Nathan Bedford Forrest: From Great Bravery to “Positively Disgusting”

Another letter The Tomahawk would not publish

by William White Williams
Chairman, National Alliance

To: The Tomahawk; Attention: Tamas Mondovics (editor)

Sir, please publish this letter (249 words) in the next issue of The Tomahawk:

THANKS FOR FEATURING last week the piece about Tennessean Nathan Bedford Forrest (NBF) that will be discontinued from the eighth grade social studies curriculum in our state. NBF is not Politically Correct. That’s why he’s being removed from the classroom and his statue removed from the hallway of Tennessee’s State Capitol, not to mention why his body was exhumed and moved.

The article is somewhat balanced, saying that criticism of Forrest during the War of Northern Aggression was from northern newspapers, including The New York Times. That was to be expected from contemporaneous Yankee print media. Forrest’s conciliatory speech 20 years after the war should have redeemed him in the eyes of his critics, but did not with those who control what is taught to Tennessee’s eighth graders. 

Yes, to many, by today’s standards, Forrest is controversial because he owned and traded slaves prior to serving the Confederate States of America (CSA). Still, that the article tells of NBF having had 30 horses shot out from under him may fascinate folks enough to make them want to know more about the courageous guerrilla cavalryman, perhaps from biographies available on Amazon.com. He was a very successful millionaire planter prior to his state seceding from the Union, joining as a private, raising a regiment with his own funds, and eventually rising to Lt. General. 

Robert E. Lee called him his best general; he was the nemesis of controversial Union general Sherman, who admired him. Forrest need not be worshipped but his life should be taught.

Will Williams
Laurel Bloomery

* * *

Appendix
from The Tomahawk weekly newspaper, Mountain City, TN 37683
June 14, 2023

Forrest: the Most Controversial Man in Tennessee History

Editor’s note: This column is the fifth in a series of topics slated to be deleted from the eighth-grade Tennessee social studies standards.

Nathan Bedford Forrest is by far the most controversial figure in Tennessee history. That’s why a statue of him was removed from the hallway of the Tennessee State Capitol,
and why his remains were recently moved.

Why is he so controversial?

Forrest was born in 1821 in a log cabin in what is now Marshall County. He and his twin sister were the oldest of 12 children of a poor blacksmith. In 1834, the family moved to Mississippi. Three years later, Forrest’s father died, and Nathan had to work to support the family.

In 1841, Nathan worked for his uncle Jonathan Forrest, a mule trader in Hernando, Mississippi. Four years later, Jonathan was killed in an argument with a group of brothers. In retaliation, Nathan shot and killed two of them.

Nathan expanded the mule trading business to include slave trading, and he moved to Memphis. By 1857, Forrest was one of the best-known slave traders in the mid-South. With branch offices all over the Mississippi River Valley, Forrest made a lot of money buying enslaved people in places such as West Tennessee and Kentucky and selling them in Mississippi, Louisiana and Texas.

Advertisements for “N.B. Forrest — Dealer in Slaves” ran in newspapers as far away as Charleston, South Carolina.

Forrest was so prominent that he became a Memphis city alderman. In 1859, by which time he owned two plantations and several hundred slaves, he retired from slave trading.

When the Civil War broke out, Forrest enlisted in the army. Only a few months later, he was promoted to lieutenant colonel and given the command of the 3rd Tennessee Confederate Cavalry.

During the Civil War, Forrest’s men fought at just about every major Tennessee battle. The actions of its leader, meanwhile, became the subject of amazing stories.

At Fort Donelson, Forrest refused to surrender and led thousands of men out of the fort into safety. At Shiloh, he picked up a Union soldier and used him as a human shield to keep from being killed. At Parker’s Crossroads, his men were surrounded by enemy troops when he gave them the command to “Charge ’em both ways!” They did, successfully.

Written accounts claim that Forrest killed 31 men during the war, mostly in saber duels or pistol shootings, and that he had about 30 horses shot out from under him.

In April 1864, Forrest’s cavalry attacked Fort Pillow — a Union fortress on the Mississippi River in Tennessee that was guarded by hundreds of African-American Union soldiers. According to Northern newspapers, Confederate troops continued to kill Union soldiers as they attempted to surrender. “The blacks and their officers were shot down, bayoneted and put to the sword in cold blood — the helpless victims of the perfidy by which they were overpowered,” the New York Times reported.

Forrest’s men later maintained that the Union troops kept their weapons and continued to fire as they fled in the direction of the Mississippi River and a Union gunboat there. This refusal to surrender, they insisted, is why so many of them were killed. The incident became known as the Fort Pillow Massacre, and in the minds of many Americans, Forrest was responsible.

Forrest’s postwar career is remembered for his leadership in the Ku Klux Klan from about 1867 until 1869 — a time when it frequently resorted to violence to intimidate former enslaved men from voting or running for public office.

However, by 1869, Forrest reportedly believed that the Klan was ungovernable and that its methods were doing damage to the South. He withdrew from the Klan and even ordered it to be disbanded. (Many members of the Klan ignored his orders.)

He spent his declining years in charge of a prison camp on an island in the Mississippi River.

On July 4th, 1875, Forrest made a speech to a large audience of African-Americans in Memphis. The conciliatory nature of his remarks shocked many Southerners. “We were born of the same soil, breathe the same air, and live in the same land,” he said. “Why, then, can we not live as brothers?” He went on to say that “we have but one flag, one country; let us stand together. We may differ in color, but not in sentiment.” 

Nathan Bedford Forrest died of natural causes in October 1877. He was buried in Elmwood Cemetery in Memphis. In 1904, his remains (and that of his wife Mary) were disinterred and moved to a small park in downtown Memphis named Forrest Park.

That park, and the large statue of him which towered over it, eventually became the center of controversy. The park has since been renamed Health Sciences Park, the statue taken down, and his remains moved to the Confederate Museum in Maury County.

* * *

Note by Will WIlliams: In doing a little research about this article, I did not find the original source, but did find that the same article had been published in the Lewis County (TN) Herald. In its version, in the third from the last paragraph, after “we may differ in color, but not in sentiment,” appears this sentence:

Many newspapers across the South criticized Forrest for the way in which he reached out to African Americans in the speech. “The speech of General Forrest is positively disgusting,” said the Shreveport Times.

Apparently Tomahawk readers’ tender sensibilities mustn’t be exposed to what the Shreveport Times thought about Forrest’s end-of-life cowardice, or they, too, might express disgust.

Forrest’s decline and flip-flop near the end of his life reminds me of how Alabama Governor, George “Segregation forever” Wallace, who MLK called “the most dangerous racist in America,” pulled a similar disgusting about-face near the end of his life, when, crippled by an assassination attempt, he was being wheeled around by a Negro.

* * *

Source: Author