Essays

Are National Socialist Autonomous Zones Possible?

by Karl Radl

WITH THE final destruction of the farce of the Capital Hill Autonomous Zone (CHAZ), at the hands of a small force comprised of armed US policemen, that was more a squatter eviction than a battle; we are forced to wonder about the future of such attempts to create autonomous zones within existing states. The creation of the CHAZ in Eastern Seattle was always something of a LARP by local anarchists and Antifa rather than a serious attempt to ‘fight the system’ by seceding from it.

This idea of complete secession is often viewed as key to the modern idea of autonomous zones and it has come up many times in the past in the attempts to create such zones, as was seen in the Paris Commune of 1871 as well as in the revolt of the Silesian Weavers in 1844 and the more general rising of German and Austrian workers in 1848 on which Karl Marx famously wrote Revolution and Counter-Revolution in Germany.

Yet this idea of complete secession has routinely failed and is actually the riskier view of secession from a state and the creation of autonomous zones. More practical is the view that to create autonomous zones requires far less of the political and ideological grandstanding that we saw in the CHAZ, as well as in many other such commune-based projects. Rather what is required is the creation of de facto autonomous zones that are ostensibly de jure within the state itself. Thus they do not overtly challenge the sovereignty of the state and force the state to act against them in defence of that sovereignty.

This then decreases the likelihood of using its police and military forces to try and enforce its will in these de facto autonomous zones, and if it attempts to do so it requires a far greater deployment of state assets in order to achieve the same results as were previously used.

This will sound impractical to some but only because our race has forgotten its evolutionary right to assert its dominance and will over its own destiny, as well as the lesser races that inhabit this planet.

Consider for a moment the ‘No Go’ zones that are now a fact of life in many European cities with the most famous being in the French capital of Paris. Are these not in fact de facto autonomous zones but yet maintain a de jure status within the state itself?

The cost of exerting the will of the state by using state assets is simply too great, so the state has quietly withdrawn its forces in the face of determined and violent resistance by the population that is largely composed of sub-humans. This is not to say the French or any other European government could not re-take these de facto autonomous zones, but rather that the governments simply don’t have the political will to do so — since the Jews and their liberal-left Shabbos goyim have no desire to have an urban battle break out that will undoubtedly result in many sub-human corpses littering the streets and result in a fresh political scandal because… well… brown lives matter.

Conversely if Aryans attempted to do the same as the sub-humans in the suburban slums of Paris then there would be little indecision on the matter and the tanks of the French army would roll in within hours with orders to ‘shoot to kill’ because… well… White lives don’t matter.

This means that we cannot enforce our political will in creating a de facto autonomous zones by force as the sub-humans have done, because the state hates us because of our race and its liberal supporters will cheer and thirst for more blood as the state’s mercenaries bayonet our babies.

Instead we are forced to evolve our struggle against our Jew-dominated state by creating de facto autonomous zones within the ostensible bounds of the law to prevent the state physically assaulting our homes as active ‘enemies of the state’. This forces the state to either violate its own laws – and therefore break its own social contract with its citizens and create a legal precedent that the state itself does not want – or to tacitly recognize the de facto autonomous zone that is operating de jure within its own borders.

This isn’t a pipedream either given that just this has been achieved in several ‘National Liberated Zones’ within Germany – which has far more oppressive and heavily enforced anti-nationalist laws than anywhere else in the world – with the most success being seen in the village of Jamel in northern Germany. Where nearly all the village is owned by (and let) to nationalist families and there is very little the occupation government of Germany can do about it without detonating a nuclear device under its own legal system.

I mean what are they going to do? Rule that nationalists cannot own property?

Sure it is possible, but very unlikely, because that would in effect trigger armed resistance and destroy whatever remains of the government’s claim to be a ‘democracy’.

Attempts to do this by nationalists elsewhere – such as in the township of Leith in North Dakota – have failed due to both the size of the settlement (i.e. the greater the size it the harder it is to do [such as vague proclamations to settle the Pacific North West in the US]) and in the case of Leith the fact that the zone’s main exponent Craig Cobb was openly proclaiming his intention to create such a zone and was actively prevented from doing thus by the interference of the state. The failure in Leith was simply a case of an insufficient source of willing participants with some kind of discipline and actively seeking publicity for the endeavour.

In practice it is easy for a group of nationalists who know and trust each other independently of any official organizations to create de facto autonomous zones by gradually buying up property in villages and small towns, which can then be let out to other nationalist families who the group knows and can vouch for and so on.

It simply requires discipline and the willingness to put your money where your mouth is.

The advantage of creating such de facto autonomous zones is obvious enough in that it provides nationalist-dominated or completely nationalist-run local governments and infrastructure with few people able to complain to the state about the ‘evil Nazis’ who are ‘taking over their town’ because it has become an accomplished fact, much as in Jamel.

