American Dissident VoicesAudioKevin Alfred StromRadio

Racial Purity

American Dissident Voices broadcast of 4 September, 2021

Listen to the broadcast

by Kevin Alfred Strom

I AM ALL FOR racial purity. It’s necessary. It’s needed. Maintaining it is the essence of virtue. Going in the opposite direction, toward racial mixing and racial chaos, is the essence of evil. That, in fact, is how good and evil should be defined. Everyone who’s listened to this radio program for more than a few months knows these things.

But most of the people who agree with me on these matters, and even some of the people who taught me these ideals, have fundamentally misunderstood what racial purity is. And that’s important. It’s important — essential, really — to see things as they really are. Without seeing things as they really are, you are likely to make fundamental errors in strategy, you may contribute to the miseducation of those whom you’re trying to teach, and you may end up helping the enemies of our people even when you’re trying to do the opposite.

The current racialist paradigm is this: Somehow, somewhere, our race emerged on planet Earth. It was pure and high and something never seen before. As it spread across the world, it created new tools, new ideas, new civilizations. No other race has been as creative as ours. It encountered other races, and sometimes mixed with them — and thereby lost its purity, sometimes to a fatal extent, losing its essential character in the process.

Now there’s a lot of truth in that narrative. It’s almost all true. Our race did emerge. It was and is uniquely creative. It did create new ideas, technologies, civilizations. Mixture with non-White races is a terrible danger, a horrible sin, a death sentence for all that is worthwhile and everything we love and everything we are.

But the falsehood embedded in this largely-true narrative is that our race’s origin was the point of its purity — that purity is of the past — that purity was at its maximum in the past and, except for some who hold themselves pure, is always decreasing as time goes by because of thoughtless racial mixing by fools and the encouragement of racial mixing by enemies. According to this idea, racial purity is something that can only ratchet one way — down — as time goes on. This view tells us that we can’t get any purer than at the beginning, because at the beginning the White race was as pure as it could get — and, unless we make an heroic effort forever, it’s all downhill from there. And it’s all downhill from here, too.

This view is essentially wrong. Oh, it appears to be true on a short time scale: No one could argue against the idea that America is racially declining generally, and that the racial purity of White Americans themselves has been slowly declining, in part because of mixture and “passing.” No one could deny that something similar is happening in Europe and in other areas of White settlement on this planet. No one could deny that heroic efforts — like those of the German National Socialists in the 20th century, and those that will be called forth in this century — are needed to maintain the integrity of our race. No one could deny that the racial quality of our people has declined because of the dysgenic effects of the easy life offered us by our technological civilization, or that one result of that decline in quality is an increased acceptance of racial mixing.

Still, the idea that racial purity was at its maximum in the past — and that it largely or only ratchets downward as time goes on — is flat-out wrong. It is incorrect. And it is demoralizing — unnecessarily demoralizing.

This narrative of past purity coupled with present and ever-increasing impurity is also psychologically tied to the old, Abrahamic, basically Middle Eastern, and definitely false view of the Universe as a static thing. In truth, the Universe is not static. It is ever-changing, ever-evolving. This constant change may be frightening to those with a conservative mindset, but it is this change which is the essential characteristic of everything that ever was, everything that is, and everything that will ever be. Seeing things as they really are — and they really are constantly changing — will help us escape from the hopeless, depressing, Jewish, and false Abrahamic way of thinking.

Abrahamic thought goes something like this: Yahweh’s creation was perfect, and it keeps getting messed up over time by Man. [The racialist, but still Abrahamic, version adds:] Our race was once pure and golden, and now we are on a downward trend that just won’t stop, can’t stop, that only ratchets downward.

Aryan thought goes more like this: Creation is ongoing. It is not complete, and will never be complete. Life arose from non-life; Life evolved from simple forms to more complex forms; consciousness awoke from unconscious Life; there may be ups and downs, but consciousness is ever-increasing over time — and our race’s evolving consciousness and understanding is in the vanguard of that ongoing process.

Let’s look at reality on a longer time scale — longer than a human life, or a hundred human lives. Longer than the life of a nation or civilization. Looking at things on a longer time scale will help us see what’s really going on.

Looking around us today, we see several human races inhabiting this world. We see White Europeans. We see Black Africans. We see Jews. We see other Middle Easterners. We see South Asians and East Asians. And we see other races, too.

Rewind to 200,000 years ago. Human beings were around then, too. But none of the existing human races were there — none! — just their ancestors who looked and acted quite different than today’s races do. In fact, the differentiation between the various races ancestral to modern races was markedly less than it is now. For just one example, the ancestors of Europeans and East Asians were the same race. They wouldn’t even diverge from each other for another 160,000 years. And Eurasians themselves wouldn’t diverge from Africans for many tens of thousands of years either.

The modern races we know are a recent phenomenon in the Earth’s history. 200,000 years ago — just 8,000 generations, which could easily be recorded in a 500-page book if we had all the records — all the existing human races of today were the same race, had the same ancestors. So it would be fair to say, I think, that the White race as contrasted to the Negro race had zero purity 200,000 years ago. None! That purity — which is another way of saying the difference between Whites and Negroes — was only a very faint and tenuous thing 100,000 years ago, even 60,000 years ago. It is far, far greater today.

