SpaceX Investigated for “Crime” of Hiring American
by David Sims
THE FOLLOWING HEADLINE says much of what Americans need to know about Joe Biden: “Biden’s Department of Justice is very concerned that Elon Musk may prefer to hire American citizens over foreign labor.”
SpaceX has developed, and is using, rocket technology that is important to the national security of the United States. It would put our country at risk, if SpaceX were to hire a foreign spy who might steal that technology.
But even if that weren’t a fact in this case, it would remain a good thing for an American company to prefer to hire American workers rather than foreign workers. The allegation that the Biden administration has made against SpaceX, as seen from a patriotic point of view, is a compliment to SpaceX (and a grave indictment of the Biden administration). Elon Musk would deserve the highest praise from the citizens of his country, were he “guilty as charged.”
Biden’s “Department of Justice” is now investigating Elon Musk’s company, SpaceX, for allegedly preferring to hire Americans over non-US citizens. Fabian Hutter, a foreign national who is legally present in the United States but who isn’t a permanent resident, wasn’t hired after being interviewed for a job at SpaceX, so he turned around and filed a discrimination complaint. Hutter holds Canadian and Austrian dual citizenship, but these laws enforcing the hiring of foreigners — and any precendents established by this case — are largely used to benefit non-Whites at the expense of Whites.
CNBC reported:
The Department of Justice’s effort to get SpaceX to comply with a subpoena for company hiring records will be heard by a federal judge on March 18.
That hearing date was set Monday after lawyers for SpaceX, which is fighting the subpoena, and the DOJ met via videoconference with Judge Michael Wilner for a planning session. Wilner gave SpaceX’s lawyers until Feb. 26 to submit a response to the DOJ’s requested subpoena, with the government then able to reply to SpaceX by March 12.
The DOJ has for months been investigating whether Elon Musk’s space company discriminates against foreigners in its hiring, court records show.
The probe was launched by the department’s Immigrant and Employee Rights Section after a job applicant, Fabian Hutter, complained that SpaceX discriminated against him when he was asked about his citizenship status last March during an interview for a technical strategy associate position.
Hutter told CNBC that he believes SpaceX decided not to hire him after he answered a question about his citizenship. Hutter holds dual citizenship in Austria and Canada but is a lawful permanent U.S. resident, according to court records filed in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.
The DOJ unit is not only investigating Hutter’s complaint, but “also may explore whether [SpaceX] engages in any pattern or practice of discrimination” barred by federal law, records show.
As part of that probe, investigators in October issued a subpoena demanding that SpaceX provide information and documents related to its hiring and employment eligibility verification processes.
But SpaceX did not fully comply with the subpoena after giving the DOJ a spreadsheet of employee information.
So DOJ attorney Lisa Sandoval last month asked Wilner in a court filing to order SpaceX to comply with the document demand.
…SpaceX is allowed to hire non-U.S. citizens who have a green card under U.S. International Traffic in Arms Regulations.
Those rules, known as ITAR, say that only Americans or foreigners who have a U.S. green card can have physical or digital access to items on the U.S. Munitions List, which consists of defense-related equipment, software and other material.
[Wow. Abdullah having a green card really makes me feel confident about his loyalty! — Ed.]
SpaceX shouldn’t hire foreigners because its rocket technology would be put at risk of being stolen by a spy, which would jeopardize US national security. That’s why SpaceX hires only American citizens. Elon Musk’s other companies, including Tesla, do hire foreign workers.
[Considering how anti-White the current alleged US government is, perhaps “US national security” is really best served by whatever brings down the Washington regime, unless that whatever is even worse. — Ed.]
I have two theories about where the motivation for this tempest in a teapot lies. First possibility: United Launch Alliance (Musk’s competitor and a joint venture of Lockheed Martin Space and Boeing Defense). Second possibility: China.
* * *
Source: Author
For further reading:
Marketing corp .
Frankly, the more dindus (((Elon Musk))) hires, the better. Whites shouldn’t work for Jews.
Elon Reeve Musk. Born 6.8.71, Pretoria, Transvaal.
His mother was Maye Musk (Haldeman) from Saskatchewan.
Neither of Elon Musk’s parents appear to have any Jew ancestry.
Neither, for that matter do Elon Musk’s present wife, nor his former wife, nor any of his seven white children.
Everyone in Elon Musk’s family appears to be white, and of European ancestry.
His maternal grandmother is partly Pennsylvania-Dutch, and partly British.
There do not appear to be any jews or blacks in Mr Musk’s family tree.
And this is just from a quick five-minute search online. Assuming Wikipedia is entirely trustworthy?
Fakeypedia is definitely NOT trustworthy, and they have been tinkering with, removing , altering and ‘tailoring’ content for years.
Carolyn Emerick has pointed this out many times in her streams and I’ve noticed it, too, which is why I try to use other search tools whenever possible.
I agree with you 100%. Wikipedia is totally pro-Jewish and Marxist.
Regarding Elon Musk, he looks like a disgusting mongrel. I think that the fact he may have Jewish blood or not is irrelevant. How many full-blooded Aryan traitors are working 24/7 for the enemy?
Who would be the first to sue SpaceX if the company hired a non-American who then revealed national secrets to his/her own country? We also need to ask: who would be the first to sue SpaceX if the company hired a non-American who then revealed national secrets to Israel? Only American citizens who have only a loyalty to America should have access to America’s secrets. Those with automatic dual-citizenship should not apply.
