Andrew HamiltonEssays

Tulsi Gabbard and the Browning of America

Tulsi Gabbard’s 2013 official congressional portrait. Interestingly, it has been airbrushed (digitally altered). Though pretty, other pictures reveal that she has facial pockmarks.

by Andrew Hamilton

TULSI Gabbard? I learned of her existence because some White racialists are touting her for President. A 37-year-old Democratic Congresswoman from Hawaii, she recently threw her hat into the ring for 2020.

Why is she being ballyhooed? Because she made some arguably “noninterventionist” comments about U.S. meddling in the Middle East.

I do not favor Gabbard or any other non-White or Democrat for public office, so I’m unmoved by any of that. She is anti-White and philo-Semitic like the rest of the evil crew in Washington. I do not believe she will become president, but that’s up to Jews and the Left. Nobody else has any say about it.

Gabbard does present an interesting case study in the browning of America, however.

To America’s elite she represents “the first”—as they label their daily milestone “achievements”—Samoan-American and Hindu member of the U.S. Congress.

But it turns out Gabbard’s “Hinduism” isn’t quite what it’s cracked up to be. She inherited it not from her non-White father, who is Roman Catholic, but her White mother, a product of the Sixties generation.

The Gabbards adhere to a Hare Krishna offshoot that some people call a cult. Hare Krishna itself (the International Society for Krishna Consciousness, or ISKCON) was founded in the United States in 1966 by an Indian swami and spread predominantly among Whites.

Next, what do Establishment publicists mean when they call Gabbard “Samoan-American”?

Given her dark complexion, black hair, brown eyes, and place of birth, the term unquestionably suggests non-White ancestry (in this case, Polynesian). (On the Polynesian race, see the end of article.) This feature is implicitly played up when the term is used.

Gabbard does have non-White ancestry. She is a racial hybrid, the product of race mixing, born in American Samoa in 1981.

The Samoa Islands in the Pacific Ocean are separated into American Samoa (also known as Eastern Samoa) and Western Samoa, which have different histories.

The Islands were discovered by a Dutch explorer in 1722, but ruled over by native Polynesian chiefs until 1860. Between 1889 and 1899 they were ruled jointly by the U.S., Germany, and Great Britain.

The U.S. then acquired sole title to Eastern Samoa, whose population is much smaller than Western Samoa’s. Today administered as a territory by the U.S. Department of the Interior, since 1960 American Samoa has had its own Constitution, governor, legislature, and judiciary.

Meanwhile, Western Samoa went to Germany, but in 1919 was transferred to New Zealand under the Versailles Treaty. It became independent in 1962 in the mass decolonization wave orchestrated by globalist elites who opposed White power after WWII. Today those same elites are flooding White homelands with Third World migrants and violently oppressing Europeans in the process of biologically and culturally exterminating the White population worldwide.

Tulsi Gabbard’s parents: mostly Samoan Hawaii State Senator Michael Gabbard (D.) and his wife Carol (Porter) Gabbard in 2015.

Ironically, Gabbard is more White than Polynesian.

Her Indiana-born mother, Carol (née Porter), is White (in fact, three-quarters German), and even her Samoan father, a Hawaii State Senator (D.) and former Honolulu city councilman, is reportedly one-quarter European, though he does not look it.

Michael Gabbard, wife Carol (Porter), and newborn son Bhakti in 1971. The couple had five mixed race children together, including Tulsi.

Abortion and contraception weren’t issues in Carol Porter’s case. Reproductively speaking, she left the gene pool and contributed five non-White and no White children to the population of the globe and the United States.

Michael Gabbard’s father looks White in an old black and white photograph, but had some Samoan ancestry.

Like her parents, Tulsi’s interracial grandparents did not stint when it came to offspring. They had eight mixed race children altogether.

Tulsi’s paternal grandfather Benjamin Harrison Gabbard, Jr. holding Michael (her father) at Hickam Air Force Base, Honolulu, Hawaii, 1952.

Race crossing such as this generation after generation blurs boundaries and means that more Whites in the future will intermarry with increasingly indeterminate hybrids.

