American Dissident VoicesAudioKevin Alfred StromRadio

A New Religion for Us, part 1

The imposed religion of Christianity is not adequate to the great task before us.

American Dissident Voices broadcast of May 6, 2017

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

WITHIN the lifetimes of some of my listeners, just before the middle of the 20th century, Aryan man achieved, in National Socialist Germany, a new way of life — a step forward in our evolution — which included the germs, the very beginnings, of a new spiritual development — a new religion. In making the advancement and progress of the race the purpose of the State, as we also intend to do, the most advanced minds among the National Socialists knew that the Middle Eastern faith imposed on Europe 1,500 years ago was not adequate for the task, and was in fact a possibly fatal hindrance to it — and was also essentially alien to the soul of our people and to the Life Force itself, of which our race is Nature’s highest expression.

This week and next, we explore the thoughts and actions of the National Socialists as they grappled with this profoundly important problem, in the words of National Socialist writer Savitri Devi, in her “National Socialism and Neo-Paganism,” an excerpt from her book Gold in the Furnace, most of which was written while she was imprisoned for her ideas in postwar Germany, read by Miss Vanessa Neubauer.

* * *

National Socialism and Neo-Paganism, part 1

by Savitri Devi

AN ENTIRELY new culture can hardly be conceived among people who retain the same religion as before. The Programme proclaimed at Hofbräuhaus states, it is true, that “the Party as such stands for a positive Christianity.” [1] But, as I have said before — and as all the most intelligent National Socialists I met have admitted to me — it was well-nigh impossible, in 1920, to say anything else, if one hoped at all to gather a following. And it also remains true that the very fact of replacing, as we did, the link of common faith by the link of common blood — the creedal conception of community by the racial one — is contrary to the spirit of Christianity, no less than to its practice, always and everywhere, up to this day. It remains true, in other words, that if whatever religion that is “a danger to the national State” [2] is to be banned, then, Christianity must go — for nothing is more incompatible with the fundamental principles upon which rests the whole structure of any National State.

However, apart from the fact that this could not be said in a political programme in 1920 — or even in 1933 — it could still less be done in a day. Christianity could not be too openly and too bitterly opposed, before the National Socialist philosophy of life had become widely accepted as a matter of course; before it had firmly taken root in the subconscious reactions of the German people, if not also of many foreign Aryans, so as to buttress the growth of the new — or rather of the eternal — religious conception which naturally goes hand in hand with it. Until then, it would have been premature to suppress the Christian faith radically, however obsolete it might appear to many of us. “A politician,” our Führer has said, “must estimate the value of a religion not so much in connection with the faults inherent in it, as in relation to the advantages of a substitute which may be manifestly better. But until some such substitute appears, only fools and criminals will destroy what is there, on the spot.” [3]

One had to prepare the ground slowly, by creating anew a thoroughly Aryan soul in the young people, through their whole education; and, at the same time — for the elder folk — by giving a precise meaning (as National Socialistic as possible) to the expression “positive Christianity.” That is what Alfred Rosenberg has endeavoured to do in his famous book, The Myth of the Twentieth Century. [4] His “positive Christianity” is something indeed very different from the Christianity of any Church, nay, from the Christianity of the Bible, based as it is solely upon Rosenberg’s interpretation of what is obviously the least Jewish in the New Testament and upon Rosenberg’s own National Socialist philosophy. The Christians themselves soon discovered that it was no Christianity at all. And of all the prominent men of the Party, Alfred Rosenberg is surely the one whom they dislike the most to this day — although they are probably wrong in doing so, for there were and still are National Socialist thinkers far more radical than he. And he was, moreover, far too much a theoretician to be a real danger to the power of the Churches.

