Russia: the Bloody Insanity of “We Can Repeat” — part 2
by Wolf Stoner
National Vanguard Russian correspondent
read part 1
HAVING LEARNED ABOUT Soviet methods of warfare, one can’t help but wonder how they could be so callous to their own people. If the brutality toward conquered Europe could be rationalized somewhat by considerations of vengeance, the senseless slaughter of Russians by the Russian state seems utterly irrational and counterproductive. And it would be irrational and counterproductive if it were really a Russian state. Here again we see the ethnic origin of all political events. Absolutely everything that happens in the world has ethnic roots, however masterfully they might be concealed.
The ruling class in the USSR wasn’t Russian by any standard. It wasn’t Russian ethnically and it wasn’t Russian culturally. The Soviet rulers considered ethnic Russians to be a cheap, disposable commodity, easily and rapidly renewable. On these predatory precepts were based all policies, strategies, and battlefield tactics. Zhukov wasn’t an originator of this attitude; that Shabbos goy simply expressed what his masters thought.
Despite being utterly destructive and counterproductive in the long run, this method of total disregard for human costs was one of the two main causes of the Soviet victory in the Second World War (the other being help from America’s industrial might). That victory further validated these attitudes among the Soviet ruling class. It simply worked — and all other considerations were irrelevant. New generations of Soviet leadership were nurtured in this vein of thought. The only thing that matters is the target; any human cost is acceptable.
The most important thing for Western people to understand is the fact that nothing has changed since 1991 — nothing of substance, anyway. Russia is run largely by people with the same mentality. This system is self-replicating. It acquires new, resilient traits, but never changes its core substance. What we can see now on the battlefield is a re-run of what happened in World War 2. It could not be otherwise. Why would these leaders use any other strategies and tactics, if the old ones proved to be successful? The present-day Kremlin leadership isn’t as homogeneous as it was at the beginning of the Bolshevik “experiment,” but the entire set of attitudes put in place by Lenin’s government continues to be the holy writ and gold standard of statesmanship in Russia. A total disregard for human costs and the norms of morality is coupled with a readiness to transgress any laws and agreements.
The greatest mistake of most foreign observers is to perceive post-Soviet Russia as something different from the USSR. It is not different. The history of Putin’s Russia is a continuation of Soviet history — its terminal phase. Looked at from this point of view, all the actions of the Kremlin become understandable and predictable. Each time you need to know what Putin’s Russia would do in such and such a situation, simply ask yourself: What would Lenin do? The most atrocious and bloody variant is always the most likely one. This method of prediction works in most cases. For the same reason, Russian/Soviet judges always prefer to use maximal punishments.
The collective bloodthirstiness and desire to inflict maximum pain on anyone who is considered an enemy is the main defining feature of Soviet Man. The Soviet/Russian populace was remodeled after this fashion. Russians accept this attitude from the state as something normal, as a necessary prerequisite of state greatness. The idea of greatness without massive bloodshed is beyond their scope. The great leader always must produce a great shedding of blood, otherwise he could not be reckoned as great. Therefore, the idea that huge battlefield losses will somehow diminish Putin’s stature is incorrect. The more people who die, the greater the leader becomes. That is a default Soviet/Russian attitude.
Who is the most despised leader in Russia? Yes, Gorbachev. Why? Because he rejected the idea of great bloodshed. If he had started a war, like that going on now, and had sacrificed a few million Russians, he would be lying in the Mausoleum on Red Square and cities would be named after him. Yeltsin was more willing to spill blood, therefore he has more respect, but not enough to be considered a great statesman. Putin has learned this lesson well and decided to become really great.
The cult of death has become the religion of the USSR, regardless of what its creators envisaged. It frequently happens in history that the long-term consequences of social projects are totally different from what was expected.
Western observers consider high Russian battlefield losses to be a liability to Russian rulers, but in reality such losses are an asset. The greater the losses, the more justifications for war: “Look how many of our heroes died defending the Motherland! We must never give up! We must do everything for our victory!” This shift in narrative can be clearly detected in internal Russian propaganda, which attempts to portray Russia as a great martyr nation ready for its last stand against the Devil. The Russian populace is actively conditioned to accept great bloodshed. The holy status of the war precludes asking any questions about the validity of its causes, atrocities committed, losses, etc.
