David SimsEssays

Feminism Is a Weapon

by David Sims

A QUESTION WAS ASKED on an online forum:

Have American women lost their femininity? It seems that traditional values are being construed as a subservient, oppressed life for a woman. Without these traditional traits in a woman, I don’t think a woman is a woman anymore. Men are going elsewhere to find these traits. Men will appreciate a woman and hold her on a high pedestal and appreciate her, if she is not mean and bossy. Anyways, the angry responses from women that I will get only reinforce the ugliness of their hearts.

You’re right, and the answers that you’ve been getting prove that most people just don’t get it. Or won’t get it: a stubborn refusal to see where things are going.

Even if what feminists really advocated were “fairness” and “equality” between the sexes, as they pretend it is, there would still be a problem. That problem is survival: staying alive in a natural world whose laws are beyond our power to change.

We are, at present, insulated by a technological culture driven by fossil fuel power. The energy we get from fossil fuels lets us substitute machines for human labor, technology for biology. We prop ourselves up, and then we forget that we are on props, which conceivably could fall and topple us all into whatever hazards we were being buffered from.

Because of technology, human flaws that would once have been pruned off by sexual selection no longer seem a reason for aversion. We become “tolerant,” and we tell ourselves that tolerance is a good thing.

What if fossil fuels run out? Now that so many of us can’t see without eyeglasses, what if we lose the ability to manufacture eyeglasses? Think also of diabetes and every other disease for which modern technology alone stands between humans and decimation.

There are times when you must choose between values, and at such times you must have those values correctly prioritized, such that you understand which of them is the greater, and which the lesser. You also must understand when people have generally gotten themselves out on a limb that might break at any moment, and that correctly prioritizing values requires taking precautions against an uncertain future.

Fairness is a good thing. But survival is a better thing because it is a prerequisite for the value of fairness to even exist. Nothing has any value to the dead. Only to something alive may anything else be good.

Cheating is generally bad. But if cheating is required for your survival, then you should cheat. The worst that can be done to you, if your cheating is discovered, is no worse than what Nature would have done to you if you hadn’t cheated when it was necessary for survival.

That’s as true for races as it is for people. In fact, it is more important for races, since individuals must die and there is no help for it, but races have at least a potential for immortality. Feminism is a ploy, a trick, ostensibly aimed at “fairness,” but in reality aimed at the destruction of the White race. See those White men, who have become disgusted with the common behavior of modern White women, seeking to marry foreign women? Do you think that move was unanticipated by the people who planned and crafted the feminist movement?

Those same people, or their cousins, also invented Marxism, which is another ploy. Although it is aimed at people a different way, its basic methodology is the same: Promise power to a part of the race to corrupt that part, in order to weaken the whole. With Marxism, the part is the working class. With feminism, the part is women. In both cases, the whole is a race (often the White race).

There is a racial predator in the world, and it is sneaky, clever, and able to create and carry out such multi-generational plans of attack. And you probably know who they are, too. You know what Karl Marx, Yakov Sverdlov, and Leon Trotsky had in common with Gloria Steinem, Betty Friedan, and Bella Abzug. Do I have to tell you?

As Orwell said, “The greatest power is that which can prevent its own mention.” So let’s try to stop playing the vindictive “fairness” game. Men and women aren’t natural enemies; we’ve only been tricked into acting that way. A natural enemy is not a matter of sex or socioeconomic class, but always of race. And that race which tries to prevent us from even mentioning their name is the Jews.

* * *

Source: Author

Previous post

The Antitoxin

Next post

Jews Are Special

Notify of
Inline Feedback
View all comments
7 February, 2022 6:46 am

The Jews boast of their chief role in foisting feminism upon the West.

WN lady
WN lady
7 February, 2022 2:27 pm

This comes across as ‘White men race mix because White women dropped the ball.’ One thing we will not do is compete against non-white women over White men. Been there, done that; found it is a game that cannot be won. Whites who mix do so because they have an attraction to non-whiteness. Otherwise, we could say that White women mix because White men have failed in some way or are comparatively inferior, and this is not true. White men have done nothing wrong and are not lacking in any way. These potential mixers have probably always existed, but could do no damage because they lacked opportunity and mixing was not normalized. Pro-family values are always better for White women, but they will not sway those chomping at the bit… Read more »

Wolf Stoner
Wolf Stoner
Reply to  WN lady
9 February, 2022 1:15 am

Yes, there should be no justification for race-mixing, be it men or women. Race-mixing is on par with zoophilia in moral respect but even worse in its results.

Reply to  WN lady
11 February, 2022 10:01 pm

“Whites who mix do so because they have an attraction to non-whiteness.”-
i would disagree on this. Most of it comes from outward influence on children’s minds and lack of teaching by parents and quite possibly additives to the water supply.
Think it coincidence that obama before he left decreased fluoridation to city waters and what not 2-4 yrs later cities erupt? Think it strange suburb peoples and all peoples use so much parasite(jew) poison called “pills” and people mainly white folk are docile lab rats to the hoards? It’s proven fact that water treatment facilities DO NOT filter out the “excess” pharmacea urinated out by humans.

Jim - National Alliance Staff
Jim - National Alliance Staff
8 February, 2022 12:08 am

At White biocentrism, this very topic was addressed in an interview between Kevin Alfred Strom and Dr. William Pierce. Have a look: https://whitebiocentrism.com/viewtopic.php?f=25&t=343

14 February, 2022 3:43 am

It is no accident that the size of upper academia has exploded in order to create fake jobs for female professors. Think of Christine Ford-Blasey. A fake if there ever was one.

15 June, 2022 5:00 am

There is something I can’t figure out, say you find what appears to be a half-decent woman by today’s standards & you introduce a bit of yesterday, the female reacts with such strong aversion to putting her on a pedestal in any manner. Simple compliments & kind gestures are met with the same venomous words that spitting in their face would bring about (they might actually take spit in the face with less animosity). Romance? That for some inconceivable reason is met with the same behavior you’d expect from those who mistake kindness for weakness. The nausea inducing lack of feminine qualities amongst women is so pervasive in my state that it is an occasion to remember when you encounter one barely swatting at what one might consider attractive. The… Read more »