American Dissident VoicesAudioKevin Alfred StromRadio

Ancient Admixture: Death Blow to Racialism? — part 2

Reich

American Dissident Voices broadcast of 18 December, 2021

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

TODAY WE WILL continue looking at the Jew David Reich’s book on ancient human DNA and ancient racial admixture, Who We Are and How We Got Here, which I’ve abbreviated using the acronym HGH for “how (we) got here,” since I don’t like the fact that Reich’s title could lead some to confuse his work with Dr. William Pierce’s Who We Are.

With reference to part 1 last week, one of my listeners wrote to me, saying

I was fascinated by this weekend’s ADV concerning racial divergence and “purity.” The divergence part makes sense to me. But, about the purity part, I wondered about that. I know they are agitating for racial mixing, because they want to fill in the density graph between the races, so you eventually have so many people who are of various mixture ratios, that you can’t tell who is who. Today, you can tell who is what race.

And there are also many mixed people as well. But, they want more of them, to where everybody is a mix of the current races, and those races blend together. That would seem to divert the natural evolutionary process, and would be genocide. To me, that is critical. That cuts off the diverging path. So, here is the part that seems tricky to me. If they nibble away at the margins like that, and blur the distinctions, and you are in a position to seek a mate, you will have certain expectations along racial lines, and, I guess you would say, purity would be part of that consideration. The term “purity” in this case would refer to someone who had not been part of the recent mixing, but had stayed very close to the main stem. You will want to find a person who is on the main line path, and there will be fewer and fewer of them, harder and harder to identify.

So, it seems like we really need to resist them filling in the gaps, and their constant nibbling away at the margins, and blurring the racial landscape. In that sense, protecting purity would seem to matter.

Yes, purity in that sense does definitely matter. I don’t say it doesn’t matter — I just say it’s been misunderstood. We must not allow the anti-Whites to “fill in the gaps” and blur the lines of distinction. One cross with a Black and evolution is set back many tens of thousands of years, at least in that line — and that line must now be rigorously excluded from our line. Anything which delays the time at which we will completely diverge from the other races is a problem. Any new cross between Europeans and non-Europeans does that, severely. In a sane and reasonable moral system, that would be a sin — and it certainly is a sin from a Cosmotheist perspective.

Another listener wrote:

I wish that I could believe what you mentioned about it becoming impossible to mix and produce offspring with other races. Although most men who aren’t Black express that they are just not attracted to Black women, which is a good thing, I still see far too many Whites who are able to produce mongrels from the racially suicidal sin of mixing blood with non-Whites. I truly wish that this type of bestiality never could produce offspring, anymore than a lonely Arab molesting a female camel. Finally, yes, what an ironic name for the Jewish author.

Thanks for the note — yes, his name is ironic. A colleague pointed out to me that he’s the son of two famous Reichs — a novelist and director of the Holocaust Museum — so his nickname is “The Third Reich.” Pretty funny, but they won’t be laughing at that forever, I predict.

When we talk about evolution eventually progressing to the point where it would become impossible to produce fertile offspring with Blacks, we may be talking tens of thousands of years — possibly much longer, or god forbid forever, if racemixing at the margins increases; possibly much less time if a subgroup of Whites separates itself completely and then takes charge of its evolutionary destiny by directing its own evolution, which is what the National Alliance intends to do over the next several centuries and more.

Another writes:

I’ve just finished the book. There is nothing new presented. The purpose of the book is to advance a social agenda. If he could get away with being so disingenuous with his interpretation of the material in a scientific paper he wouldn’t have needed the book. I would not recommend the book, except for one remarkable section entitled ‘Real Biological Difference.’ It starts on page 254 (283 of the pdf). It is a MUST READ. For five pages the author completely drops all pretence and speaks with a candour and honesty that is not only uncharacteristic of his people but that contradicts the agenda that makes the rest of the book unbearable.

