Black People in America — and the Misnamed “Civil Rights Movement”

by Stephen Contrado

WHITE PEOPLE have been supremely generous to the Negroes. They have raised Blacks from savage tribal conditions to civilization, but history does not record the kindness. Instead, historians use the relative concepts of “slavery” and “racism” out of historic context and use them to deride aristocratic southern plantation owners and contemporary White loyalists for abuses. These historians foment modern communistic revolutions. Comparing the Old South to the exploitation, crime, and social misery of the modern city slums, one definitely acquits the Old South. Moreover, during the 19th century the “free” workmen of Europe worked long hours from an early age, lived in slums, ate bad food, and were subjected to numerous social ills. Economic and political competition between the North and the South was the chief cause of secession and civil war, not slavery in itself. Lincoln did not issue the Emancipation Proclamation until 1862 when the Civil War was half over, freeing only slaves in territory then in rebellion.

The negative interpretation of the Old South’s heritage could only have been conceived and promoted by a race of vulgar opportunists who had no integral relationship with the Western heritage — the Jews. Indeed the Jews had even established the slave trade. Their principal advantage was to pass as Caucasian or White but their literacy, shrewd business acumen, and ghetto traditions of separateness facilitated their success. General Ulysses Grant barred Jews from his jurisdiction because of the trouble they caused. As the power of the Jews grew in America so did racial conflict between Negroes and Whites. Jewish money corrupted government, labor, education, churches, the press, and other leading institutions.

Racial segregation was a generous plan, but White benevolence went back many decades before it. The plan to repatriate Negroes in Africa had shown great promise. The races (Indians included) were kept apart for the benefit of civilization and good breeding. The Ku Klux Klan was founded in 1866. It saved the southern White race from reconstruction and social anarchy. It was disbanded, but reformed in 1915.

In 1896, in the case of Plessy v. Ferguson, the Supreme Court upheld the custom of “separate but equal.” It correctly concluded: “Legislation is powerless to eradicate racial instincts or to abolish distinctions based upon physical differences, and the attempt to do so can only result in accentuating the difficulties of the present situation.”

But traditional universities even admitted well-qualified Blacks. W.E.B. Du Bois (b. 1868), the founder of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), earned a Ph.D. at Harvard. (Later Jews controlled the NAACP.) Idealists founded institutions for Blacks only (e.g., Lincoln University, Howard University, Fisk, Tuskegee Institute, and many agricultural and mechanical schools). Jewish propagandists later indoctrinated these institutions to accept values to destroy White culture.

Negroes had a sense of identity and belonging by having their own cultural forms and associations. Their sports were drug-free and not a multibillion dollar show. Scott Joplin, for example, created new musical styles that swept the nation. When the Jews captured the music industry, Jews like Irving Berlin destroyed the Black spirit out of greed for profits. Chauvinism is a natural trait of the Negro, but it was not based on anti-White prejudices, protests, lawlessness, and exaggerations about the intolerance Blacks faced. A subculture reduced to blaming a majority has no real independent life or vision and is doomed to decay.

Civil rights from Booker T. Washington (b. 1856) to Martin Luther King (b. 1929) were to become a spoiling and demolition of Black identity and nationalism. Integration destroyed Black solidarity, creating “racism,” and undermining United States greatness and national sovereignty. This benefited only the international race — the Jews. Negroes never wanted equality: they wanted free expression for their unique talents. And, so, equality turned out to be self-denial and acting out. Black codes were needed to control a people not used to freedom and of a different biological make-up.

1954 was a critical year. Earl Warren (b.1891) in Brown v. Board of Education forbade racial segregation as a violation of the 14th Amendment guaranteeing “equal protection”: “We come then to the question presented: Does segregation of children in public schools solely on the basis of race, even though the physical facilities and other ‘tangible’ factors may be equal, deprive the children of the minority group of equal educational opportunities? We believe it does. … To separate them from others of similar age and qualifications solely because of their race generates a feeling of inferiority as to status in the community that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely ever to be undone …”

Warren was not the bleeding-heart historians portray him to be, but a ruthless communist working for the destruction of the United States. Even President Eisenhower regretted appointing him to the Supreme Court. Warren had been responsible for the seizure of property from Japanese-Americans interned by the federal government. Warren had no respect for democratic traditions: he usurped the power of the legislature. The Brown decision was not based on judicial procedure. No real inquiry was made into the biological consequences of race-mixing. It was simply a sociological ultimatum.

The Warren court protected every class of criminal and crime skyrocketed in the country. Mapp v. Ohio (1961) made evidence irrelevant unless gathered with a warrant. In Escobedo v. Illinois (1964) it permitted those clearly guilty of crime to go free because of court technicalities. Miranda v. Arizona (1968) made all convictions in jeopardy if suspects were not informed of their rights. These were all Jewish communist schemes.

