Jew-Owned DNA Testing Companies Fake Results to “Mess With White Racists”
SHOULD YOU drunkenly celebrate St. Patrick’s Day or Oktoberfest? Can you brag about your ancestors having first-class seats on the Mayflower? Do you need to feel extra, extra bad about slavery? All these questions and more can be answered by sending a vial of your spit off to a company like Ancestry.com, 23andMe, or Living DNA…in theory. But the reality of those businesses is a lot less science, and a lot more hustle. We talked with Morgan, who works for one of the major ancestry testing companies. He had some interesting things to say…
The Tests Aren’t As Accurate As They’re Claimed To Be
DNA is one of the most aggressively scientific acronyms in the English language. Look at the above test results page!
But when Inside Edition had a set of triplets send their spit in to Ancestry.com and 23andMe, they got wildly different results from both services. Neither gave each triplet the same ancestry results — which, considering they all came from the same sperm and egg, is pretty weird.
“Tests can be a crapshoot. For DNA tests, they use genetic markers, which are little variations in the DNA one or several groups may have, but others do not. The more markers there are, the more accurate the test will be.”
Some companies may use 12, 37, or 67, while others claim to use more than 700,000 different markers. Any of those numbers can sound impressive with the right marketing spin behind them, but the simple fact of the matter is that nobody’s method is perfect. “The best we can do is give a certain range based on those markers (or show who they are most similar to), and sometimes we’ll move up a percentage point of an ethnic group if it doesn’t add up to 100 percent.”
Inside Edition found differences of over 10 percent between the triplets they tested. That is not a small gap. …
“At least once a week, we’ll get a call from somebody who took two or three other tests and then ours, and complains about how different they are. Usually it’s 5-20 percent off, but we got an email from a guy showing how in one test he was 7 percent Irish, Scottish, and Welsh, then on another he was 33 percent, and then on ours 45 percent, and he wanted to know what was wrong with everyone. We wrote to him that each test is different because of the number and types of genetic markers used, which can skew data, but he wrote back and said that we were con men.”
Genetics experts from the University of Texas and the University of North Carolina have gone so far as to say that these companies are preying on people, because they don’t truly have the information they need to pinpoint your origins on a map, and that it’s not possible to trace unique ancestry that way. As they put it, “That’s the beauty of this scam. The companies aren’t scamming you. They’re not giving you fraudulent information. They are giving you data, real data, and allowing you to scam yourself.”
Even though Morgan works for one of these companies, he doesn’t buy into the accuracy of the product. How could he? “We were doing our own internal tests when I started, and I took the same test five times in five weeks, and I got different results each time. One of the lab assistants wasn’t upset about it. He told me, ‘Look at the range there. That’s about where your ancestors are from.’ Somebody asked him, ‘We promise accurate results. How is it accurate if he got different results each time?’ And the lab assistant said, ‘If you average them all, you have a good idea, right?'”
On one hand, these tests are definitely a con. But on the other hand, the customers are as guilty as the companies. People want to know where they come from so they can brag about being 1/64th Cherokee in Internet arguments. No one actually wants to spend hours studying genealogy and pay hundreds of dollars for a dozen different, possibly more accurate tests. “If you get a high percentage, it’s a safe bet that you have ancestors from there. I’m talking about a 50-60 percent on your test. Anything lower, and take it with a grain of salt.”
Jewish Business Practices: Blatantly Changing and Faking Results
Morgan admitted to having changed people’s results. “We only did this on rare occasions, when we knew they weren’t using it as means to harm someone.” A lot of this is done under the guise of having the tests line up with what the business already knows of the customer’s expectations. It’s easier to do that than to deal with an endless parade of clients who are angry because they aren’t as Dutch as they expected to be.
