American Dissident VoicesAudioKevin Alfred StromRadio

Hearts and Minds

American Dissident Voices broadcast of May 4, 2019

by Kevin Alfred Strom

Listen to the broadcast

THE LIARS of the mass media can be beaten. The career of the late Leonard Dinnerstein, his acolytes, and their easily-disproved lies about Jewish sex killer Leo Frank is a case in point. We’re winning that battle, and I’ll tell you more about that later in the program.

New Banner With Radical Alliance Message

But first let me encourage you with a new outreach tool National Alliance Chairman Will Williams created and which you can see in a large, high-resolution photograph in the text version of this broadcast on nationalvanguard.org — it’s our huge new banner, a full ten feet long and five feet high, ready to be mounted or held aloft by intrepid Alliance activists wherever the White public is likely to see it and want to know more. Its message, positioned next to the infamous “illegal immigrant crossing” sign, is: “Send them back. They can’t make White babies.” As we said in our printed National Alliance BULLETIN last month:

The National Alliance dares to say what other more timid or misguided anti-invasion groups are afraid to say: The invaders must be removed from our society because they are not White and because they cannot produce White children, the only kind of children we can allow in our living space if we are to survive.

Our huge 5-foot by 10-foot banner with the Alliance’s radical message, simply stating the all-important biological fact that the controlled media and the “conservatives” refuse to mention, was unfurled for the first time in April. When it comes to immigration, conservatives harp on crime, drugs, disease, welfare expenditures, and everything else except the central, essential truth that the non-White invaders are drastically impacting the racial health of our nation because they can’t make White babies! We hope this pithy slogan will catch on and supplant such wimpy memes as “It’s OK to be White.” We will provide our activists with a flier that carries this radical message in May, as well as a high-resolution file that can be used to have a banner just like ours printed at your local print shop.

Well, that digital file — so you can print your own banners; and that flier link — which you can use to print out mass quantities of the flier version of the same image — are now downloadable from our repository of free National Alliance activist materials which you can find online at natall.com/fliers. That’s easy to remember if you’re listening on the radio and don’t have a pen or pencil to make a note right now — it is simply natall.com/fliers. (And, yes, either of the two alternate spellings of the word “fliers” will work.)

Your local print shop can print a 10-foot by 5-foot banner if you supply them with the high-resolution image linked to this thumbnail picture.

There’s absolutely zero reason for anyone to be shy about promoting our “They can’t make White babies” meme. It’s good to make White babies; it’s necessary to make White babies; and only White people can make White babies. It’s about time someone starting emphasizing those essential truths! White people must continue to exist and to reproduce, and anyone who opposes that, and anyone who opposes us saying that, is a vile hater of the worst order.

This version is formatted to print an 8-inch by 10.5-inch image on standard letter-sized paper.

We, on the other hand, are saying nothing against other races at all — even the “send them back” part of our message doesn’t take away any right they have to make their own babies in their own lands — but no race can survive without its own territory, and our White children, and their children, and all the generations that will ever be born call out to our hearts and our minds and our hands to spread this essential message so that they may live! And there’s something liberating, exhilarating, and ennobling about finally telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. So take that step — do what’s right — and change this world for the better.

* * *

Leonard Dinnerstein — what a joke

National Vanguard writer Steve Ranes tells us how once-famed Jewish “historian” — better to call him a twistorian, I think — Leonard Dinnerstein started out — and how he ended up:

* * *

Leonard Dinnerstein

With the rise of the Internet, and the ability of independent scholars to examine original documents, this prominent Jewish historian’s life’s work — an effort to exonerate Jewish sex killer Leo Frank — became a laughingstock.

JEWISH SUPREMACIST, anti-Gentile activist and history-distorter Leonard Dinnerstein has died at age 84. 106 years after Mary Phagan’s death, it is fitting that we examine Dinnerstein’s career, which was in large part devoted to an attempt to exonerate Jewish sex killer Leo Frank, who killed Mary Phagan, and cover up the mountain of evidence that he was guilty.

Special thanks to the students of the Leo Frank case and the writers at The American MercuryNational Vanguard, and the Leo Frank Case Research Library who discussed and brought Dinnerstein and his baleful influence on scholarship to our awareness.