The whole process of racial integration has been designed to alienate the races and promote civil strife and anarchy. Yet the process was concealed in liberal rhetoric. In 1957 Congress approved the civil rights bill for Blacks to protect voting rights, And highhanded conduct was not trifling. The same year Eisenhower had the National Guard integrate all-White Central High School in Little Rock, Arkansas and the mass media have gained tremendous political power in policing social relations and values. For the most part, these are owned and managed by Jews.

Thus only when the Jews are circumscribed by White civilization can segregation work and ensure the peace and progress of society. Why then, has government taken the opposite course of empowering the international Jews with their self-aggrandizing policies for a one-world government? And why are all strategies and solutions of White people for social progress censored and suppressed? Are we past the point of no return for civilization as we know it?

In the final analysis, the Establishment has usurped all traditional rights and institutionalized new relationships based on its absolute authority. Its race-mixing intent is apparent. But every evidence demonstrates there is no social justice nor biological advantage to race-mixing.

Hitler believed the racial instinct was the only cause of the formation of communities and civilization: “All that we admire in the world today, its science, its art, its technical developments, are the products of the creative activities of a few peoples, and it may be true that their first beginnings must be attributed to one race. The maintenance of civilization is wholly dependent on such peoples. Should they perish, all that makes this earth beautiful will descend with them into the grave.” (Mein Kampf)

If we compare the conditions of 19th century White workers, we see how liberals ignore the vast amount of social misery suffered by Whites. That “Afro-Americans” and minorities should be singled out as privileged groups for special treatment augurs the dispossession and extermination of Whites. Compare the “rights” of Jews to Whites. The Jews built up a whole Holocaust industry — museums, monuments, foreign aid to Israel, media censorship of so-called anti-Semitism, hate laws, pensions and relief services to Holocaust survivors, etc. — that biases every European and American institution to pay tribute to an alleged 6 million Jews gassed! But Whites who challenge the myth are quickly demoted, blacklisted, and ostracized.

More and more Whites are sensing the conspiracy every day. Civil rights will prove to be a bigger failure than laissez faire economics. Documents from 19th century British industry depict what Whites could expect from life. British mines, for example, were deplorable. Lord Ashley’s Mines Commission made an investigation of labor conditions in the mines. Here is a glimpse of the times.

Sarah Gooder, aged 8, reported: “I’m a trapper in the Gawber pit. It does not tire me, but I have to trap without light, and I’m scared. I go at four and sometimes half past three in the morning, and come out at five and half past. I never go to sleep. Sometimes I sing when I’ve light…. I go to Sunday-school and read ‘Reading made Easy.’ [She knows her letters and can read little words.] They teach me to pray. [She repeated the Lord’s prayer, not very perfectly….] I have heard tell of Jesus many times…. I would like to be at school far better than in the pit.”

Isabella Read, 12 years old, a coal-bearer, reported: “I am brought with sister and brother, it is very sore work; cannot say how many rakes or journeys I make from pit’s bottom to wall face and back.

“I carry out about 1 cwt. and a quarter on my back; have to stoop so much and creep through water, which is frequently up to the calves of my legs.

‘“I do not like work, nor do the lassies, but they are made to like it.”

Mary Barrett, aged 14, reported: “I have worked down in the pits five years. Father is working next pit…. I hurry for my brother John, and come down at seven o’clock about. I go up at six, sometimes even seven. I do not like working in pit, but I am obliged to get a living. I work always without stockings, or shoes, or trousers. I wear nothing but my chemise. I have to go up to the headings with the men. They are naked …I cannot read or write.”

Patience Kershaw, 17 years old, reported: “My father has been dead about a year. My mother is living and has ten children. Three lassies go to mill. All the lads are colliers…. I go to pit at five o’clock in the morning and come out at five in the evening. I eat my breakfast of porridge and milk first. I take my dinner with me, a cake, and eat it as I go. I do not stop or rest any time for the purpose. I get nothing else until I get home, and then have potatoes and meat, not every day meat. I hurry in the clothes I have on, trousers and ragged jacket.

“The bald place upon my head is made by thrusting the corves [vehicles for carrying coal]. My legs have never swelled, but sisters’ did…. I hurry the corves a mile and more underground and back; they weigh 300 cwt. The getters I work for are naked except for their caps. They pull off all their clothes. I see them at work when I go up. Sometimes they beat me, if I am not quick enough, with their hands. They strike me upon the back. The boys take liberties with me; sometimes they pull me about. I am the only girl in the pit. There are about 20 boys and 15 men. All the men are naked.” Lord Ashley’s Report added that this girl was ignorant, filthy, ragged, and deplorable looking, such as the uncivilized {…}

* * *

Source: Liberty Bell magazine, June 1997 and Racial Realism