These zones also provide much needed socio-economic infrastructure for the nationalist movement as well as local bases of support that can in time be used to grow and expand nationalist influence to surrounding areas by leading by example in creating the kind of communities that will come to dominate the Fourth Reich.

This also enables the creation and tacit enforcement of nationalist law – which as long as it doesn’t overtly violate the state’s law is not likely to be challenged by the state itself (i.e. don’t start creating posses to go hunt down the local African population and the like) – and because the property belongs to many different nationalists rather than one umbrella group it cannot easily be confiscated in a contrived law suit as happened to Aryan Nations when its security guards opened fire on a lost family of Congoids driving towards their compound.

Nor is this pie in the sky given that this is precisely how the Mormons created and have kept hold of power in Utah while having their church operate as a form of shadow government. Another good example is the effective takeover of the town of St. Mary’s in Kansas by the Society of Saint Pius X (SSPX) in recent years.

It is true that nationalists have greater obstacles and enemies ranged against them than any other group but it can and should be done, because with de facto autonomous zones that operate de jure within the state, then we can at last largely free ourselves from state interference and begin to build the Fourth Reich one community at a time.

* * *

Source: The Purity Spiral

Previous post

Compromise

Next post

'Mastering’ Germany's Difficult Past

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
26 Comments
Oldest
Newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Angry Swede
Angry Swede
15 August, 2020 5:38 pm

I think this is possible, our own communities worldwide.
With the most dedicated people together there are good chanses for us. Of course there are problems to solve but that’s just how it is.
We know our enemies and their foul play by now so.

Aidhan
Aidhan
15 August, 2020 5:48 pm

A few years ago I invited my friends to begin saving with me with the intention of buying up a big farm to own in trust, where we could all build our dwellings and aportion land under our own internal scheme and have the whole thing owned in trust by all of us. You can guess what happened. I saved, when it came to everybody having enough money I had but nobody else had done anything. I couldnt pay rent anymore so I went and bought a house on just over an acre on my own because I had to. I still say, if any of them can come in with meaningful money we can buy up the farmland around here and I’ll put everything in trust. Nobody will do… Read more »

James Clayton
James Clayton
15 August, 2020 9:24 pm

Nothing in my lifetime galvanized relatively solid young White men more than the government murders of the separatist Branch Davidian community near Waco, Texas. When one commits an intentional or negligent illegal act that results in death, the perpetrator is considered guilty of the killings. Expect no less than even Presidents Lincoln and Kennedy, not to mention Chancellor/ Führer Hitler, for separating from debt-money slavemasters.

Dr. William Pierce on Criminals with Badges and Robert Griffin on Timothy McVeigh in the Fame of a Dead Man’s Deeds are good perspectives on how that played-out..

Last edited 1 month ago by James Clayton
Walt Hampton
Walt Hampton
Reply to  James Clayton
16 August, 2020 6:57 pm

The scene in the banner of this item is
inspirational. However, what are the chances
of a dentist or a doctor being nearby? How
about access to electricity and plumbing?

James Clayton
James Clayton
Reply to  Walt Hampton
18 August, 2020 12:42 am

That’s what I take the term “off the grid” to mean, not just the electrical grid. In cities, one must be connected to public utilities for an “occupancy permit” from the proper authorities. Therefore, one may not have their own well, solar-electric, or propane, if utilities are available. I’m sure their are exceptions but I still recall buying a small place some 40 years ago and having the septic tank pumped and inspected as a condition in escrow only to find, when escrow closed, that city sewer had become “available” and I was forced to connect including backfilling the septic system against future cave-in. Search for books, Where there is No Doctor, and Where there is No Dentist. However, in the North Woods, it was sometimes a bit of a… Read more »

JM/Iowa
JM/Iowa
Reply to  Walt Hampton
18 August, 2020 1:31 pm

Regarding dentists and doctors, if you build it, don’t you believe they’ll come if the home is at the right price and the neighborhood to their liking?

Plumbing and electricity aren’t insurmountable problems to solve. As I recall, the West Virginia campus is still equipped for utility independence. It has been done and can be done again– anywhere. Also, look into what “preppers” or survivalist minded people have researched. In many ways, electrical needs can be bypassed. As an example, a kerosene powered refrigerator exists that uses reasonably small amounts of fuel.

Where there’s a will, there’s a way.

JM/Iowa
JM/Iowa
18 August, 2020 1:18 pm

A sensible essay. A need is addressed, examples both successful and otherwise from the past cited, some problems to be overcome mentioned with advice. Committed Cosmotheists certainly know this is why we have land in West Virginia and have been shown opportunities near the national office by Chairman Williams of the National Alliance.