Assimilation also eliminates barriers that formerly kept people apart. Tulsi Gabbard displays no language, dialect, clothing, or similar cues that would sharply differentiate her from Europeans.

There is her Hinduism, but that’s in the context of an anti-Christian society where even the vast majority of “Christians” are anti-Christian, and seemingly exotic Hare Krishnas arose among Whites, not foreigners.

The father’s and daughter’s looks demonstrate how quickly the White phenotype, developed over millennia, vanishes. That’s why Jews and government push miscegenation so hard in their propaganda, including pornography, now society’s primary source of sexual norms and education, mediated from the shadows by the Sex Establishment, a vast government- and oligarch-funded bureaucracy and legal system employing thousands of people at generous salaries.

Tulsi’s Samoan grandmother, Aknesis Agnes Gabbard, married to Benjamin Harrison Gabbard (above), is said to have been one-eighth White, meaning she had one White great-grandparent.

It was racially irresponsible for the Whites in Tulsi Gabbard’s family tree to intermarry and have children with Polynesians. Although it is not my concern, Samoans did not benefit either. From a conservationist standpoint both groups were harmed.

From a strictly empirical point of view Tulsi Gabbard is more White than non-White: three quarters European and one-quarter Polynesian. She could have been classified as “White” instead of “Samoan.” In a way it would make more sense. Fortunately that did not happen. It is vital that hybrids be directed away from what remains of the White community and gene pool, not into it.

Gabbard’s ancestry, like Obama’s, is conceptually “clean” in the sense that it combines only two identifiable racial stocks. Increasingly this will not be the case, and phenotype, usually all we have to go by, will become less and less reliable as a racial indicator. This is exactly what Jews want for Gentiles.

Tulsi Gabbard’s two husbands apparently were not White.

For four years she was married to Eduardo Tamayo, about whom little is known. He is reputedly the son of a Filipino military officer, Colonel Antonio Tamayo, Jr.

Abraham Williams and Gabbard

Her current husband, Abraham Williams, seven years her junior, keeps a low public profile. His paternal ancestry is unknown, but his mother Anya F. Anthony is (or was) employed as Tulsi Gabbard’s office manager. Apparently Anthony is the woman in this YouTube clip, which means she is not White. She speaks with what sounds like an Australian accent but is apparently from New Zealand, so if not part-Maori must derive from some other race or mix.

I have no information about the racial-reproductive patterns of Tulsi’s many hybrid uncles and aunts or four brothers and sisters. But at least Tulsi herself hasn’t had children, and at 37 is approaching the point where she will not, as long as she doesn’t resort to the expensive and complicated services of a fertility clinic.

So much for the race and religion of the Establishment’s “first Samoan-American and first Hindu member of Congress” and candidate for president.

Women in the Military

Tulsi Gabbard’s recent statement in a 30-second campaign ad filmed by her cinematographer husband that “As your Commander in Chief I will . . .” caused a visceral negative reaction in me.

She should not be Commander in Chief because a) she’s not White and b) she’s a woman.

She should not be a member of Congress for the same reasons. As a congresswoman she wields power over both Whites and men.

What that statement immediately conjured up was the mental image of a photograph published in National Vanguard tabloid in 1979—40 years ago. Talk about prescience!

Tulsi Gabbard exemplifies this feminist, anti-male development. She holds the rank of major and served two tours of duty in Iraq and Kuwait.

Gabbard says military service is what caused her conversion from early opposition to homosexuality and the sexual agenda to current proud recipient of a 100% rating from the largest, most powerful homosexual lobby in the United States, the so-called “Human Rights Campaign.”

Do the armed forces match or exceed the Catholic Church in moral degeneracy? They must come close.

Promotion to major in the Hawaii Army National Guard in 2015. With her black hair out of the way it’s easier to discern part-Polynesian physiognomy. Nevertheless, she is three-quarters White.

If Gabbard flipped 180 degrees on such a vital issue, under equal or greater pressure she will jettison her current critique of Middle East foreign policy, just as Trump and Obama did. Even the hastily-granted carrot of a Nobel Peace Prize couldn’t pry the Kenyan away from the Zionists.

