This Weekend: Blanket Your Neighborhood With MLK Truth
Join our No King Over Us truth campaign and help the National Alliance awaken the slumbering.
by Rosemary Pennington
and National Vanguard staff
HERE IS EVERYTHING you need: A high-quality video, a high-quality audio version of the video, a National Alliance flier in PDF form for printing and mass distribution — and supporting documentation and information, including proof from Trump’s release of secret FBI files that the National Alliance was right about King all along.
Watch or download the video:
Listen to or download the audio version:Listen to our MLK exposé audio version
And here’s our dynamite, irrefutable “No King Over Us” flier on King:
Here’s how to fold our “No King Over Us” fliers if you print them yourself (if you get them printed at a print shop they can fold them for you):
* * *
Here’s more information — and proof from surveillance of King that what we’re saying is correct:
No King Over Us
by Kevin Alfred Strom
WHEN OUR ENEMIES gave us Saint Martin Luther King, possibly by murdering the foul creature — who was worth more to them as a dead martyr than as a living lecher — they gave us a wonderful gift. The gift of forcing the American people to rub their faces in so much filth — and forcing us to accept the most obvious and preposterous of lies as Holy Truth — that it backfired.
Bowing down and pretending to believe in unbelievable lies is something that intelligent free-thinkers, of which our race is plenteously supplied, find very, very hard to do. Thus our enemies make the very best part of the population, the part still capable of independent thought, begin to doubt not only the Martin Luther King sainthood narrative, but all the narratives of the anti-White establishment.
Thus do fall houses made of cards — and tyrants far more evil and odious, but no more legitimate, than the Wizard of Oz.
Martin Luther King was a liar and a cheater who didn’t deserve his degree. This we know.
Martin Luther King was a user and abuser of women, including White women. This we know.
Martin Luther King was an enemy of racial integrity and freedom, and an active, conscious enemy of our people and our nation. This we know.
Martin Luther King betrayed his own purported cause, and his people, when he promoted a racially mixed society instead of self-determination — and when he consorted with and supported Communists, and allowed Jewish Communist Stanley Levison to basically run his entire operation. This we know.
Martin Luther King betrayed all those who supported him when he misappropriated funds and used them to pay for degenerate sex parties that lasted for days on end and included prostitutes, both Black and White, who were often treated like dirt. This we also know.
In short, Martin Luther King was a piece of filth and precisely the opposite of the saintlike image that has been given him by the controlled media.
My well-known broadcast (and now flier) tells the true story of King. It is a powerful deconstruction of the King myth. It has now been made into a free flier, and I am asking you to put it into the hands of all the people you can reach in your community. Make this weekend — this insult of a “holiday” — into a weekend of truth-telling like you’ve never done before.
A few years ago, Brett Reese of KELS-FM in Colorado ran an abridged version of my exposé as a guest editorial. Not only did he run the piece — he featured it on the air over and over again, for years. Not a single listener complained or questioned the station’s right to do so — no one, that is, until a Jewish group heard about it.
The Jewish Anti-Defamation League (ADL), which has links to Meyer Lansky’s organized crime syndicate and which once gave their “Torch of Liberty” award to mob boss Moe Dalitz, attacked Mr. Reese and demanded that the airing of my program cease immediately: “The reckless and irresponsible spread of such misleading vitriol only heightens the divisions in our communities….” said ADL Regional Director Scott L. Levin (also a “Torch of Liberty” recipient, by the way), adding “We call upon Mr. Reese to desist from his divisive public broadcasts….” Immediately after the ADL’s attacks on him, Reese began receiving death threats that he considered credible. Reese had broadcast my program for three years running around the MLK holiday, but had never received death threats until the crime-linked ADL, whose “phone tree” notification of Jewish activists is well known, began to attack him in their publications and press releases.
Clayborne Carson, the founding director of the “Martin Luther King, Jr., Research and Education Institute” at Stanford University and the editor of King’s papers, took a very different approach from that of the ADL. He openly admitted, and was quoted by the Greeley Tribune as saying, that “many of the claims in the broadcast have been substantiated,” but added the rather weak rejoinder that many historical figures are “flawed.”
Recently, National Vanguard’s own Dale Bennett reported on new FBI documents released after years of secrecy that proved that I had been right about King all along:
Kevin Alfred Strom’s report on compromised Black leader Martin Luther King has been proven correct in nearly all particulars by the Trump administration’s recent release of a secret FBI document on King prepared in 1968.
