Classic EssaysWilliam Pierce

Anne Frank Hoax Exposed

Anne FrankClever Jew Made Millions from Dead Daughter

by Dr. William L. Pierce

TUCKED AWAY ON pages 119 and 122 of the October 6 issue of Der Spiegel, a weekly German news magazine comparable to Time or Newsweek, was a news item of considerable significance: A scientific analysis of the manuscript purported to be the original diary of Anne Frank, a Jewish girl who died in a German concentration camp during the Second World War, has revealed that the manuscript could not have been written before 1951, six years after the end of the war. (ILLUSTRATION: Anne Frank. She died of typhus in 1945 — but she didn’t write a diary.)

The significance of Der Spiegel’s revelation of this fraud is twofold. First, the printing of the story in a mass-circulation publication constitutes a major break with past treatments of similar news. The German news media, though not under the Jewish monopoly control which blights the media in this country, generally follow a pro-Jewish line, a heritage from the immediate postwar years when the Allied occupation forces gave publishing licenses only to those Germans who had proved their disloyalty to their country during the war. Consequently, most news tending to cast doubt on Jewish stories about gas chambers and the like from the World War II era has either been blacked out altogether or downplayed and given very unsympathetic treatment. The present article, though accompanied by copious apologies and held back for six months after it became news, would not have been printed at all a year or two ago.

Beyond this, the exposure of the Anne Frank forgery is important because of the sheer magnitude of the fraud and the key role it has played in underpinning the entire Jewish scenario of the war. What is known as a fact is that one Otto Frank, a Jewish merchant, formerly of Frankfurt, who had been arrested in the Netherlands and interned in the Auschwitz concentration camp during the war, began visiting publishers in 1946 with what he claimed was a diary written by his young daughter during the time the Frank family was hiding from the German police in occupied Holland. The girl later perished at Auschwitz, Frank said.

The diary, filled with touching adolescent reveries and homely little anecdotes, was exactly what the Jewish “Holocaust” propagandists were looking for: a highly effective piece of ammunition to generate a maudlin, emotion-laden sympathy for the poor, persecuted Jews — as typified by Anne Frank — and generate hatred against the wicked Germans, who had killed her and six million other Jews.

Otto Frank cashed in on the diary in a big way. Not only did he find a publisher, but he found people hot to buy stage and film rights as well. Shortly after its appearance in book form, the diary had been translated into a score of languages and printed in millions of copies, from all of which Frank received royalties. The English version alone, under the title Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl, has sold more than 4,000,000 copies to date. A television dramatization based on the diary was aired in this country last month, accompanied by the usual ballyhoo.

Almost from the beginning there were charges that the diary was a hoax. Some of these charges were based on the gross inconsistencies between various translations and editions of the diary in book form; it was clear that the text had been heavily edited to help it sell well in different markets. Other charges were based on internal inconsistencies and credulity-straining elements in the diary itself.

And then there was the matter of the script for the film version of the diary: Otto Frank was sued by a New York scriptwriter, Meyer Levin, who claimed that Frank had taken large portions of a script he, Levin, had written and had not paid Levin for his work. The court ordered Frank to pay Levin $50,000. One can easily understand why some observers began to wonder how much, if any, of the content of the various Anne Frank books, films, and plays in circulation was actually written by a little Jewish girl named Anne Frank.

Otto Frank, father of Anne, displays what he says is his daughter’s diary, written in 1942–1944 while hiding from the Gestapo. Recent scientific tests have proved the alleged diary could not have been written before 1951. Frank made millions from his forgery before his death this year.
Otto Frank, father of Anne, displays what he says is his daughter’s diary, written in 1942–1944 while hiding from the Gestapo. Recent scientific tests have proved the alleged diary could not have been written before 1951. Frank made millions from his forgery before his death this year.

In Germany, however, it was not wise to speculate about such matters publicly. The line laid down by the government and the media is that Anne Frank is gospel, and anyone who suggests otherwise leaves himself open to criminal charges (“defaming the victims of Nazi persecution”) as well as to civil suits. Otto Frank himself made a regular habit of hauling Anne Frank detractors into German courts, which invariably decided in his favor — until recently, that is.

When Hamburg pensioner Ernst Roemer, 76, began spreading the accusation that Otto Frank had himself written what he was passing off as his dead daughter’s diary, Frank sued him. As usual, the court upheld the authenticity of the diary. Handwriting experts testified that the entire diary, including loose notes and insertions, had been written by the same hand, and that hand was Anne Frank’s.

Roemer appealed the court’s decision against him, and more handwriting experts were called in. Their conclusion was the same: Everything in the diary was in the same handwriting; there was no forgery.

Roemer appealed again, and this time the court asked for the technical services of the Federal Criminal Office (Bundeskriminalamt, similar to our FBI), which carried out a careful analysis of the original manuscript of the diary with microscope and ultraviolet illumination in order to confirm its authenticity — in particular, to determine when it was written.

The report of the technical experts was given to the court in April of this year, and it contained a bombshell: large portions of the alleged “diary” were written in ballpoint pen ink — which was not manufactured prior to 1951!

Were it not for the previous testimony of the handwriting experts that the entire diary, including the portions written with ballpoint pen, is in the same hand, the father might have claimed that he only “edited” his daughter’s work, “clarifying” passages here and there. But the evidence was quite unambiguous.

For example, the testimony of Hamburg graphologist Minna Bekker in an earlier trial was: “The handwriting of the diary in the three bound volumes — including all notes and additions on the glued-in pages as well as the 338 pages of loose material — including all corrections and insertions is identical . . .”

Otto should have been more careful in his choice of writing instruments. It is now quite clear that he finished hoking up the “original” of the diary after he had found a publisher for what, in 1946, was nothing more than some rough notes and an idea in his head which seemed to have prospects for making him a lot of money with little effort. First a typescript for the publisher, and then, as sales of the book began to mount, a completed handwritten “original” to show to doubters.

Just after the report of the Federal Criminal Office was given to the court, Otto Frank conveniently died — before he could be asked a number of very interesting questions. Meanwhile, the worldwide Jewish propaganda apparatus has continued its promotion of the Anne Frank myth as if nothing had happened. Der Spiegel seems to be the only mass-circulation news periodical to have exposed the fraud to date.

 * * *

From Attack! No. 79, 1980, transcribed by Anthony Collins and edited by Vanessa Neubauer, from the book The Best of Attack! and National Vanguard, edited by Kevin Alfred Strom

For Further Reading

Previous post

What the Alliance Demands of Us

Next post

Learning to Get Along

100 Comments

  1. Jan Koen
    June 10, 2015 at 3:35 am — Reply

    GLAD THAT THE TRUTH IS COMING OUT!

  2. George Woj
    July 23, 2015 at 10:28 am — Reply

    but the ball point pen was released in 1888…

    • Zaraza
      December 17, 2016 at 7:56 pm — Reply

      not released

    • J.p
      April 2, 2017 at 10:36 pm — Reply

      It was patent in that year but it never made it to the market due to machinery for fabrications in those years prior to 1900′.

      Now it went into the market and went highly advertisded around 1940’s

    • razingcane2
      January 6, 2018 at 1:19 am — Reply

      Sorry bud, but Jon Loud’s pen patented in 1888 was never produced, and as he was a tanner, it was designed only to apply broad swaths of ink to leather hides, not relatively fine print for handwriting. None of the next 350 patents issued in the US for ballpoint pens over the next thirty years were ever produced either. The biggest problem was the ink: if too thin, pens leaked; too thick: they clogged.
      The next stage of development did not occur until 1935 (almost fifty years later) when two Hungarian brothers – -Ladislaw and Georg Biro – – tried their hand at making a commercially successful ballpoint but ultimately failed. Long story short: the ballpoint went through several iterations – some fairly successful – but it was not until 1949 that a guy named Frawley in the US and in 1952 that a guy named Marcel Bich in France produced mega-successful, low-priced reliable ballpoints, under the brand names “Papermate” and “Bic” (still called “Biro” in the UK), respectively. You can read a more detailed summary here: http://www.ideafinder.com/history/inventions/ballpen.htm
      I become more red-pilled Every Day. Found out Angela Merkel might be Jewish last week (http://tapnewswire.com/2016/02/confirmed-anti-german-parasite-angela-merkel-is-a-jew/) and taking out her vengeance on whites in Germany. She has not messed with Portugal and Switzerland because they remained neutral during WWII.

      BTW – it took me more time to type this than to look up the history of the ballpoint.

    • Haime Kykerman
      June 17, 2018 at 12:51 pm — Reply

      Time to expose the kikes — the holocaust just like the diary of Anne Frank is a farce, a lie, and a misleading manipulation. A zionist rabbi said it best “the holocaust is the most profitable piece of historic fiction” — it is time for the world to rise and expose the cancer that the kikes are and demand reparation for the 50 Million European civilians killed so they could justify stealing Palestine. These mongrels are NOT even middle eastern but khazarian criminals…. POGROMS are coming.

    • Lilu
      September 10, 2018 at 5:35 am — Reply

      GEORGE WOJ Do you not know the difference between ‘PATENT issued while ATTEMPTING to make (such a pen)’ VS ‘Succeeding at, MANUFACTURING & (MORE IMPORTANTLY) actually SUPPLYING & making available, to the masses the actual product’????