Note on the Polynesian Race

Jewish anthropologist Stanley Garn classified Polynesians as one of the nine major geographical races of mankind:

The Polynesian Geographical Race occupies a vast territory in the Pacific, ranging from New Zealand to Hawaii and Easter Island. Many now uninhabited islands of the Pacific bear relics of these hardy, seafaring folk, some of whom were still on their eastward migration at the time of Captain Cook’s voyages [1768-1780].

Polynesian polymorphism is marked for hair form, skin color, nose form, and body build. In years past, a tri-hybrid explanation was given as the most likely explanation. But we know now that . . . the Polynesians are more or less typically “Pacific,” quite unlike mainland Asia and certainly quite un-European. So while linguistic evidence may indicate ultimate Asian origins, it is apparent that natural selection has [made] . . . Polynesians what they are today. – Stanley M. Garn, Human Races, 3d ed. (Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas, 1971), pp. 156-157.

Human Races is a useful little book.

Anthropologist Roger Pearson described the Polynesians as follows:

The main body of Malayo-Polynesians who settled the South Pacific probably comprised a substantial Indian or non-oriental component, which was less mixed with indigenous Negrito and Australoid elements in the case of the Polynesians than were the Micronesians (who reveal Negrito admixture) and the Melanesians (who show strong Australoid admixture). The Western Polynesians include the Samoans, the Tongans and Ellice Islanders; the Eastern Polynesians include the Marquesans, Tahitians, and Easter Islanders; the Southern Polynesians include the Maoris of New Zealand; and the Northern Polynesians who settled in Hawaii. Other Polynesians include the Tikopians (actually located geographically in Melanesia) and the Ontong-Javanese. – Roger Pearson, Anthropological Glossary (Malabar, Fla.: Robert E. Krieger, 1985), p. 212.

Polynesia, which includes Hawaii and Samoa, has been subjected to extensive race mixing for a long time. It was already far advanced by the 1930s and ’40s. See, e.g., Earnest Beaglehole, “The Mixed Blood in Polynesia,” Journal of the Polynesian Society, 58 (June, 1949): 51-57 (the first page can be rea) .

This illustration from a 1941 pro-miscegenation academic article is about Hawaii, the state Gabbard represents in Congress, but Samoa is similar. From William W. Krauss, “Race Crossing in Hawaii: A Summary of Six Years of Research,” Journal of Heredity, 32 (November 1, 1941): 371–378.

* * *

Source: Author

For Further Reading

Previous post

A Century of Jewish Lies, part 2

Next post

Subverting Freedom

21 Comments

  1. Ted Truewil
    18 February, 2019 at 11:21 am — Reply

    What we really need it a reliable DNA testing services. I have heard that existing companies like “23andMe” deliberately distort results in order to “***k with racists”.

    A friend of mine was upset when his granddaughter’s test at “23andME” came back as 22% Japanese. There are no non-Whites in his family.

    • 22 February, 2019 at 6:16 am — Reply

      You can download the raw data and get free or inexpensive different analyses. Gedmatch uses both your raw SNP data from any of the big services, and a Gedcom genealogy file if you have one. Genomelink gives really interesting results about health, personality, and iq results tied to specific SNP’s.

      I know 4 white people personally who had theirs done on Ancestry, and all the results came out 100% European, right in line with family genealogy and obvious appearance. 23andMe seems to be the worst offender in finding non-white results for white people.

      • Bridger
        23 February, 2019 at 5:22 pm — Reply

        I’m very happy with Ancestry DNA. I received refined DNA results in 2018 and based on that I’m even more Northern and Northwestern European than the original results.

        Absolutely no negro, Amerindian or Jewish DNA as leftists always try to claim that most whites have at least some. That’s false and my DNA results proved it.

  2. Disgusted
    19 February, 2019 at 9:21 pm — Reply

    Think Barcak Obama wasn’t ridiculous enough to to thoroughly humiliate America?

    https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=george+harrison+krishna+video&qpvt=george+harrison+krishna+video&FORM=VDRE

  3. Bancroft Hall
    19 February, 2019 at 9:32 pm — Reply

    “Brace Up, Plebe! Eyes in the Boat! Don’t look at my breasts! ” Makes me wanna puke.

