Debate in Canada: Destroy and Replace Whites?

And laughing at the rape of White women and children

by John I. Johnson

THERE’S A worthwhile short video clip (above) excerpted from an April 1 debate in Toronto on governments’ importation of the Third World invaders (called the “refugee crisis” in the debate — ah, the importance of framing!).

On the “destroy the Whites” side was Jew Simon Schama, an anti-White racist television and book celebrity who’s currently teaching at Columbia University, and a Canadian-born feminist named Louise Arbour, who I assume is also Jewish. Arbour

was the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, a former justice of the Supreme Court of Canada and the Court of Appeal for Ontario and a former Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda. From 2009 until 2014, she served as President and CEO of the International Crisis Group. She made history with the indictment of a sitting head of state, Yugoslavian president Slobodan Milošević, as well as the first prosecution of sexual assault as [“under”?] the articles of crimes against humanity.

On the other side was Mark Steyn, a conservative Canadian writer who has spoken at least against Muslim immigration, and UKIP’s Nigel Farage, looking a bit discomfited by the passion Steyn displays. Conservative, right-wing, and racialist Whites are great at avoiding passion at all costs. Leave Jews and Leftists a free hand with that!

The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.

Steyn has some Jewish ancestry, perhaps not much, I don’t know, but his passion probably derives from that. From his Wikipedia bio:

He has stated that “the last Jewish female in my line was one of my paternal great-grandmothers” and that “both my grandmothers were Catholic.”

In Jewish World Review, Steyn argues “Multiculturalism means that the worst attributes of Muslim culture — the subjugation of women — combine with the worst attributes of Western culture — licence and self-gratification.” He states, “I am not a racist, only a culturist. I believe Western culture — rule of law, universal suffrage — is preferable to Arab culture.”

He didn’t kiss the Leftists’ feet, as conservatives usually do. Leftists do not have a morally defensible position on anything. Nor do they have a principled position (a different thing — mere logical consistency, adhering to principles they espouse, which Leftists never do).

The background of the clip, which shows Steyn’s response to something the opposing two said (basically ad hominem attacks, notice), is this:

After Steyn described the culture of rape against women being imported by Germany, Sweden, France and Belgium, among other countries, rattling off statistics and anecdotes that included a child as young as 3 being raped in Germany, Schama accused Steyn of being “obsessed with sex.”

The audience broke into laughter.

Arbour accused Steyn and Farage of being “new-born feminists” for their focus on sexual assaults against women.

Steyn’s response to their condescending sneers can be seen in the video clip.

Evidently the audience, which had initially supported replacing Whites, swung to the other side (they were polled) after these remarks . . . at least for the evening. The sad fact is, meaningful long-term attitudinal and social change cannot be achieved without 1) regular access to the mass media, and 2) political and cultural power just like the other side has.

Otherwise, it’s just words, instantly forgotten.

Unchecked power remains unchecked.

* * *

Source: Author