Classic EssaysRevilo P. Oliver

Jack the Ripper Mystery Solved

by Revilo P. Oliver

IN 1888-1889 a number of women were atrociously murdered in the poorer quarters of London by a sexual maniac who boastfully styled himself Jack the Ripper. The murders are still officially unsolved, but they are still remembered, partly because they were so gruesome, the murderer having so obscenely mutilated and dissected the bodies of his victims that the details were long withheld from public knowledge, and partly because the British police, then justly esteemed for their integrity, admittedly suppressed some evidence. Furthermore, the sudden cessation of the series, which Jack had promised to continue indefinitely, warranted a suspicion that the police had secretly apprehended him and put him under restraint.

The mystery thus created naturally aroused various conjectures and surmises, and someone started a rumor that Jack the Ripper had been the Duke of Clarence, the eldest son of the Prince of Wales (who later became King Edward VII). The rumor gained credence among persons who should have known better because it seemed to provide the only plausible explanation for the extraordinary behavior of the police.

The rumor has been revived from time to time. (1) You may have seen or even read a fairly recent story by one of the writers who specialize in producing pastiches of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s stories about Sherlock Holmes. In the novel, Holmes is engaged to investigate the murders committed by Jack the Ripper and is harassed and thwarted by Scotland Yard, so there is a clear intimation that a royal personage (i.e., the Duke of Clarence) is involved.

(1. A somewhat amusing revival of the story was by a Polish defector from the Soviet, known as Colonel Goleniewski, who is said to have provided much accurate information about Soviet spies and saboteurs in western Europe, but who, after some years, was either coerced by the C.I.A. to discredit himself or concluded, not without justification, that American boobs will believe anything. He pretended to be the Czarevich who was murdered by Jewish Communists in 1918, and for a time published a periodical entitled Double Eagle, to advance his claim to be the legitimate Czar of Russia. The periodical was chiefly noteworthy for the phenomenal credulity of its subscribers. Among the great historical revelations contained it was an article on the Duke of Clarence, who, indeed, had been Jack the Ripper, but did not die in 1892; protected by the police, he went into a luxurious retirement until he went to Germany and became Adolf Hitler. Naturally, he did not die in the bunker under Berlin, but was smuggled to safety and was then (in 1980) living happily under an assumed name in Britain (and hence flourishing at the ripe age of 126, thus outdoing the celebrated Count Waldeck). Another of the bogus Czarevich’s revelations was that the celebrated Reinhard Heydrich was not murdered by a team of assassins despatched from England, but was instead smuggled out of Germany by the conspiratorial team of Hitler & Churchill and sent to the United States, where he became Guy Richards, editor of the New York Journal-American, a journalist who, despite my explicit warning, espoused Goleniewski’s cause and labored mightily to vindicate his claim to be the heir of the Romanovs — until he did something that displeased His Imperial Highness and was accordingly unmasked and identified as being Heydrich in disguise. If I were to go on and name the prominent American anti-Communists who put their minds in cold storage so they could bask in the radiance of a real live Czar, I would destroy what is left of your faith in mankind.)

In Britain today, as in the United States — and quite naturally, indeed inevitably, given the infestation of both countries by “Liberal” clergymen and “intellectuals” — every month a few impuberate White children of both sexes mysteriously disappear without a trace or until their bodies, often drained of blood or savagely mutilated, are found. In Britain, however, the press does not muffle such incidents, which accordingly are causing no little concern among racial bigots and other reactionaries.

It was remarked, therefore, that after the police reportedly exhumed the body or part of the dismembered body of one victim who had been deeply buried in an open area behind a Jewish synagogue, there was a sudden silence, and two months later the police, under pressure from the public, announced that the remains were those of an animal not human. This aroused suspicion, and a bulletin demanding clarification of the murder was published by the Campaign for Gentile-Jewish Reconciliation, under the title, “Another ‘Blood Libel’ or Ritual Murder?” The bulletin points out that quite reasonably a ritual murder (2) will be suspected, unless the strange incident is officially clarified.

(2. On this subject, see Arnold Leese, Jewish Ritual Murder. You may think it significant that such murders have been reported so frequently in so many Aryan countries over many centuries, but, if you are a well-trained American, you will know that, despite appearances and despite all evidence, God’s Holy Race can do no wrong.)

The bulletin reports two very enlightening statements. At the time of Jack the Ripper’s merry exploits, the police were known to have suppressed evidence, and Sir Charles Warren, Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, admitted that he had done so, but claimed that he had done so justifiably “to avert an anti-Jewish uprising.”

The bulletin continues; “In 1908 the Assistant Commissioner of Police, in reference to the identity of Jack the Ripper, declared flatly, ‘In stating that he was a Polish Jew, I am merely stating a definitely established fact.'” [Italics as printed.]

