Civilization’s Dead End, part 2

by Wolf Stoner
NV Russian correspondent

LET US NOW consider some of Vladimir Putin’s remarks in his recent speech dedicated to the annexation of the new territories. The Kremlin’s strategists are more capable than their military colleagues. Putin’s use of historical examples of America’s unnecessary use of excessive force at the end of World War 2 is of special value. It helps to destroy the existing public perception of that war. He mentioned the senseless destruction of Dresden and Hamburg by Allied bombers, and he even pointed out the fact that Germany and Japan continue to be under American occupation today. Never before has a politician of such stature dared touch upon this sacred cow of the post-WW2 global system. The permanent occupation of Germany is something that no one is ever supposed to question. This remark was clearly intended to gain wider support among Germans and to undermine their internal anti-Russian consensus. And it is sure to work. For more than 80 years, not a single leader of any country has said anything like this. It is sure to be appreciated among Germany’s nationally-oriented circles.

However useful these pokes in the globalist muzzle are, we should never be deceived about the true reasons for using them. Obviously, Putin is not driven by any genuine concern about the fate of Germans and other subjugated nations, but aims exclusively at undermining the legitimacy of the existing Western political order. Nevertheless, this plays into our hands. The very fact that the issue of the unlawful occupation of Germany was raised at such high level is sure to produce further reverberating waves inside European society. Putin and his system, although being mere puppets of China, have done more to bring about the destruction of the post-WW2 order than any other force in the world. In this regard we must fully support their actions (by support I don’t mean public support, but silent approval of their disruptive actions; we should never side with anyone like Putin publicly; such personalities are too toxic for that; especially it would hurt in the long run all those who support Putin now).

What is really important is that both sides, the Kremlin and the West, being in a fighting frenzy, are starting to expose each other’s past crimes — thereby helping to dethrone their formerly believed “elevated moral position” in relation to WW2. Western political commentators, even on CNN and other popular media, have begun mentioning the massive atrocities of the Red Army in WW2 against European civilians. This topic would never have surfaced under ordinary political circumstances. But now, in order to delegitimize the whole Russian political system, the West has begun to use all available tools. So, we can see that the situation is progressing along the best possible path; the former WW2 Allies are destroying the reputations of their own systems. And this process is not easily controlled by Jews or any other self-appointed global rulers. The level of hostility between Russia and western Europe is bound to increase and it is sure to produce even further recriminations and disclosure of dirty historical legacies. As a result, both sides undermine the official myth of WW2, helping us to spread the truth. By seeing this ever-growing discrepancy between different interpretations of that war, the wider public is bound to lose its quasi-religious awe about this subject.

All in all, both the Kremlin and the West are doing their utmost to dismantle the existing geopolitical equilibrium, even if the West claims to be fighting to preserve it (in the same way that Churchill, moved by the desire to “save the British Empire,” was the chief killer of it).

The impasse that emerged as a result of official annexation of Ukrainian lands by Russia creates a qualitatively different situation in Europe. On the one hand, Russia has precluded for itself any possibility to backtrack now; and, on the other hand, the West can’t accept this rearrangement in any form without losing its global position. Therefore, the hostilities are sure to become more intense. The governmental measures for asserting internal control in Russia point to the growing determination to fight to the bitter end. Ukraine and other eastern European countries rely on American military might, and Russia is relying on the Chinese economic giant. Therefore, all prerequisites for an all-out global war are in place. And, if that happens, it is highly unlikely that such a war would be confined to conventional arms. Russia can’t hold on to its annexed territories without eventually using tactical nuclear weapons. And, if it uses them, the whole chain of events becomes unpredictable.

If America becomes fully committed to this war, China is sure to increase its help to Russia and, at some point, will step in to the conflict. Most probably, China would bring her troops into Russia in order to “defend Russian territory from American aggression.” This move would solve many Chinese problems. It would effectively eliminate the Russian historical factor and pave the way for gradual annexation of all Russian territories into a great Chinese empire; it would destroy all American designs of “strategic encirclement” of China. Control over the greater part of the Eurasian landmass nullifies any attempts at external blockade. China would become invincible in the geopolitical sense.

Obviously, America can’t allow this to happen. To allow China to swallow Russia is tantamount to defeat in the global struggle for domination. Therefore, the massive entrance of Chinese troops into Russia is bound to produce a Western reaction. Most probably, Russian territory would become the main theater of war between China and the West.

How such a war would end is very difficult to predict. It is highly unlikely that America in its present condition would be able to prevent the absorption of the Far East and Siberia by China. The center of gravity of the fighting is sure to be the European part of Russia, and the bulk of the Western ground force is sure to consist of European armies. This war could eventually be settled with a front line somewhere in the middle of European Russia (either closer to the Ukrainian and Baltic states’ borders, or closer to the Volga and Ural Mountains). In any case, Russia in its present form is sure to disappear.