Yes, that section of Reich’s book is essentially an admission that we racialists have been right all along. As I suggested last week, Reich wants to position himself as the teller of these hard truths — so he can then pull the rug out from under his readers and tell them how much the “rich tapestry” of mixing really drives evolution and defines what we are. One would expect no less from a racially-motivated member of the Jewish anti-race, and, to be charitable, maybe he can’t help it. But lions can’t help trying to eat your sister, either — but that doesn’t mean you should let them.

Another remark on part 1 deserves attention:

The part I have a hard time believing is the part where Jews become racially more distinct over time. If they’d stayed in the Middle East like the Sephardic jews, who I’ve never come across, not that I know of, then, yeah.

But with all their shape-shifting diaspora, taking on [and mimicking the] appearance of their (unwilling) host nations that they parasitize and leech from, many of them, especially in the western world appear Whiter and Whiter. 

True. I think the Jews are a very peculiar type of human — a parasitic variety that depends on a degree of racial mixture in order to invade the host nation. Something similar has happened with other species too, and other human races — though it is rare. I don’t think that the general rules about divergence and purity I was articulating necessarily apply to Jews.

There are several more excellent comments on last week’s show but there isn’t enough time to discuss them here.

Ancient Admixture With Neanderthals

So — let’s talk about Reich’s crown jewel of “mixture events” which he claims are a driving force of evolution: the mixture events that have resulted in all races except Blacks having significant amounts of Neanderthal DNA. (I note briefly that other so-called “mixture events” alleged by Reich in our lineage are actually just encounters between different varieties of ancient people we would instantly recognize as White if they stood before us today.)

The Neanderthals were an ancient race that is said to have migrated out of Africa, though the Mideast, and into Europe some 700,000 years ago, or 600,000 or more years before our pre-European ancestors did the same thing. It is claimed that Neanderthals were were different enough from “modern humans” (a descriptor fraught with its own problems) to be classed as a separate species, even though this contradicts the definition of “species” that multiracialists often use as a club on us, when denying that Blacks deserve their own species classification — the definition that says that if interbreeding with fertile offspring did occur, then there is no difference in species.

First, in order for both Asians and Europeans to have this Neanderthal admixture, it is very likely that the admixture took place before Europeans and Asians were substantially differentiated — so we are hardly talking about “Europeans mixed with Neanderthals” if we accept the basic thesis. Instead we are talking about “proto-Eurasians mixed with Neanderthals” — quite a different thing. It’s doubtless more significant than, say, an admixture event that occurred between two subspecies of hamster-like creatures ancestral to humans 200 million years ago — but should we really be much more concerned about it? I don’t think so. It doesn’t change what we are nor what we have done, nor what we can do — nor does it change one iota the existential dangers we face.

Since East Asians have a somewhat higher percentage of Neanderthal gene-patterns than Europeans, it also seems likely that the mixture with proto-Eurasians occurred somewhat more on the path to Asia than on the path to Europe, and that any admixture once pre-Europeans entered Europe was minimal.

Speaking of minimal, how much Neanderthal admixture is claimed, anyway? We are talking about 1 to 2 per cent. in Europeans. This is minimal, comparable to the percentage of White Americans who carry a small amount of non-White ancestry, usually without anyone being able to tell the difference — or even knowing about it themselves.

And were these proto-Eurasians really at a different level of evolutionary development, compared to the Neanderthals they encountered in the Near East? Those proto-Eurasians came ultimately from the same population substrate in Africa as did the Neanderthals. True, the Neanderthals migrated north long before the proto-Eurasians, and therefore likely came from a more primitive background. But they had also had much more time to evolve in regions in and near Europe. We know that the Neanderthals actually had larger brains than today’s Europeans and Asians. We also know that they were culturally more advanced than was once believed. And, remember, the proto-Eurasians had, biologically speaking, just barely emerged from Africa — just barely differentiated from the Africans of that time when the encounter occurred. And the Africans of that time were likely even more primitive than the Africans of today. 50,000 years ago, when the Neanderthal admixture is said to have occurred, the proto-Eurasian branch that eventually became European 1) was not in Europe yet, and 2) was less than 30 per cent. or so along on its 60,000 to 80,000-year journey to becoming fully European. So it is quite conceivable to me that Neanderthals and proto-Eurasians were roughly at the same evolutionary grade, having gotten there through parallel evolution.