Leonard Dinnerstein (1934-2019) is dead and thus so is his part in a dark chapter in American pseudo-academic fraud about Jewish-Gentile relations regarding the Frank-Phagan affair (1913-1915, 1982-1986). And there are signs that the dark chapter itself is about to end.

Leonard Dinnerstein’s half-century-long promulgation of partisan Jewish activist pseudo-scholarship on the Leo Frank Case (he earned his Ph.D., at Columbia University, 1966, with a poorly-constructed and highly biased dissertation on the case; this was published in book form as The Leo Frank Case, 1968, with a number of editions thereafter into the late 20th and early 21st century) set back our understanding of this sensational and contentious 1913-1915 double murder true crime by decades. Dinnerstein’s false narrative was supported by other Jews in both the academy and popular culture. His numerous ideological heirs have aggressively perpetuated the Frank case as a form of Jewish-Gentile pseudo-intellectual ethnic warfare (one of many examples: Robert Seitz Frey’s The Silent and the Damned: The Murder of Mary Phagan and the Lynching of Leo Frank, 1988).

The plain fact is that Dinnerstein’s main thesis — that there was strong Southern “anti-Semitism” and that it led to a false prosecution of Frank — has been thoroughly debunked. The American South, in fact, was and is the most philo-Semitic section of the country and perhaps even the world.

Dinnerstein not only prostituted the term “anti-Semitism” with his prolific bashing of the American South on the subject during his lifetime (one of many examples, “Leo Frank and the Jewish Community,” American Jewish Archive Journal, 1968), something that you’d think even thoughtful Jews would be wary of, but he provided grist for a number of major fear-mongering racketeering groups such as ADL. That group regularly promotes the anti-Gentile “Hang the Jew Cheerleading Hoax” myth that Dinnerstein originated (see Rabbi Steven Lebow, Atlanta Journal Constitution, 2000; Abraham Foxman, op ed 2005; Lauren Jones, ADL, Jonathan Greenblatt, 2017, and many others too many to mention — also see the audiobook, part 10, of the Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, Volume 3 — now censored by Amazon, by the way — at The American Mercury).

“Hang the Jew or We’ll Hang You!”

In this anti-Gentile blood libel, endlessly repeated by the Academia-Hollywood-Industrial-Complex using the big lie method, we are told a tale about supposed mobs of hysterical southern Protestant “anti-Semites,” who were supposedly screaming anti-Jewish death threats into the open windows of the courtroom while the proceedings of the Leo Frank trial were being conducted in front of a packed audience.

This hoax was most effectively debunked in the American Mercury‘s audio book series based on the National of Islam’s book — see section nine and section ten of the audio version — which is now banned by Amazon.

In one example of Dinnerstein’s many falsifications of history, he writes in The American Jewish Archive Journal, 1968:

Beyond the main testimony, the jurors had little more on which to base their decision than hearsay, rumors, and unsubstantiated accusations. Yet most members of the public were thoroughly convinced of the defendant’s guilt and made their voices heard. The intense summer heat necessitated that the courtroom windows be left open, and remarks from the crowds could be heard easily by those inside. “Crack the Jew’s neck!” — “Lynch him!” — were some of the epithets emerging from the more boisterous. Threats were also made against the jury that they would be lynched if they did not hang that “damned sheeny.”

Academia, Dinnerstein’s undeserved domain, is upstream from society and politics. Millions therefore accepted Dinnerstein’s pseudo-intellectual propaganda that Frank was convicted because of “anti-Semites” conspiring against him from day one after the abused and battered body of 13-year-old Mary Phagan was discovered in the early morning hours of Sunday, April 27th, 1913. Most of these millions know nothing about the facts which encircled Leo Frank and made it inevitable that he would be indicted and convicted of the sex killing — and lose every appeal he launched, all the way to the United States Supreme Court. Those millions, when they think of the Frank case, see only the fictionalized narrative woven by Dinnerstein over generations. Dinnerstein’s work is in fact a form of psychological war against Gentiles, most of whom see, when Frank’s name is mentioned, not a pervert and a strangler of a young girl, but who instead visualize in technicolor through Dinnerstein’s and Hollywood’s disfigured imagination, an anti-Jewish mob of booger-eating “rednecks,” belligerently terrorizing the jury, defense team, and judge, making the trial a form of a Salem witch hunt against an angelic and innocent Frank, with their murderous hatred rubber-stamped by a kangaroo court.

