David SimsEssays

Dead Ends All: Capitalism, Objectivism, Marxism

by David Sims

AN “OBJECTIVIST,” that is, a follower of the Jewess “Ayn Rand”’s extreme libertarian philosophy, once tried to explain away the deep flaws of capitalism as mere personal corruption and adherence to “bad philosophy”:

As Ayn Rand would say, the problem exists within philosophy: either ignorance of philosophy or adherence to bad philosophy. Consequences have ideas. [I think he meant ‘ideas have consequences’ — Ed.] The reason corruption exists is because people are led astray by ideas that are destructive.

Whatever the source of bad ideas might be, they do arise in the minds of people who have the power to gain by them, and never mind the consequences to the future condition of the world and to the people who will have to find a way to live in that world.

These bad ideas aren’t, from Rand’s point of view, anything “astray,” because in Objectivism the standard of value is your own life. Others matter only insofar as your own happiness is affected. For certain others, such as your family or your spouse or, perhaps, some of your friends, the extent to which they matter (to you and only you) justifies your paying maintenance costs, up to a point. You will remember that Rand said that she would support her husband, if necessary, because he was essential to her own happiness.

But beyond these close relationships, there’s no particular reason for an Objectivist to care. Which means that an Objectivist wouldn’t really worry about whether or not the Earth will be the slightest bit habitable, say, a thousand years from now. That kind of concern, for a future in which you yourself will not be alive, belongs to a different kind of philosophy, which values collectives above the individual.

One of those philosophies is National Socialism, which values the perpetual survival and advancement of the (White) race. And, of course, any other race could entertain a similar philosophy — the Jews, for example, have their own variation [with extreme parasitism and systematic deception added — Ed.].

But people who already have become powerful under our existing system, through the multi-generational inheritance of wealth, will, given any chance, take for themselves the coercive powers of government. Either they will subvert an existing political structure, or they will form their own system of gun-toting thugs and impose their own (possibly corporate) regulations about what people, who are subject to them in a practical sense, must do and what they must not do. This will happen with the inevitability of a chemical reaction, when suitable reagents are mixed in a suitable solvent.

Objectivism has the same general flaw as Marxism does. Marxism demands that men behave with more altruism than men have in them. Objectivism [as presented to the public, anyway] demands that men behave with more rationality and with more morality than men have in them.

Marxism fails, sooner or later, because people will abuse a commons and try to take out of it at least a little more than they put into it, and they will ignore any and all propaganda intended to cajole them into doing the opposite. Objectivism/libertarianism will also fail, sooner or later, because losers will turn to crime, and because winners will accrue coercive powers, and because the people in the middle will be persuaded by the profit-seeking winners to waste their money by buying what they don’t really need. The losers will ignore moral exhortations to be lawful. The winners will ignore moral exhortations to forswear the rod and the axe. And the people in the middle will never wise up, at least not by and large, about the “necessity” of their purchases.

* * *

Source: Author

Previous post

Jewish Madison Avenue Makes Most White Males Disappear

Next post

A Jew by Any Other

Notify of
Inline Feedback
View all comments
24 December, 2021 12:28 am

These systems, Marxism and libertarianism/objectivism, appear to be favorable to the Jews especially to climb on top and rule the rest through their parasitism and excellent group cohesiveness. Atomized Whites are forced into subservient roles within these systems.

For Whites to master our own kind and territory, a different system or order must yet again (National Socialists in Germany built a fine example from which to draw inspiration) be built from White populations everywhere and our National Alliance is a present-day system building Order. The only people this would be for is Whites to the absolute and total exclusion of all others and especially Jews. Whites only! in everything, including the lowest of occupations.

Tonatiuh Haruki
Tonatiuh Haruki
Reply to  JM/Iowa
2 January, 2022 8:43 pm

Liberalism was an Enlightment creation and Enlightment movement was lead mostly by freemasons and some jews; in fact many Liberalism figures were freemasons and there were also some jew liberal figures. If you look at what Liberalism was purposing and who resulted most benfited by it comes clear that it was a Troyan Horse just so that the jews, other people would also benefit of this but if only jews would then the plan would have foiled right away, could get out of the ghetos, get their freedom, equal rights and citizenship like any one else and also religious freedom without being questioned and investigated what their religion was all about. It was that and also reduce the power and influence of the Church, not saying with this they were… Read more »

Walt Hampton
Walt Hampton
24 December, 2021 9:25 pm

An up close and personal
look at the Objectivist/Rand
cult can be found here:


25 December, 2021 10:33 am

Sims is strawmannig Rand probably because he believes in the false dichotomy taught by those who hold that self-sacrifice for the sake of others is the proper basis of ethics whereas what Rand actually wrote: “By elevating the issue of helping others into the central and primary issue of ethics, altruism has destroyed the concept of any authentic benevolence or good will among men. It has indoctrinated men with the idea that to value another human being is an act of selflessness, thus implying that a man can have no personal interest in others—that to value another means to sacrifice oneself—that any love, respect or admiration a man may feel for others is not and cannot be a source of his own enjoyment, but is a threat to his existence,… Read more »

Kevin Alfred Strom
Kevin Alfred Strom
Reply to  mcaf18xj
26 December, 2021 3:14 pm

Rand condemned “racism” as the “lowest, most crudely primitive form of collectivism.” See http://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/racism.html

Will W. Williams * National Alliance Chairman
Will W. Williams * National Alliance Chairman
Reply to  Kevin Alfred Strom
26 December, 2021 11:06 pm

Thank you, David Sims, and thank you, Kevin. I nearly fell asleep reading professor mcaf18xj’s defense of the Soviet Jewess. The quote you provide is from the book the professor mentioned. Dr. Pierce gave more context here: [M]y reference to Ayn Rand as a “Soviet Jewess” was intended to mean only that she was a Jewess from the Soviet Union, not that she was an apostle of communism. Unlike many of her fellow Jews at the time, she did not preach communism. She was, however, an apostle not only of selfishness but also of other destructive ideas preached by nearly all of her fellow Jews, such as the idea that race doesn’t matter. In her book The Virtue of Selfishness, after railing vehemently and at length against what she called “collectivism,”… Read more »

27 December, 2021 5:30 pm

Jewish Democratic Capitalism. That’s what A.H. called it. Capitalism is a hyper-aggressive word for Free Market. I noticed while working in the developing countries (offshore oilfields) that the economies were way more free than here in Federaland. No heavy payroll taxes or sales tax to speak of. County folks who sale their crops on the side of the road in Federaland are threatened with fines and jail time if they don’t have a tax number to show the tax man. “If, from the more wretched parts of the old world, we look at those which are in an advanced stage of improvement, we still find the greedy hand of government thrusting itself into every corner and crevice of industry, and grasping the spoil of the multitude. Invention is continually exercised,… Read more »