The 23-page FBI document is dated just three weeks before King’s assassination in April 1968.
The file was released along with a trove of documents relating to the assassination of John F. Kennedy this week. Mr. Kennedy is not referenced in the file and it is not clear why it was kept secret for almost 50 years. Its cover shows it was assessed in 1994 by an FBI task force on the JFK assassination, which concluded that the document should be kept totally secret from the public.
Among its conclusions are that:
• King was surrounded by advisers with strong links to organized Communism
• His statements were always subject to approval by Communist operatives, especially his main handler, Jewish Communist Stanley Levison (who, confirming Mr. Strom’s report from 23 years ago, was King’s ghostwriter on numerous occasions)
• He was a secret supporter of Communism, “a whole-hearted Marxist”
• His organisation, the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, set up a “tax dodge” to raise funds for its activities and conceal Jewish/Communist sources
• King took part in “drunken sex orgies” involving both Black and White prostitutes, coerced young women to take part in unnatural acts, and “initiate” them if they were hesitant
• He was unfaithful to his wife, and had sexual liaisons with numerous females, including part-Mestizo, part-White folk singer Joan Baez
A ‘Slow Thinker’ with Abnormal Sexual Preferences
The report states that King’s advisers and handlers approved everything King said in advance: “King is such a slow thinker he is usually not prepared to make statements without help from someone,” it reads.
Linking King to Communism, it stated: “King is a whole-hearted Marxist who has studied it (Marxism), believes in it and agrees with it, but because of his being a minister of religion, does not dare to espouse it publicly.”
And, in another part, the document says: “During the early 1960s, the CPUSA [Communist Party USA] was striving to obtain a Negro-labor coalition to achieve its goals in this country… Martin Luther King, Jr, and his organization were made to order to achieve these objectives.”
At a February 1968 workshop to train ministers in “urban leadership” evidently monitored by the FBI, the report reveals: “One Negro minister in attendance later expressed his disgust with the behind-the scene drinking, fornication, and homosexuality that went on at the conference. Several Negro and white prostitute[s] were brought in from the Miami area. An all-night sex orgy was held with these prostitutes and some of the delegates.”
The document reports that King also engaged in a “two-day drunken sex orgy” in Washington in January 1964: “When one of the females shied away from engaging in an unnatural act, King and others of the males present discussed how she was to be taught and initiated in this respect,” it added. “It is a fact that King not only regularly indulges in adulterous acts but enjoys the abnormal by engaging in group sexual orgies.”
You can read the full FBI report in PDF form here.
A hard-hitting, home-printable National Alliance flier exposing the lecherous Negro fraud who went by the name of Martin Luther King is now available for download. Just click here to download the high-resolution PDF, print it out and fold it in any quantity desired, and you’re ready to go — and get the truth out to hundreds — or thousands — of people in your community.
These fliers have also proven to get results through the reaction of the controlled media too, who often take the (mistaken) attitude that they can reduce the impact of the flier by attacking it (and the Alliance) as “bigotry,” “hate,” or “neo-Nazism.” All they succeed in doing is inoculating the public against the use of those pejorative terms, since any reader can easily see for himself who is speaking with reason and authority — and who is frantically trying to prevent the public from reading an alternative point of view.
These fliers can be placed inside screen doors, under windshield wipers, posted in quantity on community bulletin boards, handed out on the streets or at community events, slipped under the doors at college campuses and dormitories — wherever our people can be found.
Share all this on social media — but also take the extra effort to go to your local print shop with the PDF file, or print it out yourself, and get out there with real world activism. Nothing makes a more powerful impression than a real-world act of courageous truth-telling. Nothing better tells your neighbors that we really care. There is no better way to tell our people that we’re with them, right here on the streets of our community. Nothing makes the White resistance more real. Let’s make 2019 the year we break a record in flier distribution — and let’s keep up the momentum of the tsunami of truth that is washing over our land!
Here’s the text of the broadcast on which the flier is based:
* * *
The Beast As Saint
by Kevin Alfred Strom
WHEN THE COMMUNISTS TOOK OVER a country, one of the first things that they did was to confiscate all the privately-held weapons, to deny the people the physical ability to resist tyranny. But even more insidious than the theft of the people’s weapons was the theft of their history. Official Communist “historians” rewrote history to fit the current party line. In many countries, revered national heroes were excised from the history books, or their real deeds were distorted to fit Communist ideology, and Communist killers and criminals were converted into official “saints.” Holidays were declared in honor of the beasts who murdered countless nations.