Pierre van Paassen, who, in addition to penning some rather incredible tales about the Leo Frank case, also claimed to have seen ghostly black dogs who could appear and disappear at will.

Dinnerstein also uncritically promoted the bizarre “bite mark” hoax of Pierre van Paassen. Van Paassen wasn’t Jewish so far as we know, but he slavishly followed — and even elaborated on — the Jewish line in his hack journalism career which tracked the Jewish rise to media domination in the 20th century. He’s seldom mentioned today because his hoaxes are so transparent, and his writing so unremittingly bad, that he is an embarrassment.

But Dinnerstein cites the “bite mark” hoax as if it were established fact. It consists of a ridiculous claim that there were bite marks on Mary Phagan’s body and that x-rays of these bite marks — yes, you heard me right; x-rays of bite marks! — did not match Leo Frank’s dental records. Suffice it to say that no one whatsoever had ever claimed there were such marks on Mary’s body before van Paassen made it up.

And, even more embarrassingly for Dinnerstein, he didn’t even note van Paassen’s egregious, laughable errors of fact: Leo Frank was not lynched on his way to his murder trial in 1913 as van Paassen stated. He was tried and sentenced to death by Judge Leonard Strickland Roan on August 26, 1913, but the hanging took place nearly two years later on August 17, 1915. Leo Frank went on trial in Atlanta, not 170 miles away in Milledgeville where the hoaxer van Paassen suggests the trial was scheduled. The most bizarre claim of van Paassen — not corrected, not even mentioned by Dinnerstein — is that Leo Frank “had not even been tried,” when in fact his trial was the longest, most sensational, and most expensive in Georgia history, the stuff of front-page headlines for weeks on end just nine years before van Paassen’s supposed “investigation.”

Now do you see why Dinnerstein is a laughingstock?

Dinnerstein laid the groundwork for cultural Marxists, anti-White leftists, which-ever-way-the-wind-blows professors, and Jewish activist academics, to transform the trial and conviction of sex strangler Frank (1884-1915)  into a soap opera-style tragedy with Frank as the victim, a maudlin hagiography about a “noble martyr” to “anti-Semitism.” It’s gaudy Jewish-American Kabuki at its finest and a pivotal part of the modern effort to re-paint White-hating Jews as stoic victims in a fictional landscape of “racist” White Americans. The real landscape is very nearly the opposite: wealthy, privileged racist Jews demonizing Blacks (Dinnerstein blames an innocent Black man, James Conley, for Mary Phagan’s murder) and ferociously demonizing Whites who offered almost no resistance to the Jewish ascent over them, who willingly and even eagerly handed over high positions in their society to Jews — Jews like Leonard Dinnerstein who repaid such kindness with weaponized hate and lies.

* * *

Well, as I said — Dinnerstein started his career when the Jews were the almost exclusive gatekeepers of the media; when CBS and PBS and ABC and NBC and the big newspapers were just about all there was, and all of them controlled by Jews. Dinnerstein, like van Paassen, and like many others, could advance his personal fortune by toeing the Jewish line, and doing so sloppily and even through deliberate hoaxing didn’t hurt his career, because all of those who would call him out for his mistakes and his lies were silenced, had no platform for their words, were attacked as “racists” and “anti-Semites,” and were afraid of losing their jobs. That situation allowed the “image-makers” to turn very mediocre liar Dinnerstein into a “respected” and “revered historian.”

But things are different now. Truth-tellers like the folks at National Vanguard and The Leo Frank Case Research Library and The American Mercury have platforms now — and an ever-growing audience. And now, on the cusp of his death and the end of his career, Leonard Dinnerstein is just what he deserves to be: a laughingstock. Google and the networks may still be pushing the “revered historian” line, but people who make a point to know what’s really happening — and that includes many who don’t agree with us politically — aren’t buying that anymore.

The efforts of our own Vanessa Neubauer and the many audio books she has produced, and myself, and the editorial teams at the aforementioned Web sites, have had a profound effect on what people see when they do research on the Leo Frank case.

