Blame Whitey: How Muslims and Jews Worked Together to Construct the Myth Convivencia in Muslim-Ruled Spain

Jewish miniature from 14th century Spain

AN IMPORTANT PART of the Blame Whitey narrative that has come to frame the understanding of history conventionally found within the public sphere is the myth of tolerance in Muslim-ruled Spain: “convivencia” as it is called, or co-existence; together with an ostentatious appreciation of the supposed fruits that arose from this happy state of diversity, featuring, as is usually claimed, joyful interchange between Muslims, Christians and Jews, ultimately to be brought to an end by wicked Christian intolerance, culminating in the conquest of Granada in 1492 and the consequent expulsion of Muslims and Jews by those Catholic fanatics Ferdinand and Isabel.

Confronted with the spectre of Islamic horror in modern Europe, and the resistance it inspires in the invaded indigenous peoples, governments have eagerly taken up the myth of convivencia and embedded it in numerous textbooks. The Holocaust, the Transatlantic Slave Trade and tolerant Muslim Spain are now probably the three chief elements of the modern European child’s historical education, the better to condition them to accept their own extinction.

But how did an idea so absurdly at variance with the facts ever get off the ground in the first place? As with so many of the ills that plague us, it started with the Jews.

This is my translation of part of an academic paper on the idea of “Convivencia” written in French: “Chrétiens, juifs et musulmans dans l’Espagne médiévale. La convivencia et autres mythes historiographiques” by Christophe Cailleaux. If you can read French, it’s worth reading the whole thing (link supplied below).

Initially, this myth was used within the framework of what (((Salo W. Baron))) called “the lachrymose conception of Jewish history”(47): the idealisation of interfaith coexistence in the territory of Islam was highlighted all the more in that it underlined, through contrast, a supposed Christian intolerance. In a surpassingly transparent way, (((Heinrich Graetz))) declared that Jews living in the territory of Islam “were not forced, like their European co-religionists, to live in perpetual fear of attracting the ire of the clergy or the punishment of the sovereign.”(48).

This supposed Golden Age of Jewish life in Muslim countries no doubt forms part of 19th century European Orientalism, a mixture of fear and fascination for an Orient whose image was shifting and was largely constructed by the West itself, as Edward Saïd suggested.(49)

In a game of mirrors, it was then instrumentalised by the Zionist movement to denounce the persecutions that European Jews experienced in the second half of the 19th century and the start of the 20th century.

In this way an ever more radical gulf between Ashkenazi and Sephardi solidified in historiography. As (((Bernard Lewis))) said in other words, the “myth of Muslim tolerance” was used by several scholars at the end of the 19th century as “a stick to beat their Christian neighbours with”(50). The same discourse was then used to legitimate the creation then the existence of Israel: thus (((Yitzak Baer))) wrote his History of the Jews of Christian Spain in 1945 (51) “in part to show that the Jews were never truly tolerated (and therefore it was better for them to have their own state)” (52).

In a quirk of history, the same myth was then taken up by some specialists in the Arab world, infused with a sense of opposition to the Zionist project. This was the case in 1939 with The Arab Awakening by the Lebanese historian George Antonius, an echo of which can be found in a speech given in 1968 by the Egyptian academic Said Abdel-fattah Ashour in Cairo:

Throughout history the Jews never received better or kinder treatment than they did from Muslims […]. In Muslims they found […] merciful brothers who considered them companions in faith […]. Spain provides a clear example of the difference in treatment of Jews by Muslims and Christians. The experience of Muslims with Jews was always bitter and difficult because the Jews repaid sincerity with treachery and kindness with ingratitude (53).


47. See Mark R. Cohen, Sous le croissant et la croix, Paris, Seuil, 2008 (1re édition en anglais en (…)

48 . Heinrich Graetz, Histoire des Juifs, Paris, A. Lévy, 1888, t. III, p. 279.

49 . See for example Edward W. Saïd, L’Orientalisme. L’Orient créé par l’Occident, Paris, Seuil, 197 (…)

50 . Bernard Lewis, History : Remembered, Recovered, Invented, Princeton, Princeton University Press, (…)

51 . Yitzhak Baer, Historia de los judios en la España cristiana, Madrid, Altalena, 1981 (1re en hébr (…)

52 . John Tolan, « Une convivencia bien précaire… », art. cit., p. 387. 53 . Cited by Shmuel Trigano, « L’Espagne des trois religions : les dégâts dans l’Éducation Nationale (…)


So Jews initially promoted the idea to stigmatise Christians. And Muslims then took it up, likewise to stigmatise Christians, but also Jews for their supposed ingratitude. Again we see the two branches of the Semitic family working together against Christians and Europeans, as they have done throughout the ages and continue to do today.

