Classic EssaysWilliam Pierce

Destroying the Past

by Dr. William L. Pierce

FEBRUARY HAS BEEN decreed “Black History Month,” and so a recent February issue of the Washington Post contained a feature article titled “Ancient African Heroines.” The two principal heroines treated were Hatshepsut, an Egyptian queen of the XVIIIth Dynasty, and Cleopatra, who reigned over the same land 14 centuries later. The clear implication of the article is that the former queen was a Negress, and that the latter may have been. Actually, both were White women, and nothing that is known about either suggests the least Negro taint to her blood.

The Washington Post article begins with the not-so-subtle insinuation that the words “African” and “Negro” are synonymous: “Women of African descent – whether called Creole, Afro-American, black or even ‘colored’ – are typically depicted as women without a history… Unfortunately, works on the development and influence of African civilizations usually have been overlooked and relegated to near obscurity in the stacks, the achievements of ancient black women with them.”

The article then introduces Hatshepsut, but in case any reader has so far failed to make the desired assumption that the great queen was a “woman of color” (the term used later in the article in referring to Cleopatra), there is a portrait. It is supposedly an artist’s rendering based on a photograph taken in Hatshepsut’s tomb, but one can only suspect that the Washington Post’s artist used Aunt Jemima as his model, rather than anything photographed in an Egyptian tomb.

QUEEN HATSHEPSUT, who ably ruled Egypt for 21 years during the 15th century B.C. and is the first great woman known to history, has been dipped in the tar pot and converted into an instant Black by the history-destroyers of the controlled news media. Hatshepsut's portrait statue, carved during her life, is on the right. The Washington Post artist's conception of her in a recent article is on the left.

The lie is given to the Washington Post by Hatshepsut’s life-size portrait statue, found in her temple at Deir el-Bahri, near Thebes, and now residing in New York’s Metropolitan Museum of Art. Numerous portrait statues of Hatshepsut’s close relatives are also extant, and they all show distinctly Europid features. Her nephew, the renowned Pharaoh Thutmose III, regarded as ancient Egypt’s greatest ruler, could pass easily as a Swede or an Englishman.

Hatshepsut’s mummy has not been identified with certainty, but the only reasonable candidate, found in the tomb of her grandson Amenhotep II, has long, slightly wavy, brown-blond hair. Blondness was not an uncommon trait among the Egyptian nobility of Hatshepsut’s time.

Two other XVIIIth Dynasty mummies, both of which have been identified positively, are those of Yuya and Thuya, the maternal grandfather and grandmother, respectively, of Amenhotep IV, the famous Akhenaton. They are also the paternal grandparents of Akhenaton’s cousin-wife, the beautiful Nefertiti. The mummies of both Yuya and Thuya have well-preserved, long, reddish-blond hair.

MUMMY believed to be that of Queen Hatshepsut was discovered In 1 98 in the tomb of her grandson, Amenihotep II. The hair, remarkably well preserved, is very light brown, almost blond. The photograph is plate XCVII from the Catalogue General des Antiquites u Egyptionnes du Muses du Cairo (Cairo, 1912).

As for Cleopatra, though she was a queen of Egypt in the first century B.C., she was of pure Macedonian descent, ruling one of the many lands conquered by her great countryman Alexander three centuries earlier. On the matter of her race there is not the slightest doubt; her ancestry can be traced back to Alexander’s marshal Ptolemy.

That does not stop the Washington Post from attempting to paint Cleopatra as a mulatta, citing William Shakespeare, of all people, as an authority, because he describes her as “tawny” in a play. (His Antony and Cleopatra opens with one of Mark Antony’s friends complaining about Antony’s infatuation with Cleopatra: “… His goodly eyes … now turn the office and devotion of their view upon a tawny front …”) “Tawny,” says the Washington Post, “often has been used, throughout history, for mulatto or mixed blood personages ….”

The Washington Post goes from Cleopatra to “black Queen Tiy of Nubia noted as the mother of King Tut.” Tiy was not Black, and she was not a Nubian; she was the daughter of Thuya and Yuya. Furthermore, she was not King Tutankhamon’s mother, although she was related to him in a roundabout way; Tiy’s daughter Nefertiti was the wife of Tutankhamon’s father, Amenhotep, IV, but one of the latter’s harem concubines was almost certainly Tutankhamon’s mother, since Tut himself does show strong signs of a Negroid taint. Negro blood was introduced into more than one Egyptian royal family via harem slaves.