      Even when it did become available to the general (WEALTHY) public it was only so in Argentina & much later, ONLY in the U.S. By this time the war ‘Holocaust /Concentration Camps’ was OVER!!!!

  3. Bobby Lee
    July 24, 2015 at 3:38 pm — Reply

    The ballpoint pen, and the ink used in them, was invented in 188, you idiots.

    Regardless, she wrote in iron-rich fountain ink.

    No one has taken this theory seriously in decades.

    Except, of course, for idiots like you.

  4. Wry Dohson
    August 8, 2015 at 7:40 am — Reply

    He wouldn’t have been able to get one conveniently for a number of years. Unless you’re suggesting he/she made their own, Bobby Lee? It’s a Jewish tactic to insult before checking facts. You have proved you’re a dickhead, so I won’t insult you.

    The concept of using a ball point within a writing instrument as a method of applying ink to paper has existed since the late 19th century. In these inventions, the ink was placed in a thin tube whose end was blocked by a tiny ball, held so that it could not slip into the tube or fall out of the pen. The ink clung to the ball, which spun as the pen was drawn across the paper, therefore giving areas of the ball with its ink removed another coating.

    The first patent for a ballpoint pen[6] was issued on 30 October 1888, to John J. Loud,[7] a leather tanner, who was attempting to make a writing instrument that would be able to write on his leather products, which then-common fountain pens could not. Loud’s pen had a small rotating steel ball, held in place by a socket. Although it could be used to mark rough surfaces such as leather, as Loud intended, it proved to be too coarse for letter-writing. With no commercial viability, its potential went unexploited[1] and the patent eventually lapsed.[8] The manufacture of economical, reliable ballpoint pens as we know them arose from experimentation, modern chemistry, and precision manufacturing capabilities of the early 20th century.[3] Patents filed worldwide during early development are testaments to failed attempts at making the pens commercially viable and widely available.[9] Early ballpoints did not deliver the ink evenly; overflow and clogging were among the obstacles inventors faced toward developing reliable ballpoint pens.[4] If the ball socket were too tight, or the ink too thick, it would not reach the paper. If the socket were too loose, or the ink too thin, the pen would leak or the ink would smear.[4] Ink reservoirs pressurized by piston, spring, capillary action, and gravity would all serve as solutions to ink-delivery and flow problems.[10][11]

    László Bíró, a Hungarian newspaper editor frustrated by the amount of time that he wasted filling up fountain pens and cleaning up smudged pages, noticed that inks used in newspaper printing dried quickly, leaving the paper dry and smudge free. He decided to create a pen using the same type of ink.[4] Bíró enlisted the help of his brother György, a chemist,[4] to develop viscous ink formulas for new ballpoint designs.[3]

    Bíró’s innovation successfully coupled ink-viscosity with a ball-socket mechanism which act compatibly to prevent ink from drying inside the reservoir while allowing controlled flow.[4] Bíró filed a British patent on 15 June 1938.[1][12]

    In 1941, the Bíró brothers and a friend, Juan Jorge Meyne, fled Germany and moved to Argentina, where they formed Bíró Pens of Argentina and filed a new patent in 1943.[1] Their pen was sold in Argentina as the Birome (portmanteau of the names Bíró and Meyne), which is how ballpoint pens are still known in that country.[1] This new design was licensed by the British, who produced ballpoint pens for RAF aircrew as the Biro. Ballpoint pens were found to be more versatile than fountain pens, especially at high altitudes, where fountain pens were prone to ink-leakage.[4]

    Postwar proliferation[edit]

    Following World War II, many companies vied to commercially produce their own ballpoint pen design. In post-war Argentina, success of the Birome ballpoint was limited, but in mid-1945, the Eversharp Co., a maker of mechanical pencils, teamed up with Eberhard Faber Co. to license the rights from Birome for sales in the United States.[1][8]

  5. Maria
    October 18, 2015 at 1:52 pm — Reply

    Here is the link to the article in Der Spiegel:

    http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-14317313.html

  6. November 12, 2015 at 7:35 am — Reply

    Anne wrote about her life and those of her house mates in a diary about what they did during thier hiding years Plus what her family did before going into hiding and about her griends at school and the classes she took ASll four of her diaries about her life What was written after the haulocost came from other people who servived it If Anne wrote avout her life in a consintration camp she was lucky on who ever found the papers Now about life in a coconcintration camp came from those who wrote it down or got interviewed

    • mcadwell
      October 3, 2016 at 5:48 pm — Reply

      Anne Frank didn’t write in her diary during her time in the concentration camp. She only wrote in them when her family was hiding, before they were found. Miep Gies found Anne’s diary after Anne’s family was taken away and she kept the diaries and other papers Anne wrote until she gave them all to Anne’s father after he returned from the concentration camp where he was held.

  7. Glenn Willeford
    January 29, 2016 at 11:36 am — Reply

    Why am I not surprised?

  8. Martin D. McCoy
    May 17, 2016 at 10:27 am — Reply

    You ought to be ashamed of yourselves! To deny the death of 6 million people, including this precious little girl is absolutely horrid. The things that have been put forth in this article have been disproven over and over, but, if you hate Jews and contend that their is a “worldwide Jewish conspiracy” you can conveniently ignore FACTS.

    For those that are interested in the TRUTH, here is a link:

    http://www.hdot.org/en/learning/myth-fact/annefrank1.html

    You are a bunch of Nazi’s and ought to just disappear like 6 million Jews did.

    BTW, I am not a Jew, but a Baptist pastor.

    • Anthony Collins
      May 17, 2016 at 11:35 am — Reply

      This Christian pastor tells us that we should be ashamed of ourselves. Why? Because we reject historical lies, like those relating to the “Holocaust,” and also because we reject the alien and inverted morality that exalts and even worships Jews, that denigrates and demoralizes Whites, and that systematically promotes ethnomasochism and racial suicide. Really, this pastor should be ashamed of himself — ashamed of what he believes, of what he serves, and of what he has betrayed. Perhaps he should be put out to pasture or, less charitably, have a millstone tied around his neck and be cast into the sea.

      • Martin D. McCoy
        May 17, 2016 at 10:27 pm — Reply

        Sorry Anthony, but the BIBLE teaches that God’s chosen people, NATIONALLY AND RACIALLY are the Sons Of Abraham, the Jews. He said that he would bless them that blesses the Jews and that he would curse those who would curse the Jews.

        I will be the first to admit that the Jews have been a pain in the, you know, in many ways, but God chose them to bring the Messiah into the world and he still has a place for them in the end times.

        I know that you don’t believe in anything that I have said, but the Bible teaches about people like you would come in the last days and would persecute the Jewish people. So, you anti-Semitism is a fulfillment of Bible prophecy. I have dealt with some people like you and I do pity you because they are willingly blind to God’s Word.

        Here is a final comment; I know that you and your kind do not believe in the Holocaust, that you deny the murder of 6 million Jews. My question is this; how many people have to be killed to qualify for a “holocaust”? If only a million were killed, would you scream, “Gotcha!! The Holocaust is a hoax because “only” a million died.” Do you see the absurdity of a basic belief that the Jews didn’t really suffer during Hitler’s regime? Of course you don’t!!! It would be funny if people of your ilk would just wake up. When the Allies got to Aushwitz, Buchenwald and the other death camps, there were thousands of unburied bodies lying around that had to be buried with a bulldozer. THOUSANDS!! And that was just at the very end of the war, there were millions who were killed and there is MUCH evidence that attest to that FACT.

        • Anthony Collins
          May 18, 2016 at 2:54 am — Reply

          This reply might be regarded, by those who do not read with the eye of faith, as an object lesson regarding Judeo-Christianity and the alienation it induces in its victims and agents. We find blind faith in a Jewish book and in Jewish fables. We find Judeocentrism and alienation from one’s own people.

          (The word alienation can refer to “a withdrawing or separation of a person or a person’s affections from an object or position of . . . attachment” as well as “a conveyance of property to another.” This is appropriate, given that the former is frequently followed by the latter.)

          I don’t feel like commenting on this reply in great detail, but I will make a few comments.

          Of course the Bible says that the Jews are “God’s chosen people,” for the simple reason that Jews wrote it. There’s no good reason why any goy should accept this conceited belief, or be intimidated by threats that God would curse those who curse the Jews, or believe that the Bible is “God’s word.” And given that the Gospel states that the Jews were responsible for the death of Jesus Christ (“His blood be on us and our children”), one wonders why a Christian should believe that the contract (“covenant”) between God and the Jews has not been rescinded. Furthermore, given the viciousness with which the Jews have attacked, and continue to attack, Christianity and Christians, one wonders why Christians have a masochistic compulsion to turn the other cheek to the Jews. (It’s true that I’m highly critical of Christianity, but I don’t do so in the spirit of goy-bashing that animates Jewish hostility towards Christianity.)

          I’m amused by the comment that folks like me “would come in the last days and would persecute the Jewish people,” just like the Bible supposedly predicts. But seriously, is anti-Semitism a fulfilment of “Bible prophecy” and a sign of the end times? No, it is largely a reaction to Jewish behavior, which is why it has accompanied the Jews in all places and all times.

