News

Ursula Haverbeck: Update on the Verdict

Determined truth-teller

by Monika Schaefer

THIS BRIEF article is just to clarify — to the best of my knowledge — the status of the heroic Ursula Haverbeck.

On December 4th, 2020, Haverbeck was found guilty for a “speech crime” under the infamous Par. 130 of the German Criminal Code. The judge sentenced her to one year in prison.

This verdict is not “rechtskräftig” — or final — as it is being appealed. Contrary to public perception, she is not currently in prison – at least not the tiny cell variety.

For many years now, Ursula Haverbeck has been dragged through the courts on various charges of incitement and disturbing the public peace under Par. 130. 

Here is a portion of that Section of the German Criminal Code – Par. 130(3):

Whosoever publicly or in a meeting approves of, denies or downplays an act committed under the rule of National Socialism of the kind indicated in section 6 (1) of the Code of International Criminal Law, in a manner capable of disturbing the public peace shall be liable to imprisonment not exceeding five years or a fine.

Heroine

During those years of court proceedings, headlines in the mainstream media would occasionally scream such things like: “Nazi-Oma sentenced to 10 months jail without parole!” or something similar, and this happened several times as she was going through the various levels of the courts, and on different charges. My guess is that the MSM headlines were intentionally misleading. It is understandable that many people thought she was in and out of jail during those years. But there were always appeals, more appeals, more charges, more trials, and on and on it went.

The first time she set foot in a jail cell was in 2018 after the police arrested her at her home. She spent two and a half years in jail, from age 89 to 91! On a note of interest, the former East Germany, a communist state, did not incarcerate non-violent “offenders” over 80 years of age. But in the “civilized” west, jailing octogenarians and nonagenarians is par for the course if those people have the “wrong” ideas or ask inconvenient questions. 

For more read my last article — https://freespeechmonika.wordpress.com/2020/12/03/ursula-haverbeck-faces-the-inquisition-again/ and the one before that:  https://freespeechmonika.wordpress.com/2020/11/05/ursula-haverbeck-is-free/

* * *

Source: Free Speech Monika

Previous post

The Lies They Tell

Next post

Barr Administers the Coup de Grace

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
7 Comments
Inline Feedback
View all comments
Walt Hampton
Walt Hampton
8 December, 2020 2:32 pm

The Yids got their butts cut when they tried
to mess with Lady Renouf. So, now the Jew
scum go and pick on a helpless little ole lady
in her ’90s. If something as disgusting as
this does not motivate you to want to do the
right thing, I do not know what will….

Prinz Edelhart
Prinz Edelhart
Reply to  Walt Hampton
8 December, 2020 8:32 pm

The Danish gubmint just murdered 17,000,000 minks because Kung Flu.
Nothing will motivate them.
They will line up for the sterilization VAXXX and then line up next door for the next iphone.

Former Liberal
Former Liberal
8 December, 2020 8:36 pm

Just absolutely disgusting for the German government to keep going after an elderly woman ! No matter what others may think, she still.has a right to voice her opinions. My family by the way is part Jewish and did lose some people in World War Two. But, about 12 million Germans at least 20 million Russians, 3 million Poles, besides people of other nationalities died. The more I read, besides being a truthseeker at heart, the more I doubt the official story of the Holocaust. If the official version of the Holocaust really did happen, why are European governments so terrified of dissidents?

JM/Iowa
JM/Iowa
9 December, 2020 11:34 pm

What a fine lady Ursula Haverbeck is! She does more than most White men dare to think of doing. Come now, show some courage! The National Alliance needs your help.

Truthweed
Truthweed
Reply to  JM/Iowa
12 December, 2020 7:19 pm

Greetings JM. She has given the ‘German’ government enough time to answer her question: “Where did it happen?”!

Truthweed
Truthweed
12 December, 2020 7:36 pm

“Whosoever publicly or in a meeting approves of, denies or downplays an act committed under the rule of National Socialism of the kind indicated in section 6 (1) of the Code of International Criminal Law, in a manner capable of disturbing the public peace shall be liable to imprisonment not exceeding five years or a fine.” Revisionist pioneer Carlos Whitlock Porter did not approve, deny or downplay acts ‘committed’ under Natrional Socialism. When required to attend a court in Germany he stated he could not attend because he had been injured by the ‘pedal-operated brain-bashing machine of Sachsenhausen’ and then by the ‘Auschwitz atomic bomb’. The action against him was abandoned.

West needs to wake up
West needs to wake up
15 December, 2020 7:16 pm

God Bless Her
Merry Xmas everyone