Classic EssaysRevilo P. Oliver

The Origins of Christianity, part 1

by Revilo P. Oliver


OF THE MANY PROBLEMS that confront us today, none is more vexing than that of the relation of Christianity to Western Civilization. None, certainly, causes more acrimonious controversy and internecine hostility between the members of the race which created that civilization. None more thoroughly counteracts their common interest in its preservation and renders them impotent and helpless. And that is not remarkable: what is in question is the essential nature of our civilization, and if there is no agreement about that, there can be no effective agreement on other questions.

Around 1910, Georges Matisse, in Les Ruines de l’Idée de Dieu,* predicted that by 1960, at the very latest, the only churches left in the civilized world would be the ones that were preserved as museum pieces for their architectural beauty or historical associations. The scientific and historical knowledge accumulated by our race had rendered belief in supernatural beings impossible for cultivated men, and universal education would speedily destroy the credulity of the masses. “We have climbed out of the dead end of the dungeon into which Christianity cast us. The man of today walks in the open air and the daylight. He has won confidence in himself.”

* Paris, Mercure de France, s.a. All translations from foreign languages in these pages are mine, unless otherwise noted.

In 1980, especially in the United States, there was a massive “upsurge” of Christianity. In November, one of America’s many bawling evangelists, Oral Roberts, had an interview with Jesus and took the opportunity to observe that Jesus is nine hundred feet tall. That datum so impressed his followers that within two weeks, it is said, they supplied him with an extra $5,000,000 to supplement the $45,000,000 they give him annually. A little earlier, another holy man, Don Stewart, reportedly made the big time in evangelism (i.e., an annual take of more than $10,000,000) by distributing to his votaries snippets of his underwear, which True Believers put under their pillows, since the bits of cloth that had been in contact with his flesh had absorbed the mana of his holiness. And in the quadrennial popularity contest to determine which actor was to have the star role in the White House, all three of the presidential candidates deemed it expedient to announce that they had “got Jesus” and been “born again.”

More significantly, in both England and the United States, a considerable number of men who have received enough technical training to be called scientists, have been hired or inspired to prove the authenticity of the Holy Shroud of Turin by “scientific” proof that the coarse cloth was discolored by supernatural means, the mana of divinity. Some of these scientists, it is true, claim that the vague picture was formed on the fabric because the body of the deceased god was highly radio-active and emitted radiation of an intensity comparable to that produced by the explosion of an atomic bomb at Hiroshima, but obviously only a very supernatural force could have charged the cells of an organic body with such enormous and deadly energy. In many American colleges, professors of reputable academic subjects are teaching courses to demonstrate that human beings cannot be the product of the biological process of evolution, but must have been specially designed and manufactured by a god in a way that they more or less explicitly identify with the well-known account of the descent of mankind from Adam and his spare rib. The divinity school of Emory University (founded in 1836) offers, for the edification of Methodist ministers, a graduate seminar in the theology of America’s most distinguished automobile thief and rapist, a Black preacher named King, and, presumably for such exemplary Christianity, was rewarded with a gift of $100,000,000, the largest private benefaction on record.

The United States has always been noted for the multiplicity and fanaticism of its Christian sects, but on a much smaller scale a Christian “outreach” (to use the evangelical term) for souls and funds may be observed in several countries of Europe, even including, it is said, some in Soviet territory. And one wonders whether a survey in England today would maintain the statistics that permitted Professor A. N. Whitehead to conclude, in 1942, that “far less than one-fifth of the population are in any sense Christians today.” I hear that the fraction would have to be significantly increased, and that Roman Catholicism, more than other sects, is constantly attracting a significant number of “converts.” But the number of persons who attend churches or profess to believe some one of the numerous Christian doctrines is relatively unimportant. The domestic and foreign policies of all the nations of the Western world are based on ideas that their populations as a whole take for granted and accept without reflection or consideration – ideas which are obviously, though sometimes not explicitly, derived from Christian theology and are, so to speak, a residue of the ages when our race was, not inaccurately, called Christendom.

Matisse was egregiously wrong. His spectacular error, however, was a projection logically made from the evidence available to him in 1910, when he concluded that “the White race has conquered the whole world and slain the Dragon [of superstition]. And the race had to do it. If the human mind had been incapable of that achievement, the most difficult of all it’s achievements, it would have been doomed. Intellect would have ended in failure on this planet. It was a question of the life or death of intelligence… The indisputable proof of the innately superior power of the European mind today is atheism.”