“If the results only added up to 99.5 percent, we’d say, ‘Let’s stick that 0.5 percent under Scandinavian.’ Other times, when we ask their family name (for women, their maiden name), and we see what country that last name came from, we’ll add it there, because they’ll be more proud of that heritage more often than not.” …
It’s not unheard of for genetic tests to be altered. New York crime lab workers have sued the police for forcing them to change or ignore results, and The New York Times found that anything related to DNA, from Ancestry results to crime scenes, can be fabricated easily. North Korea disavows that Kim Jong-Un is a quarter Japanese, despite a lot of evidence to the contrary. So Morgan and his co-workers aren’t even close to alone in their little DNA-based white lies. …
Another Jewish Business Practice: Altering Results of “White Racists”
“I only know of two times somebody wanted to be tested for being another ethnicity because they didn’t like that ethnicity. Both times, [they were] White people not wanting to believe they had Black ancestors.” The first of these made an offhand remark that, “‘I’m hoping it will show people I’m not Black.’ And not as a joke. He was serious.” The second hesitated before he said “Black” and staff assumed he was going to say, in their words, “the N-bomb.” His “punishment”? Fake results.
An anti-White reporter at Cracked praised the company’s fraud:
Morgan and his colleagues were caught between a rock and a really-want-to-mess-with-racists place. It would’ve been fun to throw a “10 percent West African” in there, but then they might have a pissed-off, dangerous person at their office, waving a gun. “Since we couldn’t do anything to the results (and we wanted to), what we did was add ‘< 1 percent’ to each African category of ethnicity. That way we weren’t lying, and they would both be wondering how much under a percentage point was. We always try to round to the nearest number because we sometimes hear about percentage points, but for them, we leave it open to whether it’s a one or a zero.”
It’s a compromise that’s elegant in its passive-aggressive simplicity. And it got a result. “The near-N-bomber wrote to us asking what that meant, and we wrote back that it meant it was under 1 percent. And we were not saying zero. Unless they got another test, that was going to bother them. Maybe they weren’t 100 percent Caucasian. I mean, they were, according to the results, but this way it leaves it open, and they’ll always be wondering.”
Bravo. Bravissimo!
Willing to Forge Results on Demand for Jews
“We had a Jewish man in Canada ask us to make it look like he was from Israel. His results showed him to be from Eastern Europe, and based on his last name, we said it was all but certain his ancestors were from Poland. Judging by his family history, they probably came over around WWII, for reasons you can probably imagine. But no, he said he was Jewish and wanted ‘Eastern European’ changed to the area Israel is in.”
As you might guess, being Jewish doesn’t work that way. There’s a big difference between Jewish people who came from European ancestry and someone whose family has been living in the land currently occupied by Israel for thousands of years. “Israel is new…and by saying he’s from there by blood, we’d be saying he was Arab. We have changed things on occasion…and we played along with him over the phone. ‘Sure, we can change your ancestry to being from the near Middle East.’ We gave him the option of being more from Egypt, more from Syria, or more Arab. He wasn’t what you would call happy that those were his only options, and when operator asked him, ‘Would you like to be Arab?’ he slammed the phone down.” …
* * *
Source: Top30News and National Vanguard correspondents
Jew-Owned DNA Testing Companies Fake Results to “Mess With White Racists”
I always suspected as much. No surprise. Another case of poisoning our wells… information-wise.
They also do it in myriad other ways, like putting out “statistical data” that shows Whites as a majority… and “crime-stats” that 1) fluff up White criminality by adding non-Whites to the ‘White’ category and 2) minimize Black criminality, even though it’s almost impossible since their criminality is so far off the charts. Same thing with White “hate crimes” and almost everything else.
Ah, tribal business practices. The looting of the gentiles and forcing them to pay for their own miscegenation and genocide, so diabolical and evil. Only the tribe that celebrates its 5000 years of genocide and war crimes – calling it the “bible” could do it with such mundane routine.
Are there legitimate DNA tests out there? I am extremely wary of giving my most personal info to a private company, especially when I can’t trust the results and I can’t trust the company to keep my DNA private and safe. I recall on the National Alliance forum that several of the members have had their DNA tested. Why would they trust in these services?
SEB: Are there legitimate DNA tests out there?… I recall on the National Alliance forum that several of the members have had their DNA tested. Why would they trust in these services?
—
We had a discussion about the Jew-owned DNA companies earlier this year, here: https://whitebiocentrism.com/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=3127&p=10539&hilit=dna+test#p10539 and here: https://whitebiocentrism.com/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=3136&p=10542&hilit=dna+test#p10542 where the reader can find the results of the DNA test I took.
