Douglas MercerEssaysGuest opinion

The Rebirth of Race

by Douglas Mercer

A FUNNY THING HAPPENED on the way to a post-racial color-blind future. Against all expectations, race was reborn. And it’s no surprise for anyone who has been paying attention: Race is both the oldest and the newest aspect of Life, and the thin gruel of a “content of your character” worldview will never satisfy. When we speak of civilization or culture or politics, we speak of the flowers on the surface; but when we begin to talk about race we go down into the mines.

In the decades following the Second World War they really thought they had finally stuck the stake in the heart of race and that it would never be heard from again on this side of the vale. They were drooling over their newfound bogeyman Adolf Hitler: He had made racial thinking central to his movement, so now race thinking had been discredited — or at least that’s what they told themselves to soothe the demon of doubt away. Many dupes truly thought that ideology had trumped race, that they had put an end to the concept of race, had put the supposedly evil genie back in the bottle. But a funny thing happened on the way to the “one race, the human race” future: Race was reborn.

It was the era of desegregation; it was the era of pressure to end Apartheid; they had their UNESCO “statement on race” which said there were no races, and certainly no superior ones; it was the high-water mark of “natural equality,” of no innate differences, of countries based on paper and citizenship and never on blood. It was we-are-the-worldism run amok. It was a time when, they say, we had “put the racism of the past behind us,” when a Mulatto could ascend to the Presidency and magically make the world “post-racial.” It was a time when “diversity” was trumpeted as a universal cure-all, and when White homelands became a lot less White. It was a time when Coca-Cola could have a cult-like gaggle of mixed-race youngsters tell us that they “wanted the world to sing in perfect harmony.” It was the time of bussing; it was the time when they got George Wallace to apologize; it was the time of the New South and of cities that were “too busy to hate.” It was the time of “coming together,” and a time when the White race learned to be humble.

They were so sure that race was a thing of the past. They tried to consign race to oblivion. But it waited and it brooded and it bided its time; and it has now returned with a vengeance, with all of its old fury.

A funny thing happened on the road to “equality.” Race was reborn.

* * *

When the races were largely separate, no one talked that much about race. Race was something which we simply had. We lived in the perfect, primal innocence of race. There was almost no language for race because none was needed. Like the fish in water, race was something we swam in but hardly thought about. This dearth of speaking about race leads race-deniers today to say that the ancients were not interested in race — this is quite wrong, for what they had instead of tomes on race was race itself, through and through.

* * *

The birth of a strong White American racial consciousness happened in roughly the 1830s. In America the abolition movement began to get more fanatical, and though the seat-of-the-pants defense of slavery and White supremacy had a long tradition, the intellectuals of the South realized that more was needed. It was no longer enough just to dig in, and being gentleman they realized that a moral justification for White supremacy was required. Following the lead of the always brilliant John Calhoun, they wrote and argued that slavery was a positive good. This was predicated on the obvious and important point that Whites and Blacks were different, would always be different, and that this vast chasm of difference was based in Nature. After this, the fallacy of “natural equality” would never hold real water. In the Naturalization Act of 1790, passed by the first Congress and signed by George Washington, it was specified that only Whites could become citizens. But in the following three decades or so, no literature arose around this issue. But then White southerners became voluble on the subject; so much so that a few decades later, Stephen Douglas could say what everyone knew all along but had not been willing or able to put in so many words: that America was a White country, formed on a White basis; created by and for White people — and was for White people alone and should be so for all time. Not only was it “no one else need apply,” it was “no one else has any rights the White man need ever respect.”

Whiteness, of course, had always existed — but, as is said nowadays, the intellectual “construction” of Whiteness (really, its discovery and the understanding of it) had taken wing, and a glorious day it was.

Simultaneously, in Europe, the landmark book by Count Gobineau (his Essay on the Inequality of Human Races) was published. In one fell swoop, the author cut though the morass of historical analysis. Economy, ideology, great men, climate, political structure — all were swept into secondary or tertiary roles as historical factors; and in their place came the linchpin: race. He was a race essentialist and a racial reductionist. He argued that race was the bedrock of everything; that race was the master key to the master class of history, the Rosetta stone of Life, the prism through which everything on Earth could be understood when it cast its all-encompassing and golden light. When his former mentor, the weak-minded Alexis de Tocqueville, read this seminal book he said that Gobineau would go very far and do much harm. In his former judgement he was correct; in his latter he could not have been more wrong.

In Europe in the wake of Gobineau came Wagner, Chamberlain, de Lapouge. Back in America came the advent of Jim Crow, the eugenicists, the racially motivated 1924 Immigration Restriction Act, and the Virginia Racial Integrity Act of the same year. Everywhere in the White world, Whites were waking up to the perils in their midst and were taking massive precautions to preserve their race — and doing it explicitly. Then, of course, came the Germans, the great masters of racial thinking. Alfred Rosenberg went so far as to say that, in its essence, National Socialism was nothing more than applied biology.