    But girlies in the Navy, and especially at Boat U. (the U.S. Naval Academy) are as Amurrikan as apple pie. The “Last Class With Balls” argument was all the rage when I was there. It was quite the contest between the USNA Class of 1975 (last year before any women were in the building) and Class of 1979 (last graduating class with no women in it). Each side had its merit!

    Now forty years or so later, women are so ingrained into USN that, literally, there’s nobody left on active duty who remembers the all-male American military. Submarine duty used to be the last bastion of all-male USN environment but that’s all gone now. Even in the Marine Corps, there’s perfume everywhere. And lesbians! Lots of ’em! You bet, baby!

    And from lots of observation: Females in their various military assignments, in all the services … Nearly all of them utterly relish their ability to rub a Man’s nose in it, at every opportunity. They also don’t bat a false-eyelash at the egregious promotional advantages of having zero testicles in the modern U.S. Military. There’s not enough room in NatVan’s comment section to cover all the details and anecdotes. Suffice to say — woe betide any and every male soldier, sailor, airman and Marine who would run afoul of the Great Feminist In the Sky. His career can go up in perfume at the drop of a — nail file.

    I’m glad that Dr. Pierce voiced his trepidation — disgust, really — at the business of females “dressing down” men in the military. (It’s embarrassing — I remember the female in the photo). He was all over it. Now I’m a balding 60-something and keep my mouth shut in the presence of young folks struggling to survive their military careers. But it’s just as damned stupid to have women in the various militaries now as it was in the days of Napoleon, Hannibal, Julius Caesar, Robert the Bruce, Kublai Khan, Patton, Charles Martel and Henry IV.

    • Disgusted
      20 February, 2019 at 5:03 am — Reply

      Some surveys indicate that 15 thousand transgendered creatures serve in the military. https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/07/military-may-fund-gender-transition-if-transgender-ban-is-lifted/

    • Andrew Hamilton
      20 February, 2019 at 1:25 pm — Reply

      Thanks for your observations. (By the way, that’s a BIG dormitory Mr. Hall!)

      With respect to the woman in the photograph, is it someone you came across personally?

      An important statement: “Now forty years or so later, there’s nobody left on active duty who remembers the all-male American military.”

      This applies not only to females in the military, but to many massive changes imposed by tiny Jewish and Left-wing cliques. It helps explain their success and continuously pushing the goal posts in new, sick directions.

      Based upon the 1975-1979 dates you provide, National Alliance founder William Pierce was on the issue virtually as it happened.

      His ability to perceive was almost uncanny. Several years ago on a different blog National Alliance Chairman Will Williams posted a portion of an old NA Bulletin written by Dr. Pierce about Chris Christie when the latter was still a college student. I probably saved it somewhere.

      That Christie should have come to Dr. Pierce’s attention out of millions of college students, and that he should have so perfectly understood what Christie was about at such a young age hits home forcefully when read today.

      • 22 February, 2019 at 4:32 pm — Reply

        ANDREW HAMILTON: … [Y]ears ago on a different blog National Alliance Chairman Will Williams posted a portion of an old NA Bulletin written by Dr. Pierce about Chris Christie when the latter was still a college student.

        https://whitebiocentrism.com/viewtopic.php?f=60&t=490&p=6618&hilit=Chris+Christie#p6618

        Fresh out of high school in 1966 I was stationed at Fort McClellan, AL, taking AIT (Advanced Infantry Training) prior to Infantry Officer training at Ft. Benning, GA. McClellan was the headquarters for the Women’s Army Corps then: the WACs. That Army base was later closed: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fort_McClellan and in a giant social experiment, formerly segregated and protected female soldiers were “mainstreamed” with men with questionable consequences.

    • 24 February, 2019 at 8:05 am — Reply

      “Nearly all of them utterly relish their ability to rub a Man’s nose in it, at every opportunity”.
      Thankfully when I served in 69-70 I didn’t have to put up with any of that from “wimens” but there was plenty of anti-white sentiment to go around.