Did you know that much the same process has occurred right here in America?
Every January, the media go into a kind of almost spastic frenzy of adulation for the so-called “Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King, Jr.” King has even had a national holiday declared in his honor, an honor accorded to no other American, not Washington, not Jefferson, not Lincoln. (Washington and Lincoln no longer have holidays — they share the generic-sounding “President’s Day.”) A liberal judge has sealed the FBI files on King until the year 2027. What are they hiding? Let’s take a look at this modern-day plastic god.
Born in 1929, King was the son of a Black preacher known at the time only as “Daddy King.” “Daddy King” named his son Michael. In 1935, “Daddy King” had an inspiration to name himself after the Protestant reformer Martin Luther. He declared to his congregation that henceforth they were to refer to him as “Martin Luther King” and to his son as “Martin Luther King, Jr.” None of this name changing was ever legalized in court. “Daddy” King’s son’s real name is to this day Michael King.
King’s Brazen Cheating
We read in Michael Hoffman’s Holiday for a Cheater:
The first public sermon that King ever gave, in 1947 at the Ebenezer Baptist Church, was plagiarized from a homily by Protestant clergyman Harry Emerson Fosdick entitled “Life is What You Make It,” according to the testimony of King’s best friend of that time, Reverend Larry H. Williams. The first book that King wrote, Stride Toward Freedom, was plagiarized from numerous sources, all unattributed, according to documentation recently assembled by sympathetic King scholars Keith D. Miller, Ira G. Zepp, Jr., and David J. Garrow.
And no less an authoritative source than the four senior editors of The Papers of Martin Luther King, Jr. (an official publication of the Martin Luther King Center for Nonviolent Social Change, Inc., whose staff includes King’s widow Coretta), stated of King’s writings at both Boston University and Crozer Theological Seminary: “Judged retroactively by the standards of academic scholarship, [his writings] are tragically flawed by numerous instances of plagiarism…. Appropriated passages are particularly evident in his writings in his major field of graduate study, systematic theology.” King’s essay, “The Place of Reason and Experience in Finding God,” written at Crozer, pirated passages from the work of theologian Edgar S. Brightman, author of The Finding of God. Another of King’s theses, “Contemporary Continental Theology,” written shortly after he entered Boston University, was largely stolen from a book by Walter Marshall Horton. King’s doctoral dissertation, “A Comparison of the Conceptions of God in the Thinking of Paul Tillich and Harry Nelson Wieman,” for which he was awarded a PhD in theology, contains more than fifty complete sentences plagiarized from the PhD dissertation of Dr. Jack Boozer, “The Place of Reason in Paul Tillich’s Concept of God.”
According to The Martin Luther King Papers, in King’s dissertation “only 49 per cent. of sentences in the section on Tillich contain five or more words that were King’s own….”!
In The Journal of American History, June 1991, page 87, David J. Garrow, a leftist academic who is sympathetic to King, says that King’s wife, Coretta Scott King, who also served as his secretary, was an accomplice in his repeated cheating. Reading Garrow’s article, one is led to the inescapable conclusion that King cheated because he had chosen for himself a political role in which a PhD would be useful, and, lacking the intellectual ability to obtain the title fairly, went after it by any means necessary. Why, then, one might ask, did the professors at Crozer Theological Seminary and Boston University grant him passing grades and a PhD? Garrow states on page 89: “King’s academic compositions, especially at Boston University, were almost without exception little more than summary descriptions… and comparisons of other’s writings. Nonetheless, the papers almost always received desirable letter grades, strongly suggesting that King’s professors did not expect more….”
The editors of The Martin Luther King Jr. Papers state that “…the failure of King’s teachers to notice his pattern of textual appropriation is somewhat remarkable….”
But researcher Michael Hoffman tells us “…actually the malfeasance of the professors is not at all remarkable. King was politically correct, he was Black, and he had ambitions. The leftist [professors were] happy to award a doctorate to such a candidate no matter how much fraud was involved. Nor is it any wonder that it has taken forty years for the truth about King’s record of nearly constant intellectual piracy to be made public.”
Supposed scholars, who in reality shared King’s vision of a racially mixed and Marxist America, purposely covered up his cheating for decades. The cover-up still continues. From the New York Timesof October 11, 1991, page 15, we learn that on October 10th of that year, a committee of researchers at Boston University admitted that, “There is no question but that Dr. King plagiarized in the dissertation.” However, despite its finding, the committee said that “No thought should be given to the revocation of Dr. King’s doctoral degree,” an action the panel said “would serve no purpose.”
