After Being Banned by Anti-White Jews, Molyneaux’s Response Is “But I’m Not a White Supremacist!”
by David Sims
STEFAN Molyneux: So we’re now posturing as Politically Correct, are we? “Contrary to what my detractors say, I am not a white supremacist.”
I might play Devil’s Advocate and argue for why you should be a White supremacist, if you can by any means qualify for that status. Points I might introduce in argument include:
1. The White race is the first race to climb the sky, and we are still the race that has gone farthest, done the most, and leads the next most accomplished race by about fifty years.
2. Whites did spaceflight before anyone knew that it could be done. Asians, having before them the proof of the possibility of spaceflight, which Whites provided, and having the benefit of later and more advanced technology, most of which Whites also provided, tinkered around until they had found a way to imitate Whites and follow in our footsteps.
Most of the Earth’s Brown and Black races can’t follow those skyward trails, not even after Whites have shown the way.
3. This universe barely tolerates life, and astronomical observations today suggest that intelligent life is very, very rare. If the universe is ever to become a place generally characterized by life, by civilization, rather than by sterility, then the White race is the race that is most likely to make it happen. If Whites disappear from existence, then what may be the only living world in the cosmos might not survive the next billion years, and, when it goes, the universe will be entirely a dead thing.
4. Sure, polar bears and grizzly bears are each adapted to their environments, just as Whites and Blacks are adapted to theirs. But that doesn’t imply equality. In the case for bears, there might be an overall near equality by happenstance. But let us consider whether this is true of the races of mankind.
Whites are adapted to high culture, to advanced technology, to high-trust societies, to K-strategy child rearing, and to a peculiar balance of the life of the body and the life of the mind. Blacks are adapted to low culture, to rudimentary technology, to low-trust societies, to r-strategy child rearing, and they are not particularly invested in the life of the mind. The differences between the races of mankind are more profound than are the differences between polar bears and grizzly bears, such that there is no happenstance near equality among the races of mankind.
The word “superiority” is meaningless without a context. Superior in what way? Superior for what purpose? When the context is high culture, advanced technology, high trust society, etc., then Whites are, indeed, superior. If you posit that Africa’s relatively primitive culture as “just as good” as Western Civilization, then and then alone you might argue for a general, overall equality of Whites and of Blacks.
But there is probably something wrong with the premise that African and Western cultures are equally good. Some cultures are better than others. Better how? Better in terms of what they can do, what their culture has made possible — by what powers, what opportunities, what possibilities their civilization has brought into existence, which had never existed before.
The ideas of the “White supremacists” do seem to have some justification.
Having said that, however, the ideology of White supremacy contains the idea that because Whites are superior (in the ways the matter most), the White race should rule over and organize the lives of other races. With that I certainly disagree. But the reason I disagree is that shouldering that burden, the so-called White man’s burden, would hobble us, and we’d do better for ourselves not to take it up.
Whites do not owe non-Whites the benefit of ruling over them. It is something that we should not do, even if it were a safe and inexpensive thing to do. As history has proved, furthermore, it is both costly and dangerous to bring non-Whites among us even for charitable reasons. Inasmuch as the survival of our own race should be our highest value, it follows that we should neither enslave nor shelter non-Whites.
* * *
Source: Author
Stefan Molyneux was banned for one simple reason….his material could potentially become an on ramp to the material at National Vanguard, etc. Our enemies simply cannot permit that.
Stefan Molyneux? Never heard of him, glad to say. Mr. Sims writes as a racial separatist, not a supremacist. How can we White separatists be “supreme” over those non-Whites who are not in our midst? Can’t happen. Now Jewish supremacy, that’s another story. I’ve known a few Karens in my life. All have been White. Some were great, like you, and none were obnoxious that I can recall. SLANG DICTIONARYKaren [ kair-in ] WHAT DOES KAREN MEAN?Karen is a pejorative slang term for an obnoxious, angry, entitled, and often racist middle-aged white woman who uses her privilege to get her way or police other people’s behaviors.As featured in memes, Karen is generally stereotyped as having a blonde bob haircut, asking to speak to retail and restaurant managers to voice complaints or make demands, and being an anti-vaxx , Generation X soccer mom.In… Read more »
What is the definition of the name Karen?