Subspecies Borders

Another thing we should consider is that, while evolution and racial/species differentiation are going on — while the branches on the evolutionary tree sprout and grow, there is always, and must always, be a point where the branches touch. There are no hard lines on the evolutionary tree — until full speciation takes place. And, even then, a border gradation takes the place of a line; a border gradation which you cannot pass beyond a certain point.

Some multiracialists have pointed out these gradations, and argued that they means that race does not exist. They note that there don’t seem to be hard-edged racial boundaries. There are instead gradual changes. One can travel around the world and, as one does so, the racial types often seem to grade into each other. (One might as well argue that because there are no hard-edged boundaries between the tiny stream that feeds Lake Itasca, the lake itself, the Mississippi River, the Gulf of Mexico, and the Atlantic Ocean — that the Atlantic Ocean does not exist.)

They do have a point, though, which it would be obtuse to deny. Subspecies — races — grade into each other on the peripheries. This is as true of men as it is of trout and sparrows. Hybridization, sometimes more common and sometimes quite rare, does occur in border areas. (And gradation isn’t always due to mixing — it can also be due to a corresponding gradation in the factors driving evolutionary change in different areas.)

None of this prevents evolutionary divergence and speciation, however — and the evidence for that is right in front of your face in the hundreds or thousands of species of living things you can probably find in your back yard alone. And it certainly has not prevented highly distinct human types from diverging, an ongoing process.

The reason this hybridization in border areas is not a threat to ongoing evolution is that the subspecies inhabit territories that do not overlap much, so that the “heartland,” in which other subspecies are absent, is much larger than the border area. Within the heartland, the race develops in its own unique direction, over time becoming more and more different from other races.

The danger in what the Jews are doing, in knocking down and delegitimizing our borders, is that they are setting up a situation in which the heartland of our people no longer exists — in which everyplace is a border region — in which everyplace is a place where hybridization is more likely to happen. This program, if carried on long enough, can be fatal to us. It amounts to genocide.

Conclusion

I think that Reich’s lies are lies of emphasis. Science is discovering more and more racial differences — more and more evidence of ever-increasing racial divergence — with each passing day. And Reich wants to blunt these emerging truths with his stress on relatively less significant “mixture events.” He minimizes what is really the central fact of life on Earth: racial divergence and speciation — and exaggerates and over-dramatizes the subtext of occasional mixture events. Many of the “mixture events” he cites don’t even rise to the racial level.

Don’t let yourself be deceived. A unique race has emerged in Europe. Our race. We have created philosophies, science, technology, literature, and art that far surpasses anything ever seen in the Universe. We and no one else will be the builders of the bridge to the stars, which can and must be ours alone.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the National Alliance. This program is published every week at whitebiocentrism.com and nationalvanguard.org. Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 4, Mountain City, TN 37683 USA. We welcome your inquiries and your financial support in spreading our message of hope to our people. We also welcome your applications for membership in our community of the conscious. Once again, that address is Box 4, Mountain City, TN 37683 USA. Thank you for your help.

Listen to the broadcast

direct audio download

Previous post

The Eternal Hitler

Next post

It Can Happen Here

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
29 Comments
Inline Feedback
View all comments
guest
guest
18 December, 2021 10:09 am

I consider race really a shorthand way of saying people with a common lineage of physical and social selection pressures.

Arvin N. Prebost
Arvin N. Prebost
18 December, 2021 11:28 am

Well said. We are the children of Europe. That part of the earth created who we are.

When artificial conditions—heating, air-conditioning, etc. (which Europeans created) are no longer feasible, will the European continent again change humans, over the millennia, into the European type? Some have said so, but I don’t think Nature does anything the same way twice. That is why we must persevere in our efforts to preserve our preternatural abilities.

Let those on the margins be weeded out; that, also, is the way of Nature. The only White women I see with blacks are big fat slobs, anyway.