No purpose, indeed! Justice demands that, in light of his willful fraud as a student, the titles “reverend” and the “doctor” should be removed from King’s name.
Communist Beliefs and Connections
Well friends, he is not a legitimate reverend, he is not a bona fide PhD, and his name isn’t really “Martin Luther King, Jr.” What’s left? Just a sexual degenerate, an America-hating Communist, and a criminal betrayer of even the interests of his own people.
On Labor Day, 1957, a special meeting was attended by Martin Luther King and four others at a strange institution called the Highlander Folk School in Monteagle, Tennessee. The Highlander Folk School was a Communist front, having been founded by Myles Horton (Communist Party organizer for Tennessee) and Don West (Communist Party organizer for North Carolina). The leaders of this meeting with King were the aforementioned Horton and West, along with Abner Berry and James Dumbrowski, all open and acknowledged members of the Communist Party, USA. The agenda of the meeting was a plan to tour the Southern states to initiate demonstrations and riots.
From 1955 to 1960, Martin Luther King’s associate, advisor, and personal secretary was one Bayard Rustin. In 1936 Rustin joined the Young Communist League at New York City College. Convicted of draft-dodging, he went to prison for two years in 1944. On January 23, 1953 the Los Angeles Times reported his conviction and sentencing to jail for 60 days for lewd vagrancy and homosexual perversion. Rustin attended the 16th Convention of the Communist Party, USA in February, 1957. One month later, he and King founded the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, or SCLC for short. The president of the SCLC was Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. The vice-president of the SCLC was the Reverend Fred Shuttlesworth, who was also the president of an identified Communist front known as the Southern Conference Educational Fund, an organization whose field director, a Mr. Carl Braden, was simultaneously a national sponsor of the Fair Play for Cuba Committee, of which you may have heard. The program director of the SCLC was the Reverend Andrew Young, in more recent years Jimmy Carter’s ambassador to the UN and mayor of Atlanta. Young, by the way, was trained at the Highlander Folk School, previously mentioned.
Soon after returning from a trip to Moscow in 1958, Rustin organized the first of King’s famous marches on Washington. The official organ of the Communist Party, The Worker, openly declared the march to be a Communist project. Although he left King’s employ as secretary in 1961, Rustin was called upon by King to be second in command of the much larger march on Washington which took place on August 28, 1964.
Bayard Rustin’s replacement in 1961 as secretary and advisor to King was Jack O’Dell, also known as Hunter Pitts O’Dell. According to official records, in 1962 Jack O’Dell was a member of the National Committee of the Communist Party, USA. He had been listed as a Communist Party member as early as 1956. O’Dell was also given the job of acting executive director for SCLC activities for the entire Southeast, according to the St. Louis Globe-Democrat of October 26, 1962. At that time, there were still some patriots in the press corps, and word of O’Dell’s party membership became known.
What did King do? Shortly after the negative news reports, King fired O’Dell with much fanfare. And he then, without the fanfare, immediately hired him again as director of the New York office of the SCLC, as confirmed by the Richmond News-Leader of September 27, 1963.
In 1963 a Black man from Monroe, North Carolina named Robert Williams made a trip to Peking, China. Exactly 20 days before King’s 1964 march on Washington, Williams successfully urged Mao Tse-Tung to speak out on behalf of King’s movement. Mr. Williams was also around this time maintaining his primary residence in Cuba, from which he made regular broadcasts to the southern United States, three times a week, from high-power AM transmitters in Havana under the title “Radio Free Dixie.” In these broadcasts, he urged violent attacks by Blacks against White Americans.
During this period, Williams wrote a book entitled Negroes With Guns. The writer of the foreword for this book? None other than “Martin Luther King, Jr.” It is also interesting to note that the editors and publishers of this book were to a man all supporters of the infamous Fair Play for Cuba Committee.
According to King’s biographer and sympathizer David J. Garrow, “King privately described himself as a Marxist.” In his 1981 book, The FBI and Martin Luther King, Jr., Garrow quotes King as saying in SCLC staff meetings, “…we have moved into a new era, which must be an era of revolution…. The whole structure of American life must be changed…. We are engaged in the class struggle.”