Matisse, of course, did not foresee the catastrophe of 1914 or sense the subterranean and occult forces that were secretly in operation even in 1910 to precipitate, not just another European war to alter the balance of power on the Continent, but a war that those forces converted into a universal disaster, even more destructive of rationality than of property and life, which may prove to have been the beginning of the end for our civilization and race. The question that Matisse so clearly posed therefore remains, not altered by the calamities he could not foresee, but instead now made even more vital and urgent.

The question is obviously, perhaps fatally, divisive, but it cannot be evaded or ignored. The question is one to which even reticence is an answer; and hypocrisy is demoralizing. I have therefore undertaken the exacting and almost impossible task of presenting in these pages an objective and dispassionate summary of the problem, condensing into a few pages what would more properly be the substance of several volumes, themselves compendious. I have necessarily refrained from debating side issues and from straying into scholarly controversies. I have tried to limit myself to skeletal essentials of what may with confidence be regarded as established fact and logical inference therefrom, and I assume that I need not tell intelligent readers that the subject is one on which it is flatly impossible to make any statement whatsoever that is not contradicted somewhere in the horrendous tonnage of printed paper on the shelves of even a mediocre library.*

* I have restricted the documentary notes to a bare minimum, limited to points that may not generally be matters of common knowledge. So far as possible, I have cited only works available in English, selecting from these the one or two that give, so far as I know, the most succinct and perspicuous treatment of the given topic.

To view our problem clearly, we must begin with its beginnings and indicate, as summarily as possible, its prehistoric origins, limiting ourselves to matters directly relevant to our own race, with which alone we need have a rational concern. And since Indo-European is best reserved for use as a linguistic term, and such words as Nordic and Celtic are too restrictive as designations of variations within our species, we shall use the only available word in general use that designates our race as a whole, although the Jews have forbidden us to use it. Aryan, furthermore, has the advantage that it is not a geographic term, and while some may think it immodest to describe ourselves as arya, ‘noble,’ that word does indicate a range of moral concepts for which our race seems to have instinctively a peculiar and characteristic respect, which differentiates it from other races as sharply as do its physical traits, and, like them, more or less conspicuously, depending on the particular contrast that is made. It is unfortunate that in the present state of knowledge we cannot trace our species, the Aryans, to the species of Homo erectus or Homo habilis from which it is descended.

To be continued

* * *


Previous post

A Puzzling Question Answered

Next post

Hate and Defamation Without End: The ADL, part 1

Notify of
Inline Feedback
View all comments
Frederick Ford
Frederick Ford
16 June, 2022 2:56 am

The biggest lies that Christianity, derived from Judaism, has come up with is the common descent of all humans & universal morality

Fear of destruction
Fear of destruction
16 June, 2022 3:40 am

You should probably do an article on George Carlin someday. He hates religion, especially Christianity. He also stated that the jews control everything.

Reply to  Fear of destruction
17 June, 2022 1:40 am

“Atheism” is also great tool in the service of the jews. One of their biggest, look what it has done and is doing to Europe and Russia- it literally and still does makes all men who believe it’s “theory” into animals. Judiasm is basically atheism masked in a garb of “religion”.
Nature and the cosmos testifies of something greater than ourselves. The jews religion/god is an “unknowable thing” therefor it is not the truest form of atheism ?
i am against all semitic “religions”. Anything that permits rape of helpless children is a crime against nature.

16 June, 2022 9:29 am

There are some people through the ages that actually stand out.
Every time I read an article from Revilo P. Oliver, it feels like I am listening to a Mozart Symphony.
How is that even possible?

Thank you NV for securing these priceless articles.

Reply to  Anonymous
26 June, 2022 1:20 pm

“Every time I read an article from Revilo P. Oliver, it feels like I am listening to a Mozart Symphony.”

My sentiments, exactly!

Walt Hampton
Walt Hampton
16 June, 2022 2:37 pm

Looking forward to the
next installment.