  4. Disgusted
    20 February, 2019 at 4:56 am — Reply

    Michael Gabbard, wife Carol (Porter), and newborn son Bhakti in 1971. The couple had five mixed race children together, including Tulsi.

    Another made-up name: http://www.sikh-history.com/sikhhist/events/bhakti.html

  5. Bancroft Hall
    20 February, 2019 at 8:53 am — Reply

    One more thought on the “Women in the Military” business: Despite its obvious Hollywood, Jewish and Political Correctness nature, the “Star Trek Next Generation” series, the one with ‘Jean Luc Picard’ as the Captain of the Enterprise, intrigued me. This was because it developed many hundreds of scenes depicting the Bridge of a Warship, and the behaviors of Officers working therein. Having spent countless hours in such a Pilot House (another name for the Bridge), I knew a few things about how people act while on watch. Captain Picard’s bridge, and the behaviors of the various Officers serving at watchstations, was peculiarly accurate when compared to the Bridge of a USN Ship – ESPECIALLY with the newly INTEGRATED Navy ships complete with Women and Blacks fully integrated into the Wardroom (Ship’s collection of Officers). Many of the Picard – Star Trek pilothouse behaviors were equivalently bad to those that can be found on a present-day USN guided missile cruiser.

    But a telling detail of the whole Star Trek Next Generation series: Captain Picard was FREQUENTLY confronted with very unpleasant encounters with Admirals and other Flag Officers, who were usually Female, Ugly, Domineering, Black, Stupid, Impulsive – or a combination of all six. I felt bad for old Jean-Luc! But what I enjoyed – and what perhaps was disliked by the Roddenberry Zio-Hollywood producers, was Picard’s obvious disgust and distaste for having to Take Merde from Senior Officers of Inferior Minds and having all those politically correct non-attributes. Picard was angry and humiliated having to kowtow to a hideous, ugly, screaming, and yes, utterly STUPID Black Woman Admiral, who undoubtedly had never conducted a combat mission on her steep climb to the top of Starfleet. So Hooray for Patrick Stewart and his Captain Picard! He was appalled at having to acquiesce to Marxist role-reversals, which for him were just as stupid in the Twenty-Fifth Century as they are to us grouchy old Nationalist military veterans living in Libtard America.

    PS Today’s young, White Junior Officer in the U.S. Navy (and all of the Services), the poor b**tard not only has to contend with women and Blacks in his midst, but also LBGTQXYZs as well!

    • 24 February, 2019 at 8:11 am — Reply

      You are probably right about Picard, he must have run a tight ship, I don’t remember the Enterprise ever running into a space tanker.

  6. Jim
    21 February, 2019 at 6:41 am — Reply

    Her mother Carol looks jewish.

  7. 22 February, 2019 at 6:32 am — Reply

    So, according to this logic, Trump, a white male, is a better choice than Gabbard due to his innate racial characteristics?
    A chimpanzee randomly hitting nuclear launch buttons to get bananas would be a better choice than Trump.
    The last thing we need is a white male as fake president; we need to accelerate the terminal phase of the US empire not the extend it.
    AIPAC is opposed to Gabbard, a fact conveniently not brought up in this article, and that fact is the only important one.

    • Phil
      25 February, 2019 at 7:25 pm — Reply

      So, according to this logic, Trump, a white male, is a better choice than Gabbard due to his innate racial characteristics?

      Yes. 100% better.

      The last thing we need is a white male as fake president; we need to accelerate the terminal phase of the US empire not the extend it.

      The worse is better approach is a recipe to do NOTHING. Go back to reading Siege instead of posting such nonsense here.

    • 25 February, 2019 at 7:53 pm — Reply

      In my view Gabbard is right about the evils of the Endless War for Israel (the ones she’s noticed, anyway), but is unlikely to understand that that war is an operation of the Jewish power structure. She’s also 1) very, very unlikely to care about the fate of Whites and would probably be just fine with accelerating our genocide and 2) incapable of being loyal to something to which she does not belong, our race.

