News

Germany Still Occupied: Ursula Haverbeck Sentenced to Ten Months for Doubting Jewish “Holocaust” Stories

by Michael Walsh and National Vanguard staff

IS THERE neither honor nor a modicum of courage in today’s Germany? What other nation on earth would sentence an 87-year old lady to ten months in prison for expressing an opinion? Today marks Germany’s deepest humiliation.

On Thursday, 12 November 2015, Mrs, Ursula Haverbeck (87) was sentenced to ten months in prison without parole by the magistrate Björn Jonsson (48) at the District Court of Hamburg.

She had expressed publicly, during the so-called “Auschwitz trial” of Lueneburg against Oskar Gröning (94) in the spring of 2015, that she ands many others do not believe in the criminally-defined “historical fact” of the so-called “Holocaust” or in the supposedly “established historical fact” that there had been, in the German concentration camps such as the camp Auschwitz-Birkenau, “gas chambers” for the systematic mass killing of Jews.

In her view, all the scientific evidence speaks against these quasi-legally imposed “obvious facts.”

Mrs Haverbeck does not accept the verdict of the judge and will file an appeal. The verdict against Ms. Haverbeck will therefore not be imposed immediately.

* * *

ursula1-e1447368969172

87-year-old Ursula Haverbeck  (pictured) has been sentenced to imprisonment in Germany for doubting that people were “exterminated” by “gassing” in the Nazi concentration camp in Auschwitz.

The defendant, in good spirits, reiterated her doubts in the courtroom. She arrived without a lawyer, and defended herself. Some fifty of her supporters crowded the courtroom and the hall outside.

She was accused of giving an interview to the German magazine Panorama in which she stated that Auschwitz was not an extermination camp but a labor camp. The mass murder of Jews had not taken place, she said.

unnamed2.jpg.pagespeed.ce.HQKuUsBy4nHaverbeck, former chairwoman of the now-banned freethought association, “Collegium Humanum,” told the judge,”Here, I stand.”

Turning to the prosecutor she asked, “How do you as a lawyer prove the accusation that Auschwitz was an extermination camp?” Her request for a revisionist historian to give evidence that at Auschwitz no one had been gassed, was rejected by Judge Jönsson who stated: “It is futile to argue with people who do not accept the facts.”

The German government prosecutor maintained that the defendant’s “fanatical delusion” had not abated and that, despite her advanced age, Ursula Haverbeck must be sentenced to 10 months in prison without parole. The judge agreed and the sentence was imposed.

In 2009, Haverbeck was fined thousands of dollars in the District Court of Bad Oeynhausen, for having given offense to Charlotte Knobloch, president of the Central Council of Jews.

German Jewess Charlotte Knobloch deeply offended
German Jewess Charlotte Knobloch deeply offended

* * *

Source: Renegade Tribune

Previous post

3 Jews, 2 of Them Israeli, Charged in 'Breathtaking' Theft of Hundreds of Millions

Next post

With Open Gates: The Forced Collective Suicide of European Nations

3 Comments

  1. Jenean McBrearty
    26 October, 2017 at 11:05 am — Reply

    Haverbeck is one of my heroines. Although not an American, she exemplifies our Constitutional ideal of freedom of expression and dissent against government tyranny. She is old enough to know the truth about what happened in Germany many years ago, and how the country has undergone Stalinization. America went to great lengths to de-Nazify Germany after the war, but what took the place of Nazism was even worse: communistic oppression under the guise of “goodness.” That Germans still do not have freedom to think speak, and preserve their culture is an abomination. That the white genocide goes unabated is diabolical; enough white guilt! And this is why Haverbeck is persecuted: she stands in direct opposition to the white guilt lie as well as the lies of the Holocaust.

  2. Yima
    24 October, 2018 at 12:34 am — Reply
  3. Truthweed
    13 May, 2019 at 5:01 pm — Reply

    At the trial of Oskar Gröning a witness, Leon Schwarzbaum, stated that when he was in Auschwitz he could smell the horrible smell of human flesh burning from the CHIMNEYS of the crematorium.

    The crematorium had ONE chimney.

    Crematoria do not smell or produce visible smoke.

    He mistook the chimneys and smells of the nearby camp kitchen for the crematorium. They were preparing his lunch in the modern kitchens that provided for individual dietary and caloric requirements of inmates, and seating arrangements that would be acceptable today. Of course this became impossible after the allies bombed everything in Germany.

    I presume Mr Schwarzbaum cannot have been long at the certain-death-death-camp, otherwise he would have perceived his mistake. The kitchen has often been mistaken for the crematorium.

    Oskar Gröning’s job was to record prisoners’ belongings, so that they could be returned. Previously, an officer named Kraus swore a statement that he arrived in Auschwitz with few items and asked for a suitcase to store them. The clerk stated that this was impossible because he would be sent to Matzgau if he stole any of the prisoners’ possessions. Inspectors had been at the camp a few weeks earlier.

    NB: If Narzie defendants state that they were in a camp but saw nothing, they will be sentenced to five years jail. If they admit that they saw evil crimes but had nothing to do with them they will be sentenced to four years jail. Choose.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.