American Dissident VoicesAudioKevin Alfred StromRadio

Trumpery

trump_smileAmerican Dissident Voices broadcast of February 27, 2016

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

THERE IS a lot of enthusiasm these days for Donald Trump among racially conscious Whites. A friend of mine often remarks “I don’t care who wins this election, as long as it’s Donald Trump.” One pro-White writer stated that the reason the Jews are risking a backlash by flooding Europe so rapidly with invaders is because US support for such actions will evaporate soon, as we enter “the coming Trump dictatorship.” (Maybe he was halfway kidding, but we’ve had nothing but bad news for so long that even a little whiff of hope is exciting — and infectious.) A very talented pro-White blogger tells us that Chris Christie’s recent endorsement of Trump means that “the tides are turning and the sands are shifting under the feet of the Jews” and refers to the expected America under Trump as the “New Rome.”

It’s easy to understand this fandom. Trump says he’ll halt Muslim immigration, build a wall on the Mexican border and force the Mexicans to pay for it. He says to the Jews’ faces that Jews won’t support him because he doesn’t need their money. If sufficiently annoyed, he tells billionaire media moguls to go to Hell and boycotts their venues. And he’s intensely hated by all the right people — not just the anti-White “liberal” establishment but the anti-White “conservative” Republicans and Jewish neocons, whose Middle Eastern wars Trump decries as disasters promoted by liars.

He steals stone-dumb-conservative and military-industrial complex support from the neocons by declaring himself to be “more militaristic than anybody.” He steals slopeheaded evangelical support from the establishment Republicans by vowing loyalty to Israel with more believable conviction than anyone.

But most of all Trump exudes strength and frankness, something that even the most exalted and talented establishment politicians fail to do — we can just tell by the way they carry themselves and the things they say that they are kept men: men who read from a script; men who run from truth the same way that Superman runs from kryptonite; men with no will, no goals, or even thoughts of their own except finding new ways to flimflam the boobs and curry favor with their masters; men with little power of their own; men with no principles except advancing their careers and ballooning their bank accounts.

Dispossessed White Americans, even the most clueless — and even some non-Whites — are drawn to that frankness. Disappointed by politicians again and again and again, they have a strong feeling that everyone’s been lying to them. And they notice how the establishment pols and the media all seem to frantically, fanatically hate Trump — and that’s proof in their view that the honesty they sense from Trump is real. It’s the greatest endorsement of all.

And everyone — everyone — is drawn to, and respects, strength. Trump has his own money and made himself a billionaire. That’s strength. Trump doesn’t need donors and tells them off. That’s strength. Trump doesn’t need endorsements — but gets them anyway. That’s strength. Trump is on a roll politically. That’s strength. Trump made his fortune dealing and negotiating with the meanest, slickest, trickiest real estate operators on planet Earth — and came out on top. That’s strength. Trump is winning, even though the System hates him. That’s strength. Trump is a winner. And that’s irresistible to many, many people. It’s a deep, ancient instinct — people love to be, maybe even need to be, on a winning team. Trump radiates, and probably really possesses, that independent “I’m in charge here” spirit that made John Kennedy so magnetic even to those who loathed his policies — and so hated by those who preferred a cowed and paid-for man.

Now, I’d like to believe that Trump will “make America great again,” close the borders, and stop our country’s descent into the status of Brazil With Nukes. And I admit that it is remotely possible that he, despite his fawning over his Jewish grandchildren and promises of eternal loyalty to the Zionist entity, secretly intends a night of the long knives for the neocons and oligarchs and really means ten times more than he says about closing the border. It is remotely possible that Trump is hiding his real racial-nationalist beliefs about race and Jewish power. Possible — but, in my view, just slightly more likely than Bernie Sanders believing and doing the same things.

There is just too much evidence to the contrary.

If Donald Trump himself is to be believed, he is far from a revolutionary. He believes in the current System and not only wants to preserve it but to extend its power and its symbiotic relationship with the Jewish power structure.

Trump is fanatically pro-Jewish and a Zionist, although he doesn’t need Jewish money at all. He is a voluntary Zionist.  He describes himself as “1000% pro-Israel.” As pointed out by James Harting, “He has a son who is married to a Jewess, and a daughter who is married to a Jew. That daughter [Ivanka] has converted to Judaism and is raising Trump’s grandchildren as practicing Jews. His Wikipedia biography notes: ‘Of his daughter Ivanka’s conversion to Judaism, he said, “Not only do I have Jewish grandchildren, but I have a Jewish daughter and I am very honored by that.”'”