I don’t trust the Jew-owned companies that are currently competing for curious gentile testees, but I’m certainly not afraid of sending any of them my “most personal information.” Maybe I was testing the Jew DNA tester (Greenspan) that I chose? This White racist didn’t feel he was “messed with” at all when he got the results of the test.
My wife and I both feel that Ancestry.com was accurate with us.
They even corrected mine, unasked-for, from “Eastern European” (which I seriously doubted) to “Scandinavian” + “Irish” (which I have always thought reflected the Norman ancestry of my family, and is in our genealogy).
They got the German ancestry of my wife right the first time.
I’ve told people for years to avoid these kinds of services for the very same reasons, intentional disinformation to make people think they’re not really White and thus, not support the movement and/or to promote the lie that we’re all mixed anyway, so keep mixing it up, folks! Besides, who wants to have their DNA end up in some government data bank anyway, because you know that’s happening, too.
Fortunately, my aunt investigated and created a family tree going back to the 1600’s long before the internet with real documents. That’s my story and I’m sticking to it.
Our people will eventually have DNA testing for our purposes — FUBU, if you’ll pardon that Negro acronym. Linked above in my earlier comment is the discussion some of us had about this subject. I accepted the challenge as National Alliance Chairman to have my DNA tested. I did so with Mr. Greenspan’s outfit with not a worry in the world that the results would indicate anything but that I am pure Aryan White boy. In fact the result I received back in June was that I am 99% European (the remaining 1% not indicated), not that I’m “all mixed up” to make me feel non-White. I do believe, however, that disinformation is exactly what our racial adversaries heaped on Craig Cobb, claiming a couple of years ago in a… Read more »
I was doing some research on these companies and they all seem to be in the process of being bought out and most of the headquarters are in Israel now! You can do some research and see these large ones are buying up the small ones all over the world, like in Europe, Germany, Poland, etc. Makes you wonder what they want to collect all these DNA samples globally for? I sure wouldn’t trust them.
they also cover up the fact they are not white ,have the most monkey dna after blacks, are retarded ,have diseaseed dna and are inbred
You must be joking this personal info I would never release.. The Us army/airforce has been rigorously collecting DNA from the whole of Russia. One an aggressive country is certain of a relatively pure race they can and will (probably have) develop race specific disease. Every new discovery is first tested to see if it can be militarised.
Our White race exists, despite Jews owning most of the commercial DNA testing services; and they and their kinsmen trying to convince us we do not exist. Fred, I rebuke you and others’ defeatism. Maybe you think we should all just shut our mouths and go crawl in holes instead of fighting for the preservation of our type on this planet — the only place our people have ever lived? We will regain some measure of exclusive living space and encourage eugenics among our own. No Jew or group of Jews will stop that. Fact! We will attract those eligible Whites who agree with National Alliance values and goals and organize them toward those goals. NA is not for everyone, but those whom our Alliance is not for seem compelled… Read more »
I don’t think it’s defeatism to be a little paranoid about giving away one’s genetic information to these people who are conspiring to commit genocide. I will admit that I am totally ignorant (that is to say, uneducated) on the topic of biology, chemistry, etc but I do know that tremendous strides are being made in the field of genetics.
Have you heard of CRISP-R? It sounds like very potent technology that could be used for some seriously evil stuff is used by the wrong people. Don’t forget about the Tuskegee experiments and all of the geoengineering that they have done.
As a national socialist is it best to trust the charts of cavalli sforza then?
is gedmatch reliable?
is gedmatch reliable? Its a simple question i ask yet it always gets ignored
Even before reading this excellent article, I had read stories that called the accuracy of these results into question. Their is a DNA database that applicant DNA samples are submitted to, and different companies use different versions of said database; a company that tests your DNA against 5 million entries will have different results from another company that compares yours to 7 million or more entries. Then there’s the issue of where those samples came from. It’s mostly Western countries and parts of Africa and Asia; almost no Andaman Islanders or other obscure ethnic groups. Obviously the more entries in the database from more diverse countries and ethnicies whose ancestry might have cross-bred with yours at some point, the more accurate the results. Then there’s genetic markers based on SNiPs… Read more »