      Even assuming the very best about her opposition to the warmongers, how likely is it that she could stand up to them? (I think both Trump and Obama resisted the Bolton-types of this world to some small degree, but somehow the bloody-handed bastards keep their power no matter who is President and no matter what he thinks. How much difference does it make if the murderers get 98 or 99 per cent. of what they want instead of 100?)

      Having said that, though, I’d have to add that it’s futile to debate whether Trump or Gabbard is closer to What We Must Have.

      What We Must Have cannot be achieved via electoral politics.

  8. Bridger
    23 February, 2019 at 6:19 pm — Reply

    Racial mixing in the U.S. is becoming a big problem. Some mulattoes and quadroons are deemed light enough and therefore as acceptable mates by white females which is polluting the gene pool. Then you have the white males that are fine men but don’t meet the high standards of extremely fickle white women. They are forced to take asian, hispanic and mulatto wives and girlfriends. Most white males still don’t find black women desirable.

    When I was growing up in the 1970’s and 80’s there was a lot of peer pressure on women NOT to mix. A black and white couple was a rare spectacle and usually invited stares in public. Today it’s a weekly occurrence.

    This nation is on the road to becoming a racially mixed pigsty just like (((they))) want unless something drastic changes. There is a segment of the white population who refuse to mix and women endowed with racial consciousness who refuse to mix, so if America has a future it will be with them.

    I think we’ll be entering another evolutionary bottleneck later this century.

  9. James Michener
    24 February, 2019 at 10:09 am — Reply

    As a former resident of Hawaii (Oahu) who worked in Honolulu but lived out in the country (Kaneohe – which was mostly white at the time) and reflected small town mainland America, their was a racial hierarchy in the islands:

    1 – Whites and Japs at the top, although Japs outnumbered Whites
    2 – Chinese
    3- Koreans
    4 – Native Hawaiians (Polynesians)
    5 – Samoans (at rock bottom – even Native Hawaiians hated them)

    At the time I was there, groids were so unusual that you thought of them as more like an escaped zoo creature than anything else. So few were they, they simply didn’t factor in to the racial stew that made up Hawaii back then – or probably even now.

    Anyway, Samoans in Hawaii were something Whites knew to avoid, as they often prowled in gangs. Think of mainland Mexican gangs to get the proper flavor. In short, they were looked upon as violent, dangerous, low-IQ scum.

    • Jerry Hoekstra
      24 February, 2019 at 1:27 pm — Reply

      I was a member of the book of the month club starting in 1970 and got started reading books by James Michener. Looking back to that time, I think his book sent me in the wrong direction. Especially a book called The Covenant.
      thanks,
      Jerry

    • James Clayton
      25 February, 2019 at 6:19 am — Reply

      During the early 1970s, for a season, I lived in Waimanalo on the beach housesitting and travelling to near the U of Hawaii (Manoa) via bus several times a week. One night, about dark, I was jogging home from a visit in Kailua (Oahu) and “missed” the bus: the driver flipped-me-off and drove by. Soon, a van stopped, the driver offered a ride, and I got in the back that had no windows, without looking first. Four “locals” mugged me and one was a giant– what they call Samoan in that part of the world. One had a handgun. When they stopped, rather than wait to see what else they had in mind, I ran cross-country rather than staying on the road shoulder to the gate at nearby airbase and enlisted the help of the two guards who had a JEEP and long guns. Long-story-short, a White City & County prosecutor’s son had been murdered in a similar encounter, recently, and he was interested-enough to fly me back for the trial and all four were convicted by an all-local jury (their peers). The Japanese had little patience with such locals and possessed aristrocratic-bearing and were always generous, in my experience. A Japanese associate, a few years ago, said that the formerly Japanese-dominated island is now owned by Chinese and is quite different.

      • Bancroft Hall
        25 February, 2019 at 8:25 pm — Reply

        Clayton, your story about Hawaii is spot-on. Visited Oahu many times in past 30 yrs for various corporate assignments. The great majority of “locals” whether Hawaiian or “Pacific Islander” that I encountered were ill-disposed to palefaces. Modern Waikiki beach at night is a good place for an unsuspecting White American tourist to get hit over the head and robbed, or worse

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.