Race and the Murder of Mollie Tibbetts: Who Speaks for the Community?

by Andrew Hamilton

THE MURDER of Mollie Tibbetts, a 20-year-old University of Iowa student in a small town 70 miles east of Des Moines on July 18, 2018 by an imported Mestizo has been put to good use by the press. It was of course inconvenient that the killer was non-White. The Establishment would have preferred to charge and convict Tibbetts’ White boyfriend or a local pig farmer they callously blamed early on; unfortunately, the boyfriend was 100 miles away at the time. Nonetheless, the student’s death, like the murders of thousands of other Whites, became grist for the Left’s propaganda mill.

The Mexican, despite being in the U.S. illegally, worked as a laborer on a local Republican politician’s farm.

He is charged with a single criminal count — first-degree murder. Apparently rape or sexual assault did not occur, even though the accused’s behavior pointed to sex as the motive. He enjoys private legal representation, which ordinarily does not come cheap.

The Tibbetts Family Is Anti-White

It was quickly revealed that the murdered girl was anti-White. She’d tweeted:

Mollie Tibbetts’ parents and other relatives, preening self-righteously, attacked Whites and immigration foes in comments trumpeted by the press after the murder. It was quite a spectacle.

A cousin publicly posted the following obscenity-laced tweet.

An aunt and a large segment of the media diverted attention to men, blaming them for the girl’s death. Criticizing murderous illegal immigrants is immoral, but misandry, spewing hatred of men and boys, is “virtuous.” What paragons.

The controlled media naturally gave the family’s Politically Correct attacks prominent play. The girl’s murder was used to valorize non-Whites and illegal immigrants and attack Whites and heterosexual men by implication.

No hardened observer of the contemporary scene is surprised to learn that Tibbetts and her family are anti-White. Their racism is the norm, not only of the ruling class but of society as a whole right down to small towns and rural areas. It is a daunting and unpleasant fact, but it is the truth and must be faced.

Was Mollie Tibbetts White?

Though there has been no mention of it in the press as far as I know, photos of Mollie Tibbetts raise the obvious question of whether she was a racial hybrid. “Missing” posters identified her as “Caucasian,” but that is not conclusive.

Look at her photos and see for yourself. If racial admixture was present it was probably East Asian or Mestizo and derived from her father. Though apparent in some (not all) photographs of the man, it is not always pronounced in videos. Her brothers do not look particularly non-White.

The Tibbetts children were born in San Francisco, not Iowa, and father Rob Tibbetts never left the multiracial stew of California. He currently resides in Fresno. Three years ago Whites constituted a mere 38 percent of the nation’s most populous state — a substantial overestimate after Jews and other non-Whites improperly lumped into the category are backed out.

Whatever the White proportion of the California population was in 1998 when Mollie was born, the proportion of White children at the time was markedly less, because large numbers of older Whites top-load aggregate (White) population figures everywhere. Whites are disproportionately beyond reproductive age or will not have more (or any) White children. Graphically, White population structure resembles an upside down pyramid. (“The Importance of Population Structure & Dynamics,” National Vanguard.)

Predictably, Mollie came from a broken family. Her parents divorced when she was in the second grade. Her mother, Laura Calderwood, an Iowa native, moved back home with the couples’ three children. Calderwood looks White in photographs and videos.

Non-White ancestry might partially explain a strange-sounding editorial expressing anti-White animus published in a regional monopoly newspaper under Rob Tibbetts’ name. It attacked Donald Trump, Jr. and praised John McCain. Tibbetts explicitly states several times that Mollie was anti-White, using code words of course.

Judging from the article’s unusual (for a random citizen) tone and rhetorical style, ostentatious grandstanding and emotional exploitation, it may have been co-written by an Establishment political operative.

Mollie served as Rob’s “best man” (her father’s odd term) at his recent wedding, apparently to a non-White. He wrote:

My stepdaughter, whom Mollie loved so dearly, is Latina. Her sons — Mollie’s cherished nephews and my grandchildren — are Latino. That means I am Hispanic. I am African. I am Asian. I am European. My blood runs from every corner of the Earth because I am American.

The writer, who, again, sounds suspiciously glib, is buffaloing his ill-informed readers, but the statement lends credence to the possibility of non-White ancestry in Rob Tibbetts’ background.

Of course, it is not dispositive. White families sometimes engage in similar theatrics when their family members are raped or murdered by non-Whites.

If the Tibbetts family is White, we see again how widespread race-mixing is, this time in a second marriage that has negative ramifications on original family members, weakening their already tenuous sense of identity.

At present there is no way of knowing if Mollie Tibbetts was racially mixed. As is so often the case we have only appearance, our knowledge that widespread race mixing by Whites has been going on for decades, and a small number of other clues to go by.

People Will Die

Anti-White policies insure that many Whites will continue to lose their lives or otherwise suffer due to interracial violence. It is inevitable, the intended consequence of prevailing policy.

Murder, rape, and sex trafficking of Whites advances ruling class interests, so there is no serious effort to stop them. Resources are channeled instead into criminalizing and silencing the speech and political organization of native populations opposed to official policies.

Anti-White violence, like similarly orchestrated anti-cop violence, contains an element of randomness, a kind of state-mandated Russian roulette forced upon non-privileged Whites. Because we do not have the power to stop or change any of this it is better that victims of System violence be explicitly anti-White rather than pro-White.

Anti-White Victims and Families Do Not Speak for the White Community

The Tibbetts and those like them are conventional people with conventional views — conformists. They are not moral. They take their cues from the group, meaning whoever governs it. Change the rulers and the zeitgeist and they would sing a different tune.

The fact that White crime victims and families so often ape Establishment denunciations of White advocates and immigration foes who speak out or demonstrate on their behalf should not silence or influence the latter in any way.

Anti-White violence targets an entire race, not one propagandized individual. Families aided and abetted by anti-White media, law enforcement, and politicians have no right to shame, insult, or silence healthy Whites or dictate their public response to the flood of heinous crimes against our people.

William Blackstone, after “examining the great outlines of English law and tracing them up to their principles,” observed in Commentaries on the Laws of England that crime is a public wrong, “a breach and violation of the public rights due to the whole community, in its social and aggregate capacity.” It is punished for that reason, and because otherwise it serves as a “pernicious example . . . for others to do the like.” The consent of crime victims or families has never excused criminal wrongdoing.

Because anti-White crimes are crimes against the White community as a whole, every attack against a White person by governments or their domestic or imported criminals and terrorists is an attack upon our collective survival. Ignorant, irresponsible, or hoodwinked crime victims or family members do not — indeed cannot — speak on our behalf.

Finally, the “community” in question is no longer government, as in Blackstone’s day, because the contemporary state is deliberately oppressing and destroying Whites worldwide — a crime under its own laws.

It has delegitimized itself.

What Does It Mean?

If Mollie Tibbetts was not White the political significance of her murder lies in the fact that it was committed (it appears) by an imported Mestizo who does not belong in our midst.

If she was White, it was an assault upon our community, regardless of what the media, the government, or Tibbetts family members say.

This time the Establishment spun the chamber in its ongoing game of racist roulette and a self-admitted hater “ate the bullet.” The best that can be said is that the fatal outcome, inevitable for someone thanks to prevailing policies, was at least visited upon a victim who supported the racial hatred, laws, and elites ultimately responsible for her death.

* * *

Source: Author