17 June, 2022 1:26 am

Look I’m not arguing for or against any organized “religion” as at the end of a man or woman’s life we will all share that door in common? I have read that cosmotheism was first thought of by a Russian (true or not i don’t really care who was “1st”). I’ve read that Hitler spoke of himself using positive “christianity”. – National Socialism is basically that in full action. Again i don’t really care if hitler supported it on the surface and privately spoke other things.WHAT IS HILARIOUSLY STUPID AND UNPROFITABLE TO THE WHITE RACE to me is that so many White people make such a big fuss and cause much division over a man’s possible personal conviction or not. After all is it not a man or woman’s own… Read more »

Reply to  cas
22 June, 2022 2:02 am

Hitler was tolerant of the German people’s belief in Christianity, but he did not align himself with the God of Christianity as Hitler just believed in a ‘higher power’. Hitler mostly believed in Nature’s Laws. National Socialism is all about Nature’s Laws. Hitler certainly did not align himself with Christianity’s excessive notions of forgiveness, turning the other cheek, repenting, meekness and loving everybody!! He understood that the universe is about survival — The survival, upliftment and progression of your race, of your people. It’s all about DNA – your spiritual and metaphysical connection through it. There is nothing more precious than your own people. Christianity is a pacifying and subversive Mind Control – just like all abrahamic religions. Christianity has been used to subvert and pacify European civilization. Did Hitler… Read more »

21 June, 2022 8:44 pm

Let’s play a game goy. Pick your side.

God vs. Satan
Ukraine vs. Russia
Democrats vs. Republicans
Ford vs. Chevy
Communism vs. Capitalism
Batman vs. The Joker
Dallas Cowboys vs. Washington Redskins

Fight each other goy, while we Jews take over everything and genocide you! It’s called a false dichotomy. Heads I win, tails you lose!

Oy vey, are you starting to catch on? We’ll throw in some sidekicks and more false options to keep you confused. Jesus, Libertarianism, Robin, demons, angels, RINOs….

We’ll just keep changing it up and you will never figure it out!

William W Williams * National Alliance Chairman
William W Williams * National Alliance Chairman
Reply to  atlantaeasy
22 June, 2022 6:05 pm

Thanks for that, Jewboy. You’re essentially correct with your Jewish divide and conquer strategy.

But the reason you hiked up here to tell us all that is because you know that some of us goyim — the Aryan ones in the National Alliance, anyway — already know this and know how to deal with your tribe and your phony fights.

Jim - National Alliance Staff
Jim - National Alliance Staff
Reply to  William W Williams * National Alliance Chairman
22 June, 2022 11:05 pm

They are watching us indeed. This should be instructive to other commenters here to be at their best when exercising their commenting privileges.

Walt Hampton
Walt Hampton
Reply to  Jim - National Alliance Staff
23 June, 2022 10:46 am

….and their step-n-fetch
FBI will even make house
calls if their Jew owners
think you are getting too
far “out of line.”

Will W. Williams * National Alliance Chairman
Will W. Williams * National Alliance Chairman
Reply to  atlantaeasy
23 June, 2022 10:16 am

atlantaeasy: Let’s play a game goy. Pick your side. — OK, let’s look at your tribe’s phony fight between Ukraine vs. Russia. Our racial nationalist correspondent in Russia, Comrade Wolf Stoner, who knows from experience of what he speaks, looks at your “game” like this: Jews dominate all major media outlets both in the West and in Russia. It is why portrayal of the war from both sides looks strikingly similar. Both sides “fight against pure evil” and for “noble cause”. And, certainly, in both cases the opposing side is presented as “Nazis”. What else could be expected from Jews?…… I must conclude that at present Jews have global monopoly on truth. They successfully shape the narrative of all major events and can twist the public discussion in any fashion… Read more »

Reply to  Will W. Williams * National Alliance Chairman
24 June, 2022 10:24 pm

Good grief, I’m a White man. I was role-playing to prove a point.

Will W. Williams * National Alliance Chairman
Will W. Williams * National Alliance Chairman
Reply to  atlantaeasy
27 June, 2022 3:01 pm

atlantaeasy: Good grief, I’m a White man. — Prove it. — I was role-playing to prove a point. — The National Alliance is a serious real world organization. Our online magazine National Vanguard is not for your or other anonymous role players’ fictional entertainment. Your “point” is faulty, weak. — Fight each other goy, while we Jews take over everything and genocide you! It’s called a false dichotomy. Heads I win, tails you lose! — To those of us in the National Alliance the only dichotomy we’re interested in is us vs. them, or Aryan vs. Jew. That is not false. Many in the greater White resistance movement see ithe struggle as Christianity vs.Judaism — now, that is a false dichotomy! False dichotomies are logical fallacies because they present two… Read more »

Reply to  atlantaeasy
27 June, 2022 10:29 pm

Hey atlantaeasy…… don’t be too hasty now.
Go on. Admit it.
I think you’re jealous and envious of it all aren’t you?

But there actually is hope, even for a Khazarian (a.k.a. Jew) Cuck like yourself.
Jesus saves. Repent! Repent!