Psychological preparation for the current war has been going on for the last twenty years. The pitch of hysteria was constantly heightened. After 2014, it crossed the line which divides a normal society from an insane one. Since then, it has hardly been possible to reverse the trend. Everything that has happened since then was inevitable and predictable. The cult of victory in the Second World War has become a new and weird religion that has displaced most everything else. It is the alpha and omega of the whole Putinist society.
The most remarkable and ubiquitous slogan of this periodm 2014 to 2022, is “We Can Repeat,” accompanied by all kinds of anti-German posters, including quiteindecent ones. This obsessive desire to repeat the massive bloodshed and wholesale destruction of Europe has soaked the Russian collective mind, poisoning all social strata. This insanity goes both ways: from the top down and from the grassroots upward. The insane rulers encourage public insanity and, in turn, the collective hysteria of the crowds emboldens the rulers to ever more atrocious actions. The result is there for all to see — and it is only the beginning. As Putin said, “We haven’t even started yet.”
Crossing the River
The history of the battles on the Eastern Front in World War 2 is very important. Everyone interested in military affairs must study this history, for those battles were very different from those in other theaters of the war. The persistence with which the Soviet high command threw its troops into desperate attacks is unparalleled by anything else in history. In order to better understand this cannibalistic mentality and total disregard for human life, we need to look at one of the typical examples of this kind of military action.
Here I want to present an excerpt from a memoir by General Erhard Raus. It describes an episode that happened during the battle of Kursk, during the phase in which the Soviets started their counter-offensive. The tactical details of the battle are especially valuable and give a first-hand perspective on events.
The book’s title is Panzer Operations: the Eastern Front Memoir of General Raus, 1941-45. This extract is from Chapter 9, ‘Belgorod and Kharkov’, page 216. The same chapter is published in the book, Kursk, the German View.
The 11th corps led by General Raus was defending a front sector to the south of Belgorod city, along the Severskii Donets river. In order to break through the German defenses, the Soviets needed to cross the river. Here is the description of the crossing:
The regiments of Major General Georg Postel’s 320th Infantry Division were situated approximately thirty kilometers south of Belgorod on the hills on both sides of A[ ] Brook valley, through which a highway ran westward of the big Belgorod-Kharkov rollbahn, and those of Lieutenant General Werner Forst’s 106th Infantry Division held a position directly north of them. Any Russian advance through this valley would quickly interrupt this vital line of communications, which placed a heavy responsibility on the battalions stationed on both sides of the valley to prevent such incursions.
Our tactical withdrawal to the eastern bank of the Donets on 22 July had so surprised the Soviets in this sector that they only cautiously and hesitantly felt their way forward to the river on 23 July. In the 320th Infantry Division’s sector the western bank of the Donets was much higher than the eastern, and — particularly at the junction of A[ ] Brook with the river — the terrain was swampy and covered with reeds. The Donets was not fordable at any point, and it seemed obvious that the Russians would have a difficult time forcing a breakthrough in this locality. During the day they would probably be able to hide along the eastern bank in the maze of trenches remaining from their battered former positions and in the innumerable shell craters, but they would be unable to move into the open without being identified and brought under fire by the German defenders.
The weapons of the 320th Infantry, from their well-concealed bunker positions, controlled the Donets River valley (which was very level along its entire extent of three to four kilometers) so effectively that it was impossible for the enemy to prepare a daylight attack. Our artillery and heavy weapons we positioned in the hills southwest of village B[ ], zeroing them in on a former bridge site and preparing them for nightfiring. Ridge 675, which afforded excellent visibility to the east, had been transformed into a virtually impregnable bastion. Shell-proof dugouts, deep shelters, and communications tunnels protected the gun crews there from Russian counterbattery fire. Exits from the tunnels that faced the river had been expertly camouflaged, with machine guns emplaced in these exits to command the river in case the enemy attempted a night crossing. Their fields of fire covered not only the potential bridge site but also concentration areas and approach routes on both banks of the Donets. Firing data for these weapons had been computed and carefully rechecked, while searchlights had been emplaced along the ridge to illuminate the immediate outpost area. The Russians lacked specific knowledge of these meticulous preparations but were fully aware that our troops had enjoyed ample opportunity to improve their defenses. As a result, a dead silence prevailed in the sun-drenched, glittering sand desert on the eastern bank of the Donets throughout the long summer days of late July.