Is the difference between these two races, the purity of our race relative to Africans, 100 per cent. today — 100 per cent. pure? No, of course not. And it never has been 100 per cent. pure. That’s the wrong way of looking at it. Purity means degree of difference. You can’t seriously suggest to me that the difference today between Whites and Blacks is as great as it is possible to get. You can’t seriously suggest to me that today, when it is still possible for Blacks and Whites to sexually intermix and produce hybrid offspring, that we have evolved the maximum possible difference between the two races. Nonsense! The races have only begun to diverge. We are far purer — far more different — from Blacks than we were 8,000 or 4,000 generations ago — but the difference that exists now is still faint and tenuous, compared to what it could be.

That’s the right way to look at racial purity. It is increasing over time. Races diverge from one another — actually, they emerge from one another. Those that survive and persist tend to get more and more different from each other and from their parent stock as time goes on. So purity begins at zero per cent. in the past, and gets greater and greater as time goes on. If the races become sufficiently different, eventually they won’t be able to mate and produce viable offspring any more. Then, I suppose, you could say that the two races being considered are completely pure. Then they have become, by even the strictest definition, separate species.

Rewind even further and the same drama, the same reality, unfolds itself on an even larger scale.

There was a time, millions of years ago, when our ancestors — the ancestors of all human races — were pre-human primates. Before that, there was a time when our ancestors were relatively primitive mammals not unlike mice or voles. There was a time when our ancestors and the ancestors of dogs were the same creature. There was a time when our ancestors and the ancestors of all fish and and amphibians were the same creature. There was a time even when our ancestors and the ancestors of grasses and grain were the same. And this is true all the way back to the first self-replicating molecules — the first life.

Purity begins at zero and arcs upward. Or it terminates in extinction. There are no exceptions. If you think there are, think again.

This new book will guide you in your quest for understanding of the meaning and purpose of the Universe — and of your life.

So to talk of a past purity is complete nonsense. Purity of race is not like purity of water. Purity of race is something that is not yet achieved. Purity of race is specieshood. Purity of race is something that — if we succeed in surviving as a separate entity; many races did not and will not — lies in the future, not in the past.

And, in truth, even specieshood is not the end of change and evolution. Beyond specieshood — a more advanced White race which cannot even reproduce with Homo sapiens anymore — will come another divergence, then another, then another which we cannot even imagine. The Higher Man of the future, several iterations of specieshood beyond our current level, will be so far above us that the distance between us and the small mammals from which we evolved will seem puny in comparison.

Without any hubris at all, in fact quite the opposite, I say that the Higher Man Who Is to Come will be — compared to us, compared to our current level of consciousness and understanding — like a God; a real God, not the bearded Semitic deal-maker in the clouds imagined and vended to us by our enemies — that was never real.

When I say that purity is ever-increasing I do not mean there are not dangers, or periods of degeneration that may be fatal. The downward path, the easy path, toward extinction is very real. Many peoples and races have taken it. Our enemies are trying to force us to take it. But we must not. We must survive. We are the best hope of Godhood to actualize itself. If we — we White people — fail to survive and re-establish our foothold on the upward path of evolution — then Life itself may well be losing its best — perhaps its only — chance to achieve its culmination. To achieve Godhood. To achieve its purity, in the truly meaningful sense of that word.

Only the National Alliance is led by men who understand these truths. Their work brings that understanding to thousands of others. With that understanding comes inspiration. With inspiration comes dedication and unrelenting struggle. And with unrelenting struggle comes success.

* * *

You’ve been listening to American Dissident Voices, the radio program of the National Alliance. This program is published every week at and Please write to us at National Alliance, Box 4, Mountain City, TN 37683 USA. We welcome your inquiries and your financial support in spreading our message of hope to our people. We also welcome your applications for membership in our community of the conscious. Once again, that address is Box 4, Mountain City, TN 37683 USA. Thank you for your help.

Listen to the broadcast

direct audio download

Previous post

Breaking News: Whites Are Doing Quite All Right!

Next post

Salt on the Booby's Tail

Notify of
Inline Feedback
View all comments
4 September, 2021 10:40 am

Wow! What an amazing and eye-opening discourse!
Thanks so much for giving us the gift of your ideas articulated in such a clear and well-organized way.
If they were here today, I’m sure that listening to your words would bring a big smile to the faces of such great leaders as William Pierce, George Lincoln Rockwell, and Adolf Hitler, to name a few. Thanks again for this masterpiece of thought and verbal expression.

4 September, 2021 2:05 pm

A brilliant way of stating what so many misunderstand. White folks…just keep breeding with white folks, and let nature do it’s thing. Thank you sir, for the clarification.

