by Andrew Hamilton
THIS IS a reply to NV commenter Angelicus, who argues that many part-Jews aren’t bad, and (by implication) should be biologically and culturally absorbed into the White community if their political views and behavior are consistent with ours. Condensing his argument:
“History is full of perfectly pure Aryans who have been faithful servants and defenders of international Jewry. On the other hand,” many part-Jews are praiseworthy. “Let’s not fall for a stupid, short-sighted purely material racism. ‘Spiritual racism’ is as good and important as ‘physical/biological racism.’”
I don’t know any White racialist who has ever advocated “stupid, short-sighted purely material racism.”
The writer believes it is “ridiculous” to think that Oswald Spengler’s “insignificant Jewish ancestry” (1/8 Jewish — one great-grandparent) could possibly have influenced his thought processes or values in any way.
Finally, “several of Spengler’s concepts and theories” are “not only valid but surprisingly accurate.”
Spengler set forth an hypothesis (or perhaps he thought it was scientific and irrefutable) that civilizations are born, grow, effloresce, age, decay, and die similar to living organisms. They can also be cut off in midlife, as he said happened to the great Latin American Indian civilizations. This was the primary theme of his major work, The Decline of the West.
In broad outline it is a plausible theory, and can’t be dismissed out of hand. I am not “anti-Spengler” in that sense.
However, I am biologically oriented when it comes to race. My starting point is comparable to that of conservation biologists concerned with the preservation of plant and animal species and subspecies.
Whites are an endangered human subspecies. In fact, the National Alliance used to produce — and now offers again for download and printing — an orange sticker: “Earth’s Most Endangered Species: THE WHITE RACE. Help preserve it.”
The ultimate objective is to move our people back onto a progressive, upward path. But we have to survive first. Collective survival is now an immediate, urgent concern.
Jewish intermixture with Whites pollutes the White gene pool. Only rarely does gene flow move in the opposite direction. I would never advocate accepting part-Jews. Obviously, the “more Jewish” part-Whites are, the worse, but I pay attention to any Jewish ancestry. The SS was onto something there.
Over generations, centuries, even millennia, Jewish genes have infiltrated the White gene pool. This has almost certainly contributed to our present plight.
Going forward it would be better to view part-Jews the way White Southerners viewed Black mixes: Rigidly classify all mixed-race offspring (e.g., Barack Obama, Lawrence Dennis [mulattos], quadroons, octoroons) as Black, not White, and through law and social policy divert the genes of such individuals outward and away from our people rather than carelessly permit them to genetically dilute our uniqueness.
Following this method we ended up with an American Black population that at one point was c. 25% White rather than a White population that was heavily tainted with Blackness. That isn’t ideal. In theory there should be no biological mixing whatsoever. But perhaps we should be practical. Such an outcome was far better than the reverse.
Mixed Jews should be treated no differently in that regard than Blacks were formerly treated. Jews aren’t White.
In fact, there should be a strong supposition that Jewish genes are “prepotent” in crosses with other races, including Whites, as some of their own experts believed at the turn of the twentieth century. It seems to be observationally true: thought, behavior, values.
As an aside, Jewish biologist Stanley Garn, who constructed his own taxonomy of human races, believed that American Negro admixture with Whites was sufficient to classify American Blacks — “of West-Africa and Northern European origin” — as a “hybrid local race of recent origin” distinct from Sub-Saharan Blacks who had remained in Africa. Such “hybrid races,” he said, “are moving toward new adaptive modes. By investigating them, we can catch ongoing human evolution on the march!” (Human Races, 3rd ed., Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas Publishers, 1971, p. 177.)
That’s evolution — or devolution — through admixture. Race-mixing shouldn’t be taken lightly. And Jewish-Aryan crosses are among the worst. For one thing, they harvest our best women on a massive scale.
I’ve read the “spiritual race” arguments — Spengler, Yockey, and recently Julius Evola — and find that facet basically misleading and unhelpful. It is vague, metaphorical, unempirical, and fraught with dangerous invitations to loose thinking, evasions of hard truths, and the shirking of duty.
Without question there are countless biologically White individuals who cannot and must not be accepted into any healthy White community, now or in the future. I’ve written about some of them (most recently Nancy Pelosi and her family, and Joseph Biden).
They present a huge problem that we must come to grips with. But “spiritual race,” whatever that is, doesn’t provide useful guidance or enlightenment. On the contrary, it tends to open the door to the acceptance of more race mixture among people who say they are pro-White.
* * *