But it is certain that, under all this talk about “positive Christianity,” there was, from the beginning, in every thoughtful National Socialist, the feeling that Germany in particular and the Aryan world at large need a new religious consciousness, entirely different from and, in many ways, in vigorous contrast to the Christian one; nay, that such a consciousness is already lurking in the general discontent, disquiet, and scepticism of the modern Aryan, [5] and that the National Socialist movement must sooner or later help it to awake and to express itself. Although he too speaks of “positive Christianity” and insists on the fact that “nothing is further removed from the intentions of the NSDAP than to attack the Christian religion and its worthy servants”; [6] and although he is very careful to separate the Movement from every endeavour to revive the old Germanic cult of Wotan, [7] Gottfried Feder cannot help mentioning that slowly rising new consciousness, and “the questions, the hopes, and the wishes whether the German people will, one day, find a new form by which to express their knowledge of God and religious life,” if only to say that such questions, hopes, etc. are “far beyond the frame even of such a revolutionary programme as the one National Socialism proclaims.” [8]

And it is no less certain that, although no attempt was ever made officially to overthrow the power of the Churches and to forbid the teaching of the Christian doctrine, books inspired through and through, not by the desire to revive any particular Cult of old — that of Wotan or any other God — but by the love and spirit of eternal Nordic Heathendom, some of which are exceedingly beautiful, were published under the Third Reich, and read, and sympathetically commented upon in National Socialist circles; and that this was the first time that the real Heathen soul of the North — the undying Aryan soul — fully realised, after nearly fifteen hundred years, that it is alive; more so, that it is immortal, invincible. I have already quoted Heinrich Himmler’s short but splendid book, The Voice of the Ancestors, that masterful condensation of our philosophy in thirty-seven pages, which only an out-and-out Pagan could write. It contains, among other things, a bitter criticism of the Christian attitude to life — meekness, self-abnegation, delectation in the feeling of guilt and misery; “aspiration towards the dust” — and, in opposition to it, a profession of faith of the proud and of the strong and free: “We do not exhibit our faults to anyone, we Heathens — least of all to God. We keep quiet about them; and try to make good for our mistakes.” [9]

Of the many other books of similar inspiration, I shall recall only two far less well-known than Alfred Rosenberg’s famous Mythus but, I must say, far more radical, and deserving undoubtedly more, both the pious hatred that so many Christians of all persuasions waste upon that work and the wholehearted admiration and gratitude of all real modern Heathens: one is Ernst Bergmann’s Twenty-Five Theses of the German Religion, [10] and the other, Johann von Leers’ History on a Racial Basis. [11] There, the incompatibility of the National Socialist view of life and the Christian is shown as clearly, once for all, as any uncompromising devotee of either of the two philosophies could desire:

A people that has returned to its blood and soil, and that has realised the danger of international Jewry, can no longer tolerate a religion which makes the Scriptures of the Jews the basis of its Gospel. Germany cannot be rebuilt on this lie. We must base ourselves on the Holy Scriptures which are clearly written in German hearts. Our cry is: “Away with Rome and Jerusalem! Back to our native German faith in present-day form! What is sacred in our home, what is eternal in our people, what is divine, is what we want to build.” [12]

And Thesis Two of the Twenty-Five Theses — the number seems to have been chosen to match the Twenty-Five Points of the National Socialist Party Programme, so as to show that the “new” (or rather eternal) “German religion” is ultimately inseparable from the creation in Germany of a true National State — the second “thesis,” I say, states that the German religion is “the form of faith appropriate to our age which we Germans would have today, if it had been granted to us to have our native German faith developed, undisturbed, to the present time.” [13] As for Christianity, it is frankly called “an unhealthy and unnatural religion, which arose two thousand years ago among sick, exhausted, and despairing men, who had lost their belief in life,” [14] in a word, exactly the contrary of what the German people (or, by the way, any Aryan people) need today.

I do not remember any writer having more strongly and decisively pointed out the contrast between the everlasting Aryan spirit and that of Christianity and, especially, having more clearly stressed the nature of the Aryan religion of the future. There is no question of reviving the Wotan cult, or any other national form of worship from Antiquity, as it was then. The wheel of evolution never turns backwards. The religion of resurrected Germany can only be that which would have been flourishing today, as the natural product of evolution of the old Nordic worship, had not “that Frankish murderer Karl,” as Professor Bergmann calls Charlemagne, destroyed the free expression of German faith and forced Christianity upon the Germanic race by fire and sword, in the eighth and ninth centuries; or rather, had not Rome herself fallen prey to what her early emperors called “the new superstition,” introduced by the Jews. And what can be said of the new German religion is no less true of the desirable new religion of every regenerate Aryan people, organised under a real national State.