          As a Christian, this pastor might regard White racialism as horrid, wicked, pagan. I believe there were Catholics who denounced National Socialist racialism as “the idolatry of race.” (I think this was the case with Pope Pius XII and G. K. Chesterton.) But many Christians effectively deify the Jewish people.

          This isn’t the place to discuss the “Holocaust” in detail, but I will say that I don’t believe there was a systematic effort to exterminate the Jews on the part of the National Socialist government of Germany. And I don’t see why White people should snivel and sob and mourn about six million dead Jews, yet be practically ignorant about the sufferings of their own people in wars and revolutions, some of which were instigated by Jews (notably the Bolshevik Revolution). The patently cynical way in which Jews use the “Holocaust” is reason enough to discount “Holocaust” propaganda.

        • GeneralT
          May 22, 2016 at 6:01 pm — Reply

          Actually, the Bible does not say that at all about the Jews.

          In Matthew 21: 42,43, Jesus himself says to the nation israel: “Jesus said to them (the chief priests and the older men of the Jews in Jerusalem): ‘Did you never read in the Scriptures, “The stone that the builders rejected is the one that has become the chief cornerstone. From God this has come to be, and it is marvelous in our eyes”? This is why I say to you, The kingdom of God will be taken from you and be given to a nation producing its fruits.’” So Jesus clearly says to the jews that kingdom will be taken from them, and be given to another nation.

          In Matthew 23:37,38, He also states: “Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the killer of the prophets and stoner of those sent forth to her,—how often I wanted to gather your children together, the way a hen gathers her chicks together under her wings! But you people did not want it. Look! Your house is abandoned to you.”

          In Acts 15; 14, The new nation is identified: Symeon has related thoroughly how God for the first time turned his attention to the nations to take out of them a people for his name. 15 And with this the words of the Prophets agree*, just as it is written: 16 ‘After these things I will return and raise up again the tent of David that is fallen down; I will rebuild its ruins and restore it, 17 so that the men who remain may earnestly seek God, together with people of all the nations, people who are called by my name, says Iehovah, who is doing these things, 18 known from of old.

          And you are totally wrong with the “seed of abraham”. In the Bible it says: Gal 3, 27-29: “All of you who were baptized into Christ have put on Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor freeman, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one person in union with Christ Jesus. Moreover, if you belong to Christ, you are really Abraham’s seed, heirs with reference to a promise.” (So, from God’s standpoint, it is no longer natural descent from Abraham that determines who are Abraham’s seed.)

          * Jeremiah. 31:31-34: “‘Look! There are days coming,’ is the utterance of YHWH, ‘and I will conclude with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah a new covenant . . . And they will no more teach each one his companion and each one his brother, saying, “Know YHWH!” for they will all of them know me, from the least one of them even to the greatest one of them,’ is the utterance of YHWH.” (That new covenant was made, not with the nation of natural Israel, but with the loyal followers of Jesus Christ to whom hope of heavenly life was being extended. When instituting the Memorial of his death, Jesus gave them a cup of wine and said: “This cup means the new covenant by virtue of my blood.” (1 Cor. 11:25)

          As of your other discussion, i dont have anything to say. I just saw a documentary on tv, and Googled it. then this page came up. and i just scrolled down to the coments field to see how its goin.

        • June 3, 2016 at 4:12 pm — Reply

          If you believe as a Pastor in a God that is a racist one, than You clearly bow to Lucifer as your God. The 6 Million victims story is so old and overused that a person with a sane mind will question it.

        • Gonçalo Costa
          June 5, 2016 at 5:00 pm — Reply

          God’s chosen people are not snakes. He showed us who he condemned: beasts and animals who lack his Grace. These people are the jews, what with their cheating and usury. The carrion birds of humanity.
          Jesus said this of the jews, in the Gospel of Saint John, chapter VIII, verse 44: “Ye are of your father the devil, and the lust of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is not truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar and the father of it.”

        • Zebo
          June 26, 2016 at 11:00 am — Reply

          Well Pastor.
          Let me tell you this(and i’m from muslim origin and for sure not religious
          and i share nothing with some white movements):

          Lying is against the ten commandements.
          Therefore stop doing so.
          1)According to the bible the jews lost their status of being gods chosen.

          2)Then god came down as jesus to set things right and he took away jewish supremacy status by declaring christians as gods true followers.
          And if you believe in christ and the bible than you are part of the chosen,not the jews.
          If you think the jews are than become a jew.

          3)please stop with this mystik and kabbalistik 6 million crap.
          Years before World War 2 jews have been already talking several
          about a holocaust and 6 million jews been killed.
          Try to find out how many times.
          3a)In the beginning of the 6 million legend(ca.50 years ago)
          a sign was built in Auschwitz stating that 4 million people have been killed there.
          Some years later the sign was changed and the number reduced to
          >2million,
          today there is a sign there saying 1 million people have been killed in Auschwitz.
          You see-3 million people less killed that they said 40-50 years ago,but
          the death toll is still six million.
          Jewish math:6 mio – 3 mio = 6 million.
          Strange isn’t it.

          And even this number does not add up.
          Just take the number of ovens in Auschwitz,consider that you needed 8 hours to burn a body and find out how many people could have been burned in Auschwitz-you will realise the number is very low and you will
          get close to the official red cross auschwitz numbers of 1947=290.000.

          And then ask yourself:
          How could have Hitler killed 6 mio. when just 3-3.5million jews
          have been living in german occupied and/or controlled territory.
          And BTW ,even if 10 mio jews would have been living in Germany ,
          there was no chance in Hell for Hitler to kill 6mio of them.

          The jews have been kicked out and persecuted for more than 100 times
          in History,from russia to china,from Europe to africa-they are the best experienced in such things and they know very well when it is time for them to run away,espacially as they are well educated and top connected.

        • Warren
          January 27, 2017 at 12:44 pm — Reply

          God’s chosen people are the Christians. This is what the Bible says:

          JOHN 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
          JOHN 3:17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.
          JOHN 3:18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.

          • Denise
            August 9, 2017 at 8:50 pm

            Quickly, without elaborating, it baffles me that a pastor teaches that that the chosen ones who denied Jesus as the messiah are still chosen. It seemed to me that status changed by denying Jesus as their Messiah. I thought it was that simple.

        • May 5, 2017 at 6:57 pm — Reply

          The jews stole every idea they’ve been flogging from others, including Akhenaten, who’s notion of one supreme god – and a male one! – was blissfully swallowed whole by the pernicious jews. Any wonder they’ve been hated for thousands of years? Dumped out of at least 100 states since their jealousy of each other had them sell that filthy kid in his disgusting coat to the leading nation at the time: the Egyptians!
          “God” has been promoting his people this way?

          • Anthony Collins
            May 6, 2017 at 1:32 am

            It is a mistake to say that the Jews have stolen every idea they’ve peddled from others. They’re definitely parasites, but they’re not lacking in a certain creativity, and we shouldn’t underestimate them. On this point, I have thought of applying the ideas on “malevolent creativity” in David H. Cropley and Arthur J. Cropley’s book, Creativity and Crime: A Psychological Analysis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013), to the Jews. Cropley and Cropley write (pp. 15-16):

            “Malevolent creativity is probably most obvious in the case of high-level, cerebral, white-collar offending that is remote from everyday life, such as financial swindles involving ingenious and complex machinations, sweeping vision, and ‘creative accounting’; see, for instance, the case of Enron. Indeed, we will pay particular attention to fraud . . . because it is here that the role of ingenuity, making of unexpected associations, the courage to try something novel, and the like in being a better criminal are most obvious. However, malevolent creativity is also seen in offences that touch the day-to-day life of relatively ordinary people, ranging from shop theft, burglary, and robbery to murder and, ultimately, terrorism. Our interest goes beyond ‘dramatic’ crime and also encompasses the application of creativity to relatively everyday offences.

            “Introducing the concept of malevolent (actually having harmful intent) and benevolent (beneficial intent) creativity expands the available classifications of creativity, including those representative of the dark side, from two categories (positive-negative) to four (deliberately good, deliberately bad, unintentionally bad and — difficult to imagine in practice, but theoretically possible — unintentionally good). This categorisation serves a purpose that is more than merely technical. In particular, it makes it possible to turn attention from the output of the creative process or activity alone to the motivation of the generator of the novelty and the process itself. When a creative process, for example, the development of a novel form of terrorist attack (like the attacks on 9/11), results in an outcome that is undeniably negative, it can now be further examined and an attempt made to understand the intent of the actor(s). Where the intent is deliberately to cause harm to others, as was the case on 9/11, the label ‘negative’ creativity is replaced with consciously malevolent creativity. The terrorists in question set out to create a novel ‘solution’ to their problem that would, if it were successful, undeniably and without any shadow of doubt, result in the deaths of many innocent people and the widespread destruction of property.

            “This negative outcome was not the result of an accidental set of circumstances, nor was it an unfortunate by-product of some other activity, both of which might cause us to label it as failed benevolence (good intent, bad outcome). Because it was both novel and effective, it was creative, and because of the nature of the intent it was not merely negative creativity, but consciously malevolent creativity. Similarly, when benevolent intent results in a positive outcome or product, then the label positive creativity is replaced with consciously benevolent creativity . . . However, addition of the factor intent also now acknowledges the possibility that malevolent intent may, serendipitously, result in a positive outcome. In this latter case we would now use the label failed malevolence.”

