Evolutionary Struggle of the Races: The Reality That Underlies All
by Douglas Mercer
BAKUNIN was on very nearly the opposite side, politically, from National Vanguard. But he nailed it when he said:
Jews are an exploiting sect, a blood sucking people, a unique devouring parasite tightly and intimately organized, cutting across all differences in political opinion.
That is, for their good and our ill, Jews are always prepared for battle.
* * *
Those who knew William Pierce often expressed surprise at how little personal animosity he seemed to bear towards Jews. But to him such personal hatred would have seemed as silly as to hate animals in the wild for attacking and killing each other. It is simply what they do, and to attach a moral value to it would make no sense. Kill or be killed knows no judgment, but only the law of necessity.
And when it comes to the millennia-old war being waged between Jews and Europeans it is best to take off all the words, the masks, and the ideologies — and see it for what it is: the oldest story in the book: us versus them.
It can’t get more simple than that.
Adolf Hitler liked to say that to win a war it was always best to focus on a single enemy, on one thing, lest your supporters get confused and become hard to rally.
Well, this is our one thing.
* * *
You sometimes hear people say that they can’t understand how evolution and natural selection could have come up with altruism. If it’s a dog-eat-dog world why do dogs sometimes not eat one another? Why loyalty or sacrifice? Why do some die for their country?
This viewpoint is the worst hangover from the ideology of radical individualism which has infected our race now for centuries. It sees man’s distant past as innumerable individuals wandering around looking out for number one, fending for themselves against the world — a war of every one against everyone else. But nothing could be further from the truth. For human evolution, human history, was never mainly the competition between individuals.
An individual in prehistoric times, off by himself, was very quickly a dead individual. What you had was a competition between bands, tribes, groups. You had group evolution. Some groups made it, others didn’t. It was always group cooperation that was paramount and group survival that mattered. And so you had group evolutionary strategies. Nothing has changed since this time.
It always was, always is, and always will be as simple as us versus them.
This is our one thing.
* * *
The final words of Wilhelm Marr’s book The Victory of Judaism Over Germanism (1879) are “Finis Germaniae.”
Thirty-seven years later, in the introduction to his book The Passing of the Great Race, Madison Grant echoed this by saying “Finis America.”
The latter was a warning. The former was not a warning, or even a prediction, but what the author considered to be a statement of fact. In his view, the war between the Jews and the Germans was concluded and Germany had met its Sedan.
As for this loss on the part of the Germans, he wrote: “Let us accept the inescapable since we can’t change it.”
I shall announce without any attempt to be ironic that Judaism has triumphed on a world wide historical basis. I shall bring news of a lost battle and of the victory of our enemy without offering excuses for our defeated army.
For Marr this age-old struggle was over the moment Jews were let into German society. He saw them as having vanquished it utterly.
This historical fact that Judaism has become the leading political and social force of the 19th Century is clearly before our eyes.
The 1800-year war with Judaism is nearing its end and let us admit without reserve that Germany has suffered its Sedan, we have lost our armies…. we have been vanquished in open battle.
How was this accomplished? Marr sees the struggle in elemental terms as a struggle between Jews and Germans, between Jewish “realism” and German (and Aryan generally) “ideality.”
He says that the Jews do not possess a religion, they possess a “business contract” with Jehovah. This contract is drained of all sentiment, and it is a hard-edged and cold-blooded quid pro quo. The Jews see the terms as: We do God’s bidding, he kills our enemies.
In his book You Gentiles (1924) the Jew Maurice Samuels lays it bare: He says that the Jews are a distinct and alien race living among Gentile society. He says that the two sides are and always will be bitter enemies, and that their interests will always remain antithetical and irreconcilable.
Samuels’ primary example is that of sports; he said the Aryans have always been a “sporting people” (from chariot races to jousts to tennis matches) and that we place a high value on being “sporting.” That is, scrupulously fair. This is the “ideality” we mentioned, what George Patton once referred to as his own innate “Saxon sense of fair play.” Well Jews don’t have a Saxon sense of fair play, not being Saxons or Europeans at all.
We Europeans were a knightly people with courtly values of gallantry, chivalry, open-handedness, fair play, objectivity, fairness. As long as we were only among our own kind, it was a noble, beautiful, and workable way of life.
But Jews have never subscribed to these high-minded Marquess of Queensbury rules of life. They are gutter fighters bereft of ethics, unconcerned about extending justice to their enemies. They are without scruples of any kind.
In this mismatched contest the naive and guileless Aryans suffered. Gallant fair play becomes totally unworkable when Jews are around.
For the Jews are cold-blooded pragmatists always keeping an eye on the main chance, their main chance; their slogan is “buyer beware.” (Whereas the Germans, says Marr, had been the country of misty-eyed dreamers, the nation of “poets and thinkers.” One could say that of other Europeans, too.)
