Tulsi Gabbard and the Browning of America
by Andrew Hamilton
TULSI Gabbard? I learned of her existence because some White racialists are touting her for President. A 37-year-old Democratic Congresswoman from Hawaii, she recently threw her hat into the ring for 2020.
Why is she being ballyhooed? Because she made some arguably “noninterventionist” comments about U.S. meddling in the Middle East.
I do not favor Gabbard or any other non-White or Democrat for public office, so I’m unmoved by any of that. She is anti-White and philo-Semitic like the rest of the evil crew in Washington. I do not believe she will become president, but that’s up to Jews and the Left. Nobody else has any say about it.
Gabbard does present an interesting case study in the browning of America, however.
To America’s elite she represents “the first”—as they label their daily milestone “achievements”—Samoan-American and Hindu member of the U.S. Congress.
But it turns out Gabbard’s “Hinduism” isn’t quite what it’s cracked up to be. She inherited it not from her non-White father, who is Roman Catholic, but her White mother, a product of the Sixties generation.
The Gabbards adhere to a Hare Krishna offshoot that some people call a cult. Hare Krishna itself (the International Society for Krishna Consciousness, or ISKCON) was founded in the United States in 1966 by an Indian swami and spread predominantly among Whites.
Next, what do Establishment publicists mean when they call Gabbard “Samoan-American”?
Given her dark complexion, black hair, brown eyes, and place of birth, the term unquestionably suggests non-White ancestry (in this case, Polynesian). (On the Polynesian race, see the end of article.) This feature is implicitly played up when the term is used.
Gabbard does have non-White ancestry. She is a racial hybrid, the product of race mixing, born in American Samoa in 1981.
The Samoa Islands in the Pacific Ocean are separated into American Samoa (also known as Eastern Samoa) and Western Samoa, which have different histories.
The Islands were discovered by a Dutch explorer in 1722, but ruled over by native Polynesian chiefs until 1860. Between 1889 and 1899 they were ruled jointly by the U.S., Germany, and Great Britain.
The U.S. then acquired sole title to Eastern Samoa, whose population is much smaller than Western Samoa’s. Today administered as a territory by the U.S. Department of the Interior, since 1960 American Samoa has had its own Constitution, governor, legislature, and judiciary.
Meanwhile, Western Samoa went to Germany, but in 1919 was transferred to New Zealand under the Versailles Treaty. It became independent in 1962 in the mass decolonization wave orchestrated by globalist elites who opposed White power after WWII. Today those same elites are flooding White homelands with Third World migrants and violently oppressing Europeans in the process of biologically and culturally exterminating the White population worldwide.
Ironically, Gabbard is more White than Polynesian.
Her Indiana-born mother, Carol (née Porter), is White (in fact, three-quarters German), and even her Samoan father, a Hawaii State Senator (D.) and former Honolulu city councilman, is reportedly one-quarter European, though he does not look it.
Abortion and contraception weren’t issues in Carol Porter’s case. Reproductively speaking, she left the gene pool and contributed five non-White and no White children to the population of the globe and the United States.
Michael Gabbard’s father looks White in an old black and white photograph, but had some Samoan ancestry.
Like her parents, Tulsi’s interracial grandparents did not stint when it came to offspring. They had eight mixed race children altogether.
Race crossing such as this generation after generation blurs boundaries and means that more Whites in the future will intermarry with increasingly indeterminate hybrids.
Assimilation also eliminates barriers that formerly kept people apart. Tulsi Gabbard displays no language, dialect, clothing, or similar cues that would sharply differentiate her from Europeans.
There is her Hinduism, but that’s in the context of an anti-Christian society where even the vast majority of “Christians” are anti-Christian, and seemingly exotic Hare Krishnas arose among Whites, not foreigners.
The father’s and daughter’s looks demonstrate how quickly the White phenotype, developed over millennia, vanishes. That’s why Jews and government push miscegenation so hard in their propaganda, including pornography, now society’s primary source of sexual norms and education, mediated from the shadows by the Sex Establishment, a vast government- and oligarch-funded bureaucracy and legal system employing thousands of people at generous salaries.
It was racially irresponsible for the Whites in Tulsi Gabbard’s family tree to intermarry and have children with Polynesians. Although it is not my concern, Samoans did not benefit either. From a conservationist standpoint both groups were harmed.
From a strictly empirical point of view Tulsi Gabbard is more White than non-White: three quarters European and one-quarter Polynesian. She could have been classified as “White” instead of “Samoan.” In a way it would make more sense. Fortunately that did not happen. It is vital that hybrids be directed away from what remains of the White community and gene pool, not into it.