            The Jews, of course, like to present their consciously malevolent creativity as consciously benevolent creativity (tikkun olam and all that). Indeed, inverting values is a fundamental part of the Jewish modus operandi.

      • sohelalam
        November 25, 2017 at 5:57 am — Reply

        very good and logical refutation of pasture moron, kudoz

    • Troy
      August 4, 2016 at 6:55 pm — Reply

      Martin, you are a judeo-Christian waste of breath…I challenge you, please show me where in the Bible God EVER SAID THE JEWS WERE HIS CHOSEN PEOPLE…and please while you’re at it, please show me where JESUS CHRIST EVER SAID HE WAS A JEW…
      Isrealites do not = Ashkanazi/Kahzar Jews…

      • conspiracyPsa64
        October 8, 2017 at 9:01 pm — Reply

        You are CORRECT!

    • Stephen
      December 6, 2016 at 11:15 am — Reply

      Shame on you, “Baptist pastor,” for suggesting anyone “ought to disappear.”
      For one thing, that’s not what Christ taught. What is wrong with you?
      Secondly, two wrongs don’t make a right.
      But that assumes those who expose fraud to be wrong.
      That’s the kind of bullying and threats that are used to maintain the hoax. It’s called ad hominem, but what does logic have to do with religion? We don’t have to use it, do we?
      By the way, Mr. Holocaust Nazi, since you use Nazi tactics, plurality is not denoted by an apostrophe.

    • zaeaza
      December 17, 2016 at 8:11 pm — Reply

      Why are you jumping to such conclusions? It is not about 6 mil Jews killed during the war, it’s about somebody who found a way to make money and it may very well be Anne’s father. Why can’t this be scrutinized ? The fact that they were Jews should not be in the way of truth. It is known a lot about Zionist program and how they paved their way to victory. Anne’s diary was one tool among other. Hitler killed indiscriminately , how many more millions beside the 6 million? Stalin killed 20 mil of his own people. In the US the Japanese Americans were sent to internment camps during the same war and so were the Germans, twice. The Chinese went through terrible times and discrimination.

    • fdgdfg
      January 23, 2017 at 11:49 am — Reply

      Actually only 275000 people died, not 6 million.

    • Donna
      April 8, 2017 at 8:21 am — Reply

      and what are your sources ?

      • Matthias
        October 5, 2017 at 6:47 am — Reply

        Maybe the Red Cross as they were inspecting the Work Camps, concentration camps were invented by the Brits during the Boer war killing innocent women and children and nicely used by the Americans for German and Japanese during the war. Of course these are all lies because Germans are barbarians, forgot that.
        Btw. “The bar-rune refers to the birth, life, origin, the birth of the spirit, the bard, the fountain, and the feminine symbol of the stretcher, which conveys security and everything that protects encompasses, cherishes, and conceals, for example: the pregnant mother’s womb, the mother’s womb of the earth, the primal mother. Boer is called the peasant in the Edda, Bur and Büer still today in the vernacular and in the Dutch or Flemish. Bavarian and Bojer, both go back to the bar. The from the Roman view supposedly meant barbarian, is the “bar-bar”, which is, in fact, twice born, the ever-recurring God’s son. Wuotan’s father is Borr, who was a son of Buri” taken from ‘Germania’s pure Soul’, 2016 hope the translation from German is any good.

      • Rainman
        August 3, 2018 at 5:51 pm — Reply

        The actual daily death record books were found in an archive (I dont remember which archive) and they show the report for every single day Auschwitz was in operation and they list the reason for the deaths each day. The totals are in the thousands not in the millions.

    • May 5, 2017 at 6:44 pm — Reply

      Binjamin Wilkomirski in his FRAGMENTS should be considered a saint! A SAINT OF LIARS, that is! Vaunted moron Jonathan Kozol claimed revoltingly he ” wasn’t worthy to even review” BW’s fantasy. Otto and Annie fall into the same pit. Add Debbie there and you have the Augean triplets par excellence, ready to sweep the truth into the polluted sea!!

    • EUROPA CHRISTIANA
      June 11, 2017 at 11:04 am — Reply

      “You are a bunch of Nazi’s and ought to just disappear like 6 million Jews did
      BTW, I am not a Jew, but a Baptist pastor.”

      — Something is telling me you’re not a “baptist pastor”, otherwise you wouldn’t have wished that 6 million people dissapear. Pastors, which are Christ’s followers, do not want 6 million people dissapear just because their opinion differ from theirs.
      — One can notice you’re an illiterate scumbag.
      Instead of writing “you’re a bunch of Nazi’s” you should learn that “Nazi” in this context does not need the Genitive ( possesive) Case. So, you should have written:” you’re a bunch of Nazis” – and not Nazi’s !!
      —- We can all notice that you’re a hater, which means you’re a jew. jews hate Truth, jews hate Christians, especially if these Christians are White, nice looking, rich and intelligent.

    • steven ransom
      August 3, 2017 at 8:20 am — Reply

      you are fervently reciting ‘rote’ knowldge. you have been taught what to think but not how. history is written by the winners and our minds are shaped and bent and twisted accordingly. you are drawing upon nothing but what your teachers and media have fed you and your emotions too are ruling your responses.

    • Duggy
      September 6, 2017 at 9:38 pm — Reply

      For u to say 6 million died proves your ignorance. That fraudulent number was admitted to when the plaque at Aushwitcz was changed from 4 million dead to 1.5 million. What rocket scientist did those calculations? Off by 2.5 million?
      That brings the lie down to 3.5 million without looking further. But for time sake, the Red Cross documents show their estimates at 120,000 total killed in camps. Wow, what a big difference. Then u can expose the lampshade liars and shrunken Head liars and soap liars so you wonder what else is a lie? However, it is a crime in many countries to question the holohoax. With all the previous shown lies wouldn’t it make sense we should research it further? Funny, the truth fears no investigation. Guess what? Lies fear investigation.

    • Mike
      October 27, 2017 at 3:01 pm — Reply

      There were as many non-Jews killed in Concentration camps (if the figures are to be believed) so why do you only mention ‘six million Jews’? You get on your high horse about them, but not the similar figure of non-Jewish victims. Still, I suppose repeating the same old ‘six million Jews’ mantra makes for a nice little sound bite.

    • GCPR
      October 30, 2017 at 3:26 pm — Reply

      No offense, but regardless if it’s true or not, one thing that is definitely confirmed is that there is no way 6 million jews were killed during the holocaust.

  9. Angel
    June 12, 2016 at 12:10 pm — Reply

    The ballpoint pen part is so funny because they where invented in 1888 but had no viability. The ballpoint pen first commercialised was invented by two people living in Germany in 1941, but they really began to produce it in Argentina, when they moved there to start the company. Soo, for a Jewish girl hiding in a basement wouldn’t be expensive but almost impossible because it wasn’t well known until 1945. Getting food in war times is hard — but ballpoint pens from a small company in Argentina, not a problem.

    • Cat
      October 4, 2016 at 6:59 pm — Reply

      They weren’t hiding in a basement. That would have been a luxury. No one below to hear a footstep, a toilet flush, smelling cooking that could only be vaguely connected to an area, and providing supplies would have been much simpler, as it would make sense for staff to go to the basement (under the guise of getting supplies) instead of waiting until after hours and climbing awkwardly up a hidden staircase to minister to the persecuted families.

      If you’re going to dispute the facts, for the love of God, get the actual indisputable facts correct.

  10. maryann rowand
    August 4, 2016 at 7:12 pm — Reply

    I REALLY FEEL SORRY YOU PEOPLE YOU ARE CLUELESS, UNEDUCATED AND HAVE NO SOUL

  11. Mea Cadwell
    September 12, 2016 at 9:54 am — Reply

    The ballpoint pen aspect is moot because experts have studied the diary and found it to be real. So, unless anyone on this board has a degree in that curriculum, and you actually studied the original diary pages, it would be very difficult for anyone else to believe what you say against the experts. The article below explains who the experts were and why there were ball point pen marks on some of the papers.

    http://www.nytimes.com/1989/06/08/books/an-authenticated-edition-of-anne-frank-s-diary.html

    • stephen
      December 6, 2016 at 11:24 am — Reply

      Again they use of Anti-semitism as ad hominem: The author states ”Ever since her book first came out after the war, individuals and groups have made statements and issued anti-Semitic pamphlets claiming it was a hoax.”

      • Mea
        December 20, 2016 at 11:16 pm — Reply

        Ah, then you must be an expert. Please let us all know what university you attended and when you acquired your diploma in that curriculum. Otherwise, what you say means nothing.

        • John
          January 25, 2017 at 4:04 pm — Reply

          Mama Mea, buying into mainstream academia as trusted source means selling out to the central bank cabal and corporate ilk that own it all. Do they own you too?

          • Mea
            January 25, 2017 at 7:40 pm

            I am not your mother, kindly do not call me “mama”. And I am not “buying into mainstream academia”. However, it is quite clear that you have bought into the false beliefs that are being purported as true. Please, open your eyes and broaden your own research on this topic so you can discover for yourself that there is more to it than the limited scope you have allowed yourself. You will be amazed at what you find and wonder why it took you so long to do so.