* * *

So vexed, spooked, and troubled by the race idea was the new and illegitimate Jewish regime that they pulled out every stop to stop it. With Hitler out of the way (so they thought), massive propaganda was poured into the ideas that there were no races and that racial thinking was evil. Ideology and the reign of the “last man” (ie, the end of race history) was put forth as the prevailing norm.

It was a house of cards built on a sinking pile of sand, destined to be blown over by the first good breeze.

And so it came that a funny thing happened on the way to the post-racial color-blind world: Race was reborn.

Of course epochal and seminal thinkers like Revilo P. Oliver and William Pierce plied their noble trade; the inheritors and perfecters of the ideas of Gobineau, Grant, Stoddard, and Hitler, they sat atop the very apex of philosophy, with a totalizing and bird’s-eye view of the world. Sitting at the pinnacle, they cannot be surpassed. But considering the demonization they underwent, one might think that their ideas were never going to pierce the public sphere, save by secret osmosis. The irony is that their ideas were smuggled back to prominence by their enemies, the “critical race theorists.” Both they and we are what the color-blind ideologists cannot abide: race essentialists.

Race is essential. And its time has come again.

* * *

Recently researchers at Brown and the University of Wisconsin did a study called “Who Agrees With Hitler?” What they did was present participants with unattributed quotes about race from Hitler, Stephen Douglas, and from White Fragility author Robin DiAngelo. All three were in basic agreement on a great number of things. In certain ways, our implacable enemies in the CRT crowd are simultaneously our secret sharers. We all believe that not only does race matter, but that it is the thing that matters most. We are two sides of the same coin, one good (us) and one evil (them) — but the same coin nevertheless.

The researchers found that sweeping claims about all members of certain demographic groups seem to be on the rise in some circles.

Indeed they are; it’s what happens when the truth comes calling. So all those articles that talk about “racism,” all those seminars on “holding the weight of Whiteness,” all those references to “White supremacy,” all the Whiteness Studies papers that come out, all the schools that teach ethnic studies or Critical Race Theory, all those mugs that go on television and bewail “White privilege,” all the books and papers on “anti-racism” — we should welcome them, for all of them are, paradoxically, good for us. They force the dialectic and heighten the contradictions. In a word, they put the word White on everyone’s lips and in everyone’s ears and get people to begin to think of that magic word.

This is just the prelude to our inevitable victory, to the time when Oliver and Pierce finally prevail as prevail they must, for having heralded the truth.

* * *

The conservatives and the middle-of-the-road liberals who cling to the worn-out theory of “one race, the human race,” of color-blindness, of a post-racial utopia, are all out of their minds. They are fighting a rear-guard action. Race is the hard rock and bedrock of reality; it masters everything because it is behind everything; it rules ideology, politics, culture, and civilization; everything is downstream from it. In the long future, the last seventy-odd years will be seen as an aberration; a time when people were duped into thinking that the most basic part of biological reality (race) was not only a fiction but an evil fiction.

Nothing which ignores what is actual can ever survive, or ever deserves to survive; at long last it will be the “anti-racists” and the racialists who will rise to the top for the final battle, and anyone paying attention has to like our chances. For our final enemies make the signal error of thinking that Whiteness is the cause of all problems, that it is the cancer of the world; when in fact it is the elixir that will usher us into halcyon and glory days beyond any seen before; when our race, the White race, will take once again its proper and preeminent position from which it shall never be dislodged.

* * *

Source: Author

Previous post

Fighting for the Future: an Interview with Kevin Alfred Strom, part 3

Next post

Mary Phagan 110: May Her Life Be Not in Vain

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
12 Comments
Inline Feedback
View all comments
RCavallius
RCavallius
25 April, 2023 1:54 pm

Excellent piece and one of my favorites by you, yet.

C.E. Whiteoak
C.E. Whiteoak
26 April, 2023 12:11 am

Thank you Mr. Mercer. That is one of the most refreshing and encouraging essays I have ever read.

Franklin Ryckaert
Franklin Ryckaert
26 April, 2023 1:26 pm

I don’t share the optimism of the author. To be sure “anti-racism” has evolved from race-denial to race-affirmation, but only in a negative sense toward the white race, which is depicted as the source of all evil. And how do you neutralize evil? Well by destroyng it of course. Thus ultimately Whites have to be destroyed, albeit that idea is for the time being couched in the less disconcerting term “abolition of whiteness”. When things “progress” outright killing of Whites will start. Ask the Boers of South Africa. Race is indeed back but only in an anti-white genocidal sense. Not good.