The fact that Germany had of late become “hard” was too little too late according to Marr. The horse was not only long ago out of the barn; the fox already ruled the henhouse. By the time of Bismarck, the armies had already left the field — one in victory, the other in defeat.
Marr says that in ancient Rome the Jews met another realistic people; so they introduced the “ideality” of the Christian religion to fragment it. Later they would meet the unsuspecting Germans on their own terrain, a terrain soon to be theirs.
Into this clumsy Germanic element penetrated a Semitic element, smooth, crafty, pliable Jewry with all of its gifts of realism; as far as astuteness is concerned, they look down on the German with his knightly lumbering and enabled him in his vices.
By simply purchasing newspapers, the Jews soon began to dictate the things that Germans could and could not say about them: “From the very beginning of emancipation Judaism has been declared off limits for us Germans.”
Nothing in subsequent years has proven him wrong;
Just before his death, Richard Wagner read Marr’s book with great interest and said that he broadly agreed with it. He said that the only possible solution to this was dramatic and decisive action against the Jews. But he saw around him no powerful impetus to bring such action to reality.
* * *
It is said that the secret of the success of the Jews is that they are versatile, that they are agile, and that they are able to change and adapt themselves to meet new circumstances — and thus dominate them.
This is wrong, very wrong. This is looking down the wrong end of the telescope.
The Jews don’t change, they change us. Once a Jew always a Jew, and always the same Jew.
Were humans to travel to an inhospitable planet they would “terraform” it, that is, make it Earth-like, make it safe and livable for us.
Jews do the same thing in the societies they penetrate; they “Jew-a-form,” if you will, that society
They Judaize it. They make it safe for Jews.
The Jews don’t adapt, they select. They transform the society that is antagonistic to them so they can make themselves at home; they make its founders and former owners into “aliens,” exiles in their own land. It is soon no longer theirs; it belongs to the Jews.
They don’t find themselves in an inhospitable environment and adapt to it; they change the environment to suit them. They don’t try to fit in (except as a very temporary measure, at first); they make a Jewish world in which they become the most fit.
That, as they say, is a distinction with a difference — all the difference in the world.
Marx, a Jew himself, admitted that as soon as Jews are allowed into a society that society becomes Jewish. Nothing that has happened subsequently has proved him wrong.
Madison Grant said that the primary reason for the passing of the Nordic branch of our race was that the world of the Industrial Revolution did not suit them. Nordics were best in the outdoors, sailing the oceans, up in the mountains. An urban, cramped, bureaucratic world stifled their instincts and they withered on the vine. By contrast this world suited the Jews just fine. Because they created it.
Jew Yuri Slezkine called the 20th century “the Jewish century.” He might as well have said the same of the 19th and the 21st.
The world that we have now is the world that is best for Jews because it was made by them via a massive deformation — in many ways, inversion — of the civilization we used to have. It’s no coincidence. How often do you hear Jews ask of something, “Is it good for the Jews?” That is their only criterion for anything. It is their one thing.
We know this Jewish world only all too well:
A world with no history,
A liquid world of capital
A constantly changing world
A world of constant movement
A culturally and sexually degenerate world
A world with no borders
A world in which White people and their history are considered evil
An urban world
A cosmopolitan world
This is the world made by the Jews, made for the Jews. They made it in their own image. And divine it is not.
This is their world and we are only living in it.
How long this latter will be true is the question of our time.
* * *
In 1933 T.S. Eliot went to Virginia and spoke about tradition. He said that for reasons of religion and race it was always a disaster for any society to have in it free-thinking Jews.
In 1941 Charles Lindbergh called out the Jews as the instigators of the oncoming war which would spell such horror for the White race. For his trouble Lindbergh was made a pariah. In her diary at the time, his wife said that she knew that what her husband had said was true but wished he hadn’t said it. She wondered earnestly if she’d ever be able to go shopping again in New York City.
In the middle of the 20th century a British politician gave his opinion about what was the most momentous event of his time. He said without hesitation: “the abdication of the White race.”
In 1954, Raymond Chandler said there was nothing left for him in Los Angeles, adding that “it’s only a matter of time before a Gentile has to wear an armband there.”
When the Bolsheviks finally made it into St. Petersburg they expected there to be fierce firefights at all points. But when they walked into the government’s buildings they were shocked to find them all empty, their former possessors having fled some time before.
This past summer, when rioting Blacks and treasonous Whites, and their Jewish herders, came upon police precincts and set to overrun them, the police were ordered by treacherous politicians to stand down. They were ordered to retreat and to flee. Like good goyim they obeyed, and skittered off with their tails between their legs. The Blacks and their allies and facilitators simply occupied the precincts, their former possessors having fled some time before.
These are the sorry terms of surrender of the race that only yesterday ruled the Earth, created science, and made the highest civilization ever known in time or space.
And that dramatic and decisive action which Richard Wagner could not see in his time? Let us find it soon — let us find it now — and let us make it overwhelmingly real.
This is our one thing.
* * *