            I am done answering the irresponsible people on this board as they are unable to grasp the truth and refuse to do their own research, relying on prejudiced information. I hope you all have a great time of things when you do learn the truth.

          • John
            January 27, 2017 at 12:15 pm

            MEA, mama came from the heart. Feel attacked by it? Gotta check that. And lies do not come from the heart. Lies lie only in head-trips. (Meaning lies are psychological). Mixed with unbridled pride, and resilient conformity ensues. Not motherly by any stretch. Follow on, then!

    • Phoenix
      June 13, 2017 at 1:17 pm — Reply

      That article leaves out the fact that her penmanship looked nothing like how she wrote. Secondly, anyone with a IQ over 5 can see the propaganda within the article alone. They immediately attribute anyone who questions the Anne Frank diary or the holocaust as a neo-Nazi, which is simply not true. One does not need to be a Nazi to observe the inconsistent data about the holocaust or even the anne frank diary. The article you linked has no merit due to its clear attempt at discrediting anyone who questions these events as a neo-Nazi. An article based on facts would not need to result or make attempts to discredit its opposition by defamation.

    • Destroyer Of Planet Z.O.G. 14/88
      July 19, 2017 at 11:55 pm — Reply

      The experts are Jewish…. why would any of us believe them? So, you haven’t proven anything either with your Jewish manipulation.

  12. SweetScience
    October 2, 2016 at 5:54 pm — Reply

    “During a criminal trial for defamation against neo-Nazis held in Wiesbaden, West Germany, in 1980, Mr. Barnouw said, the defendants maintained that the diary was a fake because corrections had been made in black, blue and green ink with a ballpoint pen and that such pens were not produced until 1951. The defendants could not produce any examples of such corrections, however. Mr. Barnouw noted that changes in the diary by Otto Frank, Anne’s father, were made in pencil.

    Although the ballpoint theory was discredited, it continued to be used by neo-Nazis in Europe and the United States. “

  13. Arthur Robey
    October 4, 2016 at 7:57 pm — Reply

    Stalin saved millions of Russians by quietly assinating his jewish Bolshevik co-conspirators who were
    A) responsible for 25 million Ukranian death by starvation in the Holodamor and
    B) responsible for holding the Mongols back in the invasion of Germany for the express policy of raping all German women 8 to 80 as an attempt at Genocide.

    Go cry me a river Jews.

    • October 5, 2016 at 3:09 pm — Reply

      Joseph Stalin (actually Dzhugashvili) was half Jewish, according to the Russian researcher Gregory Klimov. The Jew David Weissman claims he was wholly Jewish. (B’nai B’rith Messenger, 3rd of March 1950, p. 19.)
      The Jewish doctor and publicist, Salomon Schulman, admitted in Sweden that Stalin could speak Yiddish and referred to the Yiddish language periodical Di Goldene Kayt (1962) as his source. This was revealed during a meeting between Stalin and the Jewish poets Abraham Sutzkever and Shlomo Mikhoels (commissary for propaganda). Sutzkever discussed problems of Yiddish culture, with which Stalin was familiar. Sutzkever
      spoke Yiddish and Stalin understood everything but preferred to answer in Russian. The fact that Stalin understood Yiddish was one of the Soviet Union’s most jealously guarded state secrets. Stalin became a fairly obedient tool of the international financial elite. Lazar Kaganovich made sure he followed all important directives. Stalin allowed no anti-Semitism at the beginning. He had an article about the most efficient ways to combat anti-Semitism published in Pravda (No. 41) in February 1929. Lazar’s sister Roza became Stalin’s new wife and thereby also an Esther of the Jews, following the example of the Old Testament. – He changed Jews with other Jews in high position nd it is called by the msm Stalin´s antisemitism. And gullible people like you are duped and support their narrative they were again victims. Read this book: Juri Lina – Under the sign of Scorpio. You will find much more details about this.

      • German historian
        March 5, 2017 at 5:55 am — Reply

        Dzugasvili means the man from Dugan, an island in Iran see, were lived in 1843 a number of 30000 Iran jews, without any hope of better living circumstances beside their own produced grocery on the island, no other Irans lived their. So they decided to leave their home and got all over the world, to the US, to Russia, to somewhere else. Stalins grandfather with his father as a child came with some hundred Iran jews from Dugan isle to the Georgian subtropic valley in 1843, where they could settle and thats why the got the Georgian name ending “vili” connecting to the name of their isle, Dugan.

  14. Zenna
    December 17, 2016 at 9:58 am — Reply

    How can somebody in their situation use ball point pen ? She must have had a serious stock for being able to write such a big diary…

    • Cat
      December 17, 2016 at 2:51 pm — Reply

      Do you buy five years of writing instruments at a time? Don’t be an ass.

      They were hiding above Otto Frank’s business, above the office, in the attic, and received supplies from the workers there. Compared to food and clothing and other necessities, writing materials were probably relatively plentiful.

      • Zaraza
        December 17, 2016 at 7:39 pm — Reply

        If I am an ass you are the hole! We are talking 1940s when Walmart did not exist. It was a big problem to find a potato let alone ballpoint pens! Do you hear yourself? What factories could afford to produce ballpoint pens when most of the factories in Germany were making guns? However
        Actually at that time there were no such writing instruments in Germany. Do your homework.
        The story begins in 1888 when John Loud, an American leather tanner, patented a roller-ball-tip marking pen. Loud’s invention featured a reservoir of ink and a roller ball that applied the thick ink to leather hides. John Loud’s pen was never produced, nor were any of the other 350 patents for ball-type pens issued over the next thirty years. The major problem was the ink – if the ink was thin the pens leaked, and if it was too thick, they clogged. Depending on the temperature, the pen would sometimes do both.
        The next stage of development came almost fifty years after Loud’s patent, with an improved version invented in Hungary in 1935 by Ladislas Biro and his brother, Georg. When World War II broke out in Europe, a few years later, the Biros fled to Argentina, stopping in Paris along the way to patent their pen.Unfortunately, the pens were a spectacular failure. In an attempt to corner the market, the Eberhard Faber Company paid the Biro brothers $500,000 for the rights to manufacture their ballpoint pen in the United States. By 1952 Bich was ready to introduce his new wonder: a clear-barreled, smooth-writing, non-leaky, inexpensive ballpoint pen he called the “Ballpoint Bic.
        http://www.ideafinder.com/history/inventions/ballpen.htm

        • Cat
          December 17, 2016 at 10:35 pm — Reply

          Yep, I did my homework. I can read Wikipedia, too.

          I don’t give a flying fuck what your feelings are on the subject. I’m just saying, if you’re hiding above an office deemed necessary to the war effort in an occupied country, you’re probably not starving for writing materials. Make of that what you will.

          I’m not sure how proving the existence of a viable ballpoint pen proves if Anne wrote the diary herself or not. Maybe it was a work of fiction, put forth as genuine, to illustrate the plight of Jews in hiding went through during the war.

          Remember when they tried telling everyone Blair Witch was real? New subject, new era.

          • Zenna
            December 19, 2016 at 11:41 pm

            Did I say how I feel about it ? No. I clarified the non-existence of ballpoint pen at the time Anne, supposedly wrote the journal. The article says: “The report of the technical experts( the Federal Criminal Office – Bundeskriminalamt ) was given to the court in April of this year, and it contained a bombshell: large portions of the alleged “diary” were written in ballpoint pen ink — which was not manufactured prior to 1951!”
            Anne could not have used a ballpoint pen to write the journal, so if she didn’t, who did and why?
            This is not about “the plight of the Jews” it is about fraud. Should we close the eyes and accept a lie just because it comes from famous Anne Frank ? It is double shameful to use “the plight of the Jews” as an excuse for cheating the whole world.

  15. New Testament
    January 23, 2017 at 12:00 am — Reply

    Why Jews didn’t join other nations civilians in a fight against fascism ? It seems all they did was hiding like the rats. Christians were risking their lives to hide Jews and also went to war to fight, while Jews were writing diaries.
    And what kind of father is Mr Frank to rush and publish the diary soon after his daughters death? Anna Frank dairy is a well advertised fairy tale. She might be even alive somewhere in America. Pathetic people.

    • Zaraza
      January 25, 2017 at 12:22 pm — Reply

      Correct, Anna Frank is part of the same propaganda initiated by the Zionists to support their new artificial state Israel.It was the same with the ever increasing numbers of victims at Auschwitz and other labor camps where all kind of people died not only Jews.
      Israel state was created in a rush on very confusing and vague terms infringing of Palestinian rights to a country.

  16. Cheyenne
    March 28, 2017 at 9:38 pm — Reply

    How pathetic that there are still people denying the Holocaust (otherwise, why would a girl’s diary threaten you so much? Even if the diary was fake–which it is not–that would not change the truth of the Holocaust). Why does it hurt your sensibilities so much to admit the atrocities of humankind–slavery, the Holocaust, etc?
    Are you trying to hide from the fact that European Christians have committed many/most of these atrocities?
    You remind me of the weirdos who also believe we never went to the moon–or, better yet, who believe 9/11 was faked–or an inside job.
    So sad that hatred and paranoia rather than love and compassion drive your lives. It is this hatred and paranoia that feeds things like slavery, murder, and genocide. History will repeat itself when we refuse to see the truth. People like you hold the human race back from progressing. Think about it.

