Essays

Vow Not to Compromise

by William White Williams
and Dr. William L. Pierce

DR. PIERCE WARNED Alliance members several times in the last few months prior to his death to stay clear of the “movement,” or at least to keep our Alliance a safe arm’s distance from it. In the January, 2002 National Alliance BULLETIN he wrote these words:

There are members who still have a fixation on something called the “movement” rather than on the Alliance. These “movement”-oriented members see the Alliance not as unique and irreplaceable, but merely as one organization among many, all working toward the same goal. “How much stronger our movement will be” they think; “when all these organizations are united. Now we are weak because we are divided, but if we all work together we will be stronger and more successful.” These members also tend to regard anyone who sticks his arm out and shouts “White power,” as a “comrade” much like a fellow Alliance member.

There can be no doubt that we are weak now compared to our enemies, but we will not become stronger by “uniting” with weak or defective organizations — and that includes virtually every “movement” group. The Alliance is not only far and away the strongest and most effective of all the organizations claiming to share our goals: It is the only organization in North America that has any prospect at all for effectively opposing the Jews and their allies in the future. I say this not to disparage any other organization or individual, but as a simple statement of fact.

The Alliance became what it is today by following its own course from its inception. It never saw an opportunity to become stronger by uniting with another organization, and it sees none now. If in the future a suitable organization with which the Alliance might unite comes into existence, then we can explore the possibilities for collaboration. That is not a likely prospect however, for the following reason: If someone decides to form a new organization, instead of becoming a member of the Alliance, it is either because he actually has a significantly different goal or ideology from the Alliance or is determined to use significantly different tactics, or it is because of personal reasons.

By far the most common personal reason is egotism: He wants to have his own organization. He would rather be a phone-booth Führer, with a letterhead, a post office box, and three devoted but mentally challenged followers, than just another member of an effective organization. In that case he will have to give his organizational efforts a try and see what he can accomplish by himself.

I am not willing to compromise in any significant way the goals or ideology of the National Alliance. The examples that come to mind of other organizations or individuals that had similar goals but significantly different tactics are those that were too impatient to follow a course of legality and were determined instead to move ahead faster than the Alliance by using illegal tactics. So far such a course has not been successful, and it is my carefully considered judgment that such tactics are not likely to be successful prior to a major weakening or disruption of the government.

A member who disagrees with this rather dim view of the “movement” should choose a “movement” organization and join it, or he should start his own organization, but he should resign his membership of the Alliance.

For the guidance of members, the following is the policy of the National Office governing interactions with “movement” organizations.

• The Alliance will continue to follow its own course and will act independently of other organizations.
• The Alliance will not engage in joint activities with other organizations.
• Individuals who are members of other organizations and who are prospects for recruitment into the Alliance may be invited to attend Alliance meetings or participate in Alliance activities strictly as individuals, not as representatives of the other organization to which they belong.
• The Alliance does not comment publicly on other organizations, either positively or negatively. We do not respond to attacks from other organizations or engage in feuds with other organizations. We wish them well, but they are on their own.

In evaluating prospects for recruitment, we do not disqualify a prospect simply because he belongs to or has belonged to another organization, but we usually will regard his membership or former membership in another organization negatively rather than positively and will be especially alert for signs of hobbyist tendencies.

In general, the Alliance is not competing with “movement” organizations for members. A person should join the organization for which he is best suited, and if he is at all tempted to join a “movement” group, then he probably lacks the seriousness, maturity, and good judgment expected of an Alliance member.

I can’t emphasize enough that what Dr. Pierce vowed 20 years ago as his bottom line stands today with your current National Alliance Chairman. The National Alliance will stand apart from and above the greater, big tent “White nationalist movement” that is all over the board on vital issues. Many in that “movement,” in fact, are hostile to the National Alliance ideology and program for various reasons, including those stated by Dr. Pierce above. We will maintain William Pierce’s uncompromising hard line on the Alliance’s goals and ideology, and deal with issues that impact on our race’s well-being in a foursquare manner as our Founder would have had us do.

I cannot say it better than our mentor put it to us about the sort of people we want as fellow Alliance members: “I don’t want ‘movement’ people; I want virgins.”

* * *

Source: Chairman’s Commentary by William White Williams, National Alliance BULLETIN, 2017

Previous post

A Niagara of Lies

Next post

Official: 75% of Berlin Criminals are Arabs

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
11 Comments
Inline Feedback
View all comments
William W Williams * National Alliance Chairman
William W Williams * National Alliance Chairman
12 January, 2022 3:22 pm

DR. PIERCE WARNED Alliance members several times in the last few months prior to his death to stay clear of the “movement,” or at least to keep our Alliance a safe arm’s distance from it. In the January, 2002 National Alliance BULLETIN he wrote these words: […] — Thank you Kevin, for republishing this on the 20th anniversary of when Dr. Pierce wrote these words to his National Alliance members. Every current Alliance member must read these words today as a reminder that nothing has changed with our organization since January 2002 except that today there are many more “movement groups,” out there, diverting attention, thanks to the Internet. Also the urgent situation of which Dr. Pierce constantly warned: if we do not seriously organize for our interests, White America… Read more »