Gabbard’s ancestry, like Obama’s, is conceptually “clean” in the sense that it combines only two identifiable racial stocks. Increasingly this will not be the case, and phenotype, usually all we have to go by, will become less and less reliable as a racial indicator. This is exactly what Jews want for Gentiles.
Tulsi Gabbard’s two husbands apparently were not White.
For four years she was married to Eduardo Tamayo, about whom little is known. He is reputedly the son of a Filipino military officer, Colonel Antonio Tamayo, Jr.
Her current husband, Abraham Williams, seven years her junior, keeps a low public profile. His paternal ancestry is unknown, but his mother Anya F. Anthony is (or was) employed as Tulsi Gabbard’s office manager. Apparently Anthony is the woman in this YouTube clip, which means she is not White. She speaks with what sounds like an Australian accent but is apparently from New Zealand, so if not part-Maori must derive from some other race or mix.
I have no information about the racial-reproductive patterns of Tulsi’s many hybrid uncles and aunts or four brothers and sisters. But at least Tulsi herself hasn’t had children, and at 37 is approaching the point where she will not, as long as she doesn’t resort to the expensive and complicated services of a fertility clinic.
So much for the race and religion of the Establishment’s “first Samoan-American and first Hindu member of Congress” and candidate for president.
Women in the Military
Tulsi Gabbard’s recent statement in a 30-second campaign ad filmed by her cinematographer husband that “As your Commander in Chief I will . . .” caused a visceral negative reaction in me.
She should not be Commander in Chief because a) she’s not White and b) she’s a woman.
She should not be a member of Congress for the same reasons. As a congresswoman she wields power over both Whites and men.
What that statement immediately conjured up was the mental image of a photograph published in National Vanguard tabloid in 1979—40 years ago. Talk about prescience!
Tulsi Gabbard exemplifies this feminist, anti-male development. She holds the rank of major and served two tours of duty in Iraq and Kuwait.
Gabbard says military service is what caused her conversion from early opposition to homosexuality and the sexual agenda to current proud recipient of a 100% rating from the largest, most powerful homosexual lobby in the United States, the so-called “Human Rights Campaign.”
Do the armed forces match or exceed the Catholic Church in moral degeneracy? They must come close.
If Gabbard flipped 180 degrees on such a vital issue, under equal or greater pressure she will jettison her current critique of Middle East foreign policy, just as Trump and Obama did. Even the hastily-granted carrot of a Nobel Peace Prize couldn’t pry the Kenyan away from the Zionists.
Note on the Polynesian Race
Jewish anthropologist Stanley Garn classified Polynesians as one of the nine major geographical races of mankind:
The Polynesian Geographical Race occupies a vast territory in the Pacific, ranging from New Zealand to Hawaii and Easter Island. Many now uninhabited islands of the Pacific bear relics of these hardy, seafaring folk, some of whom were still on their eastward migration at the time of Captain Cook’s voyages [1768-1780].
Polynesian polymorphism is marked for hair form, skin color, nose form, and body build. In years past, a tri-hybrid explanation was given as the most likely explanation. But we know now that . . . the Polynesians are more or less typically “Pacific,” quite unlike mainland Asia and certainly quite un-European. So while linguistic evidence may indicate ultimate Asian origins, it is apparent that natural selection has [made] . . . Polynesians what they are today. – Stanley M. Garn, Human Races, 3d ed. (Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas, 1971), pp. 156-157.
Human Races is a useful little book.
Anthropologist Roger Pearson described the Polynesians as follows:
The main body of Malayo-Polynesians who settled the South Pacific probably comprised a substantial Indian or non-oriental component, which was less mixed with indigenous Negrito and Australoid elements in the case of the Polynesians than were the Micronesians (who reveal Negrito admixture) and the Melanesians (who show strong Australoid admixture). The Western Polynesians include the Samoans, the Tongans and Ellice Islanders; the Eastern Polynesians include the Marquesans, Tahitians, and Easter Islanders; the Southern Polynesians include the Maoris of New Zealand; and the Northern Polynesians who settled in Hawaii. Other Polynesians include the Tikopians (actually located geographically in Melanesia) and the Ontong-Javanese. – Roger Pearson, Anthropological Glossary (Malabar, Fla.: Robert E. Krieger, 1985), p. 212.
Polynesia, which includes Hawaii and Samoa, has been subjected to extensive race mixing for a long time. It was already far advanced by the 1930s and ’40s. See, e.g., Earnest Beaglehole, “The Mixed Blood in Polynesia,” Journal of the Polynesian Society, 58 (June, 1949): 51-57 (the first page can be rea) .
* * *