    • Anthony Collins
      March 30, 2017 at 7:23 am — Reply

      The comment above is full of what I call kumbaya claptrap, and its writer is infected with mental AIDS.

      I don’t feel threatened by the fraudulent diary of Anne Frank, any more than I feel threatened by other works of Holocaust fiction, like those of the late Elie Wiesel, who once wrote of an alleged massacre of Jews at Babi Yar, “Later, I learn from a witness that, for month after month, the ground never stopped trembling; and that, from time to time, geysers of blood spurted from it.” There have never been geysers of blood, but there are gushers of lies, namely the Jews, and their lies can be deadly. (Gustave Le Bon remarked that the most bloodthirsty conquerors aren’t as deadly as false ideas, and he may well have been right.)

      • Cheyenne
        March 30, 2017 at 6:13 pm — Reply

        “Mental AIDS” to you = a good education with a master’s degree to me and the rest of the world. I should feel sorry for you, but I don’t.
        Have you been to Auschwitz? Have you ever seen a tattooed survivor of a concentration camp?

        • Anthony Collins
          March 31, 2017 at 1:18 am — Reply

          I should have written “kumbaya and kosher claptrap” in my previous comment. They’re closely related to each other — in a symbiotic way, like the relationship between suckers and shysters — but they’re not quite identical.

          I see no reason to go to Auschwitz and be shepherded by Jewish tour guides on some kind of guilt trip. As far as I’m concerned, there’s nothing to see, and nothing to be guilty of. The forensic evidence for “gas chambers” is less than convincing.

          Why is this commentator so attached to Jewish children’s fiction?

          I find it curious how egalitarians subscribe to a kind of hierarchical racism, in which the racial interests and claims of victimization of Jews typically trump those of non-Whites, and those of non-Whites invariably trump those of Whites. Although they claim to be anti-racist, egalitarians have a deeply racist world view, and their racism is an especially malignant, perverted, and masochistic one.

          • Cheyenne the Non-white
            April 26, 2017 at 10:07 pm

            Your ridiculous assumptions are not surprising, coming from a denier of fact/history and clear anti-Semite. I wonder what it’s like to have no heart–never mind, no I don’t.

    • Donna
      April 8, 2017 at 8:16 am — Reply

      History is written by those who win the wars. Pharaohs would erase the names of their predecessors and replace them with their own so that HISTORY remembers only them. We as thinking apes should try to keep an open mind, inquire and investigate everything that is taught in the history books. There are prime sources recorded by the first who entered the “extermination camps” describing what they found and saw. Most of them have been hidden from public eye. The media took control and distorted the truth. They did and do a great job washing brains like yours. That is pathetic!

      • Cheyenne
        April 26, 2017 at 10:09 pm — Reply

        History and the media distorted the truth? Have you met Holocaust survivors? I have. They are all lying? They all got together with the media and lied?
        Wow.

        • Donna
          April 27, 2017 at 7:52 am — Reply

          Have you met Georgian holocaust survivors or communist holocaust survivors or war survivors? Is there a difference or you make one between the Jewish race and the rest of humankind?

          • Cheyenne
            May 4, 2017 at 7:28 pm

            The “difference” is this anti-Semitic site and the anti-Jewish sentiment here. That’s why I’m posting.

  17. Brian Johnston
    April 7, 2017 at 9:44 pm — Reply

    To Martin D McCoy the Baptist pastor
    Jews were not mentioned in earlier Bibles. The term came into use around 1775.
    The Jews/Israelis/Zionists are not Israelites/Hebrew if they were they would have called themselves Israelites.
    The Jews wanted the Middle East
    Oddly they are now admitting the truth and talking about a ‘second’ Homeland in the Ukraine. Now that would be returning home
    It is frustrating when pastors preach the nonsense that you do

    • donna
      April 8, 2017 at 8:26 am — Reply

      Correct. That is the truth

  18. Lsvdb
    May 3, 2017 at 7:44 am — Reply

    ok let me start here,

    world war 2 (in a way) was started by the jews in march 1933 (newspaper covers and pictures confirm this as well as statements of powerfull jews that felt no obligation to even try to hide it since they won)

    Hitler reacted on this, he allready was no fan of jews but he did not plan on punishing an entire religion just because (as far as i could find), however after this mostly economic war started Hitler made a deal with zionists to give them a choice eather they leave Germany for palestine giving them the chance to convert their money into goods and sell those in palestine later benefitting both countries, or if they would refuse they would be deported to madagascar,(this was sabotaged leading to the formation of concentration camps)

    only about 300-500000 jews could have died during the holocaust, and most likely none were gassed, according to an american set of autopsies on the bodies piled up at one of the camps they liberated most died of typhus and other diseases, but the crematoria could merely suport the insineration of somewhere around 64 bodies per day (and that was when fuel was at hand) hence the large piles of corpses (but the human mind wil never be sure whether there were 5000 or 50000 in one picture)

    the hatches in the roof of the alledged gass chamber through whitch the tour guides so eagerly state zyklon b cannisters were thrown were put there after the war by the soviets (admitted by the Warschau camp director)

    (anne franks diarry was not just fake it was plagiary, and otto frank paid 50000 to the rightfull writer of which he coppied large parts of the fake work )

    look up “the greatest story never told and tell me was Hitler so cruel for a leader of his day or was he about as hard (or even more benevolent) you need to Judge the facts for yourself

  19. Cezar
    May 4, 2017 at 12:16 pm — Reply

    You people are disgusting. And why is Hitler your hero If he didn’t do anything?

  20. Cezar
    May 4, 2017 at 12:17 pm — Reply

    I am white, btw

  21. Cheyenne
    May 4, 2017 at 7:34 pm — Reply

    Oh, I get it. Your twisted version of the truth says that it was/is ok for a leader of a country to ban/banish an entire group of people; and if they don’t leave willingly, to put them away in concentration camps. . .and even if people weren’t gassed (which, in this case, they were), it’s ok for millions to die in these camps.

    Gotcha.

    • Deana
      May 5, 2017 at 10:13 pm — Reply

      Well said ” a group of people” ! This means they were not integrated in the German society, they kept their own ways of life, culture, etc etc, they started to interfere in politics, economy, who knows what? Did they want to take over the country? Did they want to be in that country? Jews went through this treatment not once.It happened 47 times in 1000 years http://www.rense.com/general85/banished.htm
      why ? Was everybody racists, crazy ? No it is not ok for people of any race to die in concentration camps Jews or Polish or Russians or Gypsies. There are many documents that talk about the gas chambers and how they did not exist !

      • Julian Child
        October 19, 2017 at 3:58 pm — Reply

        “Nazi Concentration Camps” A documentary from 1945. Go ahead. It’s on NetFlix now.
        You won’t watch it because you do not want to admit you’re wrong. The footage wasn’t released until recently because of its shocking and graphic detail that could not possibly be fabricated. Hell, I’d be surprised if this .org would even display this comment because their existence relies on people’s ignorance, fear and lack of education.
        -John KOONS … a German

  22. Brian Johnston
    May 5, 2017 at 4:32 am — Reply

    To Cezar and Cheyenne and others
    1) A Semite is an Arab. Anti Semitic is anti Arab
    2) Israelis are not Arabs
    How is anti Semitic anti Israeli?

    3) Hitler did not want war
    4) Hitler like Napoleon in his day was anti globalist

    WWI & WWII were planned out of London

    Further reading
    Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War by Docherty and Macgregor

    For an excellent book on the holocaust that did not happen. Auschwitz: A Judge Looks at the Evidence by Wilhelm Staeglich, who served with the anti aircraft defence. He went right through the camp.

    • Donna
      May 5, 2017 at 10:06 pm — Reply

      Both Isaac and Ishmael share the same father so they are step brothers regardless of the path God decided for them…so yes they are blood relatives both Jews and Arabs

    • Julian Child
      October 19, 2017 at 4:04 pm — Reply

      Brian, really? “Nazi Concentration Camps” 1945. Or would you let your own eye lie to you, too.

    • frequentcyfrequently
      November 10, 2017 at 12:04 am — Reply

      One of the biggest reasons behind WW2 was the creation of the Pharmaceutical Cartels in America and Germany.
      Corporation is the most ancient form of shadow government in all human history.
      http://www4.dr-rath-foundation.org/THE_FOUNDATION/history_of_the_pharma_cartel.html

  23. Cezar
    May 5, 2017 at 1:34 pm — Reply

    Both Jews and Arabs are Semites

  24. Brian Johnston
    May 6, 2017 at 3:56 am — Reply

    The site is drifting away from Ann Frank’s diary which I accept as a hoax. There is I believe a Court case registered in New York with respect to the diary.

    We now move onto the term Jew which is a modern term and includes Ashkenazi, Sephardic and others.

    In original Bibles there were no Jews though there were Hebrew, Israelites, Believers, Children of God etc.

    The Israelis are Ashkenazi of European origin. People who learnt a ‘religion’ from the Middle East. Proselytised. They learnt Phariseeism. ‘From the Pharisees’.

    Christ spoke against the Pharisees and drove the moneychangers from the temple

    Rev. 2:9 & 3:9 refers to those who are of the Synagogue of Satan

    It is criminal how the Palestinians have been treated by the Israelis. Refer. The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine by Ilan Pappe

    Isaac and Ishmael are considered by many to be the origin of Christianity & Islam though I disagree. Jew does not fit.