The writer Andrew Joyce notes: “…I was intrigued to discover that Ivanka’s previous two significant relationships were also with Jews, Greg Hirsch and James Gubelmann. Of further note is Ivanka’s very close friendship with Chelsea Clinton, another progeny of the American power elite, who married the Jewish financier Marc Mezvinsky in 2010. The Trump and Clinton situations are excellent examples of the centuries-old practice of strategic Jewish intermarriage with native elites…”

Back in 1999, when the Jews were looking for Gentile front men to attack and destroy Pat Buchanan’s presidential bid, Dr. William L. Pierce pointed out that one of the Jewish Daily Forward‘s choices for that role was none other than Donald Trump.

The Jewish Telegraphic Agency states that no other GOP candidate has as many ties to Jews as Trump:

Trump is from New York, works in professions saturated with Jews and long has been a vocal supporter of Israel. His daughter and two grandchildren are Jewish, the executive vice president of his organization is Jewish — and Trump certainly has chutzpah.

…He has served as a grand marshal at New York’s annual Salute to Israel Parade. …he was honored with an award at the annual gala for the Algemeiner, a hawkishly pro-Israel Jewish news organization.

“I have a Jewish daughter. This wasn’t in the plan, but I’m very glad it happened,” Trump said at the event in Manhattan. On Israel, he said, “We love Israel. We will fight for Israel 100 percent, 1,000 percent. It will be there forever.”

Before the 2013 Israeli election, Trump recorded a video message endorsing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

“You truly have a great prime minister in Benjamin Netanyahu. He’s a winner, he’s highly respected, he’s highly thought of by all,” Trump said in the 30-second spot. “Vote for Benjamin – terrific guy, terrific leader, great for Israel.”…

When it comes to The Trump Organization, Trump’s right-hand man is a Jewish lawyer, Michael Cohen, who also serves as a top campaign aide. [Another Jewish adviser is Samuel Nunberg.]

In one of the Republican debates, Trump was asked: “[What about] support of Israel, essential for continuing stability in the Middle East, obviously, and for maintaining a firm stance against terrorism — will you emphatically stand with Israel?”

Trump answered: “Yes, very simple answer, yes. They’ve been our most reliable ally, especially in the Middle East, and you look at what’s happened with Israel, they were so against this horrible Iran deal. They were so against it.”

On the “Iran deal,” Trump endlessly parrots the conservative meme that “we gave Iran $150 billion,” a preposterous lie. The truth is that the US finally released $150 billion that had been brazenly stolen from Iran and “frozen” — in the heavily-Jewish US banking system, natch — as punishment for daring to do one-one-hundredth of what God’s Holy People have done in the field of nuclear energy. Trump, who is nothing if not financially savvy, has to know he’s lying about that.

When Trump recently announced four members of his so-called “kitchen cabinet,” they included tired old multiracialist and former Education Secretary Bill Bennett, fanatical Zionist Rudy Giuliani, Reagan-era “supply-side” economist Arthur Laffer, and Heritage Foundation advocate of replacement migration Stephen Moore. Sounds like a Trumpian Washington will be the same old Washington after all.

What about Trump’s position on the most crucial issue from a White point of view — immigration: all good, right? Wrong. James Harting wrote:

Trump is not against non-White immigration, but rather is only against illegal immigration. The US is being drowned in a tidal wave of Hispanic, Asian and African immigrants. It does not matter whether or not these invaders are here legally or illegally — all that matters is that they are non-White. But that is of no concern to Trump. In fact, his immigration program actually promises to help non-White workers, presumably at the expense of their White counterparts.

For example, in seeking to reform the H1-B work visa program for foreigners, the official Trump platform states that he will, “…improve the number of black, Hispanic and female workers in Silicon Valley who have been passed over.” Not a word about “improving” the lot of White workers. Note also that he lumps woman employees together with racial minorities. This is in keeping with the Old Order practice of pitting White men and White women against each other, as though they were rivals, and dishonestly portraying Negroes and other minorities as the logical allies of White women.