Search engine results are a case in point. Search for “Leo Frank case” or “Leo Frank not guilty” or similar searches on Jewish-run Google and you’ll find that National Vanguard and the other truth-tellers have been almost totally wiped from the search results, though sometimes an American Mercury or other truth-telling article or two gets through Google’s censorship algorithm. But search on the many alternative search engines now available and you’ll find a very different picture. On Switzerland’s Etools search engine

https://www.etools.ch/searchAdvancedSubmit.do?query=leo+frank+guilty&send=+Search+&country=web&language=all&dataSourceResults=40&pageResults=40&dataSources=all

or on Russia’s Yandex search engine

https://yandex.com/search/?clid=2270486&win=340&text=leo%20frank%20not%20guilty&lr=103124

or on France’s Qwant search engine

https://www.qwant.com/?q=leo%20frank%20not%20guilty&t=web

or, astoundingly, on Microsoft’s Bing search engine

https://www.bing.com/search?q=leo+frank+not+guilty&qs=n&form=QBLH&sp=-1&pq=leo+frank+not+guilty&sc=0-20&sk=&cvid=588053F3A0E14B25930A1D3337663DBB

or on the Germany/UK Mojeek search engine

https://www.mojeek.de/search?q=leo+frank+not+guilty

or on Switzerland’s Swisscows search engine

https://swisscows.ch/web?query=leo%20frank%20not%20guilty

you will find that the truth-tellers all appear in significant numbers on the very first page or two of search results. That’s reaching out in a way that really counts — with irrefutable facts. (And Google’s censorship just proves our point, so there’s no way out for them.) That’s moving people’s hearts by showing them in no uncertain terms who’s been lying to them. That’s building readership of our sites. That’s changing minds. That’s also the result of some very hard work by some very dedicated people working on a very limited budget. Won’t you do your part and boost that budget, today, and keep the censors on the run?

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the National Alliance. The National Alliance is working to educate White men and women around the world as to the nature of the reality we must face — and organizing our people to ensure our survival and advancement. We need your help to continue. Please send the largest contribution you can afford to National Alliance, Box 4, Mountain City, TN 37683 USA. You can also help us by visiting natall.com/donate. Once again, that address is Box 4, Mountain City, TN 37683 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to never give up.

Listen to the broadcast
Previous post

Is There Intelligent Life on Earth? (part 5)

Next post

Up From Christianity: An Ascent

12 Comments

  1. dan
    4 May, 2019 at 7:09 pm — Reply

    “We, on the other hand, are saying nothing against other races at all”

    As a certain someone once said: “love of one’s own race does not necessarily imply hatred of another.”

    And while this is logically true, most people have been conditioned to see anything nominally pro-White as hate. Of course, I needn’t tell anyone from the NA that. The masses however do not think, as a certain someone once remarked. Some of those masses may fundamentally agree with the underlying message, but still have a conditioned reflex that may make them disregard that message as ‘hate.’ You may not want those types for the NA, but they still need to be reached. Towards that end I have been trying to construct a phrase that tries to bypass that reflex. The best I have been able to come up with so far is “loving your family doesn’t mean you hate your neighbors” which can be followed up with something else, “love your race” or “conserve your race, 8% and falling rapidly” or whatever. Just a thought.

  2. 5 May, 2019 at 1:44 pm — Reply

    DAN: Some of those masses may fundamentally agree with the underlying message [of SEND THEM BACK, They Can’t Make White Babies], but still have a conditioned reflex that may make them disregard that message as ‘hate.’ You may not want those types for the NA, but they still need to be reached…

    The Alliance’s radical message, stating a biological fact, is not for the masses who disregard every pro-White expression, Dan, even muffled pabulum like “It’s OK to be White.” It’s for the outraged minority of the larger minority of racially responsible Whites who agree with that message and say to themselves, “It’s about time someone tells it like it is!” That SEND THEM BACK message will resonate with those who will actually join the National Alliance and who, as activists, will spread that and other slogans — some softer — on our downloadable fliers, here: natall.com/fliers

    The slogan on our newest flier is not unlike what our founder stated 17 and 1/2 years ago about some other racial aliens who couldn’t make White babies, here: https://nationalvanguard.org/2019/04/send-them-all-back/

    [L]et’s send all of the Middle Easterners, including those now controlling Hollywood and Madison Avenue and our television networks and the rest of our news and entertainment media, back to the Middle East for good. W.L.P.