The author then describes various methods of reconnaissance used by the Soviets in order to gain information about German defenses:
As a result of this intelligence, the enemy selected this point for his first attempt to cross the river. Fortunately, the men of the battalion positioned here had remained vigilant. They had identified and mined the tracks of the Russian scouting parties and had adjusted their machine guns and mortars on the crossing points used by these parties, so that the weapons were ready for night firing. Thus prepared, they kept a close watch on the river throughout the night of 31 July-1 August. As expected, just before dawn, several companies of Red Army troops appeared and commenced crossing the Donets at three previously reconnoitered points, utilizing improvised equipment. The mines that exploded and killed the first Russian soldiers to land on the western bank took them by complete surprise. The companies near the river on the eastern bank came under heavy, preregistered fire from machine guns and mortars, scattering in panic with heavy losses. Our artillery finished the job by shelling and destroying the river-crossing equipment they abandoned as soon as the sun rose.
General Postel and his troops did not make the mistake of thinking that the Russians would abandon their intention to force a crossing at this location because of a single setback. On the contrary, they repeated the attack on the night of 1-2 August, at the very same crossing sites, employing stronger forces and new equipment. General Postel decided not to interfere immediately but to deliver a decisive blow at the most critical moment. He ordered several batteries to mass their fire on the bridge site to smash the construction work after it had progressed sufficiently. At a prearranged time, just before midnight, all the guns fired upon the bridge site simultaneously and then ceased as abruptly as they had begun. Observers on the ridge made out the silhouette of a bizarre tangle of beams and pillars in the flickering light of burning lumber on the eastern bank of the river. The partially completed bridge was a shambles in the midst of which wounded men were screaming for help as shadows and scurrying figures (presumably medical aid men) moved among them.
Scarcely half an hour had passed when our observers reported that full-scale construction activity had resumed. The sounds of intensive hammering and sawing induced General Postel to order another concentration fired shortly after midnight. The result was equally devastating, though this time silence followed the bursts of our projectiles, a silence interrupted only by explosions from a few ammunition dumps that caught fire after sustaining direct hits. Yet the fires soon died down, and after only a brief interval the Russians again resumed their efforts as if nothing had happened. Obviously, the commander on the opposite shore had positive orders that his bridge had to be complete by dawn.
To frustrate this intention without wasting ammunition, General Postel ordered one 210mm howitzer battery to deliver intermittent harassing fire on the bridge site. Flash observation confirmed that the projectiles had landed on or very close to their targets. After an hour of harassment fire the pattern of Soviet response became clear. When a round did major damage it cause a prolonged work stoppage, but after a near-miss the hammering resumed immediately. General Postel therefore concluded that under these circumstances the Russians might still be able to complete the bridge by dawn, harassing fire notwithstanding.
He therefore decided to employ some of our hidden machine guns to rake the construction site at short intervals with bursts of fire. Judging by the screams of those who were hit, and the immediate suspension of the bridging operation, the rapid precision fire of these weapons had a devastating effect. Even so, the Russians still attempted to continue with the construction, but high losses forced them to slow down and finally quit the work entirely.
At periodic intervals, our heavy howitzers resumed harassing fire to discourage the Soviets from resuming their project and to complete the destruction. Only after daybreak was it possible for our observers to obtain a true picture of the results achieved during the hours of darkness. A horrific sight presented itself. Splintered rafters pointed skyward, and in between hung grotesquely mutilated corpses of the brave men who had scorned death in the effort to accomplish their mission. Even more mangled bodies were strewn about in a wide circle around the bridge site or lay partially submerged in the mud holes formed by shell craters. Smashed vehicles, dead horses, and all kinds of ammunition and equipment littered the area. Live Russians, on the other hand, seemed to have vanished from the scene of their failure.
