Essays

Composite Greeks: the Ancient and the Modern

by Dienekes Pontikos

IT IS OFTEN stated either that “modern Greeks look like ancient ones,” or “modern Greeks don’t look like ancient ones” without any kind of factual-based justification which would lead one to accept either opinion.

It is well known that genes recombine in each generation creating unique combinations. This is why “no two people look alike.” This, however, does not apply only to our contemporaries, but also to our ancestors: each of us is unique when compared to both.

It is a fairly reasonable assumption though that if two populations are genetically similar, i.e., they have similar distributions of alleles, then their average human types will also be similar. If we find these to be divergent then we can be sure that we are dealing with different populations. If, however, we find them to be the same, then we have an important piece of evidence in support of genetic similarity, perhaps the best indication of racial continuity which we can hope for until such time as DNA analysis of ancient remains can become a reality.

To test whether ancient and modern Greeks look alike, I created averaged faces of 16 modern Greeks (foootball players from the 2002-2003 Champions League) and of 16 ancient Greeks (from extant marble portraits), using Morpher, a software package for morphing. The composites were created by pairwise averaging, i.e., 16 initial portraits led to 8 pairwise ones, then to 4, 2 and finally a single composite. The results are shown below:

One needs to discount the differences due to the absence of pigmentation in ancient marble portraits, as well as the preference for beards in ancient times and for their absence in modern ones. With these caveats in mind, we observe the close similarity of the two composites, with noticeably squarish face, lowness of subnasal region, squarish eye sockets, high leptorrhine nose, robust cheekbones and various other subjective features. To further test the similarity of the two, the two portraits were aligned and the corresponding landmarks were joined:

A further composite image was created with the left side taken from the ancient average and the right one taken from the modern one. This further illustrates the correspondence between the two.

From the near perfect alignment we conclude that there is remarkable metrical similarity between the two composites, as our intuition suggested, with near-perfect alignment of all physiognomic landmarks.

This study is not intended to prove that the first notion, that “modern Greeks look like ancient ones,” is correct. It does however make this notion much more likely, in conjunction with the other anthropological, historical and ethnographic pieces of evidence for genetic continuity in the Aegean basin.

Read the original article at the Anthropological Research Page

Previous post

Anthony Ludovici: Conservative From Another World

Next post

Jewish Terror: The Story of Lord Northcliffe

2 Comments

  1. hellenic spartan
    9 January, 2019 at 3:31 pm — Reply

    Genetically the greeks cluster around other European nations. They are right inbetween northern Europeans and Basques. There genetics would be very similar to Ireland and Wales as there are plenty of dark haired people there-plus many modern day northern greeks especially Macedonian Hellenes-still have an abundance of Nordic features although the majority is mediteranean, nevertheless subracialism has been genetically debunked and it is even a know fact it did not really affect Nazi politics. Only a tactic jews use to deter more people from Eurocentric ethnocentricism.

    In fact one of Hitlers favourite artists arno breker married a greek woman-http://ethniko.net/blog/demetra-messala/-and in her younger days she modelled for him. In this article they say alfred Rosenberg thought she was a jew but that’s not proven plus its quite laughable so why would they be allowed to marry eachother-as is well known the standard of the Nuremberg laws did not allow marital relations with alien blood. Plus a look at her features clearly shows a mixture between mediteranean and alpine-very common in Greece-but definitely not the Alfred fletchtheim semitic look. Straight nose, vertical forehead, full lips but no prognathism- and only lightly tanned definitely not brown on yellow-so still a white woman

    Back to dna-if one read geography of human genes one can see that essentially all indo European speakers are genetically one except for Indians who have substantial Asiatic admixture.

    Conlusion greek are not mongrelised-they are the rightful descendants of hellas- a mixture between Neolithic Europeans and aryans. Their near eastern farmer admixture has nothing to do with semites but with pre historic caucasoids which migrated from there when the climate was much like Europe.

  2. Purple Griffin
    18 April, 2019 at 1:25 pm — Reply

    To test the validity of this approach, the same procedure should be applied to various populations, then see whether and by how much the differences between the ancient bust modeling and any given modern population image composite are superior to that of this comparison.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.