David SimsEssays

The Wrongful Conviction and Unjust Sentencing of William Bryan and Travis and Greg McMichael, and Why It Happened

Greg and Travis McMichael, William ‘Roddie’ Bryan Jr.: All received life sentences, the McMichaels for legitimately defending their neighborhood and themselves, Bryan for making a video recording. It is long past time for the Saxons — by which term we mean all White people — to begin to hate their captors and would-be executioners.

by David Sims

ON THE LIFE sentences for Travis and Greg McMichael following their wrongful conviction for the first degree murder of Ahmaud Arbery, it was recently said that

The men found guilty of murdering Ahmaud Arbery were sentenced today. As I wrote in November, I think the verdicts in this case were an appalling injustice. Surely, you saw the video of Ahmaud Arbery running up to Travis McMichael and appearing to grab his shotgun. McMichael fired rather than let Arbery disarm him and perhaps shoot him. He — and his father and a man who videoed the confrontation — were found guilty of Georgia’s equivalent of first-degree murder. Travis and his father have now been sentenced to life without the possibility of parole and the third man got life with possible parole.

The sickening irony in this case is that these three White men were punished as if they had actually done what hysterical press reports led many to believe they had done: hunt down a random Black man and shoot him in cold blood. This is a grim day in American legal history, with virtually no one standing up for these three victims of today’s racial hysteria. All three men will now be tried on federal hate crime charges.

What passed for a jury in the trial was a bunch of cowards who, above all, wanted to show the world how “not-a-racist” they were. In order to do that, they shamefully sacrificed Travis and Greg McMichael, throwing them under the bus, as the saying goes.

Recently, I saw a video about a pair of White armed robbers who tried to hold up a convenience store, only to be foiled by a brave Black man who stood up to them and disarmed them. This is fiction. The people in the video are actors. They are performing a skit in accordance with a script. The script was written by a leftist, probably a Jew, as propaganda.

Crime statistics from the real world show that the perpetrators of armed robbery are Blacks most of the time. The propaganda video, of course, got that turned around backwards. The leftists who create such videos know that most people respond to fiction on an emotional level and that they also internalize “moral lessons” from well-packaged fiction more easily than they do from statistics and other factual information.

With all of the wrong lessons learned, these people go on to serve on juries, where they deliver incorrect verdicts in cases involving White defendants.

The Arbery case was a lot like a witch trial. Two White men acted in defense of their neighborhood and tried to perform a legal citizen’s arrest. One of them had to shoot a Black man in self-defense when that Black man jumped on him and grabbed his shotgun. For defending themselves, they are convicted by a racially deluded jury of first degree murder and sentenced to life in prison. Upstanding men, too, both of them, all their previous lives. And a third White man was also convicted of first degree murder for doing nothing more than following the events of the other involved persons while making a video with his smartphone.

* * *

Source: Author

Previous post

Ian Fleming's Real Goldeneye: The Cavalry of St. George

Next post

Will We Survive the Great Filter?

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
23 Comments
Inline Feedback
View all comments
Tucker
Tucker
10 January, 2022 1:55 am

Horrible injustice, is correct. But, what I find even more perplexing and disturbing is the apparent lack of even a microscopic degree of racial comprehension by these White men of the decades long climate of anti-White poison that the jews have so successfully managed to spread across nearly every segment and niche of our society. I’ve read that the jury had a majority of White women on it, and one White man and only a single black. Contrast this jury with the one that acquitted Kyle Rittenhouse. In both cases, there was a common denominator incident whereby a thug (jewish in the Rittenhouse case, black in this case) attempted to take a firearm away from its owner. In neither of these cases was the owner of the firearm legally or… Read more »

Mr. Common Sense
Mr. Common Sense
Reply to  Tucker
14 January, 2022 9:17 pm

My position on the Arbery home protection incident – –

https://www.redstatesrebel.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/16-Free_the_Georgia-3.pdf

Patrick Pappano
Patrick Pappano
10 January, 2022 7:38 am

Disgraceful and frightening. It looks like American white man has been entirely emasculated.

Jim - National Alliance Staff
Jim - National Alliance Staff
Reply to  Patrick Pappano
10 January, 2022 12:48 pm

Almost entirely emasculated, but not quite, Patrick. What White men in America lack are good examples to follow. Let’s give it to them and spread the courage.

Br. Art
Br. Art
Reply to  Jim - National Alliance Staff
28 February, 2022 5:48 am

Thanks for reminding me. This is crucial.