4 September, 2021 9:05 pm

Thank you once again for a very well articulated, well researched and very sensible podcast! As my copy of the Cosmotheist book came to me not too long ago, I am not very far into it yet. I like to read it at bedtime until I nod off. But this podcast has delved further into the book than I have thus far, and really explained the ins and outs of the Cosmotheist philosophy. My only question about racial purity is, what about the hardiness of the mestizos? Also, in America, I have come across a large number of “whites “, some quite fair looking, who mentioned having Indian blood. On the surface, they seem White, but are they not to be considered as such, regardless of how they identify on… Read more »

Reply to  L.B.Blakeney
6 September, 2021 9:23 pm

If you are 1/8 or less anything, you don’t have enough original DNA to bother making a claim, which is the case for the White Indians. They’re White, but trying to play the Mestizo card for perks (or just mentioning that ancestry in passing).

Mestizos are not any hardier than any other group, but most likely married sailor stock. The body type favored for sailing is short and muscular. This is less about race and more about the profession shaping the first White folks over here who married natives.

Reply to  L.B.Blakeney
7 September, 2021 12:20 am

I’m not sure what you mean by “the hardiness of Mestizos” or how that relates to White racial purity as explained by Kevin here, but to the second question, it’s not a question I think is even worth getting hung up on, unless it is in reference to someone who actually wants to contribute to the Alliance. There are many people out there who are 100% White genetically, but who have nevertheless abandoned their race and aligned themselves with our racial enemies. Those people have already made their decision, and I wouldn’t argue on their behalf. But to someone who does want to join us and is worried that their racial makeup will bar them from membership, I would say just apply and be honest. Even if you can’t be… Read more »

L.B. Blakeney
L.B. Blakeney
Reply to  RC
7 September, 2021 7:28 pm

I don’t have any Amerindian ancestry as far as I know, just asking on behalf of the ones I’ve met who. mentioned their Indian blood.

Riley Cox
Riley Cox
Reply to  L.B. Blakeney
8 September, 2021 3:54 pm

I didn’t think so, and I don’t either, I just figured there might be someone else reading the comments who does. I know there have been such people who have applied in the past, and I’m more or less in agreement with Tib. If someone looks White and acts White, then they’re White in my book.

Branorix Smith
Branorix Smith
5 September, 2021 12:18 am

Well said, Mr Strom. This is a far more scientific and accurate way of looking at it.

Max Musson
Max Musson
5 September, 2021 4:18 am

Bravo Kevin! You have encapsulated in one short article the essential principle that I have struggled to explain to others on many occasions in the past. As someone who has been a lifelong student of palaeoanthropology I can state with confidence that what you have set out is consistent with the fossil record that exists and also with the genetic evidence that has been revealed by the sequencing of the human genome. For a recovering alcoholic there is a constant choice which must made every day of their lives; to avoid alcohol and remain a sober and therefore productive and valuable human being; or to succumb to temptation and waste their lives through intoxication. Similarly, an emergent new race or species of human beings has a comparable daily choice; either… Read more »

Justine Polizei
Justine Polizei
8 September, 2021 8:22 am

Wonderful podcast, but I find it hard to believe the Out of Africa theory would be supported by the National Alliance. This theory has been disproven many times by non mainstream pro White archeologists and anthropologists. We did NOT all come from the same origin or the same organism as dogs. Something else came into the picture a long time ago but there was no evolution from apes or anything like that, only hybrid breeding and mixture. The White race especially has an alien genome in them that is unlike anything else on earth and once they mixed with the animal men they fell in blood purity and consciousness away from God.

Branorix Smith
Branorix Smith
Reply to  Justine Polizei
13 September, 2021 12:05 am

The National Alliance has a firm understanding of evolution, and presents accurate scientific information, not how some WISH things had been or are. One must go with the data. The fact that we can breed with the non-Whites is proof that we have a common origin somewhere in the past. Being in denial of this just makes us look ignorant at best, dishonest at worst. We are not “aliens,” we have simply evolved on a different path than the others. Admitting that millions of years ago we shared common ancestors is not diminishing what it means to be White.

James Clayton
James Clayton
8 September, 2021 11:16 pm

Met an “scientist” and creationist who denies evolution, this afternoon, over nitrogen (N2), filling tires. It was 100-something and more humid than usual but it was so fascinating to my wife that she let the fellow go on proving to her satisfaction what my neighbor back in the mid-1960s, Garrett Hardin decries as one of the major barriers to addressing our most-pressing problems. See the first two paragraphs of Dr. Hardin’s essay, It took moments for him to ask me if I had any training in science, after which I asked him if he was a Seventh-day Adventist (Hereinafter “Adventist” or “SDA”), He said he was both an SDA and a M.D., Ph.D. neurochemical researcher, and challenged me to prove evolution simply, essentially 25-words or less, stating that the… Read more »

Edward Jackson
Edward Jackson
24 September, 2021 7:25 pm

I don’t think we can any more put the purity of race in the future than we can in the past. It is a process for all times, and the consequences are obvious. I feel like arguing about the details would just be quibbling, so I won’t. To get to the heart of what really bothers me, more demoralizing than any talk about purity: “For just one example, the ancestors of Europeans and East Asians were the same race. They wouldn’t even diverge from each other for another 160,000 years.[40kya]” “So it would be fair to say, I think, that the White race as contrasted to the Negro race had zero purity 200,000 years ago. None!” I realize I don’t have the library at my disposal that you have, so I’ll… Read more »