  25. Brian Johnston
    June 17, 2017 at 5:18 pm — Reply

    The Israelis are not the Israelites
    Jew is a recent term and not in old Bibles
    Jesus was not King of the ‘Jews’
    Solomon’s temple was not in Jerusalem

    Masonic lore says that Solomon’s chief architect was murdered and the killers fled across the Red Sea.
    One does not flee across the Red Sea from Jerusalem

  26. Cat
    August 4, 2017 at 11:23 pm — Reply

    ”History is written by the winners.”

    The Jews didn’t win. Anne Frank didn’t win. One-fourth of the world’s population didn’t win. Maybe you should say, “History is written by the ones who didn’t die.”

    • Brian Johnston
      October 6, 2017 at 2:24 am — Reply

      The Jews did win and as I have said above
      There was no holocaust
      The Allies allowed Stalin to take Berlin
      WWI & WWII were the same war and a Trade War
      The City of London took out Germany as a trade competitor

  27. Julian Child
    October 19, 2017 at 3:46 pm — Reply

    I’m curious if, two-and-a-half years later, the author still believes this in light of the release of film showing most of the camps just days after the defeat of the Germans. Not even Hollywood could have spent that much money to produce a piece of fiction of that magnitude. And if Mr. Pierce has faced these facts, would he have the b***s and class to apologize? Unfortunately, the uneducated and ignorant willfully defy enlightenment in their attempt to drag the human race down into their hellish, unhappy existence.
    Sincerely,
    John KOONS … a German

    • October 27, 2017 at 3:54 pm — Reply

      I’m glad I somehow managed to have missed the ignorant comments under this article by Dr. William Pierce until now.

      Koons, the self-hating German: I’m curious if, two-and-a-half years later, the author still believes this in light of the release of film showing most of the camps just days after the defeat of the Germans. Not even Hollywood could have spent that much money to produce a piece of fiction of that magnitude…

      The Jews in Hollywood and everywhere else tell big whoppers all the time and spend billions doing so to keep suggestible goyim like you in the dark and in line. Enjoy this by WLP: http://williamlutherpierce.flawlesslogic.com/category/big-lie/

      Had you read to the end of the article you’d see that Dr. Pierce wrote that piece in 1980 — 37 years ago, not 2 and 1/2. He was ahead of his time when it came to telling inconvenient truths.

  28. Brian Johnston
    October 26, 2017 at 7:02 pm — Reply

    That the camps were in a bad state at the end of the war is not contested
    What does need to be taken into consideration is
    1) England built bomber planes for the sole purpose of bombing every German city with a population over 100,000. Civilians, men, women, Children, refugees, hospitals and I understand British prisoners. Refer: Dresden by David Irving
    2) They bombed the rail lines including those leading to the camps. Transport was a problem food shortages and distribution problems
    3) Hitler did not want war and made numerous attempts at peace. The British ‘City of London’ hated Germany and wanted to control world trade. Germany produced better goods in newer factories and delivered to Europe by rail cutting British ships out of their port to port trade
    4) Germany ‘had to be taken down’
    5) WWI was instigated by and from England. WWII was a continuation of WWI and was intended to finish the job. Refer: Who Started World War II by Udo Walendy
    England tried to bomb Germany back to an agricultural economy
    6) Hitler has to be commended for going up against Bolshevism. Hitler knew about the power of the City of London though he appealed for peace to those in England who were opposed to the COL
    7) Eisenhower the SOB interned German prisoners in worse conditions where thousands died
    8) The Allies should have gone on trial for war crimes
    At the End of WWII America dropped 2 bombs on Japan.
    What is little known is they bombed an additional 66 cities. Japan tried to over throw British imperialism

    That’s it in a nutshell
    There is no evidence for the holocaust or planned extermination of Jews

  29. cc
    October 26, 2017 at 7:48 pm — Reply

    I figured out years ago that the Jews desperately needed a Mary Phagan, and they found her in Anne Frank. That Mary Phagan was murdered by a Jew and Anne Frank was a Jew — highlights the morbid mind of those people. One example out of many.

  30. Al
    January 22, 2018 at 1:15 am — Reply

    Well I DO appreciate ALL the dialogue here, minus the insults towards each other & name calling. Save that for the Yahoo comments sections lol. I just happened upon this site hoping to find info as I recall hearing or reading somewhere, decades ago, that Ann Frank once said something to the effect of “We were old liars”, or “We were known to be old liars” or something very close to that effect, regarding her creed, the jews. I haven’t confirmed it, maybe someone here that has, recalls it, or read it, can be of more accuracy of it, as I never read the diary though. Can’t as have way too many other books no time to read. But all of you have put in some good input, on both sides of the coin, so you got to admit, thx to the internet & also to this site that didn’t cherry pick things out to further their own ideology & keeping it fair, otherwise where would we ever hear all of this info to go further & research more? It’s educational. Lots of interesting thoughts from both sides, so if any have input to what I was looking for, please post & again, much appreciated!
    Now, lets keep the peace between us all, as remember, it’s 2018, not 1942 & we all have one, not-so-new common enemy now, with the Muslims, that want US ALL dead, since 622 & will NEVER give up! We’re all in the foxhole together now, whether we like it or not. The enemy of my enemy is my friend. That’s the reality!

    • Anthony Collins
      January 22, 2018 at 7:27 am — Reply

      I think you’re probably thinking of Irma Kurtz’s novel, The Grand Dragon, which is discussed in David Duke’s My Awakening. In the novel, Kurtz’s alter ego remarks, “He’s honest, I thought, and then I felt sorry for him, for honesty in my opinion is a vice of children, and a vice my kind [i.e., Jews] never had. We were old liars.”

  31. ALETH
    March 13, 2018 at 8:51 am — Reply

    FRANKLY FAKE

    The so-called diary of anne frank is part rewrite, part forgery by persons other than anne. It was heavily interpolated and edited by her father otto and several collaborators of his, in primis anneliese schütz and ab cauvern. It consists of 3 basic elements :

    1. plagiarism of der trotzkopf ;
    2. plagiarism of jakob von gunten : ein tagebuch ;
    3. misrepresented real events, mixed with fabricated events, from the franks´ family life 1942 – 1944.

    We are looking at patchwork here. Collage . Many other tesserae of the fraudulent mosaic were filched from : samuel richardson´s 1740 pamela; or, virtue rewarded ; goethe´s 1795-96 wilhelm meister´s apprenticeship ; 3 e.t.a.hoffmann early-XIX-century tales ; cissy van marxveldt ´s 1919-1925 joop ter heul ; h.g.well´s 1894 short story Through a window ; cornell woolrich´s 1942 short story It had to be murder; maria montessori (1870+1952)´s pedagogical concepts and books ; other assorted classic german writers and philosophers.

    If you want to have commercial success, you´d better try and be ” all things to all men “…

    As my reference editions, I shall use for the diary, DIE TAGEBÜCHER DER ANNE FRANK, aus dem niederländischen von mirjam pressler, rijksinstitut voor oorlogsdocumentatie, s. fischer verlag 1988, 2. auflage, printed in germany 1993. Hereafter, FRANK. The first edition of the diary of anne frank came out in holland in 1947.

    For der trotzkopf, der trotzkopf: eine pensionsgeschichte für erwachsene mädchen, by emmy von rhoden, 39. auflage, stuttgart, verlag von gustav weise. The year is not available, anyway this is a reprint of the original edition that came out in 1885. I shall reference the online text here :
    http://www.gutenberg.org/files/31309/31309-h/31309-h.html
    Hereafter, TROTZ.

    For gunten : jakob von gunten: ein tagebuch by robert walser, bruno cassirer berlin
    1909, online here :
    http://www.gutenberg.org/files/24176/24176-h/24176-h.htm
    Hereafter, GUNTEN

    Let´s get off into this whole dirty affair.

  32. ALETH
    March 13, 2018 at 8:53 am — Reply

    CHAPTER I : CRAZY IDEA

    Now picture yourself hiding from the nazis who are out to get you and send you to auschwitz, slave work et similia : would you write a diary, featuring all of the real names of your jewish friends, christian helpers, plus your antinazi and pro-allies stance ? Would you really do that, in view of the very real possibility you might get discovered and arrested ? Would you not only aggravate your own position in nazi eyes, but also endanger dozens of your friends and helpers ? Maybe you would do that, as a 13-year-old girl, not so smart and all alone but – would 5 adults all around you, hiding with you, aware you are keeping a diary as the diary explicitly states, allow you to keep it ?

    That would be criminal, irresponsible and suicidal at the very least ! No, I guess you really wouldn´t do that would you ? So why do you blindly believe that anne frank actually did do that crazy thing ?

    • ALETH
      March 13, 2018 at 8:57 am — Reply

      CHAPTER 4 : INTERPOLATIONS IN PROGRESS

      If we know turn for a moment to the popular edition of anne frank´s diary, the current version that everyone reads when they buy it today, we may notice that manuscript words are changed into something entirely different : take for instance the current standard german translation, ANNE FRANK TAGEBUCH, edited by otto h. frank and mirjam pressler, translated by mirjam pressler, fischer taschenbuch, 19th print, january 2013 ( henceforth POP ), page 11 : the sept. 28, 1942 entry in the photo above, reads in POP:
      .
      Wheras the alleged manuscript entry in the photo above reads :
      .