This, then, solves the supposed mystery of Jack the Ripper. It is reasonable to assume that the Polish Jew was apprehended by the British police and secretly placed in confinement, probably in a comfortable asylum for the insane, to avert adverse criticism of the godly race that is everywhere persecuted for its sanctity. It remains uncertain whether he was acting from religious motives or merely obeying the sage advice in the Talmud: “When one finds that evil appetites are taking hold of his senses, let him repair to some place where he is unknown, let him dress himself in black and follow the impulses of his heart.” (3)

(3. Cited from Mo’ed Katan, 17a.)

So many readers of Liberty Bell will recall an incident that took place a few decades ago that I will not take the time to ascertain the exact date. The corpses of two impuberate White boys, aged eleven and twelve, as I remember, were found in a wasteland west of Chicago. The bodies had not been seriously mutilated, but they had been totally drained of blood while resting on a metal table adorned with cabalistic of Kabbalistic (4) symbols, which, as the bodies cooled, impressed themselves on the flesh.

(4. In English, ‘cabalistic’ applies to any esoteric doctrine and secret practices that resemble the mystic doctrine of the Kabbala, the system of Jewish theology of which the best known exposition is the Zohar, which was probably concocted in the Thirteenth Century in Spain by a well-known Jewish theologian, Moses de Leon. It is — naturally! — a hoax, purporting to be a secret doctrine expounded to select disciples by a prominent Galilaean Rabbi, Simeon be Yohai, the favorite pupil and comrade of the famous Aqiba, who was the most fervent disciple of the christ called Bar-Kokhba, until the Roman legions proved him wrong in A.D. 135. Simeon revealed to his disciples cosmic secrets that had been transmitted only orally since the time of Adam. The doctrine was really filched from the Persian Sufis and Judaized. ‘Kabbalistic’ would imply that the symbols impressed on the bloodless corpses of the boys were actually taken from that theology, but, so far as I know, they were not identified as such by a person competent to judge.)

The symbols were photographed and published in an early edition of the Chicago Daily News. Within half an hour after that edition was on the streets, the newspapers’ trucks were dashing about frantically to collect all unsold copies, which were immediately destroyed, obviously at a heavy financial loss to the newspaper. The father of one of the boys demanded an elucidation of the symbols and the murders so persistently that he was kidnapped by the police and incarcerated in an insane asylum.

The facts require no comment. There is in the United States only one race so mighty that it could instantly frighten and coerce what was then the second most influential and potent newspaper in Chicago and compel the police to commit the crime of silencing the dead boy’s father. (5)

(5. Many of the children who disappear are doubtless taken to be educated sexually by ‘Paedophilic’ males, and, unfortunately, cannot be released to return to their parents, who might be so bigoted as to disapprove. A noteworthy “paedophil” of exceptional accomplishments was the once famous Albert Fish, a creature of uncertain race who identified himself as a reincarnation of the famous Jesus, who asked little children to come to him. Fish was so fond of children that he ate about a dozen of them, after raping the girls and castrating the boys. Since the Supreme Court in 1935 was not sufficiently progressive and humanitarian to turn the gourmet loose, Fish was electrocuted. Some children are probably used in the ceremonies of ju-ju (commonly called voodoo in this country), which require sacrifice of a “hornless goat” to make really big magic. But although perverts and niggers are powerful politically, they could not have wielded the authority that was exercised in Chicago.)

In the meantime, you will be glad to know that the “mystery” of Jack the Ripper was solved, and that Scotland Yard around 1890 deserved its reputation and operated with an efficiency that would be unthinkable today.(6)

(6. On the disgusting twerp who is now Commissioner of Metropolitan Police and therefore boss of Scotland Yard, see Liberty Bell, December 1987, pp. 8-9. The punk was proud that his sister-in-law and his niece were so depraved that they had, by 1987, given birth to six Congoid mongrels to afflict Englishmen and pollute their island.)

* * *

Source: Liberty Bell magazine, January 1991

For Further Reading

Previous post

Talking Points for Demolishing Dinesh D'Souza

Next post

The Fame of a Dead Man's Deeds Audio Book: To West Virginia

4 Comments

  1. Miguel Martinez
    November 15, 2017 at 11:12 am — Reply

    Thanks

  2. Titus
    November 16, 2017 at 5:25 pm — Reply

    The way the prostitutes were butchered is the same way the jews ritually butcher the animals to obtain meat.

  3. Superluminal WN
    November 17, 2017 at 12:29 pm — Reply

    I am a WN and also a long-time student of the Jack the Ripper mystery. I have read and considered all the suspects over the years, including the one here. After further weighing of the evidence, the most likely individual responsible for the Ripper crimes was one Walter Sickert. I am convinced he is the actual killer. For more on this individual, go here:

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/life/patricia-cornwell-spent-7-million-solving-jack-ripper-case/

    Now, politics aside, and whether or not author Patricia Cornwell is a liberal or not, her’s is the best case yet in solving this century-long crime.

  4. George Wright
    November 17, 2017 at 9:41 pm — Reply

    Superluminal WN has it right. I have been studying various theories about the Ripper for 35 years and believe Sickert was indeed the culprit.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.