That, however, wasn’t the end of the Soviet attempts to cross the river. They continued on the following days, but for us this is enough to see the methods and mindset of Soviet military leadership.
Now let’s look at more recent events. Seventy-nine years later, at the same river, Donets, only 200 kilometers south ofthe place where the Germans defended their positions, the modern Russian army again tried to cross this river — again using similar methods and showing the same obstinacy and utter disregard for their own losses.
On 8 May 2022, Russian combined arms units were gathered at the river bank. Pontoon bridges were being constructed. The higher command demanded quick victory before 9 May celebrations in Moscow. (This date is of semi-religious significance in Putin’s Russia.) Meanwhile, Ukrainian reconnaissance units had detected this concentration. The coordinates of the place were relayed to the Ukrainian command, which rapidly arranged a combined strike by fighter jets and all available artillery in the area. After a few hours of strikes, the four pontoon bridges were destroyed and at least 70 trucks and armored vehicles were destroyed or disabled. The number of killed personnel was impossible to evaluate, but certainly one battalion tactical group ceased to exist. Predictably, though, this didn’t deter Russian command from trying again to cross the river in the same place. On each day from 9 to 12 May, Russian forces tried to cross the river and construct bridges, and each time they were prevented by concentrated and precise Ukrainian artillery fire. After failing to cross the river and losing most of the equipment that was intended for a deep strike into the Ukrainian rear, the Russian command ordered a retreat on 13 May.
This example shows us that the modern Russian military leadership operates according to the same old principles. And it would be unwise to expect anything else as long as this neo-Soviet state continues to exist. But it must be noted that this time the Russian military will not be able to achieve the same spectacular results as it did in World War 2. The quality of the population is markedly worse than it was then. Modern Russians are mostly city dwellers with very high rates of alcohol and drug addiction as well as bad health. Back in Stalin’s time, Russians were mostly peasants accustomed to hard work, exposure to harsh weather, and privations of all kinds. Now such men are almost nonexistent. The only exceptions are the Asian tribesmen from the Siberian wilderness (who the Russian command actively uses) but their mental capacities are very limited, which prevents them from using complicated weapons systems and tactics.
Therefore, the Russian military leadership is in a quandary. It has reached a dead end from which there is no way out. It can’t retreat, and it can’t win. It is compelled by circumstances to continue more of the same, in order to buy time and hope for some favorable changes in the world. But the longer it persists, the worse will be the outcome. The situation will come to a point of no return, and, when it does, events will be determined by their own logic, not by any particular leader or country. In this sense, Russia has become an icebreaker that splits the globalist post-World War 2 system; not intentionally, but because of its own delusions.
The coming chaos opens the window for real changes. Any disruption of the existing equilibrium is welcome, because the status quo as it has been for the last 77 years is a death sentence for the White race.
Finis
* * *
Source: Author
Kalergi Plan, all jew Kabuki theater, fratricidal wars, kill as many whites as possible, as we are too dumb to realize we are being “had”. Sadly whites never learn, to the jew’s enrichment and culling of their enemy. 98% of our wealth has been plundered by jew central banks and schemes. All but 3 of the central banks are jew Rothschild banks. Note the term “nazi” nonstop in jew mainstream media, making whites hate other whites.
Yes, both sides of the Russia-Ukraine war overuse this “Nazi” cliche. It is the common insanity of the modern decadent western world. They are fixated on “fighting Nazism”. “Nazism” is the modern version of “Devil-worship” in Middle Ages. You don’t need to prove your claim; it is simply enough to accuse. But it is all bound to crumble. The whole system is bancrupt in all aspects. It has nothing to give people; even its main claim of providing prosperity is not true any more. The scam can’t continue indefinitely; the Jewish dominance of social life always have the same outcome. It can’t be otherwise. But this time the vermin will have no other place to go.