Early in his campaign Trump was a bit cagey about White nationalists supporting him. He said he didn’t need David Duke’s endorsement, adding, however, that he didn’t need anyone’s endorsement. When a reporter pinned him down and asked if he would disavow an endorsement from Dr. Duke, he said “Sure, if it would make you feel better.” More recently, when David Duke actually did say people should vote for him, his response was an almost instant “Disavow, disavow, disavow.”

National Vanguard commentator John I. Johnson recently noted that “Sensing forward momentum, Trump has begun ‘disavowing’ White support — David Duke and even Jared Taylor (!) . . . with more to come. ‘Once I’m President,’ Trump states, ‘I’m a totally different person. I can be the most Politically Correct person you’ve ever seen.’ Even before he’s President!”

Donald Trump openly states that he supports torture — the reinstatement of torture of helpless captives who have been secretly “rendered” into secret prisons and who are “our” opponents in the US wars for Israel which are still boiling over across the Middle East. “Torture works,” says The Donald. How much of a leap is it from that to “rendering” and torturing dissident Americans who oppose the so-called War on Terror or other policies of the regime in Washington?

If Trump’s position on NSA whistle-blower Edward Snowden — who revealed more of the crimes of the Washington regime than any man in recent memory — is any indication, it’s not such a far leap at all. Donald Trump says that Snowden should be executed.

We should also consider this: The fortunes of the National Alliance and of the White resistance in general are tied to two things: the ability of a sustainable, critical fraction of the White public to grasp the serious threats to our race’s continued existence — and the will of that critical fraction to do something about it. Trumpery is, therefore, not only unrealistic foolishness but a direct threat to our task as racially conscious White men and women, as agents of the Life Force. It is a threat because, similar to the sheep-like faith held by many Whites in the 1980s that Ronald Reagan was going to take care of all our problems, it allows us to relax and to mentally push off our responsibilities onto a plastic savior. It gives us psychological permission to do nothing. And that could be fatal. How many years were wasted while White Americans kept faith with Reagan and did nothing themselves to end their dispossession? How many kept faith even after long-time employee of the Jewish power structure Ronald Reagan signed the bill establishing the “Martin Luther King” holiday?

How long do you think you’d have to wait before honest, frank Donald Trump does what needs to be done to stop the death of White America, thereby going against everything he says he believes in? How long before you’d finally throw in the towel on this fanboy hope of yours? Well into his second term? After he starts torturing White nationalist “security risks”? After he authorizes the rendition and execution of Edward Snowden or other whistle-blowers who expose the crimes of the regime that The Donald loves so well?

Let’s not waste our time on helping Donald Trump, when our future depends on what we do for ourselves right now. Let’s not waste our precious time on waiting for Donald Trump to do what we dream about him doing, for he never will do those things — we must do them ourselves. Let’s not even waste 90 seconds of our time pulling a lever for Donald Trump or 90 minutes of our time registering and driving to where the lever is, since the other end of that lever is connected to a Jewish fist and the time we are granted for our lives on Earth is ticking away and we could better use — much better use — those minutes of our life telling our neighbors and friends and family about the absolutely uncompromising vision of the National Alliance.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the National Alliance. Volume 2 of our CD series, containing 20 more of the best radio speeches by our founder, Dr. William L. Pierce, is now available. It’s entitled William Pierce: The Power of Truth, Volume 2. To get your copy, just visit natall.com/cd-offer or send $16 for one CD, $50 for five CDs, to National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA. That’s National Alliance, Box 172, Laurel Bloomery, TN 37680 USA or natall.com/cd-offer. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you of the words of Richard Berkeley Cotten: Freedom is not free; free men are not equal; and equal men are not free.

Listen to the broadcast

* * *

COTB-copyTHE INCOMPARABLE, AMAZING music of Dresden’s Call of the Blood is now available in a digitally remastered 20th Anniversary edition CD. Crafted with jewel-like care and true artistry, this is unlike any music you have ever heard before.

Listen to a low-bitrate sampler here:

Listen to the Call of the Blood sampler

You can get your copy of Call of the Blood by clicking here.