L.B. Blakeney
L.B. Blakeney
Reply to  Arvin N. Prebost
18 December, 2021 6:13 pm

Unfortunately, there are a few dumb but attractive, successful White bimbos, at least among celebrities, such as Heidi Klum, who could’ve had her pick of attractive, successful White men, but instead to debase herself by marrying and having babies with the black English singer Seal. Multiracial, but black appearing Tiger Woods had married and divorced from a beautiful Swedish model who didn’t have the common sense to save herself for one of the many worthy White men who were drooling over her. There are way too many examples of male negro athletes or others, who once they achieve fame and fortune, prey on beautiful White models, when these airheads should’ve known better that there are many more rich and famous, and much better looking White men for them to choose… Read more »

Arvin N. Prebost
Arvin N. Prebost
Reply to  L.B. Blakeney
18 December, 2021 7:22 pm

Yes, L.B.,I agree—–some few White women go for the money and the fame. They don’t really care about the character or the race of their mate . . . they just want the prestige and the fame of being associated with him.

When White women marry blacks, I guess these women think they get virtue points for being so . . . magnanimous, or whatever, for being so humble as to marry a Negro. These women, the few of them who select black mates, look fit and trim on the outside, but inside their souls are hideous. Good riddance.

Get right, in your soul, or get picked off, you womb-men. Life is serious. I would rather have a woman who is average in looks, but right and fierce in soul.

mortal goyal
mortal goyal
Reply to  Arvin N. Prebost
20 December, 2021 11:21 am

i would rather die sleeping on cardboard, under a bridge, than betray my racial soul. These pitiful creatures deserves zero sympathy.

mortal goyal
mortal goyal
Reply to  L.B. Blakeney
20 December, 2021 11:18 am

everything you say is true LB.

i’ve seen these fat wretched White women who, along with the male Wigger creatures, are amongst the lowest form of life on this planet. Neither of them belong to our race any longer.

great article KAS.

JM/Iowa
JM/Iowa
Reply to  L.B. Blakeney
20 December, 2021 9:55 pm

Yes, these “airhead” White women and men should know better. But they don’t because our message isn’t reaching them.

To make it reach them in a powerful, authoritative, and convincing voice we in the National Alliance need more strength. More Whites willing to add their strength to ours to increase funding as well as talents. More that join us rather than simply sit on the sidelines of life and do nothing.

James Clayton
James Clayton
Reply to  Arvin N. Prebost
19 December, 2021 12:41 am

And black women don’t pretend not to hate those nominally White women for it.

Arvin N. Prebost
Arvin N. Prebost
Reply to  James Clayton
19 December, 2021 11:13 am

Our women (and men) could learn from that! Good for those black women . . .and also those two who thrashed the “transgender female,” who was White, when they caught him in their bathroom!

I don’t like some of the things blacks do, but they don’t seem to be trying to win awards for virtue-signaling, or having the mind of Christ, or being “noble” to the point of weakening their own interests. I have to admire that.

JM/Iowa
JM/Iowa
Reply to  Arvin N. Prebost
20 December, 2021 9:36 pm

“…persevere in our efforts to preserve our preternatural abilities.”

Indeed. But this isn’t just going to get done by an atomized gaggle of individual Whites though. We are seeing the results of such loosely gathered Whites individually: nothing gets done and our organized competitors are eating our lunches. Through teamwork, effort, and commitment by Whites can we do what needs done. Prove me wrong!

aa
aa
18 December, 2021 3:09 pm

I have sent the following to the NA twice. Mr. Reich wouldn’t like it.

SOUTHERN REVIEW

“An admixture of two unequal races is therefore a cancer, an unpardonable sin against mankind and against nature, which has launched an ever flaming curse on all such connections; inasmuch as she lets the mongrels invariably inherit all the vices and evil traits of both races and rarely, or never, any of the good. Nature absolutely disallows the adulteration of blood; and herein she shows herself to be an aristocrat of the purest water. Every violation of these laws she visits in the most condign and pitiless manner.”