Lazaris Procrustes
Lazaris Procrustes
12 January, 2022 4:36 pm

I have done some research on Dr. Pierce. He suffered for his vision. His family life suffered greatly. His family did not understand him. He suffered as much as Vincent van Gogh, and was just as misunderstood. As a scientist, he was not necessarily a warm human being, but I think he wanted to be, and did his best with his wife and sons. Certain attributes cluster together in humans. I think he missed out a bit on the empathy, sympathy part, but his genius had other variables, more masculine variables, clustering around it. I think that he found his calling after he became a family man, independent of being a husband/father, and then, sad to say, his family took second place. But a man, with a vision must do… Read more »

William W Williams * National Alliance Chairman
William W Williams * National Alliance Chairman
Reply to  Lazaris Procrustes
15 January, 2022 1:08 pm

Lazaris Procrustes: I think that this W3 person is correct in keeping you separate from other groups. — This W3 person thanks you for recognizing that NA must keep it’s hard line biological approach separate from the bankrupt, larger, mostly Christian conservative “movement.” — The best racialist group I know is Christian, and they have a great broadcast on Saturday night, but I think that there might be some dangerous Jesus-seeds, ready to sprout, under soft and feminine influences… — If the National Alliance has the financing of your so-called “best racialist group” — the one with the great Saturday night broadcast, the one that worships our enemy’s tribal god — you might come to consider consider NA the best racialist group. The largest Christian broadcaster, therefore perhaps the “best”… Read more »

KingVirzion The devout Disciple of Adolf Hitler
KingVirzion The devout Disciple of Adolf Hitler
12 January, 2022 7:55 pm

In my personal opinion the alliance is the best group out of all the other WN groups. Still though I really don’t know what you guys even do anyways so uh yeah…

cas
cas
12 January, 2022 11:10 pm

What historically has caused most White on White wars? White man has powerful egos.
Competition is different than ego. Ego is saying “I” have the only way. The NA appears to attempt to set aside this thing called ego

Walt Hampton
Walt Hampton
12 January, 2022 11:13 pm

Excellent words to be sure. However,
as WLP uttered these words, there
was an interloper in the wings (aka
Cleveland Unit), and the rest is history.

William W Williams * National Alliance Chairman
William W Williams * National Alliance Chairman
Reply to  Walt Hampton
14 January, 2022 2:18 pm

Walt, you just can’t let certain things from your past die, can you? For instance the “interloper in the wings” that you keep mentioning that allegedly brought on the rest of the National Alliance’s history, Dr. Pierce’s successor as NA Chairman, Erich Gliebe, lasted a dozen years (2002-2014), that’s all. That is an unfortunate part of NA’s history, but not the rest of it by far. Under NV articles here are links to others FOR FURTHER READING:. I clicked on the one by Andrew Hamilton, “DeWest Hooker, Portrait of a Radical,” a man with whom I’d met and interacted. I am mentioned in this article with a hyperlink to a Counter-Currents article, “Rockwell Was Right, Part 2”. I had written in a comment under that C-C article in March of… Read more »

Walt Hampton
Walt Hampton
Reply to  William W Williams * National Alliance Chairman
15 January, 2022 11:51 am

Please do not misinterpret my concern 
for the future as any reflection upon
the good work being done by the current
crop of members and supporters. I cannot
think of anyone being more viciously
attacked by the enemy than Kevin Strom, 
so obviously he is doing something right.

My position is this: until and unless the
how’s and whys of how someone like the
Gliebester could rise to a position of
power within the NA, the same thing
could possibly happen again. Also,
I must congratulate you on how you
managed to take the reins from Gliebe,
after being consistently on his case
for twelve years. 

Donald MacMullen
Donald MacMullen
Reply to  William W Williams * National Alliance Chairman
16 January, 2022 11:26 am

Absolutely Chairman. We know where we’ve been. Lets focus on our future! I am one of those “virgins” that came to the Alliance once Dr.Pierce’s hard line was reinstated. That’s because of your vision. Someone once told me ” the National Alliance isn’t a club, it’s a vision. Thanks for your hand in that.

Wolf Stoner
Wolf Stoner
17 January, 2022 5:22 am

It is absolutely essential to hold hard line. Nothing can be achieved without adherence to the core truth. There can be no compromise on the foundational principles. I think that the basic principle of the priority of Race is shared by all pro-White groups (except those fools who try to ingratiate themselves with authorities and to gain access to the electoral process).   The main bone of contention for the wide nationalist/racial movement will be Christianity for many years to come. And it is precisely here where the hard line should be kept unflinchingly. Christians should not be allowed to privatize the whole question of identity and traditional values, as they actively try to do. This Universalist totalitarian cult always tries to replace any independent thinking; therefore, there is no… Read more »

L. B. Blakeney
L. B. Blakeney
Reply to  Wolf Stoner
12 February, 2022 10:10 pm

Very eloquently said, Mr. Stoner. The Christian messiah was a jew, therefore not us. Christians need to think long and deeply about this before proclaiming themselves to be for the future of the White race. Anything else is contradictory.