There is little doubt that Chinese society would hold out in this global war. It is ethnically monolithic and accustomed to harsh conditions of life. The only way to destroy China is to use thousands of nuclear warheads against its population centers. In this case the ensuing turmoil could topple the central government — but in this case, the fate of the other belligerents and their neighbors would also be in great doubt. The resultant uncontrollable population flows and environmental consequences would impact the whole global system extremely hard; it is unlikely that it would be able to remain intact. Any limited use of nuclear weapons against China would only harden its resolve.

On the contrary, even the limited use of nuclear weapons against the USA would produce an assured social collapse. The multicultural American society is sure to Balkanize after the system loses its control over social processes and is unable to supply racial minorities with a certain amount of prosperity. These minorities would start to compensate for their lack of food and goods by plundering the White population, which in turn would finally be compelled to fight back for their lives. Therefore, even a few tens of nuclear explosions in major American cities are sure to produce social collapse. This is why America is the least likely to trigger the use of nuclear weapons. Of all global actors, the US is the least able to withstand the consequences of nuclear explosions.

Russia’s role as an independent global actor is sure to diminish with each passing month. If China decides that the use of nuclear weapons is justifiable, it will order the Kremlin to use them. It would be an ideal situation for China if Russia and the USA mutually annihilate each other. In this case, China could easily occupy the greater part of Russia and use it as a mineral resources base. The fact that it would be nuclear-contaminated and almost unsuitable for permanent living would be considered an advantage, a kind of heightened defensibility from any outside intrusion. In the long run, the nuclear contamination would dissipate and the whole territory would be settled with Chinese. I believe that the Chinese leadership considers the whole situation in this light. In stark contrast to Western politicians who look at events exclusively from the perspective of the electoral cycle, the Chinese outlook is mainly determined by consideration of long-term trends and permanent ethnic interests.

That is the situation as it stands now. Russia was duped into this war — a war that is the very last thing it needs.

America was compelled to react and to redirect its forces into Europe. China manipulates the strings, observes the ongoing events, and prepares to use the situation to its strategic advantage. Its outlook surely spreads far beyond the Taiwan question. Taiwan will be easily occupied when the American military factor ceases to be relevant.

This whole picture seems very dismal for the White race if observed from the conventional point of view. But if we look at these events from a different angle, and look for opportunities instead of bewailing the multitude of coming misfortunes, the situation appears much more promising. As I said, global events can’t be easily manipulated. The fact that modern civilization is far more technically sophisticated than it was 80 years ago, coupled with the fact that Earth’s population is three times greater than it was back then, implies the conclusion that the coming World War is sure to be much less controllable and predictable than World War 2 was.

I doubt very much that, after this global war, the world will remain under control of the same cabal of bankers; that is highly unlikely. The danger of Chinese global dominance, although frightening in itself, should not be overestimated. Yes, if the situation allows, the Chinese would eliminate every single person of different racial origin. That would be quite normal and natural. But the world operates differently. I doubt that they will have an opportunity to accomplish that goal, because they will have more pressing tasks on their hands — fighting against India, Arabs, and other Asian tribes, for example. These non-White masses would not meekly accept Chinese global dictatorship. The mortal struggle that would ensue among non-White tribes (including Latin American mongrels) is sure to exceed in brutality everything that has ever happened in observable history. Excess global population would be eliminated after a few years of this struggle. In the meantime, White remnants roaming the nuclear-devastated wastelands of Europe would be able to coalesce into something coherent and able to defend their collective interests. Natural selection factors would again operate to purify the White masses.

There will be no option to remain neutral then. You will either fight or die. No free stuff, no mercy to weakness and cowardice. The original White type would start to re-emerge, displacing the White curs that were so predominant in the decadent epoch.

Therefore this looming, seemingly awful and all-incinerating, global catastrophe has the potential to become the saving event for the White race.

It is impossible to predict the actual chain of events. But it is possible to discern the underlying logic of the events. Understanding this logic helps us to see what is to come.

Maybe the current ongoing war will become stalemated after a military impasse. Some kind of shaky Korean-style armistice could be arranged. But it is highly unlikely that such an arrangement would hold on for long, because the whole set of underlying causes of the conflict would remain intact and would push the opposing sides to renew fighting when the opportunity arises. Yes, battle lines can be frozen but not for more than a few years. The magnitude of the renewed conflict would increase. Therefore, regardless of whether or not a temporary armistice will be concluded in the coming months, it is likely that this war will grow into a world war at some point. The multitude of global problems that have accumulated since WW2 have grown to such an extent that a peaceful solution is out of the question. The whole rotten nature of the post-WW2 global system stands exposed; everyone can see it. The world cannot remain as it was; it must change; and this change is bound to be radical.

Finis.

* * *

Source: Author