Whites never learn because they have been poisoned by the Jewish controlled opposition mind virus of Christianity, which at its core is anti-White survival.
This two-part series sounds like something one would read in “The Atlantic” or “The New York Times,” and repeated on CNN and MSNBC. This reads exactly like CIA lies. Initially there was the claim that because of their incompetence, inefficiency, and lack of industrial capacity the Russian army would run out of artillery shells, cruise missiles and bullets within a month or two. The same claim was then made again but the the point of exhaustion would be by the end of summer. Yet, Russian artillery continues to pump out ten times the number of shells as the NATO/Ukrainian army. Now “The New York Times” and other US and British propaganda outlets are admitting that the US and NATO are the ones running out of ammo for their Ukrainian proxies… Read more »
I find your entire argument that the Putin government is just as willing to needlessly waste thousands — or millions — of the lives of its young men as the Soviet Union did during WW II to be utterly unconvincing. You offer one real comparison: that of the the crossing of the Donetsk River. While the Russians did get hammered by Ukrainian artillery attempting to cross last summer, casualties were nothing like those in WW II. And in fact, the Russians did not persist with even more losses attempting to cross again and again over the next few days. They may have lost somewhere between 50 and 75 men killed on that first day, and that was it — unless you want to believe all the wild claims in the… Read more »
I understand and agree with your thesis that both Russia under Putin and the US under the Jews are dead ends for white Russians and white Americans; however, I believe that the US system is far worse. At the moment these two regimes are waging war against one another in Ukraine. One will win, and one will lose. All evidence indicates Russia is winning this war and will eventually force a disasterous defeat upon the US which will accelerate its economic and financial collapse. Both sides will not lose simultaneously. And a Russian win and a US loss would be the best thing for our race right now. What I don’t understand is why you want to repeat so many of the Biden regime lies, such as this was an… Read more »
Winning? What I see are two Jewish ran regimes are using their White serfs to slaughter the other White serfs. Only the Jews are winning here, Old Aardvark.
First of all, this war ever more becomes a war between China and America but so far fought by Russian and Ukrainian hands. China was instrumental in stabilizing Russian situation. Without Chinese support Russian economy would have collapsed already. China cannot allow Russia to fail in Ukraine; most probably it will provide weapons as well, in addition to the unlimited supply of all other essential goods. For years China supplied Taliban in order to drive out America from Central Asia. After succeeding in this task, China was greatly emboldened and decided to act more vigorously. The development of events ever more discloses the hidden Chinese hand behind Kremlin’s actions. If, eventually, China would become a global factor that would destroy Jewish global supremacy, it would be a positive outcome. But… Read more »
I see no evidence that Putin wants to invade eastern Europe as a means to restore some kind of greater Russian empire. The USSR freely abandoned eastern Europe over thirty years ago. What reason would it have to squander its resources trying to conquer and occupy it now? The only areas I see where Russia might be compelled to enter would be areas with significant Russian populations, such as Moldova and the Baltic states. I hear that ethnic Russians are being treated harshly in these areas. The Donbass Russians begged Putin for years to accept them into Russia, and he refused for eight years until it was clear that the NATO created armies in Ukraine were prepared to roll over Luhansk and Donetsk. Putin had pushed the Minsk agreements for… Read more »
In the US you can own guns. You can be White nationalist and not go to jail. In Russia, these things are illegal or highly restricted.
You can do these things as a white nationalist in the US provided you don’t go public with it. Become an activist and they will infiltrate your organization and send the leaders to prison, along with anyone else who isn’t on the FBI payroll.
