American Dissident VoicesAudioKevin Alfred StromRadio

The Nation Which Dares Not Speak its Name, part 2

American Dissident Voices broadcast of 2 April, 2022

by Kevin Alfred Strom

Listen to the broadcast

AT THE END of last week’s program, I brought up the state of Virginia’s Racial Integrity Act of 1924, which forbade interracial marriage. And that is only one law of many which were instituted between the founding of the American Republic and 1963, designed to protect our precious blood, protect our national character, protect our unique combination of beauty, intelligence, and creativity, and protect our children’s future. In 1963, virtually all of these laws were standing and still on the books. The White character of America then stands in testimony to that.

But now things are very different. What happened? I could cite the political betrayal step by step. I could tell you about the packing of the Supreme Court with aliens and subversives and how they struck down our racial laws. I could trace the payoffs and the pressures and the corruption of our political process which led to the enactment of new laws which opened our borders and took away our freedom of association. And those were important factors, to be sure. But the most important reason White America stands on the brink of extinction is the change in attitude of White Americans themselves. Many Whites have come to accept a self-hating anti-White morality, a morality that defines as ‘good’ whatever tends to the disappearance of our race, and defines as ‘evil’ — in fact, the epitome of evil — whatever tends to support or protect the continued existence of the White race.

What caused that attitude shift? There are many reasons, but one stands above all others in importance. In 1963, we stood at the very beginning of a new age. The first generation which had grown up with television was just then coming to adulthood. The impact of television can hardly be exaggerated. It quickly replaced newspapers as the primary source of news and information for the public. It rapidly became the main source of entertainment, both dramas and comedies. It was the first all-encompassing virtual reality for its victims, filling their eyes and ears with an imaginary world that to a large extent replaced the real world for most Americans for at least several hours every day. It defined reality for most of us, outside of the small part of the world personally known to us. It became the national arbiter of taste, fashion, and mores. It showed us what was “good” and what was “bad.” It showed us how “the beautiful people” acted, what pleased them — and what horrified and shocked them. And most of us were very sensitive to those portrayals — unreal as they were — and acted accordingly. We wanted to be like “the beautiful people” too.

And in 1963, just as today, the television networks were firmly in the control of one particular ethnic group — the Jews. Sarnoff, a Jew, ran NBC. Goldenson ran ABC. And Paley ran CBS. All were Jews. Their Jewish successors dominate television to this day. And heavy Jewish ownership and control of newspapers, publishing, and film studios effectively prevented anyone with a mass audience from pointing out the Jewish TV monopoly. With this media power, Jews were able to dictate to politicians, and, most importantly, they had a mainline into the optic and aural nerves of the American public — and they proceeded to change those healthy racial attitudes held by Americans back when America was still America.

Jews are, in general, an intelligent people. They are very aware of the fact that racial integrity is necessary for a people’s survival. They know that racial integrity is needed to preserve each people’s unique character. And they apply those rules to their own people, though not exactly as we applied them to ourselves in healthier times. Many of their publications decry intermarriage with non-Jews as a threat to Jewish survival. Israel is pointedly and repeatedly defined by them in ethnic and racial terms. Unlike White Europeans, the Jews are a most peculiar parasitic race, which apparently wants and needs a degree of intermarriage with their host populations in order to pass more unnoticed among them. Such a parasite is able to preserve its Jewish essence nonetheless. Exactly how they do this is not yet known, but I have presented my own theory in my broadcast “How Shall I Kill Thee? Let Me Count the Ways.” Yet they do want a reservoir of indisputably Jewish genes, and in that reservoir, mixture with non-Jews is prevented as much as possible. There the Jews want racial integrity and racial survival in a racial state for themselves — Israel. And even in White nations, where mixture is tolerated, there are also reservoirs of indisputably Jewish genes — the many rabbis and other Jews who rail against intermarriage (yet never seem to be called out as “racists” by the Jewish-controlled media) see to that. But for White Americans who watch the Jewish-controlled networks and read the Jewish-controlled press, it’s multiculturalism, pluralism, unlimited immigration, and ‘race does not exist.’

Imagine if the President, the head of the State Department, and our top military leaders all stood up in front of the cameras and microphones and declared in their official capacities that they “were firmly committed to the survival of America as a White nation.” Unlikely. Unthinkable, actually, considering the nature of our current ‘leaders.’ But those men and many other US officials have made such a statement. They just changed the words around a little. They substituted ‘Israel’ for ‘America’ and ‘Jewish’ for ‘White.’ But the statement was made by them. Again and again, in fact. And, if you do an Internet search on the phrase, you’ll find an amazing number of White American and other non-Jewish politicians who are very concerned over the “survival of Israel as a Jewish state.” And they didn’t just pull that phrase out of a hat. It’s not just ‘the survival of Israel.’ The ‘as a Jewish state’ is repeatedly tagged on the end. Again and again. It’s something they’ve been told to say, almost word for word. It seems that the land by itself means nothing if the race is destroyed. And so, it is Israel as a Jewish state that is consistently emphasized.

