H. MillardNews

Praise the Lord and Nominate That Mother

Jews, by the way, have created the situation in which the blankos see it as “unthinkable” that a man might be picked to replace Ginsburg.

by H. Millard

HAVE YOU noticed that never-Trumpers Mitt Romney and Mike Lee suddenly support President Trump as he seems to be leaning toward naming Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court? Wonder why? Are they suddenly Trump fans? Nope. Not likely. Instead, it might be because they believe that Barrett is really a closet lefty, like them, and in her case hides her true beliefs behind a fig leaf of “conservative” bona fides based on little more than her Catholic-upbringing position that abortion is bad.

But more than possibly being a closet lefty, Ms. Barrett may suffer from a Great White Mother complex. This is a term I coined years ago to describe White women who do things such as going out of their way to serve non-Whites and preferring non-Whites’ interests over the interests of Whites. Great White Mother types in some cases adopt Black children instead of White children. Ms. Barrett has done exactly this. Why didn’t she adopt a couple of the many White children right here in the US who need adoption? Why did she go out of her way to adopt two Black children from Haiti?

Barrett and one of “her” children

In my definition of the Great White Mother (also Great White Father) complex, I see a usually subconscious feeling of superiority on the part of the GWM or GWF that makes them believe that they are “saviors” of non-Whites — and also makes them believe that since Whites (even White orphan children) are superior, they don’t need help.

In their minds’ eyes the GWMs and GWFs are something like the character Lord Jim who is carried on the shoulders of the “inferior” non-Whites who praise him as saintly but suffering for racial justice. Yes, GWMs and GWFs are super-superior human beings who try to protect non-Whites from the evil “White racists” who consist, in their minds, of almost the entire White population — except the GWMs and GWFs, of course. (Trivia alert: I appeared in the off-off Broadway stage version of Lord Jim when I was acting in New York City years ago.)

So, if I’m right, what happens if Barrett becomes a Supreme Court Justice? Well, she may become a very anti-White vote on issues involving so-called social justice issues, forced integration, putting “projects” in the suburbs, slavery reparations, castrating the Second Amendment, and the like.

* * *

Appendix:
Barrett and the “People of Praise”

dailycelebuk.com and National Vanguard correspondents

AMY Coney Barrett emerges now as a front runner after she was shortlisted for the nomination in 2018, which eventually went to Brett Kavanaugh. Trump called the federal appellate court judge ‘very highly respected’ when questioned about her Saturday. Born in New Orleans in 1972, she was the first and only woman to occupy an Indiana seat on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals.

With five biological and two Haitian adopted children, friends say she is a devoted mother. Her youngest biological child has Down Syndrome.

In 2017, her affiliation to the small, tightly knit “charismatic Catholic” group called People of Praise caused concern while she was a nominee for a seat on the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

Members of the group swear a lifelong oath of loyalty, called a covenant, to one another. They are also assigned and held accountable to a personal adviser, known until recently as a ‘head’ for men and a ‘handmaid’ for women. People of Praise describes itself not as a church, but as a “charismatic Christian community” on its Web site. The group has about 1,700 members in 22 cities across the US, Canada, and the Caribbean, they say.

Little-mentioned in media reports is the fact that (like many Christian groups) a main focus of “doing good,” according to People of Praise, is giving “love,” time, and resources to non-Whites.

Members are encouraged to confess personal sins, financial information and other sensitive disclosures to these advisors and advisors are allowed to report these admissions to group leadership if necessary, according to an account of one former member. Members are expected to donate at least 5 per cent. of their earnings to the group. Unmarried members of the group are placed living with married member couples. Members often look to buy or rent homes near other members.

They believe in “Bible prophecy,” “speaking in tongues,” and “divine healings” — and, as H. Millard has pointed out, they also have a ineradicable itch to prove how “good” and “superior” and “anti-racist” they are by giving attention and “help” to non-Whites.

A People of Praise meeting; looks like the “speaking in tongues” is about to start. One of the group’s early members, Dorothy Ranaghan, makes a psychologically revealing statement when she says that the first “tongues” spoken by her husband “sounded like Hebrew.”