Paranoia will destroy ya, OA. You say to our Russian Nationalist Alliance member this: I can only assume you have a motive. From what I can deduce your motive is to stir up anti-Russian hatred, no doubt because there are a significant percentage of white American conservatives who are sympathetic to Russia and Putin. You were for years an outstanding Alliance member but are now practically an NA critic and don’t even capitalize White when referring to our people. I cannot deduce your motives. Sean is correct. Wolf has disabused many American WNs of their belief that Putin is some sort of Great White Hope for Whites. Putin is no friend of ethnic Russian nationalists, and Wolf, being one, backs up his assertions with firsthand experience. You now are in… Read more »
I have considered why Wolf would hold his point of view. He is a white nationalist living in Russia. Of course he would like to see regime change there because he believes it would open up an opportunity for white Russians to advance their agenda. I cannot fault him for this. But I am living in the US; thus, we are mirror images of one another. I want to see the Jew-run (ZOG) system crushed here. But as I said in the previous post, in this war either Putin wins and the US loses, or Biden wins and Putin loses. Both cannot win. Both will not lose. It’s either or. I see the US as the far more dangerous threat to our race than Putin’s Russia. If the US wins… Read more »
Old Aardvark: … [Of course [Wolf] would like to see regime change there because he believes it would open up an opportunity for white [sic] Russians to advance their agenda… — Wolf can speak for himself, but I’ve never seen him say anything like that. — … At this point Russia is more of a white [sic] nation than the US is… Russian racial nationalism will find its upward path more quickly than it will in the US. — You just wrote than American White racial nationalists will be infiltrated by FBI goons and jailed once they become active. Heysus Christos! How much more defeatist can you get? We have infinitely more freedom to operate and express ourselves here in America as active Alliance members than Russian RN groups have… Read more »
Old Aardvark, I’ll risk going off-topic to address your mention of Patriot Front (PF) and the alt-right organizers of that Charlottesville debacle in August 2017 under part 2 of Wolf’s essay. What is PF’s and the rest of the alt-righters’ position on the important issue of Christianity? From all I’ve seen they have no position, unless that some embrace it, and the rest don’t address it for fear they may offend Christians. Correct me if I’m wrong. You know my position. I’ll share with you and NV readers what I wrote to our members in the March issue of our NA Members BULLETIN that was mailed Friday March 31. I’m responding to what Wolf had written to me in an email last month. NA is not for everyone, not yet… Read more »
I only mentioned Patriot Front and the Charlottesville march because they are the two best examples that came to mind of organizations who engaged in open pro-white activism in recent years and both got hammered by the USA police state. I am not a member of either group, and I know little about their ideologies. So, Mr. Williams, why the need to segue into this elaborate straw man argument about Christianity? You know I am not a Christian. When have I ever posted anything pushing Jebus on this website? However, I know the limits of what can be said online, and I spend a lot more time posting comments from a white nationalist viewpoint — often using my legal name — on YouTube and many news sites than I do… Read more »
OA, NV moderator Jim sent me the two very long responses by you to my reply to you a week earlier for review since they were critical of our Alliance and of NA member Wolf Stoner. What’s below is a condensation of those two responses: — Old Aardvark: Replies to William W Williams * National Alliance Chairman 10 April, 2023 I only mentioned Patriot Front and the Charlottesville march because they are the two best examples that came to mind of organizations who engaged in open pro-white [sic] activism in recent years and both got hammered by the USA police state. — I addressed PF and those young alt-right organizers of Unite the Right in Charlottesville and what sets our Alliance apart from them. You chose to ignore what I… Read more »
A commenter here once posted a link to a Russian-language book on the history of Jews. It was great, but I forgot to bookmark it and can’t find the comment again. I hope someone reading this knows what book I’m talking about.
It began by speculating that Judaism started in 1000 BC when a priest convinced their people to pre-emptively massacre the inhabitants of a nearby city, based on the false allegation that the people of that city were planning to do the same thing to the Jews.
I had to use Google Translate to read it, and it’s hard to even search for it because I don’t know Russian.