For Further Reading

Previous post

Brooklyn Rabbi Charged with Teen Sex Assault Gets 60 Days in Jail

Next post

SUNY "Racist Attack" Hoaxers Will Be Charged

15 Comments

  1. February 27, 2016 at 2:49 pm — Reply

    As a 501c3 nonprofit organization, the Anti Defamation League of Bad Breath (ADL) is forbidden to takes a position on behalf of or in opposition to any candidate for office….but, in that judeofascist group’s press release yesterday, 2/26/16, they put forth this position:

    New York, NY, February 25, 2016 The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) today called on presidential candidate Donald Trump to distance himself from white nationalist and former KKK Grand Wizard David Duke, as well as other white supremacists, and publicly condemn their racism…

    “Mr. Trump may have distanced himself from white supremacists, but he must do so unequivocally,” said Marvin D. Nathan, ADL National Chair, and Jonathan A. Greenblatt, ADL CEO. “It is time for him to come out firmly against these bigoted views and the people that espouse them.”

    http://www.adl.org/press-center/press-releases/extremism/adl-to-donald-trump-distance-yourself-white-supremacists-disavow-their-idealogy.

    The National Alliance couldn’t care less about Shabbos goy Donald Trump, and stands in firm opposition to Messrs. Nathan and Goldblatt and to their kin, thank you.

    • Anthony Collins
      February 28, 2016 at 2:03 am — Reply

      I think the term “Judeofascist” should be avoided. Combining “Judeo” and “fascist” in the one word is like conflating the foul and the fair, the disease and the medicine, the murderer and the victim. Of course, I’m thinking of fascism in its broader and proper sense — in the sense in which it has been addressed in articles published at National Vanguard — rather than the narrow and pejorative sense in which the term is typically used.

      Ritual defamation is the stock in trade of the ADL. The basic modus operandi was outlined by Laird Wilcox in his article, “The Practice of Ritual Defamation”:

      http://www.lairdwilcox.com/news/defame.html

      “B’nai B’rith” is supposed to mean “sons of the covenant,” but it’s tempting to believe that it really means “sons of bitches.”

      • February 28, 2016 at 7:45 pm — Reply

        Thanks, Anthony. Judeofascist is just another word, no worse, no better than the term Jewish supremacist, but one that when used repeatedly is likely to incite a defensive response from the thin-skinned Jew more so than kike, sheeney, hymie, yid, shyster, zhid, yahoodi, hakennozzle, or snipcock (Henry Ford’s favorite slur), or other supposedly bigoted names.

        To paraphrase the Urban Dictionary definition of the word Hussein Obama won’t use, but Trump probably will, Islamofascist: In general, Islamofascism refers to the notion that Islam is not so much a religion as it is a political ideology that in many ways resembles “fascism” (i.e. the modern common definition of fascism which equates it with totalitarianism, as opposed to the original capital-F Italian-style Fascism)…Radio talkshow Jew Michael Savage (née Weiner) has repeatedly claimed on air that he coined the term “Islamofascist” in his first book, and even offered a reward to anyone who could prove he was wrong. Weiner did not coin the word, but it’s safe to say he welched on the reward.

        • Anthony Collins
          February 29, 2016 at 8:52 am — Reply

          I’m no egalitarian when it comes to words: words are by no means equal in their diverse properties. But if “Judeofascist” works better than other words, use it.

          I suppose using the term “Judeofascist” is like calling Israel an “apartheid state”: this seems to greatly offend Jews, although it’s always hard to tell whether Jewish outrage is genuine or feigned. Jewish rhetoric concerning real or supposed anti-Semitism is both hysterical and formulaic.

          If one seeks to offend Jews, what would be the best way to do this? The question calls for a more extended treatment that I can give it in a brief, off-the-cuff comment, but the following points are clear enough:

          Jews don’t like it when goyim see what Jews are doing, when they see through Jewish lies, and when they recognize the games the Jews are playing, and when they refuse to accept them or play along with them.

          Jews don’t like uppity goyim who refuse to be intimidated or silenced: they fear that anti-Semitism may be legitimized and that “virulent anti-Semitism” might “go viral.”

          Jews don’t like being identified as Jews: that sets a dangerous precedent. It enables goyim to join the dots together, to find a common cause for many of their problems, and also to identify a common solution for many of their problems.

