A Jewish Revolution

by Douglas Mercer

THERE’S A HILARIOUS NEW book out called In Hitler’s Munich, in which a “scholar” argues that even though the revolution in Bavaria in 1918-1919 was ridden with Jews, it was in no way a Jewish revolution. Nope, not at all. You see, there was one Jew who objected and another Jew who was for it but kept his mouth shut. So there was nothing intrinsically Jewish about this revolution, it just so happened, quite accidentally, that it was ridden with Jews. It was all just a coincidence. You see, those Jews were not “real Jews,” because they didn’t believe in the Torah, didn’t pore over the Talmud, didn’t keep kosher, and didn’t flock to the synagogue. So they weren’t Jews; it was only a fluke that their parents were Jews, that their ancestors were all Jewish, that their names were Jewish, that they grew up in a Jewish milieu — and so to call it a Jewish revolution is wrong, maybe even “anti-Semitic.” Really, those revolutionaries might as well just have been Chinese or Māori, or Bushmen — or anything. Nothing to see here, goy!

Really, this is what the author argues.

He’s running massive cover for the Jews, trying to say that just because Jews appear in such stunningly disproportionate numbers in subversive movements, it doesn’t mean anything at all. It’s just one of those wild happenstances that happen from time to time. Whenever anything colossally inimical to the White race happens, Jews “just happen” to be there in their millions. Who knows why? Certainly nothing can be deduced by it. You certainly don’t want to base an ideology on it; that would be one of those crazy conspiracy theories Jews love to dismiss and “fact-check” to death.

The “scholar” is Michael Brenner — and of course he’s a Jew.

Michael Brenner has written eight books on Jewish history.

Jew-run Wikipedia labels him a “German-Jewish Historian” but the “German” is misleading and superfluous; Germany just happens to be where he lives and gets his bread buttered by the Jew-loving state. Michael Brenner is a Jew — just like all those Jews who fomented that Marxist revolution in Bavaria. I don’t care if he keeps kosher, or prays to Moses, or goes to the synagogue on a Saturday, or what. He’s a Jew.

And he’s written a book about a Jewish revolution in order to toss fairy dust in our eyes and get us to swear it’s not Jewish. He’s lying. He’s spitting on our cupcake and insisting that it’s frosting. It’s what Jews do. The bibliography and the scholarly apparatus and the University imprint most certainty notwithstanding.

* * *

Hitler knew the revolution that got him obsessed with politics was a Jewish revolution. Indeed, his first recorded utterance on the crucial Jewish Question came in 1919 and was elicited by this revolution. And he skewers the position of Michael Brenner lo this century later. He knows that biggest gag that the Jews try to perpetrate on unsuspecting White people is their camouflage as “Germans” or “French” or whatever when in fact they are nothing but Jews. He knows the Jews try to blend in and deny that their Jewishness has anything to do with their evil. He makes short work of it:

Jews have never adopted more than the language of the foreign nations in whose midst they live. A German who is forced to make use of the French language in France, Italian in Italy, Chinese in China does not thereby become a Frenchman, Italian, or Chinaman, nor can we call a Jew who happens to live amongst us and who is therefore forced to use the German language, a German.

That is: They are Jews. And when they act against the White race, which they always do, they are acting as Jews. There is nothing incidental about this Jewishness. It intrinsic to their identity — and to all they do.

Alexander Solzhenitsyn said that reason people misunderstand the Russian Revolution is that they call it the Russian Revolution. He said it was nothing of the kind; there was nothing Russian about it. He said that if people started calling it what it really was — the Jewish Revolution — everything about it would become quite clear.

Victor Klemperer has attained his meager fame because he was a Jew who kept a diary in Germany all through 1933-1945. Jews like to quote it to show how bad things were — but he was a Jew, so things were supposed to be bad for him. That he escaped justice is a great tragedy. Back in the early 1920s Klemperer showed his true colors (Jew colors, of course) when he said that Kurt Eisner didn’t look Jewish at all, which is ridiculous. Take one look at Kurt Eisner, who was the titular head and driving force of the Jewish revolution in Bavaria, and you’ll see that the map of Zion is written all over his face; that the Valley of Kidron is deep down in his pores; that the Dead Sea is inscribed in his eyes. Indeed, he could not be more Jewish if he had been born in Jerusalem and been taken to the Temple Mount to be circumcised by the High Priest (his uncle); he could not be more Jewish if controlled the money supply, or poisoned the wells, or if he had kidnapped a little White boy and drained him of his blood and drank it in a ritual in the synagogue on Yom Kippur. Indeed, Julius Streicher could have had his picture on his desk and when he wanted his cartoonist to sketch a particularly odious and malodorous and evil and perfidious Jew, he’d hand the photo to him so he could use it as a model. Had he come down from the mountain after getting the “ten commandments” from his God in the burning bush, he could not be more Jewish; had he sold liquor at exorbitant prices to the peasants he could not be more Jewish; were he living in the Catskills with his family ten to a house, living off welfare, his wife cranking out the inbreds like a pez dispenser, wearing an outsized hockey puck for a hat, and rocking and humming while he reads the Talmud all day long, he could not be more Jewish.

And yet Brenner says Eisner was a Jew “in name only.” He belonged to the fictional category that he summons up out of his backside called “the non-Jewish Jew.” He calls them “Jewish heretics.” His prime example gives the game away: Trotsky. He says Trotsky “abjured his Jewishness” and was embarrassed by it. Perhaps he did, but that is irrelevant. Indeed, there has never been more a Jewish Jew than Trotsky aka Bronstein. The map of Zion is written all over his actions — and his hideous face; his evil is bound up totally with his Jewishness.

Once a Jew, always a Jew. A Jew can come in many guises, many faces, and many costumes; and all his embracing of this and denial of that means nothing. He is a Jew. No matter what he says, he is still a Jew. And will be as long as he crawls over the face of the Earth.

* * *

Imagine someone saying that there were Germans who were not National Socialists, that some opposed it, that some stood aloof; and that therefore the National Socialist Revolution of 1933 was not a German revolution. This thought puts in plain relief the sleight of hand perpetrated by Jews and by Brenner. Of course it was a German revolution; the exception proves the rule, it was a German revolution through and through, the naysayers notwithstanding. And so, too, the fact that some Jew in Munich wasn’t in tune with Eisner in no way mitigates or diminishes the Jewishness of that Marxist revolution. It was Jewish through and through, Jewish to the core, Jewish in all particulars, that one guy notwithstanding. (Jews always have a foot in both camps; so that means nothing.)

What was supremely Jewish about it, even more than all those Jews who made it, was that it was anti-German. That’s always the telltale sign, the very mark of Jewishness. It could not have been more Jewish had the revolutionaries marched across the Isar River bridge under the banner of the Star of David, or had they danced to the Hava Nagila in the Bürgerbräukeller while downing blintzes in their tiny hats.

The conspicuous prominence of Jewish revolutionaries prompted a reaction that created a space for anti-semitic agitation to an unprecedented degree.

Yes indeed it did; in the climate of already growing awareness of the Jewish danger in Munich, the sudden appearance of so many Jews overthrowing a centuries-old way of life at the drop of a tiny hat was alarming. Why wouldn’t it be? You’ve been German from top to toe since time immemorial, and now in an instant everything is toppled, and in the name of international Marxism grimy and greasy foreign Jews suddenly rule you? A shock indeed.

After such an appalling (and revolting) development, a stern and draconian response was in order. National Socialism was that response. In the immediate aftermath of this Jewish revolution (to give it its proper historical name), good Germans joined the Freikorps and soon put the revolution down. But it left scars, scars which Hitler promised to heal. And when one has come that close to being absolutely ruled by the hereditary enemy, his was a powerful message indeed.

Brenner has a section heading which surely must go down in the history of scholarship as one of the greatest head-scratchers ever. It reads:

Jewish revolutionaries do not a Jewish revolution make.

I kid you not.

What do they make? — a Chinese revolution? A Nigerian revolution? It’s childish and nonsensical on its face.

Actually, it’s axiomatic that Jewish revolutionaries make a Jewish revolution. Jews can make no other kind; it’s bred deep in their foul bones. But the likes of Brenner don’t want you to draw the obvious conclusion. Nor do Jews want us to draw the obvious conclusions suggested by the endless nests of Jews crowded into all the anti-White activities, trends, and narratives of our time. (As a recent instance — whatever you think of Trump, not much I hope — the judge who signed off on the warrant that allowed the FBI to raid Mar-a-Lago was a Jew.)

There are many such cases, now — and a century ago.

It is indisputable that neither before or afterward in Germany have there been so many Jewish politicians in the limelight.

This is his concession before he turns Jew magician and tries to pull the rug out from under us. He admits that it was Jews as far as the eye can see — Jews galore, Jews to the gills, Jews packed in like sardines, Jews from top to bottom and stem to stern. But don’t go making any hasty generalizations! You’re not of those “anti-Semites,” are you? The ones that can see an obvious pattern? Heaven forfend!

The great majority of the Jewish community distanced themselves from the Jewish revolutionaries.

Perhaps they did, perhaps they didn’t. Perhaps some favored it but kept quiet, perhaps some did not like it. So what? That is irrelevant. Either way it’s a canard, and a classic Jewish attempt at misdirection — Jewish stock in trade. Some Japs in Okinawa probably didn’t want to bomb Pearl Harbor; but that doesn’t stop us from saying that the Japs bombed Pearl Harbor, does it? By no means. What matters is the driving force that makes history. And in this revolution — and the revolution ripping America and the West apart today — it was Jews and none other.

Of course, there is a point to all this; there always is a point with the Jews. Hitler’s rise was predicated on the notion that Jews had overtaken Germany; that Communism was Jewish; that Jews were threatening the very blood and soil of Germans and Germany. Hitler again and again brought up the issue of the Jewish revolution of 1918-1919. It happened, after all, in Munich, the home city and heartland of National Socialism. The event itself and the Jewish fomenting of it was so searing, dramatic, and traumatic that it was unforgettable. Indeed, you might say that this horrific Jewish revolution was the primal scene for the early National Socialists, the nightmare’s lesson being: The Jew must never be allowed to rule us; the Jew must be finally defeated.

So if one admits the plain truth that it was in fact a Jewish revolution, one also concedes Hitler’s point. It is not a “conspiracy theory,” but a fact.

Strip away their meaningless verbiage, all lies, and you at once see that the Jews have no defense. The Jews were predators upon Germany, just as the Leader said.

Reading In Hitler’s Munich, you don’t even have to read between the lines to see it. For, whatever the author’s purpose, whatever the author’s attempted deceptions, the truth is there for all to see as plain as day.

It was a revolution all right. A revolution made by, and for, Jews. A Jewish revolution.

The only kind a Jew can make.

* * *

Source: Author