The only international religion — if such a thing is to exist at all — should be the extremely broad and simple Religion of Life, which contains and dominates all national cults and clashes with none (provided they be true cults of the people, and not priestly distortions of such); the spontaneous worship of warmth and light — of the Life energy — which is not the natural religion of man alone, but that of all living creatures, to the extent of their consciousness. In fact, all the national religions should help to bring men to that supreme worship of the Godhead in Life; for nowhere can Divinity be collectively experienced better than in the consciousness of race and soil. And no religion definitely stamped with local characteristics, geographical or racial, should ever become international. When such a one does — as Christianity did; as Islam did — the result is the cultural enslavement of many races to the spirit of that one whence the religion sprang, or through which it first grew to prominence. An Indian Muslim, to the extent he is thoroughly Muslim, is outside the pale of Indian civilisation. [15] And, to the extent he accepts Christianity, a European accepts the bondage of Jewish thought. And a Northern European, to the extent he accepts Christianity, and especially Catholicism, accepts, in addition to that, the bondage of Rome. Germany, the first Aryan nation that has rebelled on a grand scale against the Jewish yoke — cultural, no less than economical — is also the first Nordic nation to have shaken off, partly at least, in the sixteenth century, the less foreign (while Aryan) but still foreign bondage of Rome. Nothing shows better the spirit of the religious revolution — of the religious liberation — slowly preparing itself under the influence of National Socialism, than the outcry of Ernst Bergmann which I have quoted above: “Away with Rome and Jerusalem! Back to our native German faith in its present-day form!”

NOTES

[1] “Die Partei als solche vertritt den Standpunkt eines positiven Christentums” (Das Programm der NSDAP, Point 24)

[2] “Wir fordern die Freiheit aller religiösen Bekenntnissen im Staat, soweit sie nicht dessen Bestand gefährden oder gegen das Sittlichkeits- und Moralgefühl der germanischen Rasse verstoßen”; “We demand the freedom of all religious denominations in the state, so long as they do not endanger its existence or militate against the ethical and moral feelings of the Germanic race” (Das Programm der NSDAP, Point 24).

[3] “Für den Politiker aber darf die Abschätzung des Wertes einer Religion weniger durch die ihr etwa anhaftenden Mängel bestimmt werden als vielmehr durch die Güte eines ersichtlich besseren Ersatzes. Solange aber ein solcher anscheinend fehlt, kann das Vorhandene nur von Narren oder Verbrechern demoliert werden” (Mein Kampf, I, x, pp. 293-94; cf. Mannheim, p. 267

[4] Alfred Rosenberg, Der Mythus des 20. Jahrhunderts (Munich: Hoheneichen, 1930).

[5] This fact has been most forcefully pointed out by Gustav Frenssen in his magnificent book Der Glaube der Nordmark [The Faith of the Northland] (Stuttgart-Berlin: Georg Truckenmüller, 1930).

[6] “Es kann nicht genug betont werden, dass der NSDAP nichts ferner liegt als die Christliche Religion und ihre würdigen Diener anzugriefen” (Das Programm der NSDAP, p. 17).

[7] “Die Partei als solche verbittet es sich jedenfalls, mit Wotanskultbestrebungen identifiziert zu werden … “; “The party as such asks that it not be identified in any way with the endeavours of the Wotan cult …” (Das Programm der NSDAP, p. 62) [Trans. by Ed.].

[8] “Alle Fragen, Hoffnungen und Wünsche, ob das deutsche Volk dereinst einmal eine neue Form finden wird für seine Gotterkenntnis und sein Gottenleben gehören nicht hieher, das sind Dinge von Säkularer Bedeutung, die auch über den Rahmen eines so gründsturzenden Programmes, wie es der Nationalsozialismus verkündet, weit hinausgehen”; “All questions, hopes, and desires whether the German people will find once again a new form for their knowledge of God and religious life do not belong here, among things of secular meaning, and are far beyond the frame even of such a revolutionary programme as the one National Socialism proclaims” (Das Programm der NSDAP, p. 62) [Trans. by Ed.].