At least 10 members of Barrett’s family, not including their children, also belong to the group. Barrett’s father, Mike Coney, serves on the People of Praise’s 11-member board of governors. Her mother Linda was also a ‘handmaiden,’ now called a Woman Leader.

* * *

©2020 H. Millard

Ourselves Alone & Homeless Jack’s Religion: Messages of Ennui and Meaning in Post-American America by H. Millard — In this book, H. Millard, the hard-to-pigeonhole author of The Outsider and Roaming the Wastelands, has put together some of his category-bending commentaries on post-American America. They deal with politics, philosophy, free speech, genocide, religion and other topics in Millard’s edgy style — and lead up to “Homeless Jack’s Religion,” in which Homeless Jack lays out revelations he found in a dumpster on skid row. ISBN-10: 0-595-32646-3

Roaming the Wastelands by H. Millard — The groundbreaking novel of post-American America and of a life-affirming philosophy that is beyond left and right. From Chapter 1: “There are some among us who can’t help but listen to a different drummer. The drumming they hear is from their DNA. Some try to block it out, but it is heard in the blood which has no ears that can be covered to stop the sound that is not a sound. It is a call of the wild from centuries past to the wild in some humans. Those who try to deny the drummer are doomed to unhappy lives, for they are denying what they were born to be.” ISBN-10: 0-595-22811-9

The Outsider by H. Millard — Non-conformist and alienated, Buck wanders alone through a post-American America seeking meaning and the authentic. H. Millard’s iconoclastic, sacred-cow-toppling essays and fiction have appeared in everything from the high-IQ society Mensa’s publications to newspapers and magazines. Follow the linked title or get it by telephone: 1-877-823-9235. ISBN-10: 0-595-19424-9

Previous post

Ugh, it’s a Krug

Next post

Jews Screech, Facebook Jumps

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
19 Comments
Oldest
Newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Phil Keup
Phil Keup
23 September, 2020 3:28 pm

Rejection of nature by the Jewish Bible and labelling it as “pagan” (evil) ends up leaving the white person to clean up the mess and rather than acknowledging they have been duped they succumb to the lies they have been told in these churches. Jesus to these blacks is not different than Santa Claus and any free benefits they can get from the white European must come from “God” The Jewish merchants got filthy rich bringing negro slaves to Haiti and they revolted killing every single white on the island Now this GWM feels empowered to make these blacks her equal and sacrifice racial purity for the sake of universal love which in reality is self hatred for “sins” her ancestors must have committed in the past The destruction of… Read more »

Joe
Joe
Reply to  Phil Keup
23 September, 2020 5:56 pm

Barrett likes blacks so much, why doesn’t she go move to Haiti and be a judge in Haiti? None of the Whites who love blacks so much ever move to black countries. Barrett will probably be the Supreme Court judge to replace Ginsburg. She’s going to be a disaster for us White Americans. Another disaster for us. When it comes to racial matters Barrett is going to vote against the interests of White Americans. She’s going to be yet another ANTI-White Supreme Court judge, to prove to her fellow congregants in her church how morally righteous she is. To show her adopted black children what a loving mother she is. Trump wanting Barrett for the Supreme Court — another reason to stay home on election day and not vote at… Read more »

ulysses freire da paz jr
ulysses freire da paz jr
Reply to  Phil Keup
25 September, 2020 4:21 pm

But not the Jew alone, but everything that emanates from the Jewish spirit is a substance that gnaws away and destroys the best in us ”Houston Stewart Chamberlain  
comment image  

Powell
Powell
23 September, 2020 11:44 pm

I would rather he pick the Cuban. I want nothing to do with yet another misguided white fool who has taken in children who should be cared for by their own people. These virtue signalers need to be called out. Were there no white orphans that needed care? Were there no blacks willing or able to take care of their own? If not, why not?

Josef Tone
Josef Tone
24 September, 2020 2:20 am

The whole social dynamic that this represents is the one true case against white people. I think it’s normal in life to be misled, then you have to gather yourself at some point. However, all of these unhealthy “things”: liberalism, conservatism, christianity, monopoly capitalism, social marxism, globalism, genuine environmental degradation, etc, that all of these people latch onto and hold a death grip to. Some people actually censor their very own thoughts I think. An individual probably not terribly friendly to us, nevertheless once said:

“There’s nothing more enslaved than an enslaved mind that thinks it’s free. It’s the ultimate prison.”