I don’t know why the left decided to pick on my name, but I can live with it.
I thought they would’ve gone with Kate. In my mind, a Karen closely resembles Kate Gosselin — the haircut, the look like she just sucked on a lemon, or found out her husband’s cheating on her with an intern.
I find the whole thing silly, it’s like they can’t really attack white women, because they count on us for votes, but they’re still trying to put us in our place.
Anyway, Karen, I enjoy reading your comments.
Anti-vaxx, Gen X and a mom ?
Hardly.
‘Karens’ are usually Gen Boomer, would HAPPILY plunge that Bill Gates vaxx&chip into you themselves and have no kids.
You got something against your elders, Sonny? Whatever the generation of the White female, to use Karen in this context to refer to her is a silly pejorative. Those who use that term are youngsters who think they are “woke,” They are not National Alliance material. One source I found said the etymology of Karen is Katherine, a lovely English name. Katherine the Great was Ekaterina. Another source says this: — What is the derivation of the name Karen? It could also be derived from the phonetically similar Latin element ‘carus’. In addition, Karen is a Dutch, English, German, and Scandinavian diminutive form of the name Catherine (English and French) as well as a Dutch, English, German, and Scandinavian variant transcription of the name Katherine (English). — In other words,… Read more »
I also used to resist the ‘Karen’ moniker, ‘Sarahs’ seemed more appropriate – for much the same reasons as yours – but The Great Hoax of 2020 aka The Scamdemic has changed my mind. The vast majority of grassroots-level ‘enforcers’ of all these insane ‘rules’ and regulations are White, middle-class women of Boomer age and their (sometimes younger) butchdyke sidekicks. They are not soccer mams (often childless), they are most certainly NOT anti-vaxx, in fact, they are very fond of doctors, hospitals and anything having to do with drugs – prescription or other – and most of them are in their mid-50s and beyond. The oldest Xers are currently 55, Gen Boomer = 56-75. I have often wondered what happened to that generation. They fought ‘The Man’, tried VERY hard… Read more »
Katherine is a feminine name, which comes from the Greek name Aikaterine (Αικατερίνη). The -h- was introduced 16c., probably a folk etymology from Greek katharos “pure” (see catharsis). The initial Greek vowel is preserved in Russian form Ekaterina.
Why are people shy to admit that whites are supreme beings in this world :D
Karen’s are actually pro vaxx.
Rees A.: Karen’s are actually pro vaxx.
—
Sure. And Rees’s are actually peanutbutter cups.
There is a huge difference between those races whose lineage left Africa 70,000 years ago and negroes. The major exception are the Australian aborigines which probably went straight to Australia.
The problem that arose with Molyneaux, is typical of asymmetric Pseudo-Nations (They resemble but are not), a Nation (Birth-Earth-Blood-Ancestral) must share Bio-Ethnocentric, Socio-Cultural, Spiritual values in common. The Semitic parasite that governs directly attacks the identity values of nations (forced diversity, open borders), thus undermining its victim to control and drain. I said it before, separate isolate the problem and rescue and protect the healthy. It is time for action and not to cry over the milk already spilled.
Society and culture are both racial constructs. Race is the spring that produces both. No stream will rise higher than its source. A superior race produces or is capable of producing a superior culture and society. Personally I consider complexity a sign of a superior society and culture since the division of labor found in complexity tends in the long term to permit greater adaptation to changing historical circumstances. Complex societies and cultures also tend to be highly productive which increases carrying capacity of the habitat and therefore permit greater numbers and genetic diversity. Just as the greater the number of folds in the brain leads to larger surface area and greater intelligence, complexity in a society and culture leads to more marginal adaptations. Mises was wrong about a great… Read more »
I thought Stefan Molyneux is Jewish.
There are some writings saying that.
Why does he need to say he is not a White Supremacist.
He seems to be the same as Ben Shapiro, but the jews haven’t denounced them as self-hating jews, so you have to wonder.
He believes in Race & IQ. Isn’t that enough to be one?