  3. G.S. Ivey
    6 May, 2019 at 2:27 am — Reply

    I think it’s important for people to think twice about going to post-highschool institutions of the academi, when they are staffed at every level of professorship and management with cultural bolsheviks. Too bad they don’t put bright orange warning stickers on books, DVDz and audio-booklets to let people know this guy or gal with or without distinguishing academic wallpaper (college degrees) is a bolshevik activist and not someone who seeks to make honest sense about the world.

    I’m glad witch doctor dinnerstein has expired, but what of all his academic publishings flowing freely and above all others when searching on this truecrime? Even in death, he will continue to give primal matter to future cultural bolsheviks who will use the Leo Frank kabuki theater to scare Jews into seiging against Euro-Gentiles, while waging a war of psychological attrition on the cohesiveness of Whites.

    What are we supposed to do when people search on book stores like censorous amazon or ebay with his agitprop slime comes up first and no counter balance shows? I see no books worthy anyware counter punching the jewish progaganda machine on Mary Phagan tragic story.

    So what if witch doctor dinnerstein had 84 years of conning under his belt, what good is fighting back if no one can find alternative views on google or youtube? These other search engines get only a fraction of traffic of the big tech juggernauts. Facebook now deletes accounts of anyone who even dares suggest jews are tenth degree black belts in lying.

  4. JOE
    6 May, 2019 at 10:03 pm — Reply

    “It’s ok to be white isn’t “wimpy”
    It’s a troll ,the whole idea of it is to provoke a reaction meant to expose our enemies

    this slogan is not really any revelation , it just states the obvious
    i hardly think it is going to win over any republicucks who make distinctions between “legal” and “non legal” immigration
    they will miss the point entirely about it being about demographics
    i honestly think we can do much better
    forever trumpers are still not going to get it

  5. James Clayton
    7 May, 2019 at 12:07 pm — Reply

    https://nationalvanguard.org/2018/06/how-hitler-tackled-unemployment-and-revived-germanys-economy/ [Mark Weber]

    … “National Socialist Germany, alone among countries peopled by whites, succeeded in attaining some increase in fertility,” notes the outstanding Scottish-born American historian Gordon A. Craig, with a sharp rise in the birth rate after Hitler came to power, and a steady increase in the years that followed.

    In a lengthy address to the Reichstag in early 1937, Hitler recalled the pledges he had made when his government assumed power. He also explained the principles on which his policies were based, and looked back at what had been accomplished in four years. / 35 “… Those who talk about ‘democracies’ and ‘dictatorships’,” he said, “simply do not understand that a revolution has been carried out in this country, the results of which can be considered democratic in the highest sense of the term, if democracy has any real meaning … The National Socialist Revolution has not aimed at turning a privileged class into a class that will have no rights in the future. Its aim has been to give equal rights to those who had no rights … Our objective has been to make it possible for the whole German people to be active, not only in the economic but also in the political field, and to secure this by organizationally involving the masses … During the past four years we have increased German production in all areas to an extraordinary degree. And this increase in production has been to the benefit of all Germans.”

    It’s often been claimed, even by some supposedly reputable scholars, that Hitler’s success in reviving his nation’s economic life was based largely on government spending for rearmament and preparation for war. This is a myth. As the renowned British historian A. J. P. Taylor noted: / 37 “Germany’s economic recovery, which was complete by 1936, did not rest on rearmament; it was caused mainly by lavish expenditure on public works, particularly on motor roads, and this public spending stimulated private spending also, as [British economist John Maynard] Keynes had said it would. Hitler actually skimped on armaments, despite his boasting, partly because he wished to avoid the unpopularity which a reduction of the German standard of living would cause, but more from the confident belief that he would always succeed in bluff. Thus, paradoxically, while nearly everyone else in Europe expected a great war, Hitler was the one man who neither expected nor planned for it.”

    … In fact, the jobless rate in the United States remained high until the stimulation of large-scale war production took hold. Even as late as March 1940, the US unemployment rate was still almost 15 percent of the work force. It was production for war, not Roosevelt’s “New Deal’ programs, that finally brought full employment. / 39 …

  6. 7 May, 2019 at 2:22 pm — Reply

    JOE: “It’s ok to be white isn’t “wimpy”
    It’s a troll ,the whole idea of it is to provoke a reaction meant to expose our enemies…

    I see. It’s also OK to be a high school dropout. It’s OK to most folks these days to be “bi-racial.”

