David SimsEssays

White Babies

by David Sims

WHITE WOMEN should have more babies! Go ahead. Kids are fun. And you get somebody to call you Mommy and take care of you when you’re old.

Besides, we don’t want our race to die out.

Not even Hungary has a White birthrate that is above replacement level, which is 2.1 births per woman, or about 17 births per 1000 population per year.

How high could a birthrate be?

About one-sixth of the White population is women of child-bearing age (18-40). If in any given year one-quarter of those women are pregnant, then the birthrate will be 42 babies per 1000 population. That’s five times greater than is the typical White birthrate of 8 babies per 1000 population.

Pregnancy among White people is much too rare.

It is, however, very common among African populations, where the typical birthrate is 36 babies per 1000 population per year, and two African countries — Uganda and Angola — have birthrates above 42 babies per 1000 population per year.

To convert a birthrate from births per woman to births per 1000 population per year, multiply by eight.

A woman is fertile (and nubile) for about 20 years. Women in this age range are around one sixth of the total population. A woman is occupied by a pregnancy and by recovery from pregnancy for about one year. If the average woman has two children during her lifetime, then in the average year one tenth of all fertile women are pregnant. For each 1000 population, there are 167 fertile, nubile women, about 17 of whom gave birth that year.

17/2 = 8.5, which I rounded down to eight.

Under the circumstances in which we (the White race) find ourselves, anything that lowers the birthrate is bad for us.

Making women’s “right to vote” higher in our scale of values than having children was a mistake.

Making women’s college education higher in our scale of values than having children was a mistake.

Making women’s careers, especially in their 20s, higher in our scale of values than having children was a mistake.

And legalizing abortion was a mistake.

On that last mistake, some might say that without legal abortion some women would risk their lives getting clandestine abortions from an under-equipped, unqualified abortionist. To that, I say “Good!” Let death be the penalty for abortion, at least once in a while. And may evolution through natural selection weed the White race of any inclination to abort healthy White babies.

* * *

Source: Author

Previous post

Square Corners and Suicide Pacts

Next post

Conan: The Master of All Circumstances

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
14 Comments
Inline Feedback
View all comments
The G Factor
The G Factor
21 May, 2021 2:53 am

Unfortunately in the modern welfare state it is mainly the not-so-bright and lazy who are given the most incentive to procreate – while the more useful members of society are expected to pay taxes to support them.

guest
guest
21 May, 2021 9:25 am

The abortion argument can go both ways. With rational immigration, tax and economic policies abortion would be unnecessary. On the other hand, think of all the additional negroes and mestizos that we would have without abortion.

I never could understand conservatards that lament all the Afro-physicists that were killed by abortion.

Arvin N. Prebost
Arvin N. Prebost
21 May, 2021 11:57 am

Additional benefits of having children: 1) You learn that they are all different, and apparently are born that way just like the races are different, and men and women are different. You start to see the importance of genetics and wonder how much “free will” we really have. 2) By seeing what your kids go through, you realize what you went through (and what your parents went through). This makes for understanding and, I am reluctant to use this word—forgiveness. 3) You learn how important parents are in their kids’ education, not only in school but in life itself. My kids absolutely excelled in school because we pushed and helped them. I did not excel in school or college, despite having a mensa IQ. My parents offered no encouragement and… Read more »

Prinz Edelhart
Prinz Edelhart
21 May, 2021 9:41 pm

Propaganda to keep White women from having children goes back even further than most people imagine. For example, it was already in full swing in Weimar Germany.
Some in my own family considered pregnancy a ‘disease’ and impregnating a woman the worst crime a man could commit. I heard this pretty much every day during the 1970s.
Back in the 1980s and 90s, yours truly had the dubious pleasure of running into a whole series of women who were either barren due to drug use or having their tubes tied on purpose or botched abortions or having had too many abortions.
These women ranged in age from 19 to early 30s.

WhiteWest
WhiteWest
21 May, 2021 10:12 pm

I concur with all stated in this article, yet I believe as of now abortion is a necessary evil. As you stated above the black birthrate is significantly higher than that of the whites.
Blacks also comprise most of the abortions, and if it were outlawed before the deportation of non whites, their population would skyrocket diluting our blood even further.

