Ten Year Study: Unvaccinated Children Far Healthier Than Their Vaccinated Peers

Dramatic graph showing pediatric office visit rates triggered by various illnesses in both vaccinated (orange) and unvaccinated (blue) children. In no case were vaccinated children healthier in these metrics — in fact, the exact opposite was true.

THE CENTERS for Disease Control (CDC), the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and the National Institute of Health (NIH) refuse to conduct any study comparing the unvaccinated child to his/her peers. While HHS is legally obligated to conduct safety studies every two years and report to Congress in accordance with the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, it was admitted in a 2018 court ruling that none of these vaccine safety studies were ever conducted over a thirty year span.

This medical fraud has enabled the rise of a predatory vaccine industry and a growing number of “recommended” childhood vaccinations. However, as childhood vaccinations increase, the health of American children has not improved in the past thirty years and respiratory infections are rampant. Visits to the pediatrician have skyrocketed, with chronic health issues becoming a normal way of life for many. A whopping 54 percent of children and young adults in the U.S. now suffer from chronic illnesses that lead to life-long pharmaceutical prescriptions.

Ten-year study finds that unvaccinated children are healthier in several metrics and enjoy 25 times fewer pediatric visits

A new study published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health finds that unvaccinated children are far healthier than vaccinated children. As the rate of vaccination increases, so do chronic health issues such as asthma, allergic rhinitis, respiratory infections, eczema and a host of other health problems. The study, titled, “Relative Incidence of Office Visits and cumulative Rates of Billed Diagnoses Along the Axis of Vaccination” shows how childhood vaccination causes an increasing number of pediatric visits and an influx of diagnoses. The research followed 3,300 pediatric patients for ten years and was conducted at Integrative Pediatric, a pediatrics practice in Oregon run by Dr. Paul Thomas, M.D.

RIOV (relative index of office visits) for various illnesses (the chart also includes “well child” visits for comparison): The RIOV number is a multiplier indicating how much more susceptible vaccinated children are to these conditions.

During the study, Thomas’s pediatric practice prioritized parental decision-making and followed the informed consent doctrine of the American Medical Association. The plan allows parents to stop or delay vaccination if vaccine injuries were present. Not every child processes vaccine ingredients in the same way; conditions like eczema, developmental delay, allergies, or autoimmune conditions are typical signs that a child’s body is unable to process the vaccines. Dr. Thomas’s practice contained the perfect mix of children who ranged from being unvaccinated to partially vaccinated to “fully vaccinated” per the CDC’s guidelines.

The study found that the unvaccinated child shows fewer signs of respiratory infections and fewer fevers at well-child visits, among many other disparities. The unvaccinated child required twenty-five times less pediatric care over a ten year span. The CDC pushes 70 doses of 16 vaccines on every child before he or she reaches the age of 18. Children who received 90 to 95 percent of the CDC-recommended vaccines for their age group were about 25 times more likely to see the pediatrician than the unvaccinated group.

Vaccinated children (with a family history of autoimmune issues) suffer more compared to their unvaccinated peers

An important feature of this study was Dr. Yehuda Shoenfeld’s work, which singled out a predisposition to vaccine injury called autoimmune syndrome induced by adjuvants (oil emulsions, aluminum salts and other chemicals, and “inactivated toxins,” designed to irritate and thereby increase the body’s immune response). If there is family history of autoimmunity, children who get vaccinated are more likely to suffer from ear infections, asthma, allergies, and skin rashes, when compared to the unvaccinated who also share the same family history of autoimmune issues. The aluminum adjuvant and the other various chemicals in the vaccine may activate the genes that enable autoimmune issues. Family history of disease is important in determining whether vaccines should be used in the child.

Vaccinated children up to six times more likely to suffer from anemia, allergies, sinusitis, and asthma

The most concerning aspect of the study was the rise in chronic health issues among the vaccinated children. The vaccinated children were three to six times more likely to wind up in the pediatrician’s office to treat anemia, allergies, sinusitis, and asthma. The vaccinated were also 70 percent more likely to suffer from various respiratory infections compared to the unvaccinated. Do the vaccines weaken overall immunity and make children more susceptible to other infections?

This series of charts shows relative incidence data for numerous diseases for the unvaccinated versus quartiles of vaccine uptake. You may be surprised to see an apparent variation from the general trend of this study in the last two columns of the autism chart (the last chart in section F). This is likely a flaw in the data caused by parents (understandably) ceasing vaccination upon signs or symptoms of autism.