[9] “Wir kommen nicht zu Gott, zu klagen, wir Heiden weil wir unsere Fehler nicht den Leuten zeigen am wenigsten aber Gott. Wir suchen unsere Fehler abzulegen und zu wachsen” (Die Stimme der Ahnen, p. 31 [cf. The Voice of the Ancestors, pp. 34-35 — Ed.]).

[10] Ernst Bergmann, Die 25 Thesen der Deutschen Religion. Ein Katechismus (Breslau: Hirt, 1932).

[11] Johann von Leers, Geschichte auf rassischen Grundlage (Leipzig: Reclam, 1934).

[12] Die 25 Thesen der Deutschen Religion.

[13] Die 25 Thesen der Deutschen Religion, p. 9.

[14] Die 25 Thesen der Deutschen Religion, p. 9.

[15] This is an idea which I have expressed many times, during my long struggle in India against those religions of equality that do not take racial factors into account. The immemorial non-Aryan cults and customs of India, however, were never put in any sort of bondage to the finer Aryan culture of the Sanskrit-speaking invaders, for the latter did admit the principle of the inequality of races and the importance of the racial factor in religion. The non-Aryan cults and customs were allowed to survive. They exist in India to this day.

* * *

You have been listening to Vanessa Neubauer reading part one of Savitri Devi’s “National Socialism and Neo-Paganism” — we’ll continue with this exploration of the development of a new religion for European man, possibly the most vital task of our era, next week right here on American Dissident Voices.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the National Alliance. The National Alliance is working to educate White men and women around the world as to the nature of the reality we must face — and organizing our people to ensure our survival and advancement. We need your help to continue. Please send the largest contribution you can afford to National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Make your life count. You can also help us by visiting natall.com/donate. Once again, our postal address is Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you: When you look at the night sky, think of ORION — Our Race Is Our Nation.

Listen to the broadcast

* * *

Download our PDF flier

* * *

For Further Reading

Previous post

Hacker Who Helped Expose Ohio Rape Case Pleads Guilty, Faces More Prison Time Than Rapists

Next post

Getting Off the Wall

11 Comments

  1. Anthony Collins
    May 6, 2017 at 9:11 am — Reply

    Savitri Devi may have been in error when she attributed the authorship of Die Stimme der Ahnen (The Voice of the Ancestors) to Heinrich Himmler. It has been claimed that this work, which was first published in 1933 under the name of Wulf Sörensen, was written by Frithjof Fischer (1899-1977).

  2. Jim B
    May 6, 2017 at 9:40 am — Reply

    Extremely interesting reading! Can’t wait for the next part!

    What I’ve read above certainly resonates with me. The more one begins to fathom the actual depth of the treachery that we Whites have allowed ourselves to fall victim to… and the clearer we understand the jews’ centuries-old malevolence towards our race, their murderous hatred of us… one simply cannot help but to be hit between the eyes with the true nature of Xianity… the subtext of the “god-spell” revealing itself plainly, slithering and hissing.

    Looking forward to part 2, Mr. Strom!

  3. WHITE_WARRIOR
    May 6, 2017 at 3:52 pm — Reply

    Beautiful and profound!!

    I am always confused by the term neo when applied to beliefs important to me. I still follow the teachings of Sir Isaac Newton, so does that make me a neo-Newtonian physicist? His work is a relevant today as it was all those years ago. I am a NAZI, no neo about me. I do not wear grey shirts or swastikas, but then again I do not wear wigs or knickerbockers or the other paraphernalia that Newton did. Let us be proud of the beliefs that will endure the ages – abandon the labels.

  4. May 6, 2017 at 5:36 pm — Reply

    Excellent post Mate. Death to the false kike-kult!!! Spot on!!!