Jim - National Alliance Staff
Jim - National Alliance Staff
Reply to  Franklin Ryckaert
26 April, 2023 6:45 pm

We here at the National Alliance build optimism and hope with real world solutions, Mr. Ryckaert. One of those being to shine a light on the real evil: the planning and execution of the destruction of our race and to call Whites with some or a lot of loyalty to our race to action. Your presentation of a wholly negative perspective of things seems rather defeatist to me. We are all not dead yet. Whites by the millions do have some feeling positively for our race, if only somewhat. It’s our task to gather as many as we can to further our capabilities for simple self defense and survival as well as other Alliance-building tasks. For certain, you can go your own way and spend your life just trying to… Read more »

The Truth is Out There
The Truth is Out There
26 April, 2023 5:50 pm

Reality must be met and dealt with before one can rise above it. Race, sex and the utilitarian nature of our bodies must be faced, first and foremost. Then, and only then, can certain individuals rise above the mechanical demands and restrictions of the natural order. Then, and only then, can certain of our race approach the state of Enlightenment. If the Doors of Perception were cleansed, everything would appear to Man as it is, Infinite. But those doors have to be made out of common wood, with sweat and toil, first, and then they must be well-oiled with experience and failure.

Jim - National Alliance Staff
Jim - National Alliance Staff
Reply to  The Truth is Out There
26 April, 2023 6:35 pm

So what are you getting at, TTiOT? Are you willing to join with others of our race to present a clear picture of reality to our people or just put some clever words together and leave it at that? I’m all for words used to communicate an action you personally are willing to make yourself or as part of a community as we have here, but I am skeptical of words that go nowhere. State your intention for action, please.

Elfriede Lentner
Elfriede Lentner
Reply to  Jim - National Alliance Staff
30 April, 2023 3:40 am

Maybe the commenter is sharing his (or her) understandings.

Jim - National Alliance Staff
Jim - National Alliance Staff
Reply to  Elfriede Lentner
30 April, 2023 10:38 am

And that message was received, Mr. Lentner. My response had to do with putting action to understanding. Words without any action are dead to me, they mean nothing. We can all just sit here and chatter our brains out and waste our life away doing so for titillation of the moment or we can get involved in the life we have. It’s a choice. My job here is to weed out the useless chatterers and separate them from the actual men of action to Our Cause and actually solve our problems. To do this, I’ve got to find out what sort of character you and other commenters bring here. To those who want to get in on the action, welcome. The rest can ramble on somewhere else. I might not… Read more »

William W Williams * National Alliance Chairman
William W Williams * National Alliance Chairman
Reply to  Jim - National Alliance Staff
30 April, 2023 1:27 pm

[As long as] our Chairman is satisfied with what I’m doing and how I’m doing it, I’ll continue weeding out the rest from the best that come our way. — Keep up your good work separating wheat from chaff here at NV, Jim. TTiOT, as you described “his or her” comments, is not ready for prime time. His or her “understandings” of our Alliance are weak. What impresses me is an NA member who uses NV to tell it like it is, who sets an example for others to follow, even though English is not his first language. Wolf Stoner, for example, here: https://nationalvanguard.org/2023/04/fighting-for-the-future-an-interview-with-kevin-alfred-strom-part-3/ Our Alliance does not want unrealistic warm bodies, it needs to attract serious Whites who agree with Wolf’s description of disengagement (read: racial separation) and acceptance… Read more »

Krishnan Kumar
Krishnan Kumar
28 April, 2023 9:03 pm

You such people of the “National Alliance” are so close to the Suchness! You are advised to engage an Initiate to guide you into the deeper mysteries. It would give me pleasure to come to your compound and start a dialogue. I am a Brahmin with brown eyes and brown hair. I am of the remnant in India. The remnant that has remained close to God and His ways, that surpass the understanding of men. You would advantage yourselves to hear that which I have to say. The Initiates of the Flame have not, and will not, let the Flame extinguish itself! Lo, even now the embers of that Flame are scorching the follies of Men!

William W Williams * National Alliance Chairman
William W Williams * National Alliance Chairman
Reply to  Krishnan Kumar
29 April, 2023 9:45 am

Krishnan Kumar: You such people of the “National Alliance” are so close to the Suchness! You are advised to engage an Initiate to guide you into the deeper mysteries. It would give me pleasure to come to your compound and start a dialogue…

Thanks, Krishnan. As higher caste people your suchness may well be close to ours, but your remnant’s deeper mysteries don’t necessarily comport with ours in all aspects.

There is no need for you to put NA in scare quotes. If you wish to compare your Hindu god with the cosmical foundation of our remnant, we don’t need to engage in a dialogue at our “compound.” Go here to inform yourself: Cosmotheism | Search Results | National Vanguard

Valentin
Valentin
29 April, 2023 6:26 am

Every time I read your articles, I feel that I love you all from Vanguard Nation. Sympathy from Romania!