          One shouldn’t aim to merely insult this thin-skinned and loud-mouthed people. As the Jews go out of their way to find offense, that’s hardly an accomplishment, and it doesn’t stop them from perverting our civilization, wrecking our nations, and driving our race to extinction. One should work to objectively and substantively injure and weaken them. What is needed is intelligent, articulate, courageous, and indomitable opposition to them. That is the kind of opposition that can kindle the anger of one’s people against this people. That is the kind of opposition that can give the Jews legitimate cause for alarm — and aliyah. Garden variety anti-Semitism isn’t enough.

          When taking on the Jews, truth is often the greatest provocation and the strongest defense.

          I hadn’t known that Henry Ford called Jews “snipcocks.” Some ancient Romans derisively referred to the Jews as “penis pruners,” mocking their practice of genital mutilation, which for some reason is an integral part of their contract (“covenant”) with Yahweh. Indeed, the “B’rith” in “B’nai B’rith” apparently refers to circumcision.

          I think Kevin Alfred Strom might have coined the term “Jewish supremacism,” a term which has been popularized by David Duke’s books. I’m fairly sure that Strom delivered a broadcast titled “Jewish Supremacism” before any of Duke’s books were published, but I don’t know if Strom coined the term: he could have coined it himself or picked it up from a conversation, a correspondent, or a publication. I’m sure that Strom can clarify this matter.

    • February 28, 2016 at 7:59 pm — Reply

      Today, 28 February, CBS Jew Jacob Paul Tapper gets the Donald to say, “I don’t know anything about White supremacists”: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IjQrX5U6Pw8&feature=youtu.be

      Jake should have asked him if he knew anything about Jew supremacists, and if he did and received an endorsement from a Jew supremacist, would he disavow?

  2. WHITE_WARRIOR
    February 27, 2016 at 3:01 pm — Reply

    At last others are starting to see the light about Trump. I have posted on many forums my contempt of Trump. Many times my posts have been deleted. I am not an American, just a very street-smart retired scientist. There are many ways one can determine the character of a person, and one of the best ways is to look at who they call their friends.

    I will repeat one of my posts here:

    “Fact: The Jews are entirely responsible for America’s problems and the West’s problems in general. Name a destructive social policy – any policy – and there will be a Jew promoting it.

    “Now Donald Trump:

    “Daughter converted to Judaism – married to a Jew
    “Son – shacked up with a Jewess soon to marry her
    “Policy adviser – Michael Glassner – ex AIPAC

    “Is it any wonder that the Jews laugh at you? As Krushchev once said about Americans – spit in their face and they will call it rain.

    “When will stop letting the Jews spit in your face – and when will you see democracy for the farce that it is?”

    That post was deleted from a so-called pro-White website. It was only added after I complained to the site’s administration.

  3. harvey
    February 27, 2016 at 3:24 pm — Reply

    National Vanguard sobering up millennial neuroticism! An inspiring venture into the objective reality of the dubious counter-narrative of presbyter Trumpery.

  4. Walt Hampton
    February 27, 2016 at 8:49 pm — Reply
  5. Anthony Collins
    February 28, 2016 at 1:01 am — Reply

    Arthur Schopenhauer’s phrase “criminal optimism” might well be applicable to Trumpery. This is a strong term, but optimism can be properly regarded as criminal when it leads to profoundly improvident, delinquent, and dangerous behavior.

    If we are to entertain any hopes for the future, our hopes shouldn’t rest upon febrile hopes of what others might do for us, but rather on the knowledge of what we are doing and what we are working to create. As Revilo P. Oliver said long ago:

    “We in America must again have faith — an unyielding and unquestioning faith — in ourselves, in our values, and in our strength. . . . Without that faith, we are men standing helpless on the bridge of a sinking ship and our voices are lost in the rush of the wind and the infinite loneliness of a darkling sea.”

    Trump’s fans have no such faith. They hope, despite all the evidence to the contrary, that Trump might make the system work for White Americans. But what will they do if he doesn’t get elected, or doesn’t live up to their expectations?

    We’re already on a sinking ship, but we needn’t stand helplessly upon it. If we recognize the danger we’re in, if we act resolutely and prudently, and if we make good use of the time available to us, we might still be able to save our people.

    Ezra Pound said that a slave is someone who waits for someone else to free him. Friedrich Nietzsche said that a free man is a fighter. Thomas Hobbes said that freedom is power. If we are to free ourselves from the Judaized state, we must seize the initiative, we must exercise aggressiveness, and we must cultivate our strength. We can’t expect the system to save us. We have no proxy and no savior. We can do what needs to be done only by ourselves.