No ADHD in the unvaccinated

There was absolutely no ADHD in the unvaccinated children, but as vaccination uptake increased, ADHD and behavioral issues increased. Thomas’s practice halted vaccination when signs of ADHD were prevalent, which is why his practice saw roughly half the rate of ADHD overall, when compared to the general population. (This halting of vaccination also means that vaccine-related ADHD risk is likely even greater than indicated in the study.)

Vaccine-preventable illnesses were not prevalent in the vaccinated or the unvaccinated

Strangely, or perhaps not so strangely, a quarter percent of the vaccinated were diagnosed with infections that the vaccines were supposed to prevent, including chicken pox or whooping cough. A slight uptick in chicken pox and whooping cough was observed in the unvaccinated too, but they all recovered and gained lifelong immunity to the infections. There were no cases of measles, mumps, rubella, tetanus, or hepatitis for the children who were vaccinated. But there were also no cases of these infections in the unvaccinated during the entire 10.5-year study period. This brings up the question: Are vaccines even necessary, or do they impose a burden of unnecessary harm to children?

* * *

Source: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (archived version here) via Natural News and National Vanguard correspondents

Previous post

Robert Frost’s “Directive”

Next post

The Ghetto-Folk

Notify of
Inline Feedback
View all comments
15 December, 2020 9:34 am

Well, it was one thing not to vaccinate when the US didn’t have the increased hordes of third worlders entering the country, bringing “dead” diseases with them. I was vaxxed and got chicken pox as far as I know vaccines don’t prevent it. There’s too many factors this study doesn’t take into account.. what are the ethnicity of the children? It’s common knowledge Whites tend to be more healthy than nonWhites and mixed. What is the home life of the vaccinated children versus unvaccinated? That could have a bearing on ADHD and respiratory issues. Parents who vaccinate may also do x amount of something else to their kids versus parents who don’t vaccinate. I believe in objectivity and parents being informed, but I don’t think this study is conclusive by… Read more »

Guy Haines
Guy Haines
Reply to  Grimork
16 December, 2020 9:17 am

The whole concept of vaccination is scientifically questionable. Yes, some immunity is sometimes gained, 50% of the time if you’re lucky — but at tremendous risk of harm and sickness. I used to trust the medical establishment but no longer do; they are out for money and cooperate with power- and control-mad bureaucrats to increase their “slice of the pie.”

Reply to  Guy Haines
2 February, 2022 10:38 am

Guy Haines is right.

Let us never forget that the medical establishment is out there for money, not for public’s health.

If everyone was healthy, then they will have no incomes and no bread in their table. Thus, it is part of their business to keep you sick.

Bruno Anthony
Bruno Anthony
16 December, 2020 9:21 am

The lead author of this study has just had his right to practice taken away from him based on lurid, trumped-up, years-old charges — But the real reason is that he published this study. They are trying to destroy his life, just like they did to other truth-tellers like Kevin Strom, David Duke, Andrew Wakefield, and many more.

Prinz Edelhart
Prinz Edelhart
17 December, 2020 9:01 pm

Much like a muscle becomes stronger when used, but atrophies when disused, the immune system gets stronger if it gets a chance to do its’ job, weaker when prevented from doing so by getting VAXXXed.

Reply to  Prinz Edelhart
30 July, 2021 3:56 pm

I believe that’s an oversimplification of the immune system. The “immune system” is primarily not even our own; even mainstream scientists acknowledge that 70-80% of our immune system is the result of bacteria in our gut. In other words, the health of non-human organisms inside of the human (which vastly outnumber human cells) determines the outcome of overall human health. Bacteria called macrophages function as janitors. Human cells have programmed deaths (apoptosis) and trauma-related deaths (necrosis). From the healthiest to sickest person, we all undergo regular cell death. Bacteria process the garbage, and without bacteria we would be backed up with our own dead cell debris. From a holistic point of view, is it not rational to conclude that anything increasing the frequency of cellular death or decreasing the function… Read more »

Reply to  Prinz Edelhart
2 February, 2022 10:46 am

The immune system is the one that does the job of fighting off diseases. The original vaccine was a mild version of a disease so the body can get infected with it and develop anti bodies in a more comfortable way. You STILL have to get sick and survive the illness to train your immune system and make it stronger. And yet, only a minority of the population may need one. The rest survived just fine. Now, vaccines contains all kinds of toxic thrash and death stuff that for sure compromise your health somehow, and here is the proof. The lunacy of covid vaccines today is just a demonstration of the media’s power of fear over the population. And of course, governments will use this to increase their control on… Read more »

How Truth Gets Hidden and Stays Under the Radar - Carolyn Hidalgo
17 September, 2021 12:44 am

[…] To investigate further, he completed a 10 year landmark study with his own patients – over 3,000 children comparing the vaccinated with the unvaccinated for health outcomes in a peer reviewed study in December 2020. […]