You don’t have to believe that Whites are superior to other races, only different and special, therefore needing their own living space. I believe that’s the NA’s position and it’s the right one, for White survival and growth. That’s not White Supremacy, which did exist as Jim Crow laws, which were a flawed solution to a separation question. On Race & IQ, presenting relevant passages from the Bell Curve or equivalent are enough to get you fired or suspended from social media now. They are the classic “Hate Facts”. This is what happened to Stefan on Twitter. The Bell Curve was a controversial but mainstream book issued in 1994, still sold on Amazon. Since then, the West has been continuously pulled further left on race, largely at the hands of… Read more »
I doubt that he considers himself a Jew, though he did hint at some amount of Jewish ancestry (or possibly just a marriage connection and not actual ancestry) in a video he made a number of years ago and has never mentioned it since. I do see him as one who thinks himself clever because he doesn’t tell all the truth he knows.
Whether he thinks himself clever or not is irrelevant. I doubt he – or
anyone in such a position – thinks of it in that way. The point is that
when things break down, and they ARE breaking down, does he side
up, WILL he side up with us, and be explicitly pro-White. Or will he
hem and haw, explain, and virtue signal like all the common fools.
If he does, he is USELESS, and I think that will be the case.
He must have said or thought or had the capacity to think something that they might possibly not like.
In response to the final paragraph of this essay, about Whites not owing it to non-Whites the benefit of ruling over them, I note that in 1903, the Rockefeller-founded and -funded General Education Board started its first project. It was to survey and report on conditions of negro and White schools. Of course, the negro schools were not nearly as nice as the White schools. The GEB invested many dollars in negro schools and also encouraged the local Whites to help improve the negro schools, which of course being the soft touches that Whites are, they did, an early instance of Whites shouldering the burden of improvement of a different race. Here we are in 2020, having spent untold millions of tax dollars on programs for black people, and what… Read more »
Susan, if you’re leading up to the point that Whites should unburden themselves of the Black in every way, then I agree!
This will require plenty of organized and intelligently applied activity, and makes it easier said than done. Whites are achievers, if we can put a man on the moon, we can separate ourselves from all others too.
White supremacy is a system by which White men and women founded and built these US, the most powerful and successful country ever to have existed. But today’s negative meaning attached to the term, “White supremacy”, has been created by the real racial supremacists, the jews, for the purpose of taking our homelands away from us, from we, the very people who made them great. As it is taught in their Talmud the purpose of which is to generate hatred for Whites by the other races and enlist these nonwhites as allies in their age old war against the White race. While Whites have no desire to rule over other races, jews seek to subjugate all non-jews, Whites and nonwhites alike, and rule over them like an effendi. To wit: “Goyim… Read more »
White Supremacy – belief that Whites should have rights that non-whites are denied in the same country – leads to discrimination that becomes unseemly object lessons in advancing the less driven. A White-only nation is needed, where excellence is furthered and racial discrimination is unnecessary. See my reply to MichaelR.
Travon, your argument is flawed.
Firstly, Whites are the only people truly capable of building civilisation.
(Egypt, Rome, Greece, etc.)
So, technically “White Supremacy” does not exist. White people are superior to all other peoples, and this is reflected by the natural order of things.
You say that non-whites (or to my mind “non-humans”) are denied rights applicable to whites in the same country. Simply put, non-whites should not even be IN THE SAME COUNTRY.
Sorry, if it seems like I was yelling, but this is a critical point of which you should be well aware.
The existence of non-whites in a White Country is not a right.
It is a privilege.