PrinzEdelhart
PrinzEdelhart
24 September, 2020 9:15 am

Putting women in positions of power is a bad idea because they are far too easily influenced by outside factors: propaganda, advertising, peer pressure, that sort of thing.
Women (and older men) also fall much too easily for pretty lies about ‘safety’, ‘security’, ‘peace’, ‘prosperity’ and will sell their tribe, village, country, culture down the river because of it.
And if the women are without biological children of their own, these issues are magnified many times over.

A. Wyatt Mann
A. Wyatt Mann
Reply to  PrinzEdelhart
24 September, 2020 5:22 pm

Agreed. White women are far more gullible than their white American male counterparts. In order to understand this, one only has to look at how many of these worthless females choose to dilute the Caucasian gene pool by procreating with 80 IQ Negroes.

I’ve also always found women to be very malleable in their “beliefs”. Basically, taking the same position as whatever man (or, more likely, mangina) they happen to be with this week. It’s the very reason that I don’t want to go out with any of these American whores, much less procreate with them. They have zero principles.

PrinzEdelhart
PrinzEdelhart
Reply to  A. Wyatt Mann
25 September, 2020 7:30 am

Nature has given women 2 prime directives:Social advancement and biological reproduction. They are loyal to 1 thing and 1 thing only – their own womb. If the kids get a little bit lucky, also to what issues forth from it.
Expecting loyalty to more esoteric concepts such as tribe, race, culture, country or similar from women is like expecting a shark o live on celery or a squirrel to live on steak.
They are simply not built that way.

J P
J P
Reply to  A. Wyatt Mann
28 September, 2020 3:52 am

You can say that again . . . after reading about black Benjamin Jenkins and his success at manipulating 150 young women into performing bizarre sexual activities, one can only sigh at how gullible young women are.

Josef Tone
Josef Tone
Reply to  PrinzEdelhart
24 September, 2020 8:32 pm

I have to say, I don’t really agree. The ratio of white women with non-white males is more frustrating than the other way around, however the numbers aren’t very disproportionate. For example, here in the Bay Area, I see at least 20 WM/AF couples for every 1 WF/BM couple. It’s at least that. Out of the individuals who are afflicted by this, females on average probably take it to a socially higher level; whereas the males tend to be more unattractive, perverted, selfish, still want to live in a predominantly white area, and in some cases may not even like the race of their “other!” I really don’t see any significant difference, other than the Negroid aspect to this.

PrinzEdelhart
PrinzEdelhart
Reply to  Josef Tone
25 September, 2020 7:44 am

I suppose a lot of this has to do with where you live, but I’ve spent good amounts of time in a decent number of very different places and here’s what I’ve seen in terms of mixed race couples: The BY FAR most common combo is White female+Black/Arab/Turkish/Indian/Hispanic male, followed by HF/BM. You hardly ever see White women with East Asian males and there simply aren’t enough Amerindian men to show up on the radar, although there is no shortage of White women looking for their ‘Native’ cowboy crystal healer spirit guide….. Probably the second most common combo is WM/EAF, – they’re so ‘traditional’ and ‘submissive’, dontcha know….- which usually translates to middle-aged White losah with beer gut + fake ‘Hawaiian’ shirt + East Asian gold digger/escort or Nerd+ Nerd.… Read more »

Josef Tone
Josef Tone
Reply to  PrinzEdelhart
25 September, 2020 5:29 pm

I understand. I still think that white males with even a remote amount of racial consciousness are affected more by sights that are enough to gag-a-maggot, and we psychologically inflate the threat level/numbers/ratios at least somewhat. But getting back to the original point, even here in the belly-of-the-beast, I rarely see white females hanging around with non-white females. It still much more common to see white female friends together, black female friends together, Oriental female friends together, and a big increase in brown-people-at-large starting to socially cross-pollinate among themselves (Mexicans, Palestinians, Brazilians, Polynesians, etc). That’s at least somewhat of a good sign, under the circumstances.

.

