.thedailybeast.com/jewish-immigrants-fathered-modernism and https://www.jewishboston.com/events/modern-art-in-the-1920s-and-the-jews-that-made-it-possible/ In depth: https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/art#20th , which mentions Marc Chagall, who accomplished this in 1920: https://artblart.files.wordpress.com/2015/01/composizione-cerchi-capra-web.jpg Much of the painting is simply tracings using a ruler and compass. By today’s standards, it is conservative; it isn’t nauseating to look at the way some more recent works are.

  4. July 7, 2018 at 1:20 pm — Reply

    Forcing you to delete your own comments, your true sentiments and feelings put down in words is similar to forcing someone to deny their faith. There’s a dehumanizing and shaming quality to it that strips away a fundamental part of your identity and slowly conditions you to disown it. Forcing you to delete your own comments, as opposed to Twitter just obliterating them from the site, is a conditioning exercise.

    It also amazes me that no one challenges the absurd reasoning behind alleged hate speech. Since hate is experienced and defined differently for everyone, how can there be a standard for whatever hate speech is supposed to be? Who can say when simply being mean turns into nastiness or nastiness becomes cruelty, and when cruelty allegedly becomes hate? These are all highly relative terms and to literally define them, we’d need as many laws as there are people who experience these emotions. At the same time, no one can know what’s in your heart or mind when you express anything. Finally, there is much talk of certain speech inciting people to hatred and that’s why it needs to be censored. Where are all these hate-filled mobs roaming the streets killing blacks and jews just because they read something online? It never happens. There is no such thing as hate speech, just free speech that’s hated.

  5. JimB
    July 7, 2018 at 5:44 pm — Reply

    “There is no such thing as hate speech, just free speech that’s hated.”

    Did you just coin that phrase? It’s almost perfect.

    The only thing I’d change about it is I’d leave one word out. My version of it would be, instead: “There is no such thing as hate speech, just speech that’s hated.” Not because I have a problem with free-speech or with the term “free” in conjunction with speech, just because it ought to already be implicit as a component of speech itself.

    • July 7, 2018 at 8:26 pm — Reply

      JIMB: I can’t claim credit for that excellent quote. Actually, I read it in a comment section on a website about a year ago from some anonymous poster. I’ve since put it on a bumper sticker to get people thinking. Use it everywhere. It would be great if it went viral. I also like: No one has a right to NOT be offended.

  6. Smitty
    July 8, 2018 at 3:18 pm — Reply

    What I do concerning Twitter, is that every 6 to 8 months I log out and then start a new account with a new phone number and hand-held device. This way all the tweets I make likely stay in the twitter archive and I don’t risk losing the account over one tweet.

    My recommendation to everyone using twitter is to logout every year and start a new account with a new phone number and computer device. I’ve done this half a dozen times, and when I look in the hashtags I post, I still see all my old accounts and their posts.

  7. Travon Martinberg
    July 9, 2018 at 10:21 pm — Reply

    Kevin, my account was frozen two months ago, apparently for generalizing about muslims in Europe but also being an all-around pain-in-the-ass to the usual suspects, jew and not (and I got blocked by Gilbert Gottfried!). After getting past the sign-in screen, I must provide a telephone number, though my profile, tweets, followers etc. are visible. Well I’m not buying a Walmart $13 flip phone to satisfy the interests of the ADL and its boytoy @Jack in tracking me.

    • Clinton Adolph Seeber
      July 12, 2018 at 1:51 am — Reply

      This also happened to me about a few months ago. I was antagonizing Tim Wise with multiple responses to his insane tweets. My account was frozen for the reason that I was supposedly displaying “bot-like behavior”. I had to get them to call me from a 5 digit number in order to receive the code to restore to me use of my account. But I have one of those free WiFi phone numbers through an app named “Talkatone” (I’ve got no interest in paying a monthly phone bill), and 5 digit numbers don’t work with those kind of services. I had to get my friend to come over, and I got him to get them to call him. He answered and gave me the pin code that they gave him. When I entered the code, access to my account was promptly restored.

  8. Clinton Adolph Seeber
    July 9, 2018 at 11:09 pm — Reply

    Mr. Strom, my friend, I have been banned numerous times on both Facebook and Twitter over the five years or so that I have been using those platforms – usually for being a “racist”. I’m proud of it.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.