Mr. Stoner, to your two reasons (lend-lease and total disregard for human life by Soviets) of the victory of Bolshevism in Second Antibolshevist War 1941-1945, I’d like to add a third, in my opionion, major reason for the catastrofy of 1945. It is the failure of Japan, an ally of Germany at the time, to open a second front against Soviets in 1941. Japan wasn’t a very true ally to N. S. Germany. Japan was thinking only of her own interests when she attacked the US in December 1941 at Pearl Harbor, without giving a thought how it would help N. S. Germany. If Japan, instead of attacking the US in December 1941, attacked the Soviet Union and opened the Second front on the Soviet Far East in December or… Read more »
As for allies, Germany had, effectively, none or almost none. Hitler’s fascination with Mussolini was one of his greatest and most fatal flaws, the only reason why the desperately under-staffed and under-supplied Afrika Korps was even created was to save the hapless, backstabbing Italians’ bacon – again and again – against horrendous odds and for no good reason. Those men could have been put to much better use in the east. The only non-Germanic troops who did not turn tail or even switch sides when things got rough in late ’42 were the Hungarians – maybe because they knew what was coming from racial memory. I have often wondered what might have happened if German diplomats had worked out an alliance with newly independent Ireland. Not only would that have… Read more »
I was making a specific point of how Japan could have radically changed the issue of that war from the the catastrofe of 1945 to the triumph of 1941 if she had thought less of her own ego-interests, and more of the interest of her ally and their common cause. And you are quite right, it’s a tragedy for us all that Hitlerian Germany didn’t have real, faithful allies. I don’t know about Hungarians but I know about Roumania, also Germany ally. Roumanians were very good at shooting Soviet POWs, those Soviet soldgiers who surrendered or wanted to surrender, the fact which Degrelle vehemently protested to Roumanian commanders, but who turned out to be embarrassing cowards when it came to the real battle. At Stalingrad, Roumanian troups covered the flank… Read more »
I have never heard this argument before. It is quite compelling.
Now many years later, when I look back it seems quite obvious to me why Roosevelt and Churchille provoked Japan on numerous occasions. It is obvious they were enticing Japan to attack America and wage war against her so that Japan could not attack Stalin and open the second front against the Soviet Union. A second front would certainly help Germany to defeat Soviet Communism, even then in 1941. Unfortunately for the white world and white race, they succeded in enticing Japan to wage war against the US, and Stalin was safe. And that’s why we have now this neo-Stalinist neo-Bolshevist chinless dwarf Putin in Kremlin.
It should seem obvious if you’ve had a chance to study The Origins of the Second World War by historian A.J.P. Taylor and Infamy by John Toland. Provoking war has been a hobby of gasbag puppets such as Roosevelt and Churchill and thinking men have shared this knowledge in detail. Sadly, this sort of information is somehow withheld in places of
learningindoctrination following 1945.I must humbly admit that I came to this conclusion by myself without reading any learned histories. After looking at the facts it seemed obvious to me that Roosevelt and Churchill did everything they could to provoke Japan into war with America. Why? To prevent Japan, as Germany’s ally, to open the second front on Soviet Far East and start the war against Bolshevist Russia. Because that would have surely been the end of Bolshevist Stalinist Russia. And if you remember that America and Britain from the very beginning, from its inception were supporting and financing Bolshevism (Soviet Communism) in Russia, supplying, protecting and defending it at the critical moments of danger, you begin to understand the real motives of Roosevelt and Churchill towards Russia and Bolshevism.
Old Aardvark: I have never heard this argument before. It is quite compelling. — That’s good that you find Halen’s theory about Japan and WWII compelling but let’s not change the subject. What does that have to do with your being such a staunch defender of the Putinist regome in the topic at hand: the Russian/Ukrainian border dispute (in your comment, made above on 10 April), and this ridiculous criticism of the host of National Vanguard and of one of our most valued NA members, Mr. Stoner. …I find it curious that the National Alliance has positioned itself on the side of Biden, Antony Blinken, Victoria Nuland and the rest of the Jews running his regime and against Putin and his regime. The NA is supporting the Anglo-Zionist establishment against… Read more »
Setting Biden and his Jews aside for the moment, to grasp just how much Putin as well as Trump are in bed with Jews, see this expose from the liberal news outfit Politico from 2017: Chabad: Putin’s Jews and Their Man Trump | National Vanguard
You are absolutely right. Japanese overwitted themselves. They were som much preoccupied with their interests and so fearful to do anything that would benefit someone else that they made this fundamental mistake. Yes, if they had struck USSR in 1941, instead of pledging non-aggression, the war would end not with “encounter at the Elbe” in 1945 but by encounter on the Ob river between Germans and Japanese in 1942. We must make an unmistakable conclusion that any alliance with non-whites is useless. They never keep promises and always try to gain most without giving anything of substance in return. The White man can’t have allies in his path of greatness. The White man is the pinnacle of evolution and must act by himself, without hoping or relying on any outsiders.… Read more »
Yeah, Japan was acting egoistically, and basically betraying her ally Germany, and and thinking of only her own self-interests, without thinking of her ally, when she struck the US instead of striking the Soviet Union, which Japan should have done as Germnay’s ally.