Frederick Ford
Frederick Ford
10 January, 2022 9:28 am

justice is a subjective concept. For someone to be considered “guilty or innocent” of a crime wholly depends on what people determine to be a crime based on the morality of said people. The conviction handed out to those three men, therefore, was only handed out in accordance with the morality of the African-American People so trying to defend these three men in accordance with the morality of the African-American community is playing into their perception of right and wrong which does not help Whites in any way.

b.smith
b.smith
10 January, 2022 3:16 pm

You can blame them for not being aware how much they were not allowed to defend themselves from the aggressions of jew-pet Negroes. Like you can hate white-sheople for being so stupid, cowardly, and self-defeating (and I used to). But now that I’ve grasped the nettle of responsibility I see it this way: If the best of the white race RULED the white race then: Ordinary decent white men like these guys wouldn’t have to be so all-aware, they could just be themselves and be okay. Ordinary white peasantry wouldn’t be forced into the farce of pretending they can rule society. They could just make their humble contributions in safety. Sappy white women wouldn’t be targets for emotional manipulation into anti-white treachery. Because they would all be bloody ruled by… Read more »

William W Williams * National Alliance Chairman
William W Williams * National Alliance Chairman
10 January, 2022 11:01 pm

Neighborhood Watch is one of the oldest and best-known crime prevention concepts in North America. In the late 1960s, an increase in crime heightened the need for a crime prevention initiative focused on residential areas and involving local citizens. The National Sheriffs’ Association (NSA) responded, creating the National Neighborhood Watch Program in 1972, to assist citizens and law enforcement…A Neighborhood Watch program is a group of people living in the same area who want to make their neighborhood safer by working together and in conjunction with local law enforcement to reduce crime and improve their quality of life. Neighborhood Watch (NW) groups have regular meetings to plan how they will accomplish their specific goals and assign responsibilities to group members. Neighborhood Watch is homeland security at the most local level.… Read more »

Old Aardvark
Old Aardvark
Reply to  William W Williams * National Alliance Chairman
12 January, 2022 4:08 am

I spend a lot of time debating liberals and conservatives and pushing an openly pro-white viewpoint on YouTube and in comments sections on various websites. I defended the McMichaels father and son in long discussions attached to several internet news articles. If you watch the video you see as clear an example of killing in self-defense as you will ever see. Not only did Arbery try to take the shotgun away from Travis, he also landed about a dozen blows with his right fist against Travis’ head and shoulders while trying to do so. Ignore the comments from the biased media and just watch the video, and it is obvious no legal murder took place. Travis McMichael defended his life from a violent attacker. The local authorities reviewed the video… Read more »

b.smith
b.smith
Reply to  Old Aardvark
12 January, 2022 10:50 am

I see! Thank you for that insight. It feels like a de-facto real world working out of (((their))) racial theories: Everything is Whiteys fault Therefore in any confrontation between a Negro and a White everything is Whiteys fault (((somehow))). Therefore the Negro is free to attack but whitey is not allowed to defend. Therefore Whitey must die. Evil ideas, cowardly ignored, fester into bad outcomes! Low-iq blacks somehow understand this attack vector while for some reason whites on juries with presumably higher iq’s act like they don’t. I wonder if any-of us has the interest and capacity to organize a movement to shun such stupid traitor whites as those who sacrificed these men to (((moloch)))? I am working on a relentlessly “positive” toned project but maybe shunning the bad ones… Read more »

Howard
Howard
13 January, 2022 2:03 pm

The only outcome for this particular judgment is going to be permitting an open field day on all white people and how they are judged in the judicial system. It is a loss-loss for all concerned. It gives the nonwhite and Jew free reign to prey upon whites and it fails to give whites any kind of judicial protection within our own laws. A dark day indeed!

Ramon
Ramon
13 January, 2022 6:47 pm

The McMichaels ought to be in jail, but Bryan should be free.

Expecting people to comply with a dude with a shot gun claiming citizen’s arrest power when you haven’t committed a crime is ridiculous. Trying to do a citizen’s arrest when you have not witnessed or have been told the person you are trying to arrest has committed a crime is kidnapping.

Bryan should be free a he did was hold a camera while someone with a firearm committed a crime.

b.smith
b.smith
Reply to  Ramon
13 January, 2022 11:02 pm

The “Jogger” had committed crime in that neighborhood and was scoping out further crime. So even if you were right about citizen’s arrest being null and void if “you haven’t committed a crime” you would be wrong on that fact. “Trying to do a citizen’s arrest when you have not witnessed or have been told the person you are trying to arrest has committed a crime is kidnapping.” Nope, wrong on that one too Ramon. But really this case was about jew-pet non-whites getting free reign to invade white neighborhoods, steal, trespass, assault, attempt and commit murder of white people. Surely you know that, and knowing that, do you support that? Once the jew-pet Jogger attacked that white man, and tried to take his gun, the white man had to… Read more »

Old Aardvark
Old Aardvark
Reply to  b.smith
14 January, 2022 1:08 am

From what I read Arbery frequently used the “jogger” fiction to commit petty crimes. He would be out in his sweat pants, jog into a convenience story, grab a couple handfuls of snacks, and then run out. He really was a crazy nigger, and low IQ even for a black. He had a record of petty crimes. He had assaulted his own mother. None of these details were allowed to be entered as evidence at the trial. Arbery lived miles away from the neighborhood these three men lived in with their wives and families. Why would he go to a different part of the county just to run for exercise? There is no doubt he was up to no good. Gregory McMichael had worked in law enforcement. None of these… Read more »

Ramon
Ramon
Reply to  b.smith
14 January, 2022 7:25 pm

You can’t expect anyone to comply with the orders of two non-uniformed armed men pointing a shotgun at you.