HANNIBAL AS NEGRO: A series of paintings of "Great Kings of Africa" being circulated in America's public schools and promoted by the controlled media depicts the great Carthaginian general (274-183 B.C.) as a Negro (left). On the right is Hannibal's portrait statue, now in the Museo Archeologico Nazionale, Naples.

The article concludes with a boost for a “Great Kings of Africa” series of paintings which, among other things, portrays Hannibal, the great Carthaginian general, as a coal-black Negro. Reproductions of the paintings have been distributed free — “as a public service” — to schools all over America to promote “Black History Month.”

Why did the Washington Post do it? Ignorance is not a plausible excuse for the nation’s second most prestigious newspaper, with the enormous files of reference material at its disposal. Its editor refused even to acknowledge a detailed letter from NATIONAL VANGUARD Editor William Pierce pointing out the errors and misrepresentations in its article. Malice and greed, however, are plausible.

Thirty-five years ago the English writer George Orwell noted with irony in his novel 1984 that those who control the past also control the future. In his dark vision of our present era he saw government thought controllers continuously rewriting history to suit the political and social needs of the moment, changing the citizens’ image of the past and, thereby, their attitudes toward the present and their expectations for the future.

Alas, grim reality has already outstripped Orwell’s fancy. But it is not the government which has undertaken the task of revising Americans’ understanding of the past — at least, not the elected government in Washington, as bad as it is, but instead the self-appointed shadow government which stands behind it: the Sanhedrin of the masters of the controlled media. High, indeed, in the Sanhedrin sits Katherine Meyer Graham, owner of the Washington Post; and important, indeed, is the role of her newspaper in the Sanhedrin’s program of falsifying history in order to bring it into line with the needs of the moment.

One of the foremost of those needs is the undermining of the White man’s racial consciousness. For those who sit in the Sanhedrin belong to the most racially conscious of all peoples, and they realize that in their consciousness lies their strength. Their rule can only be secure, however, so long as the majority race among whom they live as a parasitic minority does not regain its own self-consciousness.

Racial self-consciousness demands a consciousness of the history of one’s people; if a people can be robbed of its history, then there will be no soil in which the roots of its racial consciousness can grow. That is the ultimate motive behind every aspect of the Sanhedrin’s history-rewriting program.

(March, 1983)

Previous post

Multiracialism Causes "Social Withdrawal"

Next post

The Composite Greek Woman

Notify of
Inline Feedback
View all comments
Destroying the Past | Counter-Currents Publishing
3 February, 2011 3:53 am

[…] // Published: February 3, 2011 | This entry was posted in North American New Right […]

Black History Month SpecialThe Fraud of Black History | Counter-Currents Publishing
4 February, 2011 3:22 am

[…] has not been particularly hard to pull off before America’s credulous school-children. Thus, the African civilizations of ancient Egypt and Carthage have become the achievements of Black culture-creators in the lesson materials distributed in the […]

JA Rogers
JA Rogers
19 November, 2012 1:11 pm

“In his dark vision of our present era he saw government thought controllers continuously rewriting history to suit the political and social needs of the moment…”

How apt, I think you should read ISBN-10: 1258030772

Nunya Dambusiness
Nunya Dambusiness
1 August, 2014 8:33 pm

You my friend are misinformed dig deeper because your ancestors did not tell you the truth. Cleopatra was African, Egypt is in AFRICA (where black people are from) common sense really!!!!

LH Collins
LH Collins
Reply to  Nunya Dambusiness
31 March, 2022 9:35 am

YOU are lying, monkey-boo (Nunya Dambusiness). Cleopatra was a scion on Macedonian royalty. Not a head-bobbing, fatass, negroid disgrace! White people have been colonising Africa before you porch-baboons knew about the wider world. You’re called “Sub-Saharan” for a reason.

Will Williams
Will Williams
9 August, 2014 4:38 pm

Come on, Nunya.”[C]laims of Cleopatra’s ‘blackness’ are just laughable ignorance and racism parading as history. As anyone with even a smidgeon of historical knowledge should know, Cleopatra VII was ethnically Greek. Her name was actually Cleopatra VII Philopator, or even more precisely, Κλεοπάτρα Φιλοπάτωρ. (Philopator in Greek means ‘father loving.’)” See her family tree, here:

Joe Lowsac
Joe Lowsac
8 July, 2020 7:39 pm

The Children Of Ra‘ by Arthur Kemp is a great and thorough book on the subject.

LH Collins
LH Collins
31 March, 2022 9:36 am

Hannibal Barca was a republican Semite; not a negro lord of the jungle (Tunisia had no jungles 2000 years ago, never mind today).