But we must also give credit to Roosevelt who was bending backwards to provoke Japan into war with the US and thereby to prevent her from attacking the Stalinist Russia and opening the second front on the Soviet Far East. Hitler acted much nobler by fullfilling Germany allies obligations when he followed suit after Japan declared war on the US.
Halen, you raise a good point. Hitler did honor his treaty obligation to Japan and he did declare war on the USA. I know he was justified to do so on many accounts, but to my mind, that was the unpardonable sin that marked him for death. You can not mock fate and live. That is why Hitler could never get back of his feet. It was over the moment he declared war on the USA. The USA, of course, was not the same country in 1941 as it was in 1945. Who could predict the 10X growth in every area of military might? It was not for mortal men to see the future, but on hindsight, we can see clearly that Hitler signed his own death warrant the moment… Read more »
An interesting view of history. Did Hitler sign Germany’s death warrant by declaring war on the U.S. or was war already declared by the U.S. upon Germany in 1940 and earlier through acts of war committed without any declaration? I believe it was the latter, U.S. military vessels physically attacked German warships in international waters, belligerents in Europe such as Britain and other enemies were supplied with men and/or war materials of American origin, and a policy of belligerence towards Germany in order to provoke war clearly indicates that war with Germany was an American aim. Formal declarations were merely the official culmination of the real state of relations between the two countries. Roosevelt was clearly hell bent on war with Germany and whether or not Hitler obliged with that… Read more »
You missed the point. My point was not whether the millitary mistake Adolf Hitler might have made and thereby “signed his own death warrant” by declaring war on the US but His moral integrity and ethical honesty by doing so, by following suite after Japan as her ally. While Japan obviously betrayed Germany and behaved dishonestly by attacking and declaring war on the US in December 1941, instead of attacking and declaring war on the Soviet Union in December 1941 or even yearlier. True, Roosevelt was low-life scoundrel and bending over backwards in inviting and provoking Japan into war with America, but Japan would have had to resist the temptation and as Germany’s ally declare the war not on the US but on the Soviet Union, i.e. Bolshevism (Soviet Communism).… Read more »
Correct.
There are many who envy the White man, many who admire the White man – in an ideal world, that would include White women – many who hate the White man, many who want the White man dead.
But friends or allies, the White man has none and it is often dangerous to go looking for friends and allies where there are none.
Wolf Stoner (great name LOL), I could imagine Japan waging war on Russia in 1904 with the help of a $200 million dollar loan from Jacob Shiff (4.2 Billion dollars in today’s currency value). International finance makes the impossible possible. Before that date there was no major battle in the modern era in which a major European power was defeated by a Colored Nation or Confederation of Colored Nations in the rest of the world. Perhaps this is a good time to reflect on the dangers of hostile rich international Finance. – TAV ♥️
The Japanese suffered high casualties in the border conflicts fought against the Red Army during the battles of Lake Khasan (1938) and Khalkin Gol (1939).
The Japanese probably did not realize the significance of knocking the Soviet Union out of the war, or the fact that Germany had a much better chance winning if the Americans had stayed out of the war.
Hitler did not seem to realize that the Americans had little difficulty fighting a two or three front war. Had he refrained from declaring war on the United States, war could have been delayed for several months. This is despite the fact that as early as 1940, the US Navy was already intensely involved in the Battle of the Atlantic.