by Douglas Mercer
WHEN A JEW SPEAKS of morality, and you hear the shofars blowing and the Torah scrolls unrolling, watch your back.
It’s all a pack of lies.
The default position of Jews relative to their own morality is that they are the “people of the book” and are the moral exemplars of the world; they are the guiding light of the Gentiles, the light unto the nations, and wherever they go they serve as the conscience of the peoples; they are the sine qua non of righteousness.
If pressed, the Jews might tell you that this moral munificence on their part has to do with their perspective as a constantly vulnerable minority in the countries of the Earth. That is, they are the eternal “little guy” and thus have a deep empathy for all little guys, for the wretched and the marginalized of the world.
If pressed further, the Jews might tell you that this exalted morality of theirs, their championing of the intolerable, their pushing for the “rights” of the outcasts, their deep sympathy and work on behalf of the socially maligned has a practical purpose, too. They might tell you that they are forced (forced, mind you) to disrupt the homogenous racial nature of their hosts because such monolithic societies are inherently corrupt and oppressive — and bad for minorities like them; that it is true that it is good for them to question the power centers of these societies, in order that this power may be devolved to various groups. The power that they undermine is evil, they say; the new sources of power they help to create mean “hope for a better future” for them and for those like them. (As if there could be anyone like them!) In other words, when there are many minorities and those minorities “have a voice,” then the world is safer for Jews. But (they say) they only do this as a last-resort survival mechanism, which is defensive in nature and, at any rate, the world they thus create is a better one for all involved.
All of these explanations by Jews for Jewish “morality” are false, false because in fact the Jews don’t have any morality: They have an anti-morality, serving only themselves. The truth is that time out of mind the Jews and the Europeans among whom they unfortunately dwell have been in a mortal war, a war unto the death. The Jews have fought this war constantly, the Europeans only sporadically, which is the reason for the current ascendance of the former. When the Jews first met Europeans, they were encountering a powerful people — but one with a soft underbelly. Our sense of chivalry, of good manners, our sense of fair play, so prized by us, were really our downfall. Safe to say the Jews were not burdened by any such things; no self-limiting rules dictated the way they waged this war.
Of particular interest to the Jews was the refined European sense of morality, and they homed in on it. Once Christianity became dominant, the Jews noticed that the book most Europeans now called ‘holy” talked about how “the meek will inherit the Earth,” and contained maudlin tales about helping the waylaid alien sojourner by the side of the road. They noticed that it said no one who is not perfect should cast the first stone, and so they pushed a “Who are we to say? — Who are we to judge?” version of tolerance. And they started pushing, pushing, pushing to hold us “strictly accountable” to this impossible, unworkable creed. In the name of so-called “right and wrong” (as defined by the Bible they wrote), they got enough of us to tolerate the intolerable. You see, it was “immoral” to keep our country for White people only; it was “immoral” the way the Negroes and other non-Whites were excluded; it was “immoral” to treat Chinese, Indians, and Hottentots one jot differently than we treated our own kin. And soon it was “immoral” to have different roles for women than for men; “immoral” to limit homosexuals in any way; “immoral” to oppose a 14-year-old cutting off his genitals. They pretended they were appealing to our “better angels.” But they cared not a whit for angels; they knew for an absolute fact that this supposedly soft-hearted (really soft-headed) “morality” would weaken us and send us into premature and precipitous decline. They did it with ice-cold premeditation.
When you hear that they are kind-hearted souls just wanting to “repair the world,” you know it’s not true; they want to ruin the world, our world, the only world we have — to destroy it for the sake of their ugly and ignoble lamprey-like tribe; if we die, they will simply jump to a new host like lice from a dead animal. Theirs is not a morality, it is a strategy of war. When they infect children with homosexual propaganda, it’s not to make them more tolerant — it’s to corrupt their morals. When they argue for unlimited immigration, it’s not to create “one world harmony” — it’s to weaken Whites; when they said women should be in the workforce they were not being solicitous toward the distaff side — they were hollowing out the family; when they want to relax drug laws, it’s not to create a freer society — it’s to make a more addled one; when they push “reparations,” it’s not for justice for the Negroes — it’s to make Whites poor; when they say they want an “open society,” it’s not because they want one that is less oppressive — they want one that has no internal cohesion; when they say they want “equity” and “inclusion,” they are not doing it for the ostracized and the outcast, about whom they care exactly nothing — they are doing it to weaken us as they move in for the kill.
When you hear the shofars blowing, better reach for your weapon. It means they’re about to attack you and your children.
For the Jew is a liar, and he proceeds by misdirection. For Jews, “morality” is not what it seems to us. It’s a fraud. It’s weapon to be deployed — a way not to gild the lily, but to cover up a rotted, black, and cancerous growth.
A growth that cries to the heavens for the surgeon’s knife.
* * *