PrinzEdelhart
PrinzEdelhart
Reply to  Josef Tone
26 September, 2020 7:51 am

Regarding the ‘cross-pollination’ (pretty good description, btw.) between Browns, there is (or was if it’s been ‘fact-checked’, read: censored) a YT video called ‘Can Latinos and Middle Easterners tell each other apart?’
The general consensus seems to be no…….

Joe
Joe
Reply to  PrinzEdelhart
26 September, 2020 5:27 pm

A lot of the slave owners in Puerto Rico [ and throughout the Caribbean and in Brazi] l were arab jews and the arab jew slave owners had alot of sex with their slaves, so Puerto Ricans are a type of arab jew. They certainly act like arab jews. I’m not at all surprised to find out that Latinos and Middle Easterners have a difficult time telling each other apart. Latinos act like arab jews and they look like arab jews. That’s because they have a large dose of arab jew blood/DNA, from the arab jew slave owners. Of course us Whites get blamed for slavery. The jews and the arabs owned and controlled the slave trade. Also, lots of blacks were involved in the slave trade, but the huge… Read more »

Powell
Powell
Reply to  PrinzEdelhart
25 September, 2020 5:42 pm

The White female is the most beautiful category of human on the planet, so it makes sense that every type of male will try to get one if they can. Unfortunately, many White females actually don’t realize they are at the pinnacle, and seem to have no concern at all with preserving their phenotype or having children who look like them. Blue eyed men prefer blue eyed women, but blue eyed women have no such preference. An actual study was done on this. It’s all quite sad and will lead to White extinction if things keep going the way they are. Some people are very happy about that. Some are sick, some are stupid, some are competitors, and some are just evil.

PrinzEdelhart
PrinzEdelhart
Reply to  Powell
26 September, 2020 7:58 am

Generally correct, but I have to disagree on one point. There is no such thing as an attractive woman who doesn’t know she’s attractive. Those are fantasy creatures who exist only in books, movies and country songs. Pretty girls know – on some level – that their looks have a great effect on the males of the species – and other females as well – as early as age 4. Good-looking children – especially girls – are almost always treated better, even by their own families, good-looking teens are almost always more ‘popular’ than others, good-looking adults are hired more readily, receive raises and promotions more often, and so on. Groups of women out and about will almost always position themselves in such a way that the most attractive one… Read more »

Josef Tone
Josef Tone
Reply to  PrinzEdelhart
26 September, 2020 1:04 pm

Young white couple visiting Bangladesh… the attractive and garrulous wife knows she’s a “star” in brown town.. 4:32… 12:29..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NlNLIHxuTe0

Eugene
Eugene
28 September, 2020 10:36 am

I’ve read somewhere of someone saying that Blacks have soulless eyes. The picture you have of Amy Barrett and her Black Haitian daughter proves it. Some are saying that Trump picked Barrett because he wants the Catholic vote. That Barrett is conservative. A conservative is a Zionist. And the fact that she has adopted Black children from another country proves she will be a liberal in her thinking like the woman she replaces. Maybe that is why Trump isn’t replacing a Jew with a Jew. Ron Verb of WKBN, radio station, in the 2000’s decade, I believe, had call ins from Black women. They claimed that if a Black man can have a White woman, he does not want a Black woman. Also, that the Black man wants his sex… Read more »

William W. Williams * Chairman, National Alliance
William W. Williams * Chairman, National Alliance
28 September, 2020 4:52 pm

Who cares which Semitic religion the nine tyrants in black robes are? Six Catholics/three Jews, or whatever, none will stand up for the interests of the White majority. Even with her adopted niglets, Barrett can’t be all bad since the SPLC doesn’t like her for speaking to a group that takes a dim view of queers: .Amy Coney Barrett Gave a Perfect Response to Anti-Religious Bigotry Citing SPLC smears to hit ACBYet the alumni’s most despicable attack involved the SPLC and ADF. The signatories condemn Barrett for having “obfuscated about her association with an anti-LGBTQ organization that the Southern Poverty Law Center — an Alabama-based nonprofit that studies hate groups more intensely than any organization in the United States (with the possible exception of the FBI) — has labeled a… Read more »