Kristallnacht as a Jewish False-Flag Operation

by Hadding Scott

[The audio clip contains some raw language; it should not be played by or in the presence of children. — Ed.]



There are three distinct major points here.

  1. The violence of Kristallnacht has been greatly exaggerated. (The canonical figure for deaths is not in the thousands as one might suppose, but only 91. Heinrich Haertle however says that the number was 35.)
  2. German authorities had strong reasons for not wanting such violence, and in fact took measures to stop it when they found out.
  3. A conspiracy of Zionist Jews instigated the violence so that the British government would not ban Jewish immigration to Palestine.

Points 1 and 2 are indisputable. Point 3 is somewhat speculative, but it answers the question of how violence could erupt throughout Germany all at once, contrary to the interests of the German government, without any organizing factor in view.

Of course, there must have been many German people angry at the Jews, not only for the assassination of their diplomat but for the hardships of the worldwide boycott against Germany organized by the World Jewish Congress in 1936. At the same time, however, riots do not erupt simultaneously in many places without organized instigation.

In the aftermath of Kristallnacht, the National-Socialist government made an effort to prevent repetition of such an event. Since Kristallnacht seemed to be an expression of the German people’s rage against the Jewish presence and especially Jewish commercial strength in Germany, the government sought to placate that rage and to prevent another such outburst. First, a large fine was imposed on Germany’s Jewish population to pay the cost of repairs. The National-Socialist government then bought Jewish-owned businesses so that they could be placed under non-Jewish ownership (aryanized), so that there would no longer be large numbers of Jewish-owned shops to provoke resentment. Under the Rublee Plan, adopted several months after Kristallnacht, every Jew under the age of 45 was expected to emigrate, and Jews who could not afford to emigrate received financial assistance to make it possible.

* * *

Source: National-Socialist Worldview

Previous post

Shakespeare: "This Sceptered Isle"

Next post

America Under the Jews' Heel: A Frankenstein Monster of Kitsch and Sanctimony


  1. JimB
    25 November, 2018 at 1:59 am — Reply

    War by deception. Lies are the Jews’ plows and causing war among the ‘goyim’ is their harvest. Our devastation is their elevation.

  2. Walt Hampton
    25 November, 2018 at 2:23 am — Reply

    This is an excellent view. I am now reading Irving’s
    “Hitler’s War,” that the view is consistent with what
    I have read so far. Why do the Jews hate Irving
    with such a passion? At this point, I do not know.
    However, I do know that when Jews jump all over
    something the way they have on Irving, it tells me
    the British historian must be onto something…..

    Stay tuned….

  3. Mr. Hilter
    25 November, 2018 at 12:51 pm — Reply

    March 30 1933 — Judea declares war on Germany. September 11 2001– Judea declares war on world.

  4. Norman de Geurre
    27 November, 2018 at 10:03 pm — Reply

    I hear what Hadding is saying regarding “non-violence”. Yet, the only alternative to that is “negotiation” or “voting” or “compromise”. I’m sorry, but you cannot compromise with the children of the adversary… nor can you live side-by-side with them in some pseudo dual state. They will ALWAYS strive to thwart and destroy you – for that is their essence. Therefore, “violence” in some sort or other is inevitable against them if we are to survive and thrive as a species… period.

  5. Walt Hampton
    28 November, 2018 at 1:33 pm — Reply

    Norman de Geurre has a point.

  6. Truthweed
    16 August, 2019 at 7:18 pm — Reply

    Seeing through the broken windows: Hitler’s provocation for Kristalnacht


    Ingrid Weckert’s research paper, ‘Crystal Night’ 1938: The great Anti-German spectacle’, presented to the Sixth International Revisionist Conference, exposes many factual inconsistencies in the orthodox version that blames either Hitler or Goebels for Kristalnacht in 1938. In fact, after their recent highly successful Olympic Games, they were appalled at the damage to Germany’s trade and its growing reputation as a tourist destination. They, the SA and police acted to prevent further destruction and to arrest the participants. Weckert mentions agent provocateurs stirring mobs against Jewish properties, making telephone calls under assumed identities to give false orders to attack Jewish properties, and includes an incident where ignorant men in bogus SS uniforms ordered an SA leader to arrest Jews – a preposterous circumstance similar to a politician’s security staff members ordering an emergency service volunteer member to arrest people.

    A few years before Kristalnacht, Hitler, compared his relatively peaceful revolution with those of France, Russia, Bavaria and Hungary and stated on several occasions that his revolution had “broken no windows”. It is reasonable to suggest that these well-known statements could have provided his opponents an opportunity to stage a false flag window-smashing operation to embarrass Hitler, sabotage his efforts to maintain peace internationally, and to attract sympathy for ‘his’ victims.

    Hitler’s speeches mentioning windows

    Reichstag, 30th January 1934: “When the Party took over power in Germany, after overthrowing the very formidable obstacles that had stood in its way, it did so without causing any damage whatsoever to property. I can say with a certain amount of pride that this was the first revolution in which not even a window pane was broken.”

    Thirteen Points’ Reichstag speech of 21, May 1935: “The rest of the world, however, whom we have done no wrong and whom we ask nothing but to be left to go our way in peace, has for months past been engaged in spreading lying reports and slander about us.
    During the time that a national revolution was taking place in Germany, which, unlike the French and Russian revolutions, did not indulge in human carnage or murder hostages, did not, as in the times of the rising in Paris and of the red revolutionaries in Bavaria and Hungary, destroy buildings and works of art by fire, but which, on the contrary, did not smash a single shop window, and neither plundered shops or damaged houses.”

    ‘The Model Revolution’, Munich, Putsch Anniversary, 1936: Contrasting his comparatively peaceful ascent against Spain’s violent revolution Hitler stated: “We have conquered our State without, I believe, the breaking of a window-pane. That was possible only thanks to thorough preparation and the building up of the Party . . . ”

    Walsh, M. The Triumph of Reason: The Thinking Man’s Hitler, A Michael Walsh Compilation., p.31.

    Weckert, I. ‘Crystal Night’, 1938: The great Anti-German spectacle’, Paper Presented to the Sixth International Revisionist Conference.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.