Is there evidence that Musk is a Jew? I’ve never heard that before.
He’s a Zionist seemingly, he attended a Jewish school, and the name “Elon” is Hebrew. So he may be, but possibly not.
Greetings Kevin. I do not know about Elon Musk’s background. I was referring generally to the thesis of the article, that SpaceX is being challenged over its proper policy of hiring employees who have loyalty to America only, if they have access to secrets. A few years ago Australian Members of Parliament (MP) were compelled to resign because they had foreign citizenships or were entitled to them. Of course, the MSM never raised the issue of Jewish MP’s automatic entitlement to Israeli citizenship. The MPs were required to renounce any such citizenship and then be re-elected. I do not know whether any Jewish MP renounced their Israeli citizenship, (an allegiance to a foreign power) as required by the Constitution of Australia. In the SpaceX case, those with access to secrets… Read more »
“I do not know whether any Jewish MP renounced their (sic) Israeli citizenship…” Should read: “I do not know whether any Jewish MP renounced his Israeli citizenship…” Let us not get sucked down into the mire of ungrammatical PC Newspeak.
For some reason Elon Musk seems to have some Chinese blood. Look at his flat, broad cheekbones and then his eyes:
“You can’t serve two masters”.
Well, the bigger the company the greater the fall. Musk makes most of his money from the government, otherwise his business would flop. Government is anti citizen, even here in Australia. The Australian government makes it hard to hire citizens and its cheaper to hire aliens. They pay a full time professional less than if they were contractors, so if they pay them 80 a year the company has to pay equal to that in taxes. As a company I would never have ties with the government, but alas, there are other jobs. As for national security, as if our government is protecting us, that’s laughable.
I wish the assault on this country and, it’s people would stop.
Musk’s martian colonization plans are inspirational but totally impractical. It’s hard to believe that investors who surely have access to technically knowledgeable advisors would invest in this idea. Those that take a closer look at Musk’s history and his companies present a less than flattering picture.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCgKWj1pn3_7hRSFIypunYog/videos
I suspect that Musk’s martian colonization plans are a front for some sort of US government space weapon or surveillance system or a geoengineering project. He may well be a frontman like Howard Hughes was for the CIA project to recover a sunken Soviet submarine.
The next NASA rover will land on mars next week. How many gratuitous negroes will be displayed in the mission control center?
Let them. The satrapy that calls itself the United States of America is the avowed enemy of any and all decent people remaining in the world, including its own subjects. Any potential rivals are probably far ahead anyway, and would therefore be little interested in Musk’s monkeyshines.
What we should be concerned about is the so-called “Starlink” scam. What (or rather, who) gives Musk the right to enclose the Earth in a woof and weft of orbiting space junk so low they will decay and reenter every five years? What powers a satellite so small sixty of them can be orbited in a single shot? For what is this a front? 5G?–pffft! No doubt something sinister in nature.
The problem is in order to explore space one needs long-term planning and adequate funding. (Remember the Apollo program was to go to Apollo 24 but quit at Apollo 17). Such is not the case in the United States and such will never be the case. What one administration approves the other one cancels as we can see now in the whole Trump versus Biden situation. The Space program is dear to my heart since it employed one of my relatives during the heady days of Apollo. Looking at NASA videos on YouTube regarding Project Artemis (The plan to put Americans on the moon again by 2023) I can’t decide if NASA is peddling space exploration or cosmic diversity. We are told time and time again in their videos that… Read more »
I am amazed that people still fall for the fraudulent space-ex / elon musk charade.
Rockets cannot fly in the aether (known as space), simply because chemical reactions that push against a vacuum will not provide any opposing force. It is well known now that this is another judeo-masonic fantasy that will never come to fruition whilever they indulge in their materalist illusions.
The only people who could have propelled some form of intergalactic craft are being slowly murdered according to the dictates of the morgenthau / kaufman plans.
So, Konrad, you’re trying to tell us that geostationary satellites do not exist, and, if they did exist, they couldn’t adjust their positions with propellants, which they actually have done thousands of times at least? And you’re trying to tell us that a firearm would have no recoil in space because recoil is caused by “pushing against air”? Pffffft.
And you are trying to tell us that these tiny (comparatively), objects can be placed at exactly the right locations in “space”, where a partial vacuum exists, along with electrical currents, plasma, ions and who knows what else, that deliver perfect tv/radio signals all over earth, in any weather and can hold enough fuel to adjust their positions? pffffffttt It ain’t gonna happen. It never has and never will. It is the stuff of jew science fiction, asimovian lies. Your “satellite” signals are nothing more than terrestrial signals bounced off the atmosphere. Nothing, but nothing with such a small mass can be sustained in the aether without succumbing to another force related to mass i.e. the earth or moon. There is no such thing as a geostationery orbit. It has… Read more »
I’m a broadcast engineer, among other things. I’m certain that the commonly available satellite television broadcast signals are not, and could not be, ionospherically or otherwise atmospherically propagated. For one thing, the frequencies they use can’t be reflected from any atmospheric layer except under rare and exceptional circumstances; for another, the dishes used are too directional for such a use even if such propagation were possible; for another, such propagation would be highly unstable from moment to moment and these signals are not; for yet another, the antennas are indeed always aimed carefully at the equatorial belt that one would expect given a geostationary orbit; and furthermore the latency of such systems is precisely what one would expect given their geostationary position.