    Your troll slogan is wimpy to me, Joe, but it’s not wimpy to your “republicucks” and “forever trumpers.” I get that. They are not likely to be attracted to the National Alliance so I don’t count them. That’s OK, too, for them. That type likes the wimpy, reactionary “All Lives Matter.”

    They probably will be offended by “It’s Great to be White.”https://nationalvanguard.org/2018/06/the-value-of-time/

    • 8 May, 2019 at 10:05 am — Reply

      One purpose of this troll slogan, I think, is to purposely be as weak and mild as possible — and then when the Jews and anti-Whites attack the posters, they will be exposed as hating even the mildest expression of approval of White people, and also hating the very existence of Whites, which they in fact do.

      The National Alliance was first with the concept, though, with our “Love Your Race” campaigns (which began, I believe, in 2003), which also baits the anti-Whites into exposing their hatred of us, which they’d prefer to keep hidden.

  7. Sethmoto101
    8 May, 2019 at 1:39 am — Reply

    Someone is standing in *front* of the banner in the campsite picture. Jews in Hollywood peddle anti-white themes in entertainment, but they’d hire a goy cinematographer to catch that beforehand. Don’t trust slogans. When alt.right marchers in office casual with tiki torches chanted “jews will not replace us”, whites giggled because no jew would be caught dead marching with a tiki torch in office casual, chanting jews… So, the text “They can’t make White babies” includes white babies, women past menopause, Iraq-war vets left in vegetative states by Islamists, and native Americans (send them where?). Slogans shouldn’t imply that the target audience shares views, but is too literal for broad realizations. Fix it by replacing the road sign with face drawings of generic groid, mexi, chink, paki, and jew with a Shlomo Shekelstein mug. No confusion over who “They” is (illegals or all non-whites?), then.

    • 8 May, 2019 at 9:50 am — Reply

      Seth: The top picture is just an illustration of an event, not a piece of outreach in itself. It captures the moment of the banner’s unveiling, a moment of enthusiasm instead of a posed shot, and it does that well — and so it doesn’t really matter if some words are covered up in that particular picture, especially since just below it is the perfect source file of the banner itself. There were quite a few pictures of the unveiling, a few of which showed the full text, but this one was the one that best captured the feeling of the moment in my opinion.

      As for our “They can’t make White babies” banner (with its prominent invader crossing sign) itself, I think everyone gets it. (White children can and, we hope, will make White babies once they’re adults; vets and older folks will have had children already or can help fight for their existence even if they unfortunately haven’t; and the future self-determination of Amerindians is way beyond the scope of our banner — and I think that viewers of the banner would immediately understand all that.)

      The caricatures could work too, and there’s a place for them, but I think that many of the kind-hearted Whites we’d like to influence see the A. Wyatt Mann-style extreme caricatures (which are hilarious, even great at times) as crude, low-class, wildly exaggerated, and “unfair.” But the best of them can still admit, I think, that White children will be overwhelmed by invaders and their offspring if they are allowed to live among us.

    • 8 May, 2019 at 1:52 pm — Reply

      SETHMOTO101: …Fix it by replacing the road sign with face drawings of generic groid, mexi, chink, paki, and jew with a Shlomo Shekelstein mug. No confusion over who “They” is (illegals or all non-whites?), then.

      You seem to be the only person who thinks the message in our new banner/flier is not clear, SETHMOTO101. The yellow CAUTION sign ‘Illegals Crossing,’ is universally accepted, as is the red circle w/the diagonal slash. If that’s not enough, then SEND THEM BACK clarifies the message better. The biological fact that the non-White invaders Can’t Make White Babies does not need “fixing.” We all know who “They” are, except you.

      Our Alliance members like our new flier.

      Thanks for your clarification, Kevin.

      • Sethmoto101
        9 May, 2019 at 11:21 am — Reply

        Thanks. Yours and Kevin’s responses are a really good explanation. If antifa and media careerists mock the signage, who cares; it won’t help them one bit in the long run.

  8. cc
    8 May, 2019 at 12:03 pm — Reply

    The 1990s unleashed a White race mixing Reign of Terror that swept the country. The gene altering campaign continues to run wide open.

    Dick Clark, host of American Bandstand, had Yankee girls dancing with Negroes on national TV in the 1980s.

    The money powers and Federal forced amalgamation promoted miscegenation.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.