In all, a viable concept that only needs each of us to buy into it.

Sethmoto101
Sethmoto101
19 August, 2020 1:24 am

Just tell the powers-that-be that Whites belong on reservations just like the ones they put Amerinds onto. The political climate today is so anti-White, it could happen. The cure for White privilege is separating Whites from non-Whites, the logical conclusion to acceptance of the White privilege notion (which is BS). Make sure most of the US’s farmland is included as territory. Include mostly-white cities no larger than Pittsburg. Non-whites get compensated for realty and relocation, or their is property seized by eminent domain if they refuse to move.

Howard
Howard
19 August, 2020 11:10 pm

You say in which you were talk about having separate racial states: one for black, one possibly for mixed race, and the rest for pure whites. The point that you always miss (along with a considerable number of other people) is the fact that what is overlooked is that the people who don’t wish to separate from us don’t wish to separate from us only because they can’t prey upon us but, more importantly, to the Jews if we have a purely white country in which we permit no others to come in then we will have a country in which the Jew cannot obtain a foothold and ultimately destroy us! That is the most important thing of all; the fact that Jews MUST HAVE ACCESS to white people so… Read more »

O'Really
O'Really
21 August, 2020 5:35 am

“Conversely if Aryans attempted to do the same as the sub-humans in the suburban slums of Paris then there would be little indecision on the matter and the tanks of the French army would roll in within hours with orders to ‘shoot to kill’ because… well… White lives don’t matter.”

Has this ever been attempted? There seem to be too many variables in this equation to consider this a foregone conclusion to be taken for granted. And if so, perhaps it should be attempted regardless, just to prove a point. Of course, who would want to live in the suburban slums of Paris, but no-go zones for blacks for example can certainly be envisioned and enforced :D 

Demosthenes
Demosthenes
22 August, 2020 7:55 pm

I find it fascinating how National Vanguard has been so opposed to the Northwest Imperative. This is odd considering the fact that it is not mutually exclusive in any way with creating de facto autonomous zones. In fact, isn’t that exactly what the Butler Plan calls for? Furthermore, I also find the attacks on HAC in other articles here quite childish. I find it odd how much National Vanguard seems to be trying to discredit the Northwest Imperative. These articles are written with quite a great deal of insecurity. If we look at geography, demographics, and other factors, I cannot see why anyone would bother going out to the middle of nowhere in Tennessee when making a trip Northwest is a lot easier from an economic standpoint. Moving anywhere is… Read more »

Kevin Alfred Strom
Kevin Alfred Strom
Admin
Reply to  Demosthenes
23 August, 2020 8:46 am

Looking at Portland and Seattle today does make me wonder whether the water in the northwest is getting runoff from a valley full of Amanita muscaria. But I have nothing against White people anywhere gathering and forming race-based communities. It’s what we need to do. I do, however, have a problem with elevating Harold Covington to the status of decent human being: He forged my signature on letters and articles in order to harm me, the Alliance, and William Pierce. He also faked other people’s identities, as has been well documented. He also published foul, lying articles about me and my family, stories he just made up out of whole cloth. He faked a wire service report, and published it widely, insinuating that my friend Will Williams was “John Doe… Read more »

Dr. Vajajay Gupta
Dr. Vajajay Gupta
Reply to  Kevin Alfred Strom
23 August, 2020 9:35 am

I’d defer to you on this, except for one thing. The Pacific NW is now a hotbed of militancy. Young Whites taking to the streets are at the extreme left. It might not take much persuasion to get them to make one final realization in their political evolution – everything they are protesting about can be achieved through the separatist, governmental and economic principles of National Socialism – provided they renounce violence except when needed for self-defense.

Last edited 27 days ago by Dr. Vajajay Gupta
Demosthenes
Demosthenes
Reply to  Dr. Vajajay Gupta
25 August, 2020 7:16 am

That kind of militancy and demoralization is exactly the kind of environment that makes the Northwest attractive to me. Can’t have a NatSoc Movement without the commies to make everyone’s life miserable. How am I going to get material for offensive propaganda in an area as quite as Tennessee?

Dr. Vajayjay Gupta
Dr. Vajayjay Gupta
Reply to  Demosthenes
26 August, 2020 1:19 am

“Can’t have a NatSoc Movement without the commies to make everyone’s life miserable.”

That is not what I meant. I can see why Mr. Williams shooed you away.