Increasingly, I find myself edging towards the conclusion that the true Jewish métier is not money-lending, as conventionally believed, but the falsification of history.

* * *

Source: Diversity Macht Frei

Previous post

Arrogant Neocon Jew: Replace "Lazy" White Workers With Migrants

Next post

Time Is Short

1 Comment

  1. Raja Hindustani
    27 February, 2017 at 12:10 am — Reply

    It is very important to read this book about Jewish treachery
    In Page 315, we read
    “Marcelino Menendez Pelayo, the renowned Spanish
    historian of the previous century, writes concerning the
    treachery of the Jews: “The indigenous population would have
    been able to show resistance to the handful of Arabs who
    crossed the Straits, but Witiza had disarmed them, levelled the
    towers to the ground and had the lances turned into
    harrows.”125 While the Visigoth kingdom disarmed under the
    influence of the Jewish advisors and friends of Witiza,
    dismantled its defence and destroyed its war power, the Jews
    encouraged the Musulmans to fall upon the Christian kingdom
    and to destroy it. Great preparations were made in North
    Africa for this.
    Into the land which the Jews wished to destroy they
    introduced pacifism, and into the land which should serve
    them as a tool to destroy the other, a warlike spirit. These
    classical tactics the Jews have applied in the course of
    centuries in different states and use them today with a
    perfection, in which they have attained experience in the
    course of centuries. It is worthy of note that at the present time
    the Jews preach – directly or with the help of freemasonic or
    theosophical organisations, Socialist and Communist parties,
    secret infiltration in different Christian churches, press, radio,
    and television controlled by them – Pacifism and disarmament
    in the free world, while in the Soviet Union and the other states
    under the totalitarian dictatorship they incite the peoples to
    war. While towards the end of the last war the USA and
    England disarmed in a dangerous way, they handed over to
    Communism vitally important positions, simultaneously
    destroyed the basic defense of these two great powers, and
    even traitorously betrayed to the Soviet Union and other
    Communist lands armed to the teeth the very weapons which
    they had stolen from the other countries. The “Fifth Column”
    has controlled the governments in Washington including
    atomic and rocket secrets. The tactics are fundamentally the
    same as twelve hundred years ago.”

    Besides, Islam itself was started by Jews to use Arabs as a way to destroy the Persian and Byzantine Empires. The Persian Empire which saved the Jews from Babylon, the same Persian Empire the Jews controlled, the same Persian Empire where the Jews killed the Persian nationalist Haman and his sons.
    After looting and sucking dry a nation, Jews may as well destroy it for good.

    Also many muslims are convinced that the Saudi royal family is Jewish

    So what I think is that Jews are gonna destroy Europe and the West using Muslims (and blacks and others). Native Europeans are being made passive and weak full of guilt and self hate via Christian churches, media, education etc… while Muslims are allowed to enter and then are exposed to Jewish Wahabi ideology via the Jewish Saudi family.
    Similarly Jews are supporting non Muslim organisations from through out the world including Hindu organisations in India and Buddhist organisations in Sri Lanka for example like the BBS.
    The aim is to create civil wars throughout the World using the Zionist-Saudi, non muslim-muslim, pincer tactic. That way Israel can sell more ammo and make money. Muslims have always been the punching bags of the Zionists to be used like a swarm of barbarians to attain some Zionist objectives. ISIS for example was started in the same fashion by the CIA -Mossad-Saudi establishment. Their also rumours that the obnoxious Islamist in Britain Anjem Choudhary who enjoys riling up the native Britons over Sharia is a MI6 (Zionist) agent.
    Also worth nothing is that recently we have seen the collapse of real British nationalist groups like the BNP who target all non White people in Britain to leave Britain and the rise of selectively anti Islamic parties like the EDL who only target Muslims. This is because the BNP refused to become a whore of Jewish money and hence get controlled by them. Their refusal led to a massive campaign by the BBC and establishment to destroy the BNP. But the EDL on the hand gets much more of a free pass. A Christian Muslim civil war is planned which is good for the Jew and Israel.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.