With Egypt, Rome an Greece, you mean ancient civilizations. There were substantial civilizations in the New World e.g. Inca, and in China e.g. Han Dynasty, which were non-white. They didn’t quite measure up to those of the West, but were nevertheless. What you call non-humans are producing numerous mixed-race children, usually with White female partners. How is that possible genetically or physically? White Supremacy by common definition means Whites blocking non-whites’ equal access to jobs, comparable education facilities, personal freedoms etc. that Whites enjoy, within the same country. It is morally wrong. Of course the only legal discrimination now is against Whites. Racial separatism – separate ethnostates – is the ONLY way to end racial discrimination against ANY group. It will become the most readily accepted of resolutions to racial… Read more »
Firstly, the Quechua people of Peru, (of whom the Inca was Emperor) did not build their great structures. If you ask them nowadays, they do not know who built those walls and fortresses, nor can they replicate the accomplishment. The Quechua people used to believe in their great god Viracocha – who had fair skin, and came from the sea, and taught these people all that they know. Secondly, crossbreeding is possible with many kinds of species. A horse can mate with a donkey. The offspring is neither horse, nor donkey, but something in-between. My point is that it is quite possible for similar, yet separate and distinct species to interbreed. In my example, the offspring my look like a horse, or a donkey, but it is actually neither. It… Read more »
I never said that White supremacy is the belief Whites should have rights that are denied nonwhites. Didn’t you read my comment? This is exactly the kind of nonsense you have stated, that my comment dispels. This is what the enemies of White people claim White supremacy is. I explained how the term, White Supremacy, is used falsely in order to smear Whites. There is no systemic racism against nonwhites as they claim. They’re victims of their own stupidity and greed. In actuality non-whites do have special rights and privileges that rank and file Whites cannot access. The US government is busy with anti-white pandering to nonwhites and giving them more and more while at the same time, they take from Whites. So I don’t know what comment you’re responding… Read more »
I’m using the common, cuck media (e.g. Fox) definition of White Supremacy because it is the one normie Whites are most familiar with. We all know there is legal discrimination against Whites now in many areas – employment, newsworthiness, school admission and scholarships, etc. But ANY racial discrimination is wrong, and to redpill Whites to the separatist cause, you can’t use terms that are confusing, such as saying White Supremacy is Whites being superior and therefore justified in discriminating against non-whites. No normie will agree to that, initially.
Power and success are two different things…the first is true of the USA, the second is not as Germany between 1933 and 1943 was the most successful European state of the aeon…however, as a mere proxy of Israel, America’s power is actually the lowest ebb of any historical European states power given the unhappiness of the average (Anglo/)American which stooges must always suffer…if America has a mission it would be to institute National-Socialism in Europe, meaning a social revolution in America first which would be fought every step of the way by the Chosen parasite who has spread the new Weimar worldwide to stifle just such a revolt of the Europeans.
Molly-Nuts is a jew gatekeeper and whites fell for his deceptions.
Yes he is, and I wonder why so few people have come to realise this yet. His narrative has been credibly exposed as anti-white deception many times over, yet any sensible person watching his videos could have deduced him as a con for themselves without needing it pointed out.
Yes, I thought it was common knowledge that Molyneux is a Jew, after all it was he himself that said on a video (circa 2015) that he was Jewish. IIRC it was a talk he gave at a school/university.
The 20th century must reevaluate the concept of “training” and “education” Heredity and the Schallmeier Selection was the most important work in the field of eugenics until 1922, when the Foundations of the Teachings on Human Heredity and Racial Hygiene by Baur, Fischer and Lenz were published … … So, even before the beginning of our century, the ideological world of the future was making its way. For him, the problem of “human improvement”, which the last century tried to solve through education and improvement of the environment, is due to hereditary inclinations and selection. If the 19th century believed in the “progress of humanity” according to the decisions of the parliamentary majority, then, for the 20th century, the rise of a person is only possible as a result of… Read more »
The Hegelian Dialectic of public discussion on Jewmedia becoming ever smaller.
Molyneaux taking one for the tribe lol.
I agree with the author, the white race has helped other races enough already. Charity begins at home. Let’s help our own if we help anyone.
Fact is, history is, at bottom, the record of one peoples displacing (conquering and removing) another. And this will ALWAYS be the case. And alas, IT IS OCCURRING RIGHT BEFORE OUR EYES RIGHT HERE IN AMERIKA. And, in fact, in all white nations around the globe. Is it not? If whites ever recover from the nightmare, febrile dream of self-removal, and behave as their forebears did who conquered the world, then we may begin again to do what I have implied at the beginning of my comment. And I seem to be the only WN (as far as I have seen in my limited survey) who will admit this reality. Cowardice is a very tenacious disorder of the spirit. To recap, remove…or be removed. Wonder if this comment will be… Read more »
‘East Asian genes’…and what would these be? Japans Ainu? China’s Tokarian’s, Ruozhi and Huns? Uigurs? the Saka/Scyth Buddha, none of whom were Mongoloid? The Far East is the Old West.