Demosthenes
Demosthenes
Reply to  Kevin Alfred Strom
25 August, 2020 6:52 am

Alright. Let’s just assume that you’re right about HAC and that everything you said is true. So what? 1. He’s not the only person who agrees with the Northwest Imperative. There are literally dozens of people working towards it. 2. He’s dead. Stop stabbing a corpse. It makes you look weak. 3. The Northwest Imperative goes back to Pastor Richard Butler. HAC just so happened to be the primary spokesperson for it before he died. Attacking him is irrelevant at this point. I think that you forget that the NI neither begins nor ends with HAC. 4. It’s fascinating how I have not seen a single substantive objection to the NI here. Just character assassination. “But it’s a bit silly to debate why one reason is better than another…” Yeah.… Read more »

Kevin Alfred Strom
Kevin Alfred Strom
Admin
Reply to  Demosthenes
25 August, 2020 7:44 am

As I said, I sincerely wish you well in building White community in the northwest, just as I wish success to those doing the same in London, Laurel Bloomery, or Lombardy. Success will out. This is our online magazine, and we support the National Alliance and Dr. William Pierce’s vision, which isn’t geographically limited. We have no anti-northwest policy, though commenters and authors have a range of opinions to be sure. In our community, we’ve solemnized several marriages and brought several children into the world in the last year. Let a thousand families bloom.

Demosthenes
Demosthenes
Reply to  Kevin Alfred Strom
25 August, 2020 8:37 am

Well I am glad that National Vanguard isn’t anti NI. However, I have seen a narrative taking shape since HAC kicked the cab. That’s why I posted my original comment.

Last edited 25 days ago by Demosthenes
William W. Williams * Chairman, National Alliance
William W. Williams * Chairman, National Alliance
Reply to  Demosthenes
23 August, 2020 7:08 pm

<ahem!> Demosthenes yammers: [T]he attacks on HAC in other articles here quite childish… These articles are written with quite a great deal of insecurity… — No they aren’t. Your erstwhile leader Harold “Big Lie” Tubbington was a well-documented political saboteur and professional smear artist, Fact! If you can’t see that, Mr. Demosthenes, your judgment must be called into question. Here are the two articles on NV that mention the “publisher” that I sued for defamation and prevailed: https://nationalvanguard.org/2018/07/dr-william-pierce-on-harold-covington/ https://nationalvanguard.org/?s=Harold+Covington Tubbo owed me $250,000 for his careless libels of me, so he hunkered down in his phony Seattle-area autonomous zone and declared bankruptcy. Why did he not tell his suckers that I had prevailed in Williams vs. Covington or that he had declared bankruptcy to avoid paying me? He never even… Read more »

Dr. Vajayjay Gupta
Dr. Vajayjay Gupta
Reply to  William W. Williams * Chairman, National Alliance
24 August, 2020 10:00 pm

“I would rather wake up in the middle of nowhere than in any city on earth.” – Steve McQueen

Demosthenes
Demosthenes
Reply to  William W. Williams * Chairman, National Alliance
25 August, 2020 7:12 am

1. I have read those articles. Those were the ones that I was citing. I found them exceptionally childish. The man is dead. Give it a rest will you? From my experience, going after people after they are dead has no productive effect in the Movement. I understand why you are angry. I would be too in those circumstances. However, you old timers in the Movement really do need to fix this “he said she said thththrbt!!!” attitude. It’s getting annoying reading about the constant back and forth and phallus measuring contests between Movement elders. 2. HAC isn’t my leader. No one is. I prefer to lead myself. You seem to have me mistaken for some cultist. You just proved my point about the childishness. Don’t you realize that we… Read more »

Kevin Alfred Strom
Kevin Alfred Strom
Admin
Reply to  Demosthenes
25 August, 2020 7:28 am

Actually, the last time Covington was mentioned in a National Vanguard article was two years ago, and he’s only been mentioned six times in thousands of articles going back more than a decade. Hardly a “constant back and forth.”

Demosthenes
Demosthenes
Reply to  Kevin Alfred Strom
25 August, 2020 8:25 am

National Vanguard isn’t the only publication that I read.

Will White Williams * National Alliance Chairman
Will White Williams * National Alliance Chairman
Reply to  Demosthenes
25 August, 2020 2:50 pm

Good. Go there and prosper. You are not Alliance material and you have worn out your welcome here. Chew on what ol’ timer Richard Butler had to say about ol’ timer Tubbo co-opting his NW Migration Plan: His attorney, ol’ timer Ed Steele, wrote to your Leader, Tubs: “Even Pastor Butler, the one person you have yet to attack, tells me he doesn’t know what to make of you because of this “Butler Plan” of yours, about which you never bothered to consult him.” Or what ol’ timer Tom Metzger said he and ol’ timers Bob Miles and Richard Butler had finally come to think of Butler’s own “NW Republic Plan”:  “Boots on the ground White leaders then were Bob Miles, Richard Butler, Tom Metzger and a few others. […]… Read more »

Last edited 25 days ago by William White Williams • Chairman, National Alliance