  5. Forever
    May 7, 2017 at 7:05 am — Reply

    The Myth
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PL8N4Xw3MtJJzF1YzQJ-fq0r8qYqyLPQkv&v=X77dkiDpBoM

    “This movie is based on an abridgment of Der Mythus des zwanzigsten Jahrhunderts and is released for historical and educational purposes. One of the most important and neglected works of political philosophy from the first half of the twentieth century, The Myth has been made accessible to the scholar and lay person alike as never before. Released under Creative Commons License by The Sunwheel Society in 2016, this film will boldly challenge your understanding of religion, life, politics, and philosophy, requiring you to critically assess its ideas as well as your own.

    Created directly from a historical document, The Myth is released with the intention of free philosophical inquiry and an accurate understanding of a deeply influential philosophy that has long been misunderstood, even by those who admire the political system it created. Welcome to a new, deeper understanding of history. Welcome to The Myth!”

    H264 encoded version https://archive.org/details/TheMyth

  6. PTFogg
    May 7, 2017 at 3:34 pm — Reply

    Excellent topic.

    Christianity will be the death of the White Race. Christianity sacrifices life in this world for eternal life in the next world. How many Christians would work to save even the entire white race if it meant their soul would burn in Hell for all eternity? None ! SAVING the white race is exactly what Christianity condemns as racist and immoral.

    Ben Klassen and Revilo P. Oliver are two of the authors who’ve given us the best explanation of what Christianity means for the white race, suicide.

    For the white race, our race is our God. If God is Love, then we see God every day, in the love of parents for their children, and for all future generations of the white race.

    If “our race is our God”, then National Socialism takes this fundamental principle and applies it to every aspect of our everyday life in this world. National Socialism is our worldview.

  7. Anthony Collins
    May 8, 2017 at 10:01 am — Reply

    In his ADV program on the Promise Keepers, William Pierce said:

    “Perhaps patriots should be grateful that the feminists have a new group to worry about and to contend with on social issues, but patriots should not let themselves be fooled into believing that Promise Keepers can be our allies, just because they are saying the right things on some issues: just because they condemn homosexuality, for example, or because they deplore the decay of the institution of family. They are so dead wrong on race that nothing else they say or do can possibly compensate for this.” (Emphasis added.)

    I think this is true of Christians in general. Although there might still be White Christians who, despite everything, have sound racial instincts, they’re very badly served, to put it mildly, by the scriptures, doctrines, institutions, and policies of the Christian churches.

    The framework of Christian thought and action forms, not the scaffold of the builder, but the scaffold of the executioner.

  8. Arvin N. Prebost
    May 8, 2017 at 6:16 pm — Reply

    All good points, above.

    But people are afraid of sex and its misuses; and they are afraid of dying. They were also, long ago , afraid of demons.

    Christianity tells them to sanctify sex; and that they need not fear death; the faithful will live forever. And that the cross is more powerful than demonic entities.

    A powerful brew.

  9. Posis1959
    May 8, 2017 at 8:25 pm — Reply

    In Chapter 12 of Mein Kampf Hitler derided the “wandering scholars who were peddling Germanic folk-lore and who never accomplished anything positive or practical” but he might have endorsed this simple conception:

    ‘I always regarded Christianity as a religion alien to white men’s instincts, because it takes no note of man’s best friends who share his hearth. It is in the East where dogs are pariahs. I think it a pity that Christianity has not been adjusted better to the spiritual needs of Nordic men, who do not need to be told not to murder and steal; a white man’s religion would begin on a higher plane and teach him to be straight-forward, to be kind to animals, to be courageous, loyal and chivalrous.’

    — Arnold S. Leese, in his autobiography: “Out of Step: Events in the Two Lives of an Anti-Jewish Camel-Doctor”

    More than SD’s writings as so far encapsulated in this article, the modern book by Belgian Journalist Jos Rogiers captures in a detailed fashion the divergence of Christian spirituality and the soul of White Western Man: ‘The Bible: The Devil’s Book.’ In a long and proud tradition, beginning at least with Paine’s ‘The Age of Reason’ but building up, not merely tearing down.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.