Evidence for the “Holocaust”

by David Sims

THE QUESTION WAS asked: “Is there actually any real evidence for the Holocaust?”

There is some evidence — that the Holocaust is either a myth or is, at least, much exaggerated.

The trials of Ernst Zundel in Canada produced some interesting insights that have since been mostly covered up. For one thing, a lot of the so-called eyewitness testimony was proved false. Many survivors lied about what they said they had seen. For example, some survivors stated under oath that they had seen flames shooting out of the crematorium chimneys, bringing up ash, some of which landed on their clothing. It was a lie. It was proved in court that those chimneys were specifically designed not to emit fire or ash, but only warm air.

Holocaust testimony is sometimes in self-conflict, in mutual conflict, in conflict with physical evidence, or in conflict with the laws of Nature.

The chemical “criminal traces” of ferrocyanide on the red bricks forming the alleged gas chamber, where Jews were said to have been killed, isn’t consistent with the near daily use of a brick building as a gas chamber. There just isn’t enough of the bluish “Prussian blue” chemical for that to be the case. Instead, the level of contamination is consistent with a once or twice per year fumigation to kill pests and germs, which wasn’t done during World War 2 by the Germans alone, but also by the Allies, who used the same chemical (hydrogen cyanide, as evolved from Zyklon B) for the same pesticide purpose. Indeed, the alleged gas chamber isn’t the only building to exhibit that trace of ferrocyanide. Other buildings in the Auschwitz camp also show it, including the guards’ barracks. Again, this indicates that Zyklon B was used as a pesticide, not as a gas to kill people. If the Germans wanted to kill people, then there were much more effective gases available to them (which were invented during World War 1 for chemical warfare).

Furthermore, much of the photographic “evidence” was also false, misleading, or intentionally deceptive. Some of the photos did not begin as photos, but as high quality drawings that were then photographed slightly out of focus so that they seemed to be real photographic images. Some of the photos that did begin as photos were altered by drawing in extra objects or human figures that weren’t in the originals. Some photos had misleading captions on them; for example, a photo whose caption said that shown were the dead bodies of Jews from Auschwitz actually showed the dead bodies of Germans from Dresden.

The lesson to learn is not to make assumptions that go beyond what a picture really shows you. Just because you see a pile of dead bodies doesn’t necessarily let you know what those people died from. It doesn’t even tell you who the dead people were. It usually doesn’t tell you where and when the photograph was taken. When a narrator says the people shown were “gassed,” he might be lying. A great many people in German concentration camps died because they were infected with typhus, which is a deadly disease spread by lice. If the bodies look skinny, like they were starving before they died, it does not mean that their captors were intentionally starving them. During the war, the Allies bombed the railroads that the Germans used to send food and medicine to their eastward detention camps. That resulted in hard times for the people in those camps. The Germans probably wanted to feed their prisoners properly, but they couldn’t always do that.

The Germans did burn the bodies of the people who died. That was to prevent lice from hopping from those bodies to other people who were still alive and thereby spreading the typhus infection.

There are so many fakes in the body of “Holocaust evidence” that many people suspect that it’s all a great fake.

* * *

Source: Author