David SimsEssays

Zero White Guilt

by David Sims

The following note was sent to someone who thinks that White people should apologize to the other races, and give to them ground and the right-of-way.

AMERICA SPENT the first 120 years of its history fighting Indians, not harmonizing with them. It spent almost as much of its early period keeping Blacks in slavery. And it was under those circumstances that America rose to eclipse the British Empire as the preeminent political power on Earth.

The United States was, essentially, a White country. White people ruled, and any others who were here learned to stay out of our way and at least pretend to be respectful. In 1900, White people were lords of the planet from pole to pole. Western Civilization was at or near its peak of power.

When the White pioneers came to the Americas, they found the Amerindian tribes, but they didn’t find them at peace with each other. The proposition that they were peaceful peoples before the White man came is one of the biggest lies ever told. They slaughtered each other for land and for game. By the time the Europeans arrived in the late 1500s, a great number of Amerindian tribes which had once existed had already been completely obliterated by other Amerindian tribes. The White pioneers saw how the game was played and joined it. And won.

No Amerindian can truthfully say that the White man did unto them what they had not already done unto others. So go peddle your self-hating White guilt to somebody gullible. I know better.

You’re a Marxian socialist, and that means you deceive yourself about unity. Before there can be a lasting political unity, there must be racial comity, a biological basis for a stable political order. A reason for man to regard the men around him as his brothers. And although White liberals claim that they can feel this for persons of other races, their choices about where to live and where to send their children to school usually prove that their words are false.

Racialist fascism and National Socialism attend to the necessary biological foundation of political unity, which puts politics on a firm, real, natural basis: on something more solid than words in the wind. The strangers are shown to the gate, and the gate is locked behind them. And then the national family can speak and act more freely than when the strangers had been in the kitchen, in the living room, in the bedrooms, and roaming the halls.

I see no reason to exterminate myself. I’m White, and I know my ancestry: primarily English/British/Scottish, then Irish, French, and German. That accounts for about 97% of my ancestors. The genetic spread among these groups is quite small, for all their differences in culture. I refer you to The History and Geography of Human Genes, by L. Luca Cavalli-Sforza, Table 5.5.1, on page 270 of the Abridged Paperback Edition.

Being “fair” to another group or individual, or whether that entity is innocent or not, isn’t the point. The survival of my people is the point, the greater moral concern.

One of the subjects on which you leftists presume to know more than you really do is morality. You think that fairness and justice are the highest values, and you are wrong. Morality is essentially survival behavior at the racial level; the highest value in any proper moral system is the survival of its practitioners. Why? Because what does not exist is worthless and what can’t exist for long isn’t worth much. Because nothing matters to the dead. Because neither truth, nor justice, nor freedom, nor prosperity have any value to extinct groups. Because only to something alive may anything else be good.

Is that too complicated for you to understand?

When you put fairness above the survival of your natural group, the people among whom you were born and with whom you share recent common ancestors, you do not behave morally, but rather immorally.

Rein in your cognitive dissonance and think for a moment.

I haven’t said that justice is bad, or that freedom isn’t important. Those are good things. But they aren’t the best things, because survival is better. Survival is better because it is a prerequisite to the value of any other thing. You can’t be free, unless first you are alive. You can’t be aware of truth if you are dead. You can’t be prosperous without having a heartbeat.

* * *

Source: Author

Previous post

Murder in the Cathedral, part 2

Next post

Lithuania: A Covid Pass Prison

Notify of
Inline Feedback
View all comments
16 October, 2021 9:41 am

A quote from the man who is purported to have the highest I.Q. in the world. And, yes he is White.

Art Thief
Art Thief
Reply to  Karen
18 October, 2021 12:06 pm

If it is shut down, we die. We should be thankful conservatives failed at that.

Reply to  Art Thief
18 October, 2021 1:07 pm


Conservatives failed at pretty much everything.

Art Thief
Art Thief
Reply to  Karen
19 October, 2021 9:00 am

Absolutely. I meant that was one thing in particular we should be glad they’ve failed at.

Oh Crap
Oh Crap
Reply to  Karen
20 October, 2021 12:39 am

I am sure there are plenty of women with higher IQs.

16 October, 2021 10:19 am

Many of the Indians sided with the Whites either to help fight their tribal enemies or get access to weapons and trade goods to get an advantage in their own fights against other tribes.

The Iroquois Confederacy was supposedly founded to keep the member tribes at peace with each other. I have to admit that the way the Confederacy was structured indicated a sophistication that you don’t see in pre-contact Africa.

17 October, 2021 9:24 am

Many years ago, I read a story of some battle in the French Indian war.
A female British or colonial was told to never try escaping again.
She did try and failed the horrific hours they spent torturing her, chopping off her female parts after cutting off her eyelids and scalping her. They inserted a cherry red stake up you know where.

These kinder gentler folk had a grand old time till a Whitey/French soldier one of those who had to watch, did her the kindness of blowing her brains out.
It had gone on so long she had gone mad.
The injuns were not happy

Rommel 41
Rommel 41
17 October, 2021 2:46 pm

Great “note”!! Very solid thinking on the firmest of (ideological) footing.
I would anticipate a lot of “But yes but Since I have pretty much
always been of the mind that we should win, that we should rule without
hesitation or apology, if for no other reason, somebody has gotta, I don’t
understand why there are always plenty – too many – fellow Whites eager
to please, to signal kindness and fairness and acceptance. Maybe I’m just
a mean guy, but I think these people should be ruled also, and especially
when they don’t want to stay out of the way. Are you still friends ?! :)

mortal goyal
mortal goyal
18 October, 2021 3:09 pm

damn- very well said.

nothing you wrote could possibly be contested. Ever. Exhilirating writing ….about the only subject matter on Earth that means a F$&K……

You , Mercer and Strom are on fire here lately .

Eric Ford
Eric Ford
19 October, 2021 4:29 am

Anyone who thinks whites should feel guilty are merely empathizing with the enemies of the white race. Guilt itself is merely a perception of a group who view another group or another person being against their benefit. Everything that whites have done throughout their history have always been for their benefit and whites shouldn’t apologize to their enemies who want to destroy them.