Way back in June 2003 this issue came to a head. It was reported then that Israeli Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom was extremely concerned that the language used by Arab and US diplomats meet with Jewish approval, and he particularly wanted “a clear statement by Bush of the need to preserve Israel as a Jewish state. We expect Abu Mazen to say so as well. We expect the Sharm el-Sheikh summit to express an Arab undertaking to recognize Israel as a Jewish state.”

The very next day, June 3d, the Israeli newspaper Maariv discussed how seriously Jewish leaders take the inclusion of the words ‘Jewish state’ in statements on Israel by American politicians. Leave the phrase ‘as a Jewish state’ out and they become very concerned. When it was merely rumored that George Bush was not planning to refer to Israel in precisely that fashion in a summit in Aqaba, the Jews made it clear what a mistake that was. The article about it was even titled “Bush Refuses to Declare that Israel is A Jewish State.”

On the same day the Maariv article appeared, June 3d, Colin Powell told a press conference that the administration believes that “Israel must be always seen as a Jewish state.” And the day after that, at the summit, President Bush “pledged to protect Israel ‘as a vibrant Jewish state.’” Gee, I wonder, why did he decide to phrase it that way?

And then, on July 29th and on several other occasions, Bush used almost precisely the same language: “America is firmly committed to the security of Israel as a Jewish state…” Correspondent John Donnelly of the Boston Globe admitted that “Bush always uses similar language when addressing any political issue involving Israel.” Then Dick Cheney got into the act: He spoke at a campaign reception at New York’s Waldorf-Astoria hotel. What did he say? “In the Holy Land, America is committed to the security of Israel as a Jewish state….” Haven’t we heard that somewhere before?

In the weeks and months that followed, media figures and politicians started to repeat the special phrase, a hidden message to Jews, a message of subservience — though most White people were clueless about the coded language. Republicans Jack Ryan and Eric Cantor, Fox News commentator Charles Krauthammer, and countless others, all repeated the phrase almost word-for-word. Assistant Secretary of State William Burns publicly decried moves that might “imperil the future of Israel as a Jewish state. …Within the next decade or so, Jews will be a minority in the area encompassing Israel, the West Bank and Gaza.” I wonder what Mr. Burns thought about the changing demographics of Texas, California, and North Carolina. Do demographic trends there imperil the White majority? Do they threaten the existence of Texas as a White state? Do they threaten the existence of America as a White nation?

Fast forward to the Biden administration. On March 8 of last year, US State Department spokesman Ned Price uttered almost the same exact phrase imposed on our so-called leaders almost 20 years ago, saying how concerned the administration is about “Israel’s continuing identity as a Jewish and democratic state….”

A few years earlier, during the final month of the Obama administration, Secretary of State John Kerry said that America’s resources were being readied and deployed to “ensure Israel’s future as a Jewish and democratic state….” The same year, Deputy National Security Advisor Ben Rhodes told us that “Recognition of Israel as a Jewish state has been the US position for years.” No kidding, Ben. What about a state for White European people? That is essentially forbidden — and, more than that, any discussion of such a state that does not condemn the idea as “racist” is also essentially forbidden in our great “free” “democracies.”

Hilary Clinton chimed in, vowing to protect Israel “as a Jewish, democratic state….” Barack Obama gave two speeches three days apart in 2011 using the exact same phrase, “Israel as a Jewish state and the homeland for the Jewish people….” This use of the same boilerplate text by all these “leaders” is a coincidence like Kamala Harris is beautiful.

An editorial in New York’s Jewish Post openly called for us to find ways “to protect Israel as a Jewish state with [an] ever growing Jewish majority.” Why, then, do the Jewish media and their followers tell us it is wrong to want America to have an ever-growing White majority?

In negotiations between Palestinians and Israel’s Labour Party, the Jewish side requested that, as part of the price for peace, Palestinian refugees must renounce any claim to return to Israel, and must further “recognise Israel as a Jewish state for eternity.” That’s an expression of their concern — their imperative requirement — for the racial integrity of their population. That’s the way the Jews view it. And White politicians are supposed to support Jewish racial integrity and Israel as a racial state, while at the same time they must never express concern for White racial integrity or concern about the survival of France, Russia, Germany, Britain, or America as White nations.