  6. Christopher
    February 28, 2016 at 5:53 pm — Reply

    Donald John Trump: Savioritus, or the contemporary desire to be faithful followers of an assumed omnipotent king with “all the answers” is one of our race’s negative qualities. I don’t expect anything consequential from a democracy made up of self-hating trendy egalitarians on facebook, beer guzzling sports fanatics and obese couch potatoes living on government subsidies. These leeches are of no use to anyone, at all, anytime, period. The mass media falderol gives to indication of the enemy’s state-of-mind. One must research offline to acquire clues.

    I have been reading Jewish publications written by Jews not for the masses but for their fellow tribesmen, not published online but circulated through their shuls and yeshivas. One interesting vein is the outright fear of starting a trend that cannot be controlled. Just how many up and coming candidates will ride in on Mr Trump’s act/coattails, I don’t know. What fears them is the likelihood of a breed of representatives starting locally, countywide and statewide that refuses bribes, doesn’t want their support and turns political correctness around on their opponent and to their advantage, in under 10 seconds. This lack of control problem they allude to surprised me because the outcome is unknown yet.

    Now, how many congressmen would feel like a deer in cross-hairs by the momentum of Mr Trump actually getting elected? How many would “change their act” or lose to one who has? How many will change their allegiances or lose to one who has?? It’s an intriguing time to be alive!

    • Anthony Collins
      February 29, 2016 at 8:56 am — Reply

      You’re quite right that one needs to look beyond the mass media and the internet to properly inform oneself about what the Jews, that supposed “light unto the nations,” are up to. If you’ve been reading “Jewish publications written by Jews not for the masses but for their fellow tribesmen, not published online but circulated through their shuls and yeshivas,” perhaps you should share more of what you’ve learned with readers of this website.

      I think Dr. William L. Pierce remarked in one of his articles that a goy who perused a copy of the Jewish Press left on a train might easily dismiss it as a periodical put out by a kooky little Jewish sect — when in fact it was (and might be still be) one of the largest-circulation Jewish newspapers in the United States. Rabbi Meir Kahane was one of its columnists. With the Jews, what might appear to be kooky is often quite orthodox — literally so.

    • NR
      February 29, 2016 at 3:34 pm — Reply

      Quote:
      “…Just how many up and coming candidates will ride in on Mr Trump’s act/coattails, I don’t know…”

      It is possible that Mr Trump will create opportunity for factors eroding the System. However, Clinton will be extremely divisive, which also will weaken belief in the System. Mr. Sanders’ economic plans would be greatly beneficial for the same reason. I would vote for all three becoming president. Not sure whether such is possible.

  7. Anthony Collins
    February 29, 2016 at 9:04 am — Reply

    I suppose that an anthropologist or a sociologist studying phenomena like the Trump campaign might find it useful to address magical thinking and cognitive dissonance. As for us, we need to think and act in a far-sighted, rational, unsentimental, and diligent manner.

    Kevin Alfred Strom is right: we don’t have time to waste. But what time do we have? That isn’t a simple question, and it’s perhaps poorly formulated, for it involves complex matters of strategy, tactics, techniques, capabilities, opportunities, and probabilities. In other words, time is really a matter of relative agency. (In this context, “time” might resemble the protean concept of “shi” which is used throughout in Sun Tzu’s Art of War and which is the subject of François Jullien’s The Propensity of Things.) Time is against us in the sense that the relative agency of our race is diminishing. But despite this, it might be possible to work with time, if we use it well. If we form a vanguard of our race, if we use our time well, if we conduct ourselves according to a sense of duty rather than the transports of enthuasiasm and despair, we can make time work for us. We can be well prepared for new dangers and new opportunities. We can exercise the initiative.

    The key here is to concern ourselves with what we can actually do to increase our power and influence. Today this must involve more of a bottom-up rather than a top-down approach.

  8. Christopher Strenta
    March 3, 2016 at 9:11 am — Reply

    Exactly right.

  9. May 3, 2016 at 10:53 am — Reply

    Can I make a video using these words? These are important cautionary points.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slander, crude language, incivility, off-topic drift, or remarks that might harm National Vanguard or its users may be edited or deleted, even if unintentional. Comments may be edited for clarity or usage.