Howard
Howard
18 December, 2021 4:48 pm

“When we talk about evolution eventually progressing to the point where it would become impossible to produce fertile offspring with Blacks, we may be talking tens of thousands of years — possibly much longer, or god forbid forever, if racemixing at the margins increases; possibly much less time if a subgroup of Whites separates itself completely and then takes charge of its evolutionary destiny by directing its own evolution, which is what the National Alliance intends to do over the next several centuries and more.” That particular paragraph above got me to thinking along a certain line. Wouldn’t it be wonderful if we could find a way to somehow inoculate (if you will) and in a sense, protect ourselves against foreign admixtures into our DNA. What I would like to see, if… Read more »

L.B. Blakeney
L.B. Blakeney
Reply to  Howard
18 December, 2021 7:59 pm

If it weren’t for those pesky jews thwarting our efforts to preserve our race’s future, I also imagine it could be possible to develop that kind of technology.
Remember not too many decades ago when older people got cataracts and were blinded from that, but now Medicare covers artificial lenses to fix it.
Same with laser vision correction for those too dependent upon their high prescription contacts and glasses.

JM/Iowa
JM/Iowa
Reply to  Howard
20 December, 2021 10:07 pm

It would be great to alter our DNA as you’ve described to become a totally different species from the rest of the human races. Talented people in that profession are needed for that research.

But first the need is to get our message out that our Alliance’s needs quality, qualified Whites to join with us. Our efforts at building a powerful enough voice to reach all Whites needs doing and that means bringing in more people with the talents and/or means to get things done.

L.B. Blakeney
L.B. Blakeney
18 December, 2021 6:51 pm

Wow, as soon as I clicked on this page, because I could even read the headline, let alone listen to the podcast, I thought “ Jew!” Wow, what a schnoz! And it turned out to be a picture of the jewish author of which this 2 part series was about. I am honored and humbled that KAS quoted parts of my comments from last time. In one, I bemoaned that many jews in the west could visually “pass ” for White, but if only the entire jewish population looked like this guy, things would be simple. There would be no reptilian chameleons among them, so we’d have a much easier time staying aware of them, rather than being duped into finding out that someone hot like Scarlet Johansen et al… Read more »

guest
guest
19 December, 2021 12:13 am

I’ve noticed that jews, for all their supposed high IQ, only began making accomplishments in science and technology only after they incorporated themselves in White societies and selectively outbred with Whites. You never saw any technological achievement in ancient Israel. Even when scientific and technical knowledge was fostered in the Islamic world, jewish efforts were focused on advising the muslims or commenting on religious issues.

L.B. Blakeney
L.B. Blakeney
19 December, 2021 3:02 am

Man, I imagine that Reich guy pictured above, has probably been arrested a few times for indecent exposure. That beak looks like it belongs in his underwear.

mortal goyal
mortal goyal
Reply to  L.B. Blakeney
20 December, 2021 11:24 am

you funny.

UncensoredDeutsch
UncensoredDeutsch
19 December, 2021 5:35 pm

Are you serious? Are you actually buying in the BS that we, ethnic Europeans, came out of Africa? The Jews would love to have us believe that along with believing that we “evolved” from a chimp or whatever animal <chimp, gorilla, fish, etc> that they’d like us to believe we evolved from. Because the point of all this to make us think that we don’t “belong” in any place, especially Europe aka not indigenous anywhere on this Earth, nor had any ancient history where we had worldwide advanced technological civilization <swastika, anyone?> that had the ability to travel to the stars, but were dumb & primitive ape+cavemen. No, it is us that are literally primitive compared to our Ancestors because we have been downgraded & dumbed down in every way.… Read more »

JM/Iowa
JM/Iowa
Reply to  UncensoredDeutsch
20 December, 2021 10:11 pm

“By simply focusing on rebuilding ourselves, our communities and naturally BE-ing who we are as a People”

We in the National Alliance are doing this now. Have you considered joining our communities? http://www.natall.com/about