      Thus you can see how the so-called diary of anne frank is really a work-in-progress, in which several persons other than anne have felt free over the decades to change whatever they pleased.

  33. ALETH
    March 13, 2018 at 8:59 am — Reply

    CHAPTER 5 : LITERARY PLAGIARISM

    As I said in the introduction above, the alleged diary is a collage of 3 elements basically, the first 2 having to do with literary plagiarism from TROTZ and GUNTEN. It is a very subtle sort of plagiarism, very professional , absolutely not creditable to an average 13-year-old such as anne frank. TROTZ is a novel about a 15-year-old girl, ilse, a contrarian and wild child, just like anne.
    The first leit-motif in TROTZ is the strong rapport ilse has with her father, as opposed to the hostility she harbors for her stepmother. Just like anne in the diary, who relates mostly positively to her dad otto, and negatively to her mother. On page 11 of TROTZ, we are on the second day of the novel, a june 12 : , says ilse´s father. And the diary of anne frank starts on a june 12. Just before that, ilse´s father has announced to his wife his decision to send ilse to a boarding school – she is to leave on july 1. Now, in the diary, the frank family moves to the hiding place on a july 6. And the hiding place will soon become a boarding school of sorts for anne, her sister margot and their teenage co-hider peter van pels. I am not somehow suggesting that anne frank wasn´t born on a june 12, or that the franks didn´t move on a july 6. I am saying that whoever partially rewrote and partially forged the diary of anne frank, was well aware of the coincidences with TROTZ, and imitated the plot and the spirit and the ideology of TROTZ throughout the rewrite/forgery that is the diary of anne frank.

    We shall soon factor in dozens more striking similarities, but for now let us sum up the ones we have encountered so far :

    TROTZ VERSUS DIARY:

    about a rebellious teenage girl and her education ; about a rebellious teen and her education
    ilse is a contrarian, temperamental ; anne is a contrarian, temperamental
    ilse has a strong rapport with her father ; anne has a strong rapport with her father
    ilse is hostile to her stepmother ; anne is hostile to her mother
    the second day in the plot is a june 12 ; the first day is a june 12
    ilse moves to a boarding school on a july 1 ; anne moves to her hiding place, which will become her own boarding school, on a july 6 .

    Before we carry on with our synoptic reading of TROTZ versus FRANK, let me just say that, since the first edition of the diary in 1947, for 71 long years ( as of this writing, january 31, 2018 ), the owners of these alleged manuscripts ( a whole series of bound notebooks and albums, plus a great number of loose sheets ) have refused to publish them in their entirety – thus nobody, except for what the anne frank fonds in basel , the anne frank stichting and the NIOD institute in amsterdam call legitimate researchers ( = prozionazi true believers in the authenticity) can verify whether or not these alleged manuscripts really feature all the materials published over the decades as the diary of anne frank ; and nobody can analyze the writings and all other details such as pics etc.

    The diary appears, on a first level of approach, to have been carefully planned out on the literary pattern of TROTZ, which belongs to a genre in XVIII- to XIX-century french and german literature called erziehungsroman, educational novel, or backfischroman, young-girls´ novel, or bildungsroman, educational novel : a genre especially targeting a readership of teenage girls, which became immensely popular and still is in those countries. The teenage rebel in such novels goes from wild child to polite and refined young lady. So does ilse, so does anne.

    Therefore, even though TROTZ is not a diary, still it is the story of the initiation of a backfisch into womanhood.

    Both the manuscripts as printed in FRANK, and TROTZ, begin with a lively exclamation by ilse () and anne (), punctuated by exclamation marks. There follows in TROTZ a short brushstroke about ilse´s physique : < a young, slim girl < : just like anne frank. And the third and fourth dated entries in anne´s diary are about her physical features .

    There follows in TROTZ a scene featuring 5 people beside ilse : her parents, a friend pair with their adult son, and the local priest. In anne´s hiding place at prinsengracht 263 we shall encounter beside anne and her sister margot, following 4 characters : a friend pair with their 16-year-old son, and a single man, a dentist.

    Again I am not thereby implying that the van pelses or fritz pfeffer did not exist – actually I think they did. I am just trying to point out that random coincidences in the lives of anne and ilse were carefully exploited by the diary´s rewriters/forgers in order to literarize the diary by molding it on TROTZ´s famous pattern.

    Next up in TROTZ, ilse enthuses over her dog diana and her puppies – this is matched in anne´s diary by her frequent references to her cat moortje, which she has to leave behind at merwedeplein, and which she will often sorely miss in the hiding place. Ilse too shall have to bid a a sad goodbye to her dog upon entering the boarding school.

    There follows in TROTZ a description of 2 leit-motive common again to both books : first, how ilse is the apple of her father´s eye, just like anne is to otto ; second, how ilse´s clothing is stained and torn – anne will often describe the inadequacy of her clothes and shoes during the war.

    The next scene in TROTZ features ilse´s stepmother scolding the kid over her unseemly behavior and shabby clothing in the presence of guests. And thereby, the leit-motif of ilse´s stubbornness and rebellious, hostile attitude unto her stepmother comes to the fore. In the diary too, as usual, one of the most frequent leitmotive is anne´s bitter hostility unto her mother.

    Ilse despises, initially, the friend pair´s son, but will end up falling in love with him. Anne initially has a low opinion of peter van pels, but will end up falling in love.

    Ilse expresses regret at his father´s choice to take another woman after his first wife´s, ilse´s mother´s, death ; anne will hint in the diary at his father´s unrequited love for another woman before marrying anne´s mother. When I say " anne " I thereby mean the diary´s rewriters/forgers – in primis, her father otto heinrich frank.

    After being scolded by her stepmother over her poor dressing style and lack of manners, ilse says to herself she will never be a lady – and so does anne often in the diary.

    As you see, virtually all, each and every single one of the leitmotifs around which TROTZ revolves, are picked up anew in the diary, and adapted to anne´s real-life persona. We shall encounter and list many more of these coincidences below. But it is not just about themes. It is about extraordinarily similar or near-identical details in the 3 erziehungsromane as well.

  34. ALETH
    March 13, 2018 at 9:01 am — Reply

    CHAPTER 6 : PLAGIARISM DOWN TO THE SMALL DETAILS

    FRANK 215 : anne lists female beauty marks that she either possesses or doesn´t : among them, cheek and chin dimples : on page 26 of TROTZ, ilse´s room mate at the boarding house, nellie, gets <<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>.

    TROTZ 26 : Once at the boarding house, ilse sees that . Once at the hiding place, anne will see through the windows, an imposing chestnut tree.

    Once more : this is not to say that anne frank did not have dimples in her cheeks or that the chestnut tree in her garden is fiction – quite the contrary, I think both were real. What I am trying to make clear is, that whoever cooked up the diary of anne frank, knew TROTZ perfectly well, and used it as a blueprint for his choice of materials – leitmotifs and details – to employ in the diary, whether or not such materials coincided with real-life events and details and attitudes of anne ´s. The inventio, the subject matter from the older novel seems to flow directly into the second, mutatis mutandis.

    The dispositio too, the order in which narrative materials appear in the 2 novels, sometimes coincides : for instance, after ilse´s arrival at the boarding house, her first assignment is to arrange her stuff . Anne´s first assignment after arrival at the hiding place, is to arrange her family´s stuff . Both girls have a helper in this task : for ilse, her roommate nellie, for anne her father otto.

    TROTZ , pages 86f., tells how ilse has made such progress at school, that an essay she has written is rated the best of her class, so she is praised by her teacher who reads ilse´s essay aloud to the whole class, a special honouring . In the diary, anne is assigned an essay as punishment for her chatting during class, she writes it in poetic form, and her teacher likes it so much that he reads and comments it aloud to the whole class and to his other classes.
    Ilse´s teacher interrupts his reading with laughter, and ilse and her classmates laugh along. Anne´s teacher causes Anne´s class to laugh loudly, alongside anne, upon hearing the funny title of anne´s third punishment-essay extra assignment .
    This amiable humor is employed by ilse´s teacher as a pedagogical means of correcting mistakes, more effective than angry words. Anne´s teacher too, changes tack and instead of assigning more extra work to anne when she chats, cracks little jokes.

    The plagiarism here is subtle in that TROTZ´s words are not copied wholesale – which would have been a dead giveaway given TROTZ´s enormous popularity in germany. What does get plagiarized here is the point-for-point narrative material, but light variations are introduced which serve the purpose of concealing the source. Read the relevant passages from the 2 books synoptically now with me :

    TROTZ pages 86f. : .
    FRANK, 239 :

    TROTZ, 87 : .
    FRANK 239 : .

    Let us call this modus operandi, varied plagiarism, shall we ?

    Again for the umpteenth time : in this context, it is irrelevant to me whether or not this episode of the extra work for chatting in class really happened in anne´s life – what instead I have been pointing out here, is how TROTZ´s narrative material is matched point-for-point in the diary, so much so that, even if the thing with the extra work really happened, its literarization in the diary is entirely derived from the TROTZ blueprint.

    And crediting a 13-year-old with such professional literary skills is to be ruled out with the proverbial …

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.