News

Jewish Google’s “Objective” Ranking Algorithm Objective No Longer

Sites telling the truth about race and Jews to be demoted in search results, will be harder to find — while sites promoting the Jewish anti-White agenda will be promoted — as this controlled media article reveals.

IN RECENT MONTHS, Google has confronted a new and unsettling trend: Its top search results for questions about the Holocaust lead to neo-Nazi sites while queries about different ethnic groups direct users to racist or inflammatory material.

The company last week said it was reluctant to take action, citing a desire to preserve the integrity of the company’s algorithms, which are designed to turn up relevant information. But on Tuesday, a Google spokesperson told Fortune it is making some changes.

“Judging which pages on the web best answer a query is a challenging problem and we don’t always get it right,” said the spokesperson. “We recently made improvements to our algorithm that will help surface more high quality, credible content on the web. We’ll continue to change our algorithms over time in order to tackle these challenges.”

The Google rep also explained that the process for tweaking its algorithm involves making scalable, systemic changes rather than simply demoting individual websites.

The changes come in the wake of news reports that Google’s auto-complete feature was prompting users to enter phrases like “Are Jews evil?” and that its top search result for “Did the Holocaust happen” was a page by the White Supremacist group, Stormfront:

The update to the algorithms appear to be kicking in already as the Stormfront site has dropped, and the top result is to a link by the United States Holocaust museum. The results may differ based on your previous searches or on where you are located. In Germany, for instance, Holocaust-denial sites are illegal, so Stormfront would not have appeared.

Meanwhile, all of the changes to the results are not entirely determined by Google. As long-time Google reporter Danny Sullivan points out, changes to the results may also be shaped by recent search activity in response to the controversy, and the arrival of new websites optimized to return queries about the Holocaust.

Sullivan also notes that sites about Jewish people have not been the only ones to yield controversial results. A search for phrases like “Are White People Stupid” also list offensive websites as a top result. And more broadly, the offensive results typically only appear at the top of the list when a user searches for a specific phrase rather than enter a more common search term like “Holocaust” or “white people.”

It’s unclear how long it will take Google to complete the updated algorithm since such changes take typically weeks or months to refine, and what sites will be favored as a result of the new emphasis on “more high quality, credible content.”

Meanwhile, the episode provides more fodder for the debate over how the influence Google (GOOGL, -0.31%) and Facebook (FB, -1.38%) have over news and information, and the role of social media in creating so-called “filter bubbles” that lead people to shut out divergent opinions.

* * *

Source: Fortune

For Further Reading

Previous post

What You Are versus What You Own

Next post

Media Jew: "Social Media Racists Must Be Silenced"

1 Comment

  1. Jay
    25 December, 2016 at 3:35 am — Reply

    Twitter is already tanking and Gab will take it’s place in time, but will Gab be any better once it’s large enough?
    Who owns it and controls it?

    We are behind the curve on this one and creative ways need to be thought up to get control of social media and search engines(start page, duck duck go?).

    The Daily Stormer has enough regular visitors to raise the kind of money needed to start a media site that is just a plan free speech and social media plate form.
    Or even a search engine platform for people wanting privacy.

    We would just need to stay in control to make sure the platform stays open.
    Advertising it as a true free speech zone and personal privacy place to chat and connect over the net.
    We would attract all the people kicked off or threaten by these other sites. Early 100,000’s or millions of people.

    Then these neutral sites would allow us to channel others here and else were by open debate.

    Since these sites would be neutral they would also be making money and provide a good living to our white tech workers who have been replaced by Indian or Chinese H1B visa job stealers.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.