What the McMichaels attempted was complete idiocy and criminal. And indefensible.

What is to stop random people from trying to detain white female teenagers on some suspicion that they are guilty of a crime? Is the correct course of action to comply?

B.Smith
B.Smith
Reply to  Ramon
14 January, 2022 9:41 pm

You argue without fact or logic, like a Jew or a fellow Jogger, or maybe just anti-white? If a white female teenager known to be a violent career criminal was “Jogging” ten (or was it 17?), miles from home in a neighborhood where she had been seen trespassing and some local residents wanted to talk to her about it she should… Wait for it… Definitely should NOT give up her opportunity to just keep on jogging away (as nobody was actually physically detainining her or even pointing a weapon at her), and NOT circle around to sneak attack an armed resident then try to beat him down and steal his weapon. Of course white women don’t go around “jogging” and stealing through neighborhoods — that’s a black thing. And raping… Read more »

Ramon
Ramon
Reply to  B.Smith
15 January, 2022 12:41 am

You are so dumb, you cannot see the implication of letting the McMichaels go free. If the McMichaels go free that means some black nationalist or Jewish supremacist ‘neighborhood watch’ can freely detain Whites and Gentiles as long as they suspect something. Suspecting something is so subjective it is basically a license to detain which is a step away from kidnapping. Let’s suppose antifa files false reports of hate crimes around your neighborhood, and suppose you have Trump (I know, I know he is unironically a Jew puppet idiot) sign on your yard, then you go out for a jog and the antifa equivalent of the McMichaels try to detain you. Do they have a right to detain you and should you be obligated to follow their instructions? non-uniform civilians… Read more »

b.smith
b.smith
Reply to  Ramon
15 January, 2022 12:35 pm

> You are so dumb, you cannot see the implication of letting the McMichaels go free. If the McMichaels go free… The implication would be that white men could still defend their land from violent criminal jew-pet jigger-joggers — without unbearable consequences from the “JEW”-stice system. Jews and Jew-pet diversity already gets free shots at white people, their property, their history, etc. ad naseum. > Suspecting something is so subjective it is… Actually suspicion has objective graduations. There are reasonable “grounds for suspicion” — reasonable grounds to suspect the jogger was up to no good that day (or the other days before for that matter). > non-uniform civilians do not have the right to detain people. The reasoning brhind that is pretty obvious. … Actually American White men did have… Read more »

Ramon
Ramon
Reply to  b.smith
15 January, 2022 1:41 pm

You should KNOW what I said if you read it. Seems like you don’t want to address the fact that all the video shows that they had NOT in fact detained the invader-jogger — it was free to keep on jogging but turned back and attacked — thus getting itself killed while attempting to murder a white man. The video shows an ambush with guns. That behavior is unacceptable. This skipping over the facts and returning to false emotional appeals seems very Jewish There is no fact I am skipping over. I asked a question about what one should do when facing an ambush like that and you ignored it. I would expect a White man facing an ambush like that to run away or to take the initiative and… Read more »

Joshua
Joshua
14 January, 2022 10:54 am

Let’s hope that their appeal is successful. The acquittal of Kyle Rittenhouse shows that the justice system isn’t yet completely in Jewish hands, although I don’t fancy their chances. At this rate being within a mile of a Black person who dies of any cause will see you executed, if of course you’re White.

thordaddy
thordaddy
Reply to  Joshua
20 January, 2022 4:23 am

Yeah… This was an “ambush” like January 6th was an “insurrection.”

Joshua
Joshua
Reply to  thordaddy
21 January, 2022 8:25 pm

And Donald Trump was a “Nazi”. LOL.

Douglas
Douglas
15 January, 2022 2:23 pm

Though there were things wrong that the McMichaels and Bryan did, the truth and/or rule of law was not seriously considered in this case. And if the jury had found them not guilty on all charges, or convicted them of a lesser crime involving Aubrey’s death, say, involuntary manslaughter or criminal negligence, giving them liability for sentences of but a few years, as opposing to life behind bars, not only was there a threat of civil violence, but the Xiden Administration made it clear that the Federal “civil rights” charges would be pursued. At this point, the only thing a Federal prosecution could add would be to impose the death penalty on any of them (likely the younger McMichael, since he was designated as the “shooter”), put Bryan in a… Read more »