Jewish Communist Stanley Levison can best be described as King’s behind-the-scenes “handler.” Levison, who had for years been in charge of the secret funnelling of Soviet funds to the Communist Party, USA, was King’s mentor and was actually the brains behind many of King’s more successful ploys. It was Levison who edited King’s book, Stride Toward Freedom. It was Levison who arranged for a publisher. Levison even prepared King’s income tax returns! It was Levison who really controlled the fund-raising and agitation activities of the SCLC. Levison wrote many of King’s speeches. King described Levison as one of his “closest friends.”
FBI: King Bought Sex With SCLC Money
The Federal Bureau of Investigation had for many years been aware of Stanley Levison’s Communist activities. It was Levison’s close association with King that brought about the initial FBI interest in King.
Lest you be tempted to believe the controlled media’s lie about “racists” in the FBI being out to “get” King, you should be aware that the man most responsible for the FBI’s probe of King was Assistant Director William C. Sullivan. Sullivan describes himself as a liberal, and says that initially “I was one hundred per cent. for King…because I saw him as an effective and badly needed leader for the Black people in their desire for civil rights.” The probe of King not only confirmed their suspicions about King’s Communist beliefs and associations, but it also revealed King to be a despicable hypocrite, an immoral degenerate, and a worthless charlatan.
According to Assistant Director Sullivan, who had direct access to the surveillance files on King which are denied the American people, King had embezzled or misapplied substantial amounts of money contributed to the “civil rights” movement. King used SCLC funds to pay for liquor, and numerous prostitutes both Black and White, who were brought to his hotel rooms, often two at a time, for drunken sex parties which sometimes lasted for several days. These types of activities were the norm for King’s speaking and organizing tours.
In fact, an outfit called the “National Civil Rights Museum” in Memphis, Tennessee, which is putting on display the two bedrooms from the Lorraine Motel where King stayed the night before he was shot, has declined to depict in any way the occupants of those rooms. That—according to exhibit designer Gerard Eisterhold—would be “close to blasphemy.” The reason? “Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.” spent his last night on Earth having sexual intercourse with two women at the motel and physically beating and abusing a third.
Sullivan also stated that King had alienated the affections of numerous married women. According to Sullivan, who in 30 years with the Bureau had seen everything there was to be seen of the seamy side of life, King was one of only seven people he had ever encountered who was such a total degenerate.
Noting the violence that almost invariably attended King’s supposedly “non-violent” marches, Sullivan’s probe revealed a very different King from the carefully crafted public image. King welcomed members of many different Black groups as members of his SCLC, many of them advocates and practitioners of violence. King’s only admonition on the subject was that they should embrace “tactical nonviolence.”
Sullivan also relates an incident in which King met in a financial conference with Communist Party representatives, not knowing that one of the participants was an infiltrator actually working for the FBI.
J. Edgar Hoover personally saw to it that documented information on King’s Communist connections was provided to the President and to Congress. And conclusive information from FBI files was also provided to major newspapers and news wire services. But were the American people informed of King’s real nature? No, for even in the 1960s, the fix was in—the controlled media and the bought politicians were bound and determined to push their racial mixing program on America. King was their man and nothing was going to get in their way. With a few minor exceptions, these facts have been kept from the American people. The pro-King propaganda machine grinds on, and it is even reported that a serious proposal has been made to add some of King’s writings as a new book in the Bible.
Ladies and gentlemen, the purpose of this radio program is far greater than to prove to you the immorality and subversion of this man called King.
I want you to start to think for yourselves.
I want you to consider this: What are the forces and motivation behind the controlled media’s active promotion of King?
What does it tell you about our politicians when you see them, almost without exception, falling all over themselves to honor King as a national hero?
What does it tell you about our society when any public criticism of this moral leper and Communist functionary is considered grounds for dismissal?
What does it tell you about the controlled media when you see how they have successfully suppressed the truth and held out a picture of King that can only be described as a colossal lie?
You need to think, my fellow Americans. You desperately need to wake up.Bibliography
1. Hoffman, Michael A., Holiday for a Cheater, (Wiswell Ruffin House, Dresden, New York, 1992)
2. Steffgen, Kent H., Bondage of the Free, (Vanguard Books, Berkeley, California, 1966)
3. Garrow, David J., The FBI and Martin Luther King, Jr., (W. W. Norton & Co, New York City, 1981)
Further information on King’s Communist connections and the FBI surveillance of Stanley Levison can be found in the Congressional Record.
The broadcast version of this article was originally published by National Vanguard.
* * *
Here are more National Alliance fliers:
* * *
Source: National Alliance