Arvin N. Prebost
Arvin N. Prebost
Reply to  WhiteWest
23 May, 2021 6:54 pm

I wrote an article for the old NV website which detailed my visit to a pro-life dinner honoring eight young girls who did not abort their babies. It was a pretty big deal; Cal Thomas was there. My article was given a clever title (by Kevin, I think)—“My Last Supper with the Pro-Life Activists.

Well, the eight young mothers were White and the babies were mulatoes.

I was sickened. It indeed was my last supper with this bunch.

I rethought my position. Yes, it is a “necessary evil.” Or maybe it is not even an evil; I don’t know. I just know that we would be swamped even more than we are if it did not exist for blacks.

Kevin Alfred Strom
Kevin Alfred Strom
Admin
Reply to  Arvin N. Prebost
24 May, 2021 2:15 pm

It’s a definite evil — an unspeakable evil, beyond anything Lovecraft ever imagined — when it is done to healthy White babies. We should not be concerned with what Blacks or Jews or other non-Whites do in their own societies. If they kill and eat their mates as some spiders do, or kill and eat their offspring under certain conditions as a few organisms do, it may be disgusting but so be it. They are beings differently constituted than us. It’s not our place to encourage or discourage that. We should be concerned with separating from them, so we have our own society and they theirs. And we should be concerned with ordering our society so that women and men shall treasure the healthy White child as something almost infinitely… Read more »

RedShoehart
RedShoehart
22 May, 2021 7:15 am

We should always put quality over quantity (although the situation when those two factors are high is perfect) and Dr. Pierce was always reminding us of that law. Abortion is the tool that allows us to filter out those sick, flawed humans that our species do not really need. The same thing goes for women that in fact should not have any children (if they cannot hold their primscuity).

ulysses freire da paz jr
ulysses freire da paz jr
Reply to  RedShoehart
22 May, 2021 7:55 pm

comment image    

comment image
Gerda Bormann with her group of children in 1943

Julius Streicher Jr.
Julius Streicher Jr.
30 May, 2021 11:38 am

The first sentence should read: “White women should have more WHITE babies.” Some White women today are likely to jump in bed with any biped or bonobo or mongrel that comes along, thanks to their jew brainwash telling them to hook up with some rich mongrel sports figure or a jew millionaire who throws a few shekels at them and spit out niglets/kikes of various shades of black/brown/tan.

Scotsman
Scotsman
1 June, 2021 2:28 am

If there had been no abortion allowed in the US, there would be 150 million negroes in the US today. It’s worth keeping abortion legal, if just to keep the non-white population at bay. The white abortion rate can be kept down with the promotion of marriage and conservative family values, making it easy for women to be stay at home mothers and making it financially easy for white couples to have more than two children if they wish. Positive reinforcement always works better than banning things.

Kevin Alfred Strom
Kevin Alfred Strom
Admin
Reply to  Scotsman
1 June, 2021 2:35 am

I am not so sure you’re right about that. Having laws that enshrine the “right” of a woman to murder her healthy child in the womb is quite coarsening and corrupting and a horrible example for youth. even if an argument can be made that “the numbers” add up in our favor.

BWhelan91
BWhelan91
2 June, 2021 12:19 am

This is very sad. So often do i hear woman in their late 40s say they want a baby some day- and men in their early 50s say the same thing. Very rare men and woman can have children (healthy) late in life, esp. if they have yet to meet a partner to procreate with.
It use to be the smallest white family was avout 8 or 9 kids! My father is 1 of 9. Now we’re lucky if a beautiful white couple has one child, with trying to keep up on mortgage and new cars.
Sickening.

Prinz Edelhart
Prinz Edelhart
Reply to  BWhelan91
2 June, 2021 8:57 am

Based on what I’ve read, the mother’s age has a greater impact on the health of the child – which would make sense.
Chances of a man in his 50s (or older) finding a woman of healthy reproductive age who wants anything to do with him…..well…..
As long as he’s got LOTS of money, is famous or has otherwise very high social status, maybe.