Guest
Guest
Reply to  UncensoredDeutsch
20 December, 2021 11:54 pm

I much agree with the essence of your post, and so I’ve suggested here before. Our focus needs to be on (re)building our European people. It’s important to keep an eye on Evil but, in this world, we need to understand we cannot fight Evil. It’s a futile, exhausting, and probably losing battle, as Evil can brainwash and incite the world masses against us through its tools – lies, perfidy, atrocious cruelty – that we are defenseless against. Despite some brave and beautiful words in the article and comments, we know our very survival is at stake, before even talking of further progress for our race. Quit lamenting and trying to fight Evil straight on. The only path forward is complete separation, of whatever genuine is left of us, and… Read more »

guest
guest
20 December, 2021 11:46 am

Looking at the reviews on AmaZOG, most of the negative complaints are about the very confusing writing and flow of the book. This is pretty common for jews. I think they have evolved to be so deceptive, they lost the ability to write clearly.

L.B.Blakeney
L.B.Blakeney
Reply to  guest
21 December, 2021 1:48 pm

AmaZOG! I love it. May I borrow that expression in the future?

Ted Truewil
Ted Truewil
20 December, 2021 1:13 pm

I am sorry for the rude post a little while ago. Please let me state this another way.

I bought books from the National Alliance back in the 90’s when Dr. Pierce was running things. He offered two books written by Jews concerning the ethnic origins of modern Jews. “Facts are Facts” by the Jew Benjamin Freeman, and “The Thirteenth Tribe” by the Jew Arthur Koestler. Pierce bought into the lie that modern Jews are not the Jews of the Old Testament.

Modern genetic studies have shown that the whole “Khazar” thing is totally false. The two Jews were really laying the foundation for the Christian Identity movement.

Never trust a Jew.

Frederick Ford
Frederick Ford
20 December, 2021 5:45 pm

Here is genetics simplified. Every kind of organism is composed of the same genetic information but with different variations of that information. Variations are specifically quantitive differences of that genetic information such as head shape, brain size, bone density, and organ capacity. All of these variations are indications of kinds of animals sharing a common ancestor which Darwin pointed out in his Origin of Species and Descent of Man so if all humans did come from a common ancestor like from Africa then all human differences including racial differences must be quantitive differences. But heres the catch, not all human differences are quantitive with the best example of this kind of difference is being the way human eyes are colored. Non-whites have brown or brownish-black eye color because they have… Read more »

L.B.Blakeney
L.B.Blakeney
Reply to  Frederick Ford
21 December, 2021 2:00 pm

What about Goebbels? Myself? Most Southern Europeans? Many English, which is most of my own heritage? My own eyes in fact are darker brown than some nonwhites. I get tired of feeling as if I’m not White enough unless I pop in colored contacts. As a brown eyed brunette, I was very happy when Cindy Crawford was a big time supermodel, because for a while there, White models featured in fashion magazines were only blue and green eyed, and the only models shown with brown eyes were nonwhite models. Whites are diverse in hair color and eye color. It was explained to us in 5th grade science class about dark hair and eyes being dominant genes, while lighter hair and eyes are recessive genes. And this was regarding our race… Read more »

aa
aa
22 December, 2021 5:22 pm

Ancient White people had brown eyes. I read White females were the first to have light eyes to attract the opposite sex for reproduction. I know brown eyed/brown hair couples who have blond/blue children. The English have a surplus of brown hair and brown eyes.

A National Geographic edition in the 2d half of the 1970s did a feature story on the fragile English beauty. Of all the White subgroups, they have the softest look. Softest accent too.

Old Aardvark
Old Aardvark
1 January, 2022 10:09 pm

This would have been a relevant and cutting-edge discussion 25 years ago, but much has changed since then. Ray Kurzweil (yes, I know he is a Jew) published his book “The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology” in 2005. It inspired quite a few sci-fi movies that were built upon Kurzweil’s predictions. I recall Johnny Depp stared in one of them. And there have been other writers, who generated much more readable prose, who put out books on the same theme, such as “Singularity Rising” by James D Miller. The obvious conclusion one draws from these books is that although racial differences are real and human evolution is real, technology is about to blow past biology so rapidly nothing we are discussing here will matter in another fifty years.… Read more »