Who is more likely to survive — the race which denies it even exists, which is afraid to speak out for its own interests except with weasel words and dissimulation? Or the race that openly asserts that it is right, moral, and necessary that it continue to exist and that it have its own exclusive territory to guarantee its future? The Jews have their advocates aplenty, born and bought. They have their racial state.

White people need to shed their fear and show their strength. We need to stand up and say that it is right and good and moral for our people to survive — for our people to have our own countries — for White children to continue being born. And the group that is saying that uncompromisingly and continuously and responsibly in every land where White people dwell is the National Alliance. Join us today.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the National Alliance. The National Alliance is working to educate White men and women around the world as to the nature of the reality we must face — and organizing our people to ensure our survival and advancement. We need your help to continue. Please send the largest contribution you can afford to National Alliance, Box 4, Mountain City, TN 37683 USA. You can also help us by visiting Once again, that address is Box 4, Mountain City, TN 37683 USA. Until next week, this is Kevin Alfred Strom reminding you to never give up.

This radio program and 24/7 radio network are entirely listener supported, and have been for almost 30 years. We received more than 200,000 visits to our site last month, more than some medium-size “mainstream” news outlets. Our outreach is constantly growing. But we totally depend on that responsible, caring, adult fraction of our listeners to stay on the air. Won’t you join their growing ranks?

All we ask for is a donation of $50 each year — less than $1 a week. Are we giving you personally at least that much value? Simply visit — and choose the $50 option to give online.

For a donation of $250 a year, under $5 a week, we’ll send you our printed National Alliance BULLETIN each month. It’s America’s longest-running pro-White publication. Just choose the $250 option at and let us know you want to receive the BULLETIN. If you prefer to donate via postal mail, just write us at National Alliance, Box 4, Mountain City, TN 37683 USA. That’s Box 4, Mountain City, TN 37683 USA. And thank you for your help!

Listen to the broadcast

direct audio download

Previous post

The Iceland-Ghana Solution to America’s Racial Problem

Next post

Four High Cultures

Notify of
Inline Feedback
View all comments
2 April, 2022 11:02 am

You should see how the Juden react when you tell them that “Israel” should become “diverse” and “multicultural”.

2 April, 2022 12:28 pm

JFK and LBJ played a strong hand in the destruction of White establishments in the 1960s South. Although the Federal doctrine of amalgamation was successful, it had no affect on White racial attitudes.

Desegregation: Ole Miss riot 1962. JFK smothered the university campus and Oxford Mississippi with 13 thousand troops. The total aggregate deployed was 30 thousand.

comment imagecc

2 April, 2022 1:14 pm

Until recent years, I mistook the televitz for an outlet for escapism, with the exception of the news, of course.
I wonder how much of a hold the jews had on radio programming in the pre television era.
My grandma told me about vaudeville, and who were the most famous people in vaudeville? (((Burns and Allen))), of course. I don’t know if their kind were more than just the entertainers in that venue.

This was a good wake up call, or for some of us, a good reminder, that our politicians…our so-called “ leaders “, are nothing more than loud mouthed, double talking jew followers. Mouthpieces controlled by them. Not true leaders. Just marionettes in suits and a microphone.

What a world. Ugh.

Paul Drake
Paul Drake
4 April, 2022 1:44 pm

Thank you for this excellent 2-part article, Mr. Strom. You never fail to elucidate the existential threat facing the White race here in Weimerica, and to offer what I believe to be the only viable solution for its survival – a homeland of our own.

jerry hoekstra
jerry hoekstra
7 April, 2022 5:41 am

Prior to Honest Abe, most citizenship was not in the maritime jurisdiction of D.C. but rather a function of “the several States.” 

I th‌ink a U.S. citizen will always be a resident of DC and therefore a corporate fiction.

George Washington and Ben Frnaklin would have citizens of their respective “several States.”

For example, “General Delivery” mail provides evidence “on the public record” that citizenship is in one of “the several States” and not of the 14th Amendment variety. 

In theory, evidence of not being a 14th Amendment citizen may come in handy when dealing with the IRS and other agencies.


Jim - National Alliance Staff
Jim - National Alliance Staff
Reply to  jerry hoekstra
7 April, 2022 10:22 am

We live in an age where legalistic arguments only work as they serve the political whims of our overlords and their narrative. Essentially, we are in a state of lawlessness. As such, is it useful to anyone to go down that path when the outcome is rigged in favor of those overlords? I would say not, it’s chasing after a fantasy that involves playing their game by their rules— and the House always wins. We in the National Alliance seek a whole new order, based on a new consciousness, to form a new people to put ourselves in a situation that’s favorable for us and us alone. It seems you’re unaware of this and therefore I’m going to recommend you go here: and Afterwards, you may want to… Read more »