Pedophilia, Kato Harris, and the UK’s Jew Problem

by David Sims

CHILD MOLESTERS come in both sexes. They aren’t all men. About 10% of them are females. Some estimates go higher on the theory that the sexual abuse of children can be disguised as care-giving. Marion Zimmer Bradley, famous for her science-fiction novels, was also a blatant and violent pedophile sex offender, whose own daughter was among her victims.

But among those charged with committing sex offenses against children, there’s a sizable proportion of innocents who are falsely accused. Kato Harris was a geography teacher at a private school in Berkshire, a county in southeast England.

Harris told a girl in his class that she had made a “silly face” in a school photo. The girl took this as a slight, and she decided to get revenge against her teacher by falsely accusing him of raping her. Three times. Inside a classroom that people could see into from the outside. While the door was open.

Although it took the jury at the Isleworth Crown Court only 26 minutes to find Harris “not guilty” on all charges, it is difficult to understand why he was even charged to begin with. The girl’s story was so ridiculously implausible that the school’s officials should have smelled the lie. Even if the school’s administrators so unbelievably stupid that they couldn’t perceive that the accusation was fabricated, the medical examination — I assume that there was one — should have revealed the fact that the girl was lying.

But innocent or not, Kato Harris has lost the job that he had invested years of his life qualifying for. A girl’s spiteful misuse of laws intended to protect children caused his descent into unemployment, into poverty and, nearly, into suicide.

England is a country that tolerated a nationwide child prostitution business in which Pakistani criminals pimped British children for 14 years. Thousands of White children were raped during the conduct of this “business,” while the police and public officials were studiously ignoring it all: Some were aware it was happening but feared being called “racist” if they told the truth. In the climate the Jews have created, they literally care more about not being called “racist” than they do about the decade-long rape of thousands of White children.

And then a White teacher is falsely accused of rape by a spiteful girl in his class, and immediately he loses his job, his reputation, and all the money that he had ever earned through the excellent performance of difficult work.

It makes you think that England’s overlords don’t like White people very much. Indeed, it makes you wonder whether England has a Jew problem. If you check, you’ll find out that it does.


Geography Teacher Cleared of Raping Pupil Says Men Should Stay Away from Teaching

A GEOGRAPHY teacher cleared of raping a pupil has warned that men should steer clear of the profession, after a false allegation shattered his dream career.

Kato Harris, a former head of department at an all-girls school in London, was accused of attacking a 14-year-old three times in a classroom during lunch breaks in autumn 2013, but was found not guilty after a trial last year.

The 38-year-old said before his ordeal began, “life was like a wonderful dream”, and with a successful career and a child also on the way he was “looking forward to a great future”.

In an interview with the Mail on Sunday, he has disclosed that “one of the biggest challenges” he now faces is forgiving his accuser, something he said he will do, “just not now”.

He told the newspaper: “I would certainly advocate that no man qualify as a teacher. It is just not worth it. What is the lesson here? There is nothing to protect the male teacher.”

A jury found Mr Harris, from Richmond, not guilty of all charges following his trial at Isleworth Crown Court.

“I had to give up my dream job because of a crime I didn’t commit,” he said.

“I am unemployed, living in a bedsit and will soon be on housing benefit. I am toxic.”

Mr Harris, who said he is now considering a job in a crematorium, added: “If I knew on the day I qualified what I know now, I would never have become a teacher.

“I will never work with children again. I will never put myself in that position of vulnerability.”

The accusations emerged in December 2014, and Mr Harris said he was in “total shock” when police arrested him.

He told the newspaper he had made the decision to kill himself if he was charged, but that with the arrival of a baby daughter he wanted to carry on and prove his innocence.

Mr Harris added: “I’ve looked into the abyss. But every day I wake up and I’m a daddy and not in prison, and that’s the best thing that I could have hoped for.”

* * *

Source: Author and the Daily Telegraph

Previous post

Worshipping the Tribe Who Seeks to Destroy You

Next post

Mexican Invader Rapes and Murders a White Woman


  1. 29 April, 2017 at 8:44 pm — Reply

    Just another example of how men in general, but specifically White men, are so disadvantaged when it comes to the law and how you can be arrested on a mere allegation with zero evidence. It’s astonishing how men’s rights are entirely overridden in the face of a hollow claim of domestic abuse, child abuse and so on. Don’t even get me started on the tragedy that has befallen men’s rights within divorce and parental rights proceedings.

    Children today are far too politically savvy and/or easily used as the tools of vindictive spouses and so on. Because of all this, I’ve recommended to any man I know who has worked with children in the last 25 year to never, ever allow themselves to be alone with a child under any circumstance. I don’t care how much they trust the child, like the family or what the relationship with the kid is. If you’re a teacher and a student wants to talk to you, invite them out into the hallway or to a location where you know you’ll be seen but not necessarily heard by others. Tutor students in the library; don’t do it in a classroom with no one else there. The same thing goes for coaches, camp counselors and anyone who deals with children. You just can’t take the chance. It’s sad, but that’s the world we live in.

  2. Disce1969
    29 April, 2017 at 9:05 pm — Reply

    There’s so much I could say in personal corroboration of the subject of this piece but I won’t since it will serve no purpose: we already know the score. Yes, it is War on the White Man in UK. But *whose* war? Your article provides the answer – at the institutional level.

    I will though make one observation concerning the issue of proof. If you read this English trial lawyer’s article and the comments you will be struck by the personal slight taken over the suggestion that rational, scientific means do exist and may be employed for determining just who is the liar, or as near as may be.

    Whilst those means may not be reliable enough in themselves to be probative to the criminal standard (in any US States can you secure a conviction based only on mechanical lie detector results or sodium pentothal?) , it seems likely they can at least carry sufficient exclusionary weight as to make less likely the bringing of proceedings of the kind discussed in your article. So why aren’t they used? What’s the strong objection? I hesitate at the conclusion: these methods are off-limits because they ARE sufficiently reliable that they COULD, at the very least, when taken with other evidence, tip the balance and *substantiate* a claim of child abuse against someone “important”, like a (blackmailed) politician. Manipulation of the political process by blackmail was, to all intents and purposes, publicly acknowledged by an MP in the Heath Government:
    Tim Fortescue MP from ‘Westminster’s Secret Service’, BBC, 1995

    And earlier this year we had the spectacle of a 4-part Al-Jazeera TV documentary on attempted Israeli subversion of UK politics (“The Lobby”).

    All of my comment above is purely reactive – after all the facts relayed struck a chord. But one *senses* there is a whole lot more going on under the surface… *rerum cognoscere causas* and yes! not just *cherchez la femme*, but *cherchez la Juive*!

    Increasingly and inevitably one is drawn to finding a *pattern*. This case was not just the “System” misfiring, there is assuredly a highly *personal* if not pathological element in the relentless pursuit of this case.

    Even today, would a typical English schoolgirl pursue formal accusations of repeated RAPE (including anally – garnish for the jaded palates of the pr0n generation) against a teacher just because he verbally chastised her or even made fun of her in class? Really? No, there is real, concerted *animus* at play here.

    When I first saw the article I immediately wondered: Kato. What an unusual name. Does he look Jewish? What is his background? His surname “Harris” evokes the common predecessor Horowicz.

    Brief ‘net surfing has brought me little, except that the origin of Kato as a given name is claimed (reportedly) not only by East Africans but Greeks and its meaning conveyed as variously ‘pure’ or ‘second born twin’! No luck there then. For all I know it could be Scottish or Cornish.

    Then his demeanour. Does he appear Jewish? He has a ‘look’ but I can’t zone in on what exactly. Probably not, absent more information. And general searches bring up firstly reports about his teaching prowess; also he seems a well-liked fellow.

    So what else is there? Well, on the complainant side, there is an interesting array of ethnic indicators:

    Girl’s family extremely wealthy, employed in finance, ‘Her parents even jetted her to New York to visit a psychiatrist’.
    They instruct the solidly Jewish law firm of Mishcon de Reya (of Brexit challenge fame).
    Mishcon de Reya instructs Sue Akers, retired Deputy Assistant Commissioner of the British Metropolitan Police Service. Some less than flattering reportage on her and the trial appears here:

    Akers – Jewish? A search finds Jews with the surname but time does not permit more. One surprise find did come up however:

    “The Jewish Police Association”. I’d never heard of it before.
    No need for Shomrim then!

    There are threads a-plenty that might be further pursued, like for example the background of the Crown Prosecution Service case officer who decided to proceed in this most unpromising case. Although as you’ll see from the reports, Harris was under anxiety medication which he claimed causes *impotence*.

    There is definitely something “up” with this case, a secret leitmotiv which it seems neither we, nor the court nor jury, have been made privy to. What is readily visible though is a rounding of the waggons (or whatever the obverse for aggression is) by a statistically improbable number of Jewish actors against an (ostensibly) White man, devoting disproportionate time and money to a false cause which is embellished with claims not only of repeat rape but of anal rape.

    As with Jeremy Bedford Turner, is the CPS guilty here of buckling under Jewish pressure, pressure transcending the fanciful and bordering on the hysterical, ‘for fear of the Jews’?

  3. Arvin N. Prebost
    30 April, 2017 at 12:00 pm — Reply

    I do not understand why he lost his job—he was innocent.

    Seems to me that he could sue the school for dismissing him.

  4. Anthony Collins
    2 May, 2017 at 9:51 am — Reply

    “Marion Zimmer Bradley, famous for her science-fiction novels, was also a blatant and violent pedophile sex offender, whose own daughter was among her victims.” It might be worth noting that Bradley was married to Walter H. Breen, a convicted serial child rapist and member of NAMBLA who wrote Greek Love under the pseudonym of J. Z. Eglinton. Revilo P. Oliver wrote of this vile book in 1966:

    “Ten years ago, I am sure, and probably even five years ago, the most pessimistic observer of our rotting nation would have refused to believe that such a work could have been published in the United States, much less accorded glowing reviews and widely circulated. It is the work of a college professor, who, as still happens, is also a man of learning: that makes him the less excusable and the more dangerous. Using the pen-name of J. Z. Eglinton and the insidious title, Greek Love (New York, Oliver Layton Press, 1964), he has written and published a five-hundred-page panegyric of paederasty, extolling its delights in perfervid and even eloquent terms, condemning such pervert-cliques as the Mattachine Society as timorous and reactionary, and boldly claiming that all men, being created equal, have a perfect right to seduce male children. Professor ‘Eglinton’ believes that boys between the ages of twelve and sixteen provide the most fun, and he proves his point by recounting, in the style of a romantic novelist, the wondrous fun thus had by university professors, scout masters, graduate students, rabbis, and the like. It would be supererogatory to argue with Professor Eglinton. If you are an American and have children for whom you care, or if you are under seventy and hope that the United States will last your time, it will be obvious to you that his species and ours cannot long coexist in the same territory.”

    Breen was never a college professor, but may have been able to pass himself off as one in his writings, given his education and his research and writing skills (he wrote a number of reference works on American coins). He is the subject of a sympathetic biographical entry by a Donald Mader in Before Stonewall: Activists for Gay and Lesbian Rights in Historical Context, a reference work edited by Vern L. Bullough — a sinister personality discussed in some detail in Andrew Hamilton’s article, “The Ideology of Contraception.”

    Predictably, Mader skirts around Breen’s criminal convictions, and has nothing to say about his victims. Instead, he whines that Breen “had the misfortune . . . to be born into our time, when such activity [i.e., pederasty] is